New Weapons. .. Reminds me of Sharknado.


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#2 - heafi (07/21/2013) [-]
Reminds me of Sharknado.
Reminds me of Sharknado.
#58 to #2 - ChristopherLloyd has deleted their comment [-]
#98 to #2 - upcha **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #38 to #2 - scarmanagent (07/22/2013) [-]
Someone should edit it so it says " **** Everything"
#3 to #2 - Drfish (07/21/2013) [-]
That is clearly a piece of filming history and my favorite cheesy scifi movie up to date.
That is clearly a piece of filming history and my favorite cheesy scifi movie up to date.
#54 - anon (07/22/2013) [-]
Actual Saints Row 4 Gameplay
User avatar #7 - nylak (07/21/2013) [-]
PETA would ruin this for everyone.
#45 to #7 - alderus has deleted their comment [-]
#19 - tjflash (07/21/2013) [-]
I had an idea for a similar weapon .Imagine with me if you will, from the side of the enemy....
>United states army is retreating from our glorious attack.
>Praise foreign deity for this win.
>Look up. Something in the distance
>Silhouette of some sort of machine on the horizon.
>Distant booms, followed by low whistles
> Sound gets louder as you see missiles headed towards you.
>Hit the ground, hope they miss
>Massive chaos as they home in and everything around you is destroyed
> Wall behind you is the last to be hit. Massive destruction but no explosion.
> Was it a dud?
>The dust clears.
>There, Sticking proudly out of the the rubble, is a sea of whale Penises.
>Surrender immediately, lest you be impaled by the next round of dicks.
User avatar #21 to #19 - newforomador (07/21/2013) [-]
While I don't quite think exactly that would be good, using animals as projectiles would be a really good idea. Imagine the fear that would be induced into the enemies if we sent the dead bodies of their army hurtling at high speeds at them. Even though this would be a really good tactic, so many people would get butthurt that it would cause the markets for butt cream to skyrocket and there would be nationwide rage from people who don't understand tactics in war. Also, I know what you said was a joke but it gave me the opportunity to say this.
User avatar #33 to #21 - dejaysone (07/22/2013) [-]
it's not that they dont understand tactics in war simply think its a cruel and disrespectful way to treat another human being
User avatar #34 to #33 - newforomador (07/22/2013) [-]
Okay, you are right, I got a little offensive at that part. But I do think that even if it is disrespectful, there is no denying the effect it would have on the enemy.
User avatar #35 to #34 - dejaysone (07/22/2013) [-]
if little jimmy from third grade came rushing at me i'd probably **** my pants a bit
#92 to #35 - anon (07/22/2013) [-]
User avatar #86 to #33 - linktheherooftime (07/22/2013) [-]
Wouldn't shooting somebody in the face be disrespectful as well though?
User avatar #87 to #86 - dejaysone (07/22/2013) [-]
that is war
disrespectful is shooting me in the face and then shooting me at my friends
User avatar #88 to #87 - linktheherooftime (07/22/2013) [-]
It may be war, but It is also disrespectful in my own opinion. But I'm also a firm believer in pacifism.
User avatar #25 to #21 - tjflash (07/21/2013) [-]
Ahh, you are thinking of medieval biological warfare. In olden times they would hurl dead bodies and animals via catapults over castle walls. Said corpses would explode, and spread disease in the trapped quarters. Th, sickening or killing those inside. They did a bit about it on Deadliest Warrior
#5 - dissectedtesticle (07/21/2013) [-]
All the 			****		 aside, it could actually work. Bee catapults.
All the **** aside, it could actually work. Bee catapults.
User avatar #6 to #5 - dissectedtesticle (07/21/2013) [-]
Unless the enemy has flamethrowers or any other quick method of dispatching the swarm, that is.
#9 to #5 - yomommabinshoppin (07/21/2013) [-]
I was thinking more along the lines of wasps, usually more painful.
#11 to #9 - SunilCCXXXVII **User deleted account** (07/21/2013) [-]
True, but Locust.. if it's war and you want to defeat your enemy, not just annoy them.. starve them out.

I'm a sadistic bastard and favour slow painful starvation.
#12 to #11 - yomommabinshoppin (07/21/2013) [-]
Why not both? Locusts to destroy the food sources, wasps to kill the people. Because enough wasp stings can kill anybody
#14 to #12 - SunilCCXXXVII **User deleted account** (07/21/2013) [-]
And bullet ants.
#13 to #12 - SunilCCXXXVII **User deleted account** (07/21/2013) [-]
#15 to #13 - yomommabinshoppin (07/21/2013) [-]
Yeah or maybe them big ******* flying things about the size of a mans palm, the ones that look like wasps but, you know, ******* huge.
#27 to #15 - daniboyi (07/21/2013) [-]
Did you two just invent a new warfare? Like insect warfare or something like that?   
No matter what I approve of it.
Did you two just invent a new warfare? Like insect warfare or something like that?
No matter what I approve of it.
#49 to #27 - yomommabinshoppin (07/22/2013) [-]
Well think of it like this, due to military funding and technologies, we can have genetically enhanced locusts and wasps swarming the enemy, maybe finding some sort of hormone that will cause the insects to attack, essentially painting a target specifically for the insects to attack. Then we drop crates full of locusts and huge ass wasps and the crates open on impact. The violent change in momentum will piss them off, so not only do they have a target painted for them, they are pissed off too. Also what is more terrifying than a ******** of insects coming to rape you and your resources?
User avatar #96 to #49 - daniboyi (07/22/2013) [-]
nothing. Nothing is more terrifying than that.
#101 to #96 - yomommabinshoppin (07/23/2013) [-]
#20 to #5 - lordraine ONLINE (07/21/2013) [-]
It kind of did, once upon a time. It was one of several tactics used to worry away at people defending a castle that could not be breached conventionally (and there were designs sturdy enough that this was the case).

