o.o [wtf 2]. .. that fact was not fun at all Good guy Hitler
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (182)
[ 182 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
97 comments displayed.
#8 - sumochef
Reply +274
(07/19/2013) [-]
that fact was not fun at all
that fact was not fun at all
#66 to #8 - strelokkk
Reply -3
(07/19/2013) [-]
It wasn't ?
#80 to #8 - youraverageteenage
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#32 to #8 - usernamecannotload
Reply +2
(07/19/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#75 to #8 - superjail
Reply +5
(07/19/2013) [-]
Are you sure? I seemed to laugh for a good 5 minutes.
#31 to #8 - pepemex
Reply +33
(07/19/2013) [-]
#34 - contradiction
Reply +194
(07/19/2013) [-]
>gas leak
>hitler
#40 to #34 - envinite
Reply +14
(07/19/2013) [-]
#41 to #34 - fapperdefap
Reply +27
(07/19/2013) [-]
Hitlers face when he found out it was a jewisc school
Hitlers face when he found out it was a jewisc school
#3 - rprol
Reply +121
(07/18/2013) [-]
People think that Hitler was the pinnacle of all evil. He really wasn't. Don't get me wrong, I'm not condoning the holocaust or WW2 in anyway but he just simply isn't, well, Hitler himself.
#11 to #3 - enkmaster
Reply -10
(07/19/2013) [-]
Not to mention Hitler was bad at literally everything he did, barring public speaking.
#12 to #11 - captainfuckitall ONLINE
Reply +9
(07/19/2013) [-]
No he wasn't. At all, actually.

Just because someone has done bad things doesn't mean they have to be the worst type of person academically or personally. Even Pol Pot was actually a very compassionate and comical person when he was in the company of friends
#13 to #12 - enkmaster
Reply -15
(07/19/2013) [-]
You misread my post. Or didnt read it at all.

I mean that Hitler was bad at a lot of things.

He was a bad leader.
He was a bad economist
He was a bad military commander.
He wasnt too great at painting, either.

The Allies even had numerous chances to kill the Fuhrer mid-war, but all were given up and plans scrapped because he was making so many mistakes militarily that eliminating him would cost more lives and would just be giving the job to someone who could do it better.
#14 to #13 - captainfuckitall ONLINE
Reply +12
(07/19/2013) [-]
If I didn't read your post, I couldn't have replied with any semblance of context.

He wasn't a bad leader, he was a great leader, he was hands on and inspirational to all of his men.

He wasn't a bad economist. He nearly single-handedly brought Germany out of a worse depression than America was in in less than half of the time.

He was never a military commander, he was a curiour, although he did receive many medals of honour and was considered a war-hero by most of Germany for his bravery and skill. He had personal strategists and generals, while Hitler himself engaged in political stints through-out Germany and all over the rest of Europe

His skills in painting are subjective, as are most creative things. I personally enjoy his paintings, although I wouldn't pay millions for them or be the first to put them in an art gallery

That is utter ******** and you should be ashamed of your own intelligence if you actually believe that crap. Nobody cared for the loss of German lives at the time (kinda like they didn't care for the Japanese when they dropped the bomb), nor did they have 'multiple chances to kill him'. The only person who came close to assassinating Hitler was a German farmer who decided against it. Again, Hitler wasn't the military commander, he just gave 'Go-Aheads' and focused on more political scandals

Perhaps you should do your own research, rather than just watching every American bias WW2 movie and game and deciding you know enough to speak for fact
#74 to #14 - anon
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
"He wasn't a bad economist"

WRONG DUMBASS.

He borrowed ********* of money and the only way he could pay it back was by conquering other countries and taking their money.
#183 to #74 - captainfuckitall ONLINE
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
Economy doesn't work that way, actually
#72 to #14 - anon
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
Do you really believe this? "nearly single-handedly brought Germany out of a worse depression than America was in in less than half of the time" Hitler had geniuses of all kinds around him.
#184 to #72 - captainfuckitall ONLINE
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
Yes I do believe that. I never said he didn't have any help, but he's the one who always gave the 'Go-ahead's and he's the one who had the initiative and came up with (at least the fundamentals) of the bulk of the plans
#15 to #14 - enkmaster
Reply -5
(07/19/2013) [-]
Im not going to try and refute any of your points since im going to bed, except this one:

He wasn't a bad economist. He nearly single-handedly brought Germany out of a worse depression than America was in in less than half of the time.

