Probably she frightened them.. Let the rage.. Harlin . 111;!. To be fair, the reason this zimmerman thing became a story is because he killed that kid, and then the cops brought him to the station, didn't arrest him for it
x
Click to expand

Comments(313):

[ 313 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#11 - tuned ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
but the real question is

did she have skittles and nestea
#225 to #11 - Rascal (07/16/2013) [-]
He had Arizona Watermelon Tea, you uninformed **** .
#238 to #225 - tuned ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
your insight was really necessary anon!
#18 to #11 - captnpl (07/16/2013) [-]
Nestea? I thought Trayvon had arizona ice tea? This changes everything! ZIMMERMAN MUST PAY
User avatar #9 - WinnerofTheGame (07/16/2013) [-]
Is Joe's Crab Shack good?
#17 to #9 - boothead (07/16/2013) [-]
seeing as how ive been going to the waterpark near it everyday and nobodies said **** id assume no
#121 to #9 - Rascal (07/16/2013) [-]
I would kill for Joe's right now.
User avatar #19 to #9 - slone (07/16/2013) [-]
its good if you like crab, obviously, and their burgers are good too. plus the waitresses dance every once in a while.

im talking about the one in galveston TX, this one might be different as far as the dancing but its a chain so the food should still be the same
#34 to #19 - lurkerlarry (07/16/2013) [-]
They dance up here in Minnesota as well.
They dance up here in Minnesota as well.
+321
#22 to #9 - themodyourgod has deleted their comment [-]
#50 to #22 - juicyy (07/16/2013) [-]
oh you horrible horrible person.. you made me laugh.
User avatar #135 to #22 - stefanolopcus (07/16/2013) [-]
yup. definitely going to hell for laughing at this one.
#237 to #22 - lamarisagoodname (07/16/2013) [-]
mannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
#149 to #22 - Jloughrey (07/16/2013) [-]
Well looks like i'm going to hell
#145 - kingbulbasaur (07/16/2013) [-]
This image looks like an ad on the side of a porn site
This image looks like an ad on the side of a porn site
#181 - thebritishguy (07/16/2013) [-]
There was that gang of 4 black people who beat up some poor Peruvian guy (Zimmerman was half Peruvian) and they shouted "for treyvon" as they beat him up, nobody said it was racist and there was only a small article about it, such 			********
There was that gang of 4 black people who beat up some poor Peruvian guy (Zimmerman was half Peruvian) and they shouted "for treyvon" as they beat him up, nobody said it was racist and there was only a small article about it, such ********
User avatar #156 - Ragumshnagum (07/16/2013) [-]
According to U.S. law, only people of Caucasian heritage have the mental capacity to be racist.
#37 - bronywhat (07/16/2013) [-]
Black people killing people isn't interesting news anymore, it happens so often it's become part of the stereotype.
A white(ish) guy killing a black teenager on the other hand, you don't see that every day, that's fresh and controversial.

The media couldn't actually care less what race these guys are, but they know you sure do.
#167 to #37 - Rascal (07/16/2013) [-]
White(ish) guy? Did you not see his parents? He is clearly Hispanic, the only reason anyone is calling him white is because the media tagged him as a "self proclaimed Hispanic" to try and shove this story into a mold of white vs. black to get ratings.
#88 to #37 - Rascal (07/16/2013) [-]
I hate the media... sending pictures of Trayvon as a 8-12 year old when that guy was 17 and violent.
#1 - teranin ONLINE (07/15/2013) [-]
To be fair, the reason this zimmerman thing became a story is because he killed that kid, and then the cops brought him to the station, didn't arrest him for it, and gave him back his gun.  It was the way the situation was handled by law enforcement that sparked the initial outrage, and then turned into a big racial thing.  Likely the story you're posting was not covered because it's par for the course, same as it ever was status quo evil, and Americans like sensationalism almost as much as self-vicitmization.
To be fair, the reason this zimmerman thing became a story is because he killed that kid, and then the cops brought him to the station, didn't arrest him for it, and gave him back his gun. It was the way the situation was handled by law enforcement that sparked the initial outrage, and then turned into a big racial thing. Likely the story you're posting was not covered because it's par for the course, same as it ever was status quo evil, and Americans like sensationalism almost as much as self-vicitmization.
User avatar #211 to #1 - arisaka (07/16/2013) [-]
They can't cover EVERYTHING. Regardless of what the news will talk about, there will always be people kicking and screaming "YEAH, WELL WHAT ABOUT THIS CASE, HUH?"

