Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#109 - roliga (07/18/2013) [-]
My first on the left and my newest on the right
User avatar #147 to #109 - phonerstonerboner (07/18/2013) [-]
>Mosin-Nagant = 8/10
>El Cheapo AK-47 = 3/10

the price of AR's have dropped so much, why stick with such a primitive model?
#167 to #147 - liquidz (07/18/2013) [-]
All AKs are glorious!

Next time you say AK is cheap, think of AK made from **** shovel. AK made from **** shovel is best AK! IS CHEAPEST AK!

AR, is capitalist wet dream, bolt too many thing to crappy capitalistic plastic stock. Always malfunction due to poor design of ******** where it eats. Is true representation of capitalist ways, **** anywhere, and eat same **** .

AK so simple child can use it, everyone praise AK. But AR fall in mud, it no go bang, full of crap jams action. AK gives no ***** , put sandwich in AK, AK will fire... shove AK up ass of capitalist pig, still fires, bury in sand for 50 years and pull trigger, still fires!

User avatar #150 to #147 - roliga (07/18/2013) [-]
Because I already have an AR
User avatar #152 to #150 - phonerstonerboner (07/18/2013) [-]
Just saying that AK's arn't something special. I'd rather show off my AR-15
#176 to #152 - Rascal (07/18/2013) [-]
AK's aren't special? And you say you'd rather be showing off a gun that redirects burning powder gases back into the chamber? The gun that let so many down in Vietnam? The gun whose owners wished they had AKs in said war? Yes it is certainly something to be proud of.

In all seriousness though, I like AR-15s. But saying AK's aren't anything special is like saying that AK's aren't special. They aren't really, but they are (in terms of everything but the bullet) so much more glorious.
#182 to #176 - rawklobstah (07/18/2013) [-]
The AR-15(civilian model) didn't let soldiers down in Vietnam, that was the M-16(outdated military model).
The only reason the M-16 let troops down in Vietnam is because the gun was new and high tech and the suppliers thought it wouldn't need a cleaning kit, even in the Jungles of Vietnam.
The problem was quickly fixed when the M16A1 came out, which included parts better suited for the wet, humid climate of Vietnam and a cleaning kit.
#187 to #182 - manninex (07/18/2013) [-]
They are literally the same thing.
#188 to #187 - rawklobstah (07/18/2013) [-]
Almost, but not entirely. The M16A1 is just a modified version of the original M16 that is built with parts better suited for operating in the environment it was being used in.
#190 to #188 - manninex (07/18/2013) [-]
It still has the crappy direct impingement. Before it became the M4, the rifle was a huge let down for soldiers. The newer versions may have had improvements, but like all AR-15 variants wihout a gas piston, it jams like Bob Marley.
User avatar #154 to #152 - roliga (07/18/2013) [-]
I didn;t say "here are my special guns" I said here is my first and my newest
User avatar #126 to #109 - omgitztom (07/18/2013) [-]

Also beautiful stock on your Mosin, what year is it?
User avatar #127 to #126 - roliga (07/18/2013) [-]
1939 and don't worry, the crapco magazines have both been replaced with nice shiny Romanian ones. the Tapco ones just came with it
#128 to #127 - omgitztom (07/18/2013) [-]
Wartime nuggets are best nuggets man
User avatar #148 to #128 - arizonastar (07/18/2013) [-]
nice we've got a spanish mouser from mid 30's
User avatar #149 to #148 - arizonastar (07/18/2013) [-]
User avatar #119 to #109 - chiefrunnyjeans (07/18/2013) [-]
gotta love those Mosins!
 Friends (0)