No. No he didnt. The Minister of Economics from the previous government did. Hitler then took credit for this, and then sacked him. Hitler only started his massive re armament program that worked only as a temporary fix and lead to recession later.

He *was* a military commander. In fact, he led numerous battles on the Eastern Front. Stalihngrad? The defense of Burlin? Hitler had a direct hand in both of those, and the losses were his fault. He wasnt the commander of the Battle of Stalingrad, but the destruction of the 6th Army group *was* his fault. He sacked numerous generals during the final Battle of Berlin for "lying" to him about the destruction of his armies, while he believed they still remained.

I like a few of his paintings, actually.

Finally, there is no need to insult me. I made valid points that, instead of refuting with any actual evidence, you just said "no, you're wrong. Shut up." There is no surer way to let everyone know you have no argument than attempting to insult your opponent.

I am not American, nor do I watch american War movies or play FPS games. My research is based on books.
#16 to #15 - captainfuckitall ONLINE
Reply +3
(07/19/2013) [-]
Do you have any books or links I could go through that support your side of it? As they do not match up with my own research (than again that's not surprising. Nearly everything surrounding the Nazi's is bias one way or another)

I didn't insult you, I just said you should be ashamed of yourself if you actually believe the military had multiple chances to kill Hitler (whom they deemed one of the most evil men in history) and chose not to because "Well, he does a bad job of running the place" (especially considering how the Nazi's quickly became one of the most powerful forces on Earth. He obviously wasn't doing a bad job). Besides, you also had no need to begin your last post with "You misread my post, or didn't read it at all" when I read it just fine

It's ironic that you say your points are valid (despite a lack of evidence on your part), while mine are not (because of a lack of evidence on my part). I didn't say "No, you're wrong. Shut up", I promptly refuted your argument with my own. There is no surer way to know when someone is pompous than by arguing the nature of an argument, rather than the argument itself (I mean, honestly, it's a bit hard to say I have no argument when you literally have just a good as one when I do)

As is mine. And in that case I apologize; I just learned a lot about Nazi's and their actual political and military processes very early on, and yet nearly everyone I came across only listened to propaganda in regards to them (then promptly called me a Nazi when I tried to correct it), so I've just taken the stance of trusting people know more about Nazi's through that same propaganda than through actual research
#24 to #16 - enkmaster
Reply -1
(07/19/2013) [-]
When I said "You misread my post, or didn't read it at all", I didnt mean it as an insult. I may have misread your post, though it seemed to me as if you had taken what I said in a context other than I had meant.

I honestly don't remember many of the books ive read, though I believe some were 'Rise and Fall of the Third Reich' by William L Shirer, 'Killing Hitler: The Plots, The Assassins, and the Dictator Who Cheated Death' by Roger Moorhouse, and another I believe, though I cant remember.
#27 to #24 - captainfuckitall ONLINE
Reply +2
(07/19/2013) [-]
Ah, then I apologize again. It's rather hard to understand nuance and mannerisms in text, I shouldn't be so quick to judge

Thank you very much, I'll be sure to look them up
#28 to #27 - enkmaster
Reply +1
(07/19/2013) [-]
You're very welcome.

#21 to #13 - stickmansam ONLINE
Reply +5
(07/19/2013) [-]
I beg to differ on the painting.
#35 to #13 - hisnameisjake
Reply +1
(07/19/2013) [-]
I heard he was really good at painting
#125 to #3 - anon
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
I'm sure if he didn't start a holocaust, people would see him as a regular, lame dictator, like Mussolini.
#165 to #125 - anon
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
Moar like the greatest German statesman, akin to Von Hindenburg.
#142 to #3 - anon
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
he wasn't evil, he didn't want to do bad. He was a normal guy with friends and family he owned a dog too. He thought his intentions were for the better of the planet, and im sure as hell that if he won, he would've been the hero and we would hear about churchil being evil
#149 to #3 - anon
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
what the **** is going on. "hurr well what hitler did was wrong, but-" ********, saying that hitler was "just following his belief" does not ******* ease what he did to an entire ethnicity of people. He WAS evil. he convinced an entire country to hate and destroy a culture. HE was responsible for the deaths of 80 million people during world war 2.
#171 to #3 - namesboo
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
correct me if im wrong but hitler did not order the murder of the jews he just let it happen
#49 to #3 - isbak
Reply +1
(07/19/2013) [-]
I remember someone saying that Hitler was good, it was the f├╝hrer who was the bad one
#179 to #3 - huttero
Reply +1
(07/19/2013) [-]
"No one is bad, they just do what they think is right"
Hitler, 1745
#6 to #3 - nsfwanon
Reply +2
(07/18/2013) [-]
I agree with you here. I mean what Hitler did was wrong, the genocide of any people isn't something I would condone. But Hitler himself was a man simply following his beliefs, which is something we all do. It was just too bad that his beliefs involved the attempted extermination of an entire religion.
#54 to #6 - anon
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
Hitler did nothing wrong.