And let's not forget a news station is still a business, and they are trying to make money. They will select stories to cover that they think will bring in the most amount of viewers.
#71 to #1 - jazzyietheferret (07/16/2013) [-]
It's cause the kid was a hood rat who just happened to be a stupid ****** .
#3 to #1 - Rascal (07/15/2013) [-]
Because it was a clear case of self defense, everyone knew it from the very begining. The only reason it went to trial at all is public outrage. So, we spent millions of dollars on a trial everyone knew the outcome of all because butthurt... **** you.
#4 to #3 - teranin ONLINE (07/15/2013) [-]
whoa, who said I supported the whole deal? This was a criticism of the way the media and our society handled the situation, and the overreactions so many people had. I was just pointing out that the main issue didn't actually start as racial, but it wound up becoming racial even though zimmerman is a latino.
#5 to #4 - gladiuss (07/15/2013) [-]
MCFW "freedoms internally"
User avatar #7 to #3 - tubaplayah (07/16/2013) [-]
It isn't self defense when you go after someone. He should have stayed in his ******* like the 911 operator told him to do.
User avatar #39 to #7 - fukermanjensen (07/16/2013) [-]
you didn't watch the live trial did you? the Dispatcher only "advised" him to not follow..although this is directly after he asked him which way did he go after knowingly been told Travon was out of sight. The dispatcher admitted that they can't and won't tell people what to do, bc it can go back on them if the person they are talking to ***** up. He only said stop following to save his ass bc he knew **** was going to go down. Also, Travon assaulted Zimmerman, straight up jumped him if you believe zimmerman's retelling. Last time I checked it isn't a crime for a neiborhood watch to follow someone being suspicious.