In addition to launching beehives, catapults were also used to throw flaming rags, garbage, and rotting corpses, all with the intent of spreading sickness, pain, and fear through the enemy.

Sieges were no joke.
#22 to #20 - dissectedtesticle (07/21/2013) [-]
I head about the flaming rags and garbage but corpses? That's pretty brutal.
I head about the flaming rags and garbage but corpses? That's pretty brutal.
#23 to #22 - lordraine ONLINE (07/21/2013) [-]
It was. They did the corpses to spread disease and scare people. Another popular tactic was going around and beheading all the bodies of the enemy soldiers, and "giving them their men back" via catapult. That was less about disease, and mostly about intimidation. Bonus points if someone on the field that was recognizable or important died that day.
User avatar #52 to #22 - snowshark (07/22/2013) [-]
Games and generally all forms of narrative depict sieges as epic battles on huge scales but the simple truth of the matter is that most sieges comprised of bringing more people to the party than the defender had and then sitting around the castle for a while, waiting for them to run out of food. Disease and fire and such was only used if the armies didn't plan to occupy the castle afterwards. Basically all they wanted was the people inside to leave so they could move in.

A lot of the time it was about sending a message or regicide or other nasty things but most of the time when it came to conflicts about borders and such it just paid to leave the castle, gates and all, in-tact and just wait the other people to death. Most lords would surrender their castles sooner or later.
#65 to #20 - gorapeacactus **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#24 - daniboyi (07/21/2013) [-]
bees are quite an idea. I mean how would you defeat bees? gas the place? flamethrower? That would cause more damage to themselves than others.
#57 - captainwow (07/22/2013) [-]
Boy wish I could make something like this.

#63 to #57 - jaak (07/22/2013) [-]
For a second I thought this was a "This comic sux" comment, almost thumbed down.

#75 to #57 - splyt ONLINE (07/22/2013) [-]
you made tha buttermilk comics right? cuz when i looked at this post i totally thought "i've seen this style before..."
User avatar #81 to #75 - captainwow (07/22/2013) [-]
Yeah, that was me. I made the drug raptor.
#100 to #81 - splyt ONLINE (07/22/2013) [-]
then i'd like to thank you kindly, i loved those nd have em saved cuz i like to reread em every so often. you are a blessing, good sir
#66 to #57 - delrio (07/22/2013) [-]
Well, you behaved more calmly than I did...
#69 - Powerbunny (07/22/2013) [-]
But why must you steal comics from captainwow without giving credit.
#62 - blackscales (07/22/2013) [-]
Someone at Valve just got excited
Someone at Valve just got excited
#41 - ThexD (07/22/2013) [-]
this was funnier when captainwow posted it...
#42 to #41 - anon (07/22/2013) [-]
LOL I read captainwows normal but thn I realized that captain wow posted it and I ROFLED 10x harder!
#43 to #42 - ThexD (07/22/2013) [-]
User avatar #36 - protomanrulez (07/22/2013) [-]
Don't steal captainwow's comics.
#61 to #60 - KevinPutt (07/22/2013) [-]
Last time this was posted this is what I made.
#97 - tealkangaroo ONLINE (07/22/2013) [-]
Hey, captainwow, this silly goat didn't give you credit
#56 - delrio (07/22/2013) [-]
You stupid, ignorant **** .
I'm going to find where you live and skull **** you.
I'm serious, you waste of human resources, I will kill you in front of your mother and father.
I will use your entrails as decorations for my ******* Christmas tree, you faggot
User avatar #64 to #56 - Mortuus (07/22/2013) [-]
Would you like to talk about your day?
User avatar #67 to #64 - delrio (07/22/2013) [-]
**** you, **** your computer, **** your chair, **** your table, **** your mom, **** your dad, **** your pet, **** your clothes

and, most of all

**** you
User avatar #68 to #67 - Mortuus (07/22/2013) [-]
Good, let it out. Let the anger flow out of you.
User avatar #55 - thatnerdyguy (07/22/2013) [-]
Nice captainwow repost.
#84 - fishinyourface ONLINE (07/22/2013) [-]
#76 - bvsfang (07/22/2013) [-]
Killing me won't bring back your damn honey
User avatar #94 to #76 - thepandaking (07/22/2013) [-]
"we might not be able to protect our honey, but you can be damned sure we'll avenge it."
User avatar #72 - makotoitou (07/22/2013) [-]
Sharknado's sequel.
#74 to #72 - alZii has deleted their comment [-]
#37 - curveball (07/22/2013) [-]
Release the dogs with bees in their mouths that when they bark they shoot bees at you.
Release the dogs with bees in their mouths that when they bark they shoot bees at you.
#40 to #37 - articulate ONLINE (07/22/2013) [-]
Bees in their mouth?
Bees in their mouth?
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)