Learn it, noob.
#4 to #3 - mattymc
Reply +16
(07/18/2013) [-]
you have something of a point, at least he loved his own people, stalin killed more russians than germans
#5 to #4 - DeathOne
Reply +28
(07/18/2013) [-]
"You underestimate how many people live here and how little i care about their lives."
-Stalin
#10 to #4 - vicsix
Reply +22
(07/19/2013) [-]
He even tops the leaderboards. Stalin's at the bottom, cause all the negative team kills.
#47 to #10 - flinkflonk
Reply +14
(07/19/2013) [-]
That's the most retarded thing i laughed at today.
#129 to #10 - wheredahoodat
Reply +1
(07/19/2013) [-]
Somebody wants to have a little talk with you.
#9 - hchmly
Reply +69
(07/19/2013) [-]
Hitler did nothing wrong.
#39 to #9 - areialview
Reply +4
(07/19/2013) [-]
#23 - thehumor
Reply +54
(07/19/2013) [-]
"wtffunfact.com"   
   
295 students killed   
   
   
wtf that's not fun
"wtffunfact.com"

295 students killed


wtf that's not fun
#64 to #23 - CactusFantastico
Reply -1
(07/19/2013) [-]
hence the 'wtf'
#36 to #23 - wolvesbrickwall
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
The Sandy Hook shooter would disagree
#68 to #23 - vladhellsing
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
You're right.

IT'S HILARIOUS!
#82 to #68 - kaiserwilhelm
Reply +2
(07/19/2013) [-]
don't you mean "hitlerious"
#112 to #82 - vladhellsing
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#51 to #23 - karmakoala
Reply +8
(07/19/2013) [-]
Indeed, it could have been many many more
#19 - stickmansam ONLINE
Reply +37
(07/19/2013) [-]
Most people forget that Hitler cared for and loved many people, it was only the Jews that he hated. and the Homos
#132 to #19 - captainlhero **User deleted account**
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#169 to #132 - anon
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
Shut it, traitor.
#177 to #169 - captainlhero **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#26 to #19 - anon
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
and mentally challenged. and certain Catholics. and gypsies
#33 to #26 - neverposting ONLINE
Reply +9
(07/19/2013) [-]
and the blacks I believe.
#59 to #33 - hudis
Reply +7
(07/19/2013) [-]
And communists, and just about anyone who opposed him.
#93 to #59 - daentraya
Reply +2
(07/19/2013) [-]
Didn't he also hate physically handicapped people, thus making the list jews, homos, handicapped, gypsies, *******, non-christians, storks, slavs, communists, and whoever else opposed him?
#43 to #19 - anon
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
and the british, and the russians
#63 to #43 - hellfiazz
Reply +4
(07/19/2013) [-]
He actually held the British culture in high esteem, well, higher than most, before the war.
#48 to #43 - solidderking
Reply +4
(07/19/2013) [-]
he doesnt hated the british people, he belived they were partyally arian, but he hated the british government
#44 to #19 - kahandran
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
And the blacks and gypsies and retarded and non-christian and russian and storks.