Also, if I asked you to watch were a person was going and then he turned out of sight..what would you do? sit there like a tard on the phone going "WHERE DHE GO GEORGE, WHERED DHE GO!?!? DARN YOU FENCE!! FOILED ME AGAIN!!!"
#103 to #1 - Rascal (07/16/2013) [-]
And you are the expert on all of this.
User avatar #179 to #1 - hellsjester (07/16/2013) [-]
black ******* in a gated community where everyone knows each other. yep nothing suspicious here
#14 to #1 - jinapayne (07/16/2013) [-]
You're great and Im surprised FJ hasnt thumbed you down for not saying the media blew it out of proportion because of racism or something
#158 to #1 - lordofo (07/16/2013) [-]
I think they released him according to Florida law. The problem with this case isn't racism but crazy gun laws.
User avatar #8 to #1 - varrlegrimscythe (07/16/2013) [-]
That and Obama got involved and made a little speech about it and that blew it all out the ******* window. Trayvon Martin Case - President Obama Weighs In: 'If I Had a Son, He'd Look Like Trayvon'
User avatar #257 to #8 - TheMagicBong (07/16/2013) [-]
I seriously hate our president here, why the **** does he need to say at all, "If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon?" It really pisses me off that this has to be turned into a racial thing and even the president evidently wants it to be a racial thing.
User avatar #314 to #257 - keatontheghostfox (07/18/2013) [-]
He is an absolutely horrible president in every way. Possibly as bad if not worse than Bush.
User avatar #317 to #314 - TheMagicBong (07/18/2013) [-]
Eh bush wasn't bad IMO, people just add a lot of blame onto his presidency that he didnt do. For example, they say he was the reason the economy was going into the ******* , when it was the housing market doing ****** up practices.
#26 to #1 - Rascal (07/16/2013) [-]
It wasn't any flaw on law enforcement that made this a problem. The police looked at the evidence they had, the evidence that was brought again to a jury, and saw no reason to accuse Zimmerman of a crime. That hasn't changed. He still hasn't been convicted of a crime, because there still isn't evidence to convict him of one. The police did everything they should have.
#13 to #1 - Rascal (07/16/2013) [-]
Zimmerman was released because Florida has a stand your ground law that states if you kill a man in self defense there doesn't have to be a trial all he has to do is give a statement and leave. After Martins family claimed racism and hate crime then there was a huge out cry from the community and he was put on trial.
#86 to #13 - Rascal (07/16/2013) [-]
so next time i shoot a guy ill just say it was self defense with no evidence other than my word? great.
User avatar #93 to #86 - bothemastaofall (07/16/2013) [-]
There are ways of proving self defense. Zimmerman's account was backed up by physical evidence. Martin had no injuries other than bruised knuckles and the bullet wound. That bullet wound's trajectory was found to be consistent with having been shot from below. Even though Martin wasn't alive at the trial, he still had a story to tell.
User avatar #96 to #93 - bothemastaofall (07/16/2013) [-]
Oh, one more thing: the stand your ground law is irrelevant here. That law says that I don't have to retreat if I don't want to. When Martin was shot, Zimmerman was in the process of being attacked by him. Stand your ground means **** in that case
#128 - redstag (07/16/2013) [-]
2 ******* walk up and try to rob a mother she tells them she doesn't have anything so they shoot the baby in the face. No media coverage. Cause when a ****** commits a crime it's society's fault. ******* ******* .
#185 to #128 - certifiedidiot (07/16/2013) [-]
Need someone to look out for the wee ones.
#159 to #128 - nextgenmidgett (07/16/2013) [-]
jesus 			*******		 christ , who the 			****		 shoots a baby?  thats just insane , pic very related
jesus ******* christ , who the **** shoots a baby? thats just insane , pic very related
#172 to #128 - firstresponder (07/16/2013) [-]
at first I thought that the baby shot the black guy. i need to get off of the internet
#108 - Rascal (07/16/2013) [-]
The treyvon martin case was publicised a lot for headlines and also to distract you from the fact the US have trapped Snowden in Moscow so the US have an excuse to be snooping around Russia and leverage against them. Why? Because Russia is supporting the government forces in Syria by arming them with anti air batteries (even though the rebels clearly don't have planes) and threatening nuclear strikes against US intervention in the region. Since Syria doesn't have nuclear weapons it's a direct threat from Russia. The US on the other hand has been busy trying to find excuses to intervene, like saying government forces were using chemical weapons (even though both sides have been). Why intervene in Syria? To be right next door to Iran, spill the war into Iran by 'accidentally' flying into their airspace and take control of the worlds 3rd largest oil reserves.
User avatar #130 to #108 - sodaberg (07/16/2013) [-]
Finding an excuse to intervene? The US and the rest of the western world has been finding every excuse not to intervene in Syria... It's like a Wilsonian wet dream
Also I would like to read about these nuclear threats being made
#146 to #108 - Rascal (07/16/2013) [-]
If we needed oil then why didn't we care about it during the BP oil spill? everyone was busy fussing about the environment over the oil.
#79 - konradkurze (07/16/2013) [-]
its happening
User avatar #132 to #79 - sodaberg (07/16/2013) [-]
hurr fukin *******
User avatar #191 to #132 - dummerbaztard (07/16/2013) [-]
You're trying to say it's not like this?
User avatar #109 to #79 - zzforrest (07/16/2013) [-]
The only reason I'm not laughing is because of how plausible this is.
User avatar #46 - I Am Monkey (07/16/2013) [-]
This whole trial I've felt like I'm taking crazy pills. It's like everyone else's logical faculties just imploded. Every time the story is told in the news it's "Zimmerman followed and killed Trayvon", they intentionally omit the part where Trayvon beats the **** out of him. I was watching an interview with the Prosecution today and they asked for one word to describe Trayvon and they said "Brave". How the **** is anything he did even remotely brave? He bravely beat the hell out of a man while he screamed for help?

