Upload
Login or register
Refresh Comments
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#39 - kadish
Reply +18
(07/20/2013) [-]
Idk if it's actually Jesus but...
"'If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads." Leviticus 20:13
I am not a christian or ANYTHING like that, I just want to say that it actually is in the bible.
#195 to #39 - blanketandpillow
Reply 0
(07/21/2013) [-]
Didn't he say a bunch of weird things that we ignore?
#179 to #39 - ILikeGreen
Reply 0
(07/20/2013) [-]
its doesnt say "sexual relations"
Its says "lie" or "lay"
after a couple hundreds of years things get messed up in translation.
#190 to #179 - kadish
Reply 0
(07/20/2013) [-]
You are the second to say that, but it's simply a differen't translation, if we go to the root it's "Qui dormierit cum masculo coitu femineo", in which dormierit works both for lay or to have sexual relations
#229 to #190 - ILikeGreen
Reply 0
(07/21/2013) [-]
I'm just saying translation is lost over the years.
#157 to #39 - Kairyuka
Reply +1
(07/20/2013) [-]
I'm pretty sure the bible actually says "If a man LAYS with a man as one does with a woman", and that's not necessarily a sexual reference, because of all the other misogyny in Leviticus, it might just mean "Don't treat a man like you'd treat a woman". That's my five cents.
#162 to #157 - anon
Reply 0
(07/20/2013) [-]
From the New Testament, Romans 1:26-27
"For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet."
#164 to #162 - Kairyuka
Reply +1
(07/20/2013) [-]
Now that's a whole different passage entirely, and that one seems more clear about it. Thanks anon
#173 to #164 - anon
Reply 0
(07/20/2013) [-]
No problem Funnyjunk stranger.
#92 to #39 - douevensax
Reply 0
(07/20/2013) [-]
U realize leviticus is full of old laws that dont apply today
#160 to #92 - anon
Reply 0
(07/20/2013) [-]
In the Christian view, yes. And though Jesus himself never really brought up the issue, homosexuality is condemned in the New Testament (Romans).
#72 to #39 - lolfire
Reply +4
(07/20/2013) [-]
#151 to #72 - vuican
Reply +2
(07/20/2013) [-]
Good news if you're into your daughter though!
#111 to #72 - theturkeyburger
Reply +2
(07/20/2013) [-]
I've counted 3 contradictions so far, any more?
#75 to #72 - kirluu
Reply +5
(07/20/2013) [-]
"13. Tearing your clothes (10:6)"
#70 to #39 - joeyisheres
Reply 0
(07/20/2013) [-]
Jesus didnt write the bible..
#51 to #39 - anon
Reply 0
(07/20/2013) [-]
Jesus is discussed in the new testament. Old Jewish laws, oral tradition, and philosophy create the old testament and serve as background to the significance to the coming of Christ. Leviticus is known as one of the very intolerant, very outdated, very impractical laws of Judaism that, because of the old testament, is considered by many Christians, and atheists, practices that are upheld by modern Christians. I am Christian, but gay marriage, abortion, euthanasia, and most personal choices that don't impact the safety or health of others. Before people say "being gay isn't a choice" I said gay marriage, not being gay.
#49 to #39 - sexydingonipples ONLINE
Reply 0
(07/20/2013) [-]
Not Jesus Christo, Leviticus is part of the Old Testament, that would be Pappa Christo
#56 to #49 - heartlessrobot
Reply 0
(07/20/2013) [-]
What about the Count of Monte Cristo?
#42 to #39 - anon
Reply 0
(07/20/2013) [-]
well its not against being gay
its just about putting your penis into someones ass