He ******* hated storks.
#69 to #44 - christmouth
Reply +6
(07/19/2013) [-]
And the Slavs.
#85 to #19 - sodaberg
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
and the disabled
#116 to #19 - anon
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
He only didn't like the gays for the sole reason that they didn't create babies to contribute to his master race
#189 to #19 - anon
Reply 0
(12/12/2013) [-]
no one likes the homos really
#53 - awildniglet
Reply +30
(07/19/2013) [-]
******* plebeians, don't know how to control their gas usage
******* plebeians, don't know how to control their gas usage
#55 to #53 - anon
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
So i heard the ladies love self confident, hard working, cultivated guys in uniforms who are also suffering artists and love pets, plus they are also a party guy? He even got his own car - a Mercedes and leads his own business.

Epic pussy magnet Hitler.
#79 to #53 - jacobthecow
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
**** I was gonna use that gif
#65 to #53 - truffle
Reply +7
(07/19/2013) [-]
#90 to #65 - professorfj
Reply +4
(07/19/2013) [-]
you might enjoy this .gif
you might enjoy this .gif
#91 to #90 - truffle
Reply +2
(07/19/2013) [-]
Why thank you.     
Here, have a thumb rocket!
Why thank you.
Here, have a thumb rocket!
#92 to #91 - professorfj
Reply +2
(07/19/2013) [-]
Thank you. Though I usually prefer thumb missiles so here are some for you.
Thank you. Though I usually prefer thumb missiles so here are some for you.
#94 to #92 - truffle
Reply +2
(07/19/2013) [-]
Explosions...brilliant choise indeed.
Explosions...brilliant choise indeed.
#187 to #90 - awildniglet
Reply +1
(07/20/2013) [-]
Here's another one
Here's another one
#1 - rikter
Reply +25
(07/18/2013) [-]
Probably got some pointers too. Cheap bastard.
#7 - gernab
Reply +19
(07/19/2013) [-]
Halifax Explosion 1917, 2000 dead and 9000 injuries basically our 9/11 it's sad that no one remembers even in Canada and few remember the date of the event. It shows you how quickly people forget such terrible things so quickly, it will make you wonder how long it will take for us to forget or not heed the lessons of the world wars and inevitably repeat them.
#119 to #7 - dracomancer ONLINE
Reply -1
(07/19/2013) [-]
That's why we have history classes. But though I agree that such a thing is terrible people probably don't remember it because (Please forgive me for saying this) it's not as important in the world. It was just an accident really. People most likely won't forget world wars unless the stupidest of people come into real power and even then somehow manipulate the populace. The Halifax Explosion wasn't a terrorist attack or a declaration of war and things like this of course will be forgotten. I'm sure soon (Historically soon so like 50 years) more present matters like Hurricane Katrina, the Hatian earthquake, and the Japanese Tsunami will be on a level like that.
#120 to #119 - dracomancer ONLINE
Reply -2
(07/19/2013) [-]
Of course I could be wrong and did a quick check up on Wikipedia to make sure it wasn't like a terrorist attack or some horrible act of war.
#18 to #7 - originialname
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
**originialname rolled a random image posted in comment #3079835 at Friendly ** what happened
**originialname rolled a random image posted in comment #3079835 at Friendly ** what happened
#20 to #18 - originialname
Reply +2
(07/19/2013) [-]
i could have just googled it instead of waiting for a reply, im not that bright
#37 to #7 - mitchellking
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
I remember the comercials about it.
#38 to #37 - mitchellking
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
commercials*
#60 to #7 - whitenerdy
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
Depends how quickly Modern Warfare becomes unpopular
#176 to #7 - namesboo
Reply 0
(07/19/2013) [-]
my town is called Halifax.... England not Canada
#180 to #176 - gernab
Reply +1
(07/19/2013) [-]
Yeah, Canada being a part of the comment wealth at the time subsequently causes parts of Canada to be named after the UK its the same thing in the USA, in case you didn't already know heu heu.
#22 to #7 - ronyx
Reply +1
(07/19/2013) [-]
Considering that communications back then were still pretty cavemen type I wouldn't be surprised if most people except the ones that saw it or were told by somebody know about it.
#29 to #22 - gernab
Reply +1
(07/19/2013) [-]
I think you underestimate the capabilities of communication back in the day, the disaster was sent out in telegraph within the hour and rescue/recovery was responding around the Maritime quite quickly, it has nothing to do with bad communications rescue trains from around Atlantic Canada and North Eastern United States were sent within the hour judging by how many people responded word most likely spread quickly people just hate things that makes them scare or cringe so they forget it.