Give this woman a cookie!. tags are male privileges.. I think she deserves a sandwich
Home Funny Pictures YouTube Funny Videos Funny GIFs Text/Links Channels Search

Give this woman a cookie!

tags are male privileges

Views: 67651
Favorited: 201
Submitted: 08/18/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to weenieandthebutt E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend


Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Anonymous commenting is allowed
User avatar #427 - anonymouzx (08/19/2013) [-]
I still wonder why call it feminism. How are you gonna be for both sides and call yourself a feminist? It would also be stupid to call yourself a masculinist.
User avatar #417 - zarumai (08/19/2013) [-]
Thank you so damn much. Who ever this girl is, please make the other people in the 1st world countries think the way you do. Holy **** , a girl who actually understands it. Omfg, i thought they didn't exist.
#416 - tbagbandit (08/19/2013) [-]
So let me get this straight, I have to listen to bitches talk about feminism where it isn't my concern now?  I mean if bitches don't want treatment from 1300 B.C. then move the 						****					 away.
So let me get this straight, I have to listen to bitches talk about feminism where it isn't my concern now? I mean if bitches don't want treatment from 1300 B.C. then move the **** away.
#423 to #416 - skydiving (08/19/2013) [-]
Dude it's not that simple.
#426 to #423 - tbagbandit (08/19/2013) [-]
And its not that simple to just sit in another country, and do nothing but 						*******					 talk about whats happening in another.  You wanna help someone,  ACTUALLY 						*******					 do it!
And its not that simple to just sit in another country, and do nothing but ******* talk about whats happening in another. You wanna help someone, ACTUALLY ******* do it!
#415 - joshkroger (08/19/2013) [-]
She needs basic human rights that applies to everyone not just women
User avatar #428 to #415 - timmywankenobi (08/19/2013) [-]
then maybe feminists should stop fighting against men having the same human rights as women in the 1st world before they decide they are moral aribiters for the whole world ?
#422 to #415 - madconductor **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #409 - bledoprodz (08/19/2013) [-]
this image says the complete opposite:
User avatar #407 - commanderbunbun (08/19/2013) [-]
being a femanist because of a ****** ........why not just be "anti ****** "?
#414 to #407 - mananas ONLINE (08/19/2013) [-]
Because those ******* are caused by a misogynistic society who gives women close to no rights.
I do hate feminazis, and see feminism in developed countries as something stupid an unnecessary.
#413 to #407 - Edensfire (08/19/2013) [-]
Because ****** could be of both genders. She was ******** because she wanted rights as a woman.
#405 - poljento (08/19/2013) [-]
The fact that things are worse off somewhere else doesn't really change the fact that there are things to be changed in the first world countries as well. Moreover, your own culture is much easier to change.
User avatar #404 - princethunderballs (08/19/2013) [-]
I can guarantee that the people in the middle-east will not adopt feminism, in any way shape or form. By the way, how the **** is feminism going to change the customs of another country? Feminism is nowhere near equipped to doing something like that. I'm not an anti-feminist or a masculinist or anything, I'm just pretty sure that it won't happen.
#424 to #404 - skydiving (08/19/2013) [-]
Feminism allowed women to be considered people and not property, and also pushed women to be allowed to vote. Though there are tons of stupid people out there, feminism will push women's rights forward. In the future, hopefully there will be no need for feminism.
#402 - anonymous (08/19/2013) [-]
yes its true its worse in third world countries but that doesnt mean the problem doesnt exist closer to home either...gender inequality in the workplace is still is very real thing. Objectifying women in the media still exists. Actually one of the main reasons why things aren't changing anymore for women in most places is because people think the problem has been resolved and stupid shallow women or what not need to stop complaining well that is the same state of mind as the people in third world countries, that there is no problem so shut up...

anyway just thought id share some stuff ive learned in university however useless it has proven to be.

dont mind the red thumbs, i know i rambled
#410 to #402 - tacolishous (08/19/2013) [-]
Don't try to argue something when your moral ground is so low that Marianas Trench looks like the sun.
Don't try to argue something when your moral ground is so low that Marianas Trench looks like the sun.
User avatar #406 to #402 - timmywankenobi (08/19/2013) [-]
you do know that men are objectified too right and that women have more rights then men, and get far more lienient criminal sentencing simply because they have ******* and if you were born with a ****** you are 95% more likely to get alimony and child support and custody of children even if you abuse drugs or have dangerous friends or you ex has proof you beat or abuse the children. also did you know thsat the womens studies department don't do any fact checking when they write their text books and often try to pass off hypothisis as fact. and womens studies professors are almost all mouth peices for the radicals in charge of the movement and they are violently opposed to opening shelter or clinics for sexually or physicall assulted men which are sorely needed. yet they claim they want equality ? they are self serving hypcrites.
User avatar #396 - timmywankenobi (08/19/2013) [-]
feminists is typical tribalist behaviour. The members close ranks against anyone who threatens the tribe’s power, uniting against anyone who’s seen to compete against it or undermine its influence, seeking the authority and justification that comes with inclusion under the big umbrella, in this case the sisterhood. But lo and behold, they disperse into a crowd of individuals with no responsibility to one another the moment you call them to task for their ideology’s damaging and hateful belief system. This is the general hypocrisy of any tribalist system; whether they are a unity or a group of unrelated individuals depends entirely on what best serves their purpose at any given time, and the cardinal rule is that you *never* turn against the tribe. Hence, you will never see a condemnation of the tribe from its members, no matter what it’s done; the best you can hope for, if they really can’t get away with waving the whole thing off, or if it truly discomforts them, is a few individuals being sacrificed to preserve the power and influence of the group: “those are the bad apples, we’re not like them! They bring disrepute to the good name of (insert here)”. Hence “No true Scotsman” arguments or the insistence that “it’s wrong to judge us all by the actions of some (even though we clearly and unambiguously support and silently condone those actions, and at other times insist upon being seen as a unified whole)”. What matters is that the tribe goes on, the tribe is good, the tribe is powerful. Under this system of ethics, there is no universality, no objectivity. If it benefits the tribe it is good, because the tribe is good. If it harms the tribe, it is bad. You doing something to me and me doing the same thing to you are not equal acts; the first is an outrage, the second justified.

