Upload
Login or register
Refresh Comments
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#62 - pimpinboobnugget
Reply +1
(07/20/2013) [-]
I would like ONE GOOD reason why homosexuals are bad.
#121 to #62 - lumpymandude
Reply -2
(07/20/2013) [-]
This is the biggest trap post. If you respond, you will be hit with a torrent of red and 15 comments why you are actually retarded
#118 to #62 - bradonloch ONLINE
Reply 0
(07/20/2013) [-]
They keep buying all of the stylish clothes before us straight people even get a chance to look at them before they become part of an ever-expanding wardrobe of fabulousness.
#91 to #62 - douevensax
Reply +1
(07/20/2013) [-]
They're so gay.
#71 to #62 - roliga
Reply -14
(07/20/2013) [-]
If you took five seconds to actually read the Bible you'd find that no one ever says "homosexuals are bad people because they are homosexuals". They only don't want gay marriage because the legal term for marriage is pretty much derived from the christian ideal of marriage, then one should not necessarily desecrate that via government decree, as that would be government affecting religious practice, further destroying the separation of church and state since marriage was adopted in the beginning. Also if you legalize homoesexuality then you have to start recognizing other forms of relations such as polygamy, inter species relations (horse x human weird ****), etc. The government should have no role in marriage whatsoever in all reality.



Boom
#97 to #71 - traceirving
Reply +5
(07/20/2013) [-]
'if you legalize homoesexuality then you have to start recognizing other forms of relations such as polygamy, inter species relations'
Not sure if you're trolling or if you just are honestly that beyond saving. Are you serious?
Well hopefully you can take solace in the fact that people like you are the reason the church gets a bad name.
I have no problem with religion, but you personally are a cunt. Good day.
#101 to #97 - roliga
Reply -1
(07/20/2013) [-]
alright
#85 to #71 - gilfhunter
Reply 0
(07/20/2013) [-]
Homosexuality will lead to bestiality being recognized? Okay, when animals develop the sentience and language skills on par with their human counterparts to the level that they can consent to a relationship ( And have people actually understand that consent) I will be more likely to believe that....
#82 to #71 - zanea
Reply +1
(07/20/2013) [-]
Inter species relations will never be legal because a relationship requires two consenting entities and since animals cannot speak for themselves it is considered an act of cruelty to pursue romantic relationships... polygamy is perfectly fine in other cultural contexts. Since marriage is a fairly universal concept they wouldn't be "desecrating" anything other than conflicting with christian values( boo friggin hoo).
#96 to #82 - alexanderh ONLINE
Reply 0
(07/20/2013) [-]
Actually, bestiality is legal in Denmark. The same rules apply to animals as they do to humans; as long as it isn't rape, and neither party is a minor, it is legal. And we also have gay marriage (even in christian churches. Some priests do refuse to marry gay couples, but gay couples can get married).
As far as I know, the line between consensual bestiality and rape is that if the animal doesn't struggle, it's consensual.

I don't know if inter-species marriage is legal here, but if it is, I believe it is a "town hall wedding", where you go to the local town hall and sign some papers, legally marrying you. I'm pretty sure you can't marry an animal in a church, but I wouldn't be that surprised if you could.
#99 to #96 - zanea
Reply -1
(07/20/2013) [-]
Thats still frickin cruelty! an animal can be trained not to struggle, does that mean it likes to be ******? absolutely not
#102 to #99 - alexanderh ONLINE
Reply +2
(07/20/2013) [-]
So can humans. If a human is conditioned not to struggle, does it mean it is consensual? Of course not.
I'm just saying that, in Denmark, it's legal as long as the animal is consenting. How that is determined, I'm not sure. But it is legal.

And no, I don't believe it is cruelty if the animal in question is enjoying it. Just as I wouldn't say that it is cruel to a human woman to have consenting sex with her, especially not if she enjoys it.
#78 to #71 - Furubatsu
Reply 0
(07/20/2013) [-]
If the "ideal" Christian marriages were still happening my father would've been legally allowed to sell me at 12 years old for two goats and a camel.
#98 to #78 - Shramin
Reply +1
(07/20/2013) [-]
Christian ideal or Bible ideal?
Just asking since the old testament would be what Judaism follows while the new testament, is what formed Christianity, with Christ as the figure head.

Not defending religion, just asking to make sure the "facts" are correct.
#172 to #98 - Furubatsu
Reply 0
(07/20/2013) [-]
Jeudo-Christian Abrahamic scripture bible.

And I'm not bashing religion (I'm Catholic) but you have to admit that there are bits that are a little out-dated.
#182 to #172 - Shramin
Reply 0
(07/20/2013) [-]
There is a lot that is outdated, but that's a discussion for another time.
#79 to #78 - roliga
Reply -3
(07/20/2013) [-]
I didn't say it's the direct ideal, I said it's derived. Read closer next time.
#86 to #79 - gilfhunter
Reply +1
(07/20/2013) [-]
The concept of marriage as a legal entity predates the bible by nearly a thousand years.
#87 to #86 - roliga
Reply -2
(07/20/2013) [-]
Marriage as a concept does, the US legal definition of marriage on the other hand does not.
#89 to #87 - gilfhunter
Reply 0
(07/20/2013) [-]
That definition was laid down when man and woman marriages were the only ones that didnt get you shunned..We are alot smarter since then. Also, marriages at that time were rarely for love, often to gain some kind of leverage of benifits between the parties. The idea of marriage then, and the idea of marriage now (Wanting to attenpt to spend the rest of your life with someone because you love them) are different altogether.
#66 to #62 - Furubatsu
Reply +7
(07/20/2013) [-]
They steal all the hot men!
#76 to #66 - mechaemperor
Reply +1
(07/20/2013) [-]
The ARE the hot men.