User avatar #400 to #396 - timmywankenobi (08/19/2013) [-]
Feminism sets itself up as “the tribe of women”, in competition against the supposed (and non-existent) tribe of men. As ever in tribalist conflicts, the other tribe (here, males) is simultaneously powerful/threatening and yet inferior. I honestly believe we need to understand feminism in this way; it’s that natural in-built group preference that females (and only females) have, stoked by a quasi-Marxist perceptual structure that casts that ingroup in eternal conflict with another tribe, which has supposedly been oppressing and exploiting them. Why do feminists not see a problem with any of the obvious and blatant disadvantages suffered by males, e.g. those mentioned in the article? Because to tribalist ethics, that truly *isn’t* the same thing as females being somehow disadvantaged. If it hurts women – those of the tribe, so to speak – then it’s bad. If it hurts men – those not of the tribe – it doesn’t merit response. Added to this mindset the ongoing tribal conflict (because feminism is not merely female tribalism, it’s the harnessing of female tribalism to an ever-lasting lopsided tribal feud with the supposed Tribe of Males (AKA “The Patriarchy”)), and you have it taken as given that if members of the tribe are disadvantaged, it’s the malicious actions of the other tribe to blame. If the other tribe’s members are disadvantaged, that either means nothing or is a *good thing*. Some people say that feminist attitudes to male disadvantage is part of some misguided desire for “revenge” – as in, they believe that women were an oppressed class treated maliciously, so they now want to treat men in the same way. I’m not convinced. I see it as something more primal – the misfortunes of the rival tribe are simply not something you’re going to care about, other than perhaps to smirk in satisfaction and then go on increasing your own security and status.

User avatar #401 to #400 - timmywankenobi (08/19/2013) [-]
I’d suggest this be kept in mind: feminism is a one-way tribal feud being waged on a tribe that doesn’t exist. They insist that they don’t hate men, they hate Patriarchy. They don’t hate the individuals, they just want to destroy the competing tribe, to break the power of that tribe. The tribe which isn’t there and never was. And the supposed members of which have not fought back because they didn’t even know they’d been cast as players in a tribal feud.

Most coffee-shop feminist women defend feminism out of reflex, because for all their half-hearted ill-thought-out mumblings about “equality”, they know and relate to feminism as the tribe of women, and they claim membership in that tribe, however loosely. Even if they never actually shelter under the umbrella of feminism, they know it’s there and will react negatively to seeing it threatened. Hence the wishy-washy assertions of “we’re not all like that” or “well, I consider myself a feminist because I believe in equality” (with the implicit argument that *therefore* feminism is simply about equality). More women have little or nothing to do with feminism than it might seem, but they won’t turn around and fire into the heart of it, because however loosely the tribe still has its grip on them; they are part of it.

User avatar #394 - Zyklone (08/19/2013) [-]
User avatar #392 - derpyhoovezz (08/19/2013) [-]
Pretty much she is saying people in the Towel head countries need feminism
When honestly, they are just fine with the way there culture is (Most of them at least)

While people like this are trying to shove there Culture down peoples thoughts for being diffrent
#375 - redtable (08/19/2013) [-]
( ( ( _ _ _
'. ___ .' ||_ '\-//`
' (> <) ' (o o) (o o)
#370 - sippay (08/19/2013) [-]
Give this woman a cookie?
.. No
Give this cookie a woman!
User avatar #367 - icanpaintyay (08/19/2013) [-]
no, no, no. its equality you need. equality!
User avatar #388 to #367 - Zydratejunkie **User deleted account** (08/19/2013) [-]
Original feminism was about equality. It's only modern western feminism that is about female dominance.

This girl is arguing against modern westernized feminism, because she, like every female who isn't ******* insane, knows that modern feminism is ****** up.
User avatar #441 to #388 - icanpaintyay (08/20/2013) [-]
well, im grad you told me. i dont like to judge.
#395 to #388 - bajathegreat **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #403 to #395 - Zydratejunkie **User deleted account** (08/19/2013) [-]
You were clearly attacked by 10 ******* insane modern feminists. And it is completely ******* wrong that no one would take your case. But in the middle east and other similarly run countries, feminism (as it was originally intended) is still required.

A good friend of mine went to a local pub one evening, when he left he was followed by 4 middle aged women. They proceeded to ***** and hit on him. He repeatedly told them to stop, and tried to make them leave. When he tried to file a police report for sexual assault he was ignored by the police. When he brought his story to the news, a journalist wrote a story about how he "probably enjoyed himself".

It's ****** up, and it's wrong, but we can't fix these problems by bashing women back to patriarchal roles, it will only swing back to the current state of affairs (and worse) like a pendulum. We need to fix these problems by educating the populace about social issues, and raising a better society. Hopefully one that won't stand for these sexist (in both senses) happenings.
#362 - dessydegreemurder has deleted their comment [-]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)