What really gets me is that they will crucify Zimmerman's "poor judgement" for getting out of the car to look for Trayvon, but not say a word about the fact that Trayvon's reaction to being watched was to savagely beat the man. Not confront him, not even hit him once and subdue him. He punched him in the face, broke his nose and then started repeatedly bashing his head on the curb. That is the only thing that got Trayvon Martin killed. Not racism or profiling. He made the fatal decision to attack an armed man case closed. Rant over.
User avatar #261 to #46 - walkingdisaster (07/16/2013) [-]
What the **** was trayvon supposed to do? He was being stalked by someone even though 911 told him NOT to follow him, was he supposed to run? Then why is he running? He must have something to hide, he's guilty! Just surrender and let the person following him do whatever he wanted? No matter what he what he does, it would have been wrong. The pro-Zimmerman people cry that Zimmerman was guilty until proven innocent by the media while they are doing the exact same thing to Trayvon.
#70 to #46 - armanthul (07/16/2013) [-]
Listen here monkey, i am not saying that Trayvon was a good kid or anything, but Does this ***** look like he was beaten up? does it look like he was in a fight, and fought for his life? dude, thats a normal punch, i would probably punched myself in the face pretty hard if i did something i couldnt get out of. stop jumping on this FJ bandwagon about how zimzam was a saint for killing another ****** , a good person doing right. i actually wish both of them died, thats 2 less ****** people breathing my air. so stop spewing ***** and pretending you actually have been following this case you cock juggling ass pirate. btw, dont give a **** about the case, but it pisses me off how schizofrenic FJ is...
#74 to #70 - Rascal (07/16/2013) [-]
I'd say having your nose turned into a 90 degree angle constitutes being beaten up.
#77 to #70 - ohemgeezus (07/16/2013) [-]
Sorry to hear about your retardation, I guess you never heard of something called "paramedics", nor have you heard about something called "back of the head" which is where he was getting his head smashed into the pavement.

So stop spewing **** and pretending you actually have been following this case you cock juggling ass pirate.
User avatar #91 to #77 - armanthul (07/16/2013) [-]
I never said I did, you slutty ass breathing clown dildo. but i also said, that those damages he got was nothing compared to how you guys described it.
User avatar #214 to #170 - armanthul (07/16/2013) [-]
showing the same ****** pics multiple times doesnt make it look more painfull or convincing.
#198 to #170 - Rascal (07/16/2013) [-]
[url deleted] here's to counteract your stupid ******* image. Now think about this with a logical mind cause apparently no one can anymore. if you have your head slammed into CONCRETE would you only have light scratches? no i'm pretty sure you would have gashes and cranial fracturing.
#199 to #198 - Rascal (07/16/2013) [-]
[url deleted]
User avatar #112 to #46 - Bad Man (07/16/2013) [-]
The problem is that Zimmerman shouldn't have been following him in the first place. His superiors even said "we don't need you to do that". If someone walks up at me in the middle of the night, gun out, you can bet your ass I'm going to defend myself.

In case you hadn't heard, Martin was 30 seconds to a minute from his house. Would you walk up to your home and show a gunman where you live? No. Would you ask for help in a neighborhood that has a history of racism? No. I'm not saying he made the right choice, but there wasn't much of a choice for him in the first place.
User avatar #180 to #112 - xjvlezmerised ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
well why the hell wouldnt he run home if it was 30 SECONDS AWAY now i think that was an even dumber move if he would of ran home zimm would have found out he lived there and been on his way. But since martin had to act difficult and not answer a simple question hes dead.
User avatar #188 to #180 - Bad Man (07/16/2013) [-]
Martin defended himself as anyone should have. He shouldn't have gone so far, no, but I'd be fighting if someone was stalking me right outside my home with a gun. I wouldn't lead someone who potentially wanted me dead to the place where I stay, because that's ******* stupid. Martin had no way of knowing Zimmerman was who he said he was. For all he knew, the man with his pistol out wanted to rob/murder his entire family.
User avatar #254 to #188 - themongoose (07/16/2013) [-]
Read the account. There was no pistol out. Zimmerman had it with him, but not in his hand. Martin reached for it first.

A man with a gun in his hand does not yell for help (heard in the background of the 911 calls)

A man with a gun in his pants being beaten and unable to reach it because he's being beaten senseless would indeed yell for help. And based on the fact that he didn't go for the gun until Martin did first, Zimmerman really didn't want to kill anyone. That tells me this is a prime example of self defense.
User avatar #192 to #188 - xjvlezmerised ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
wait so your telling me you would attack some one who was outside your home with a gun and not call the police with your cell phone and run inside.... now thats ******* stupid
User avatar #283 to #192 - Bad Man (07/16/2013) [-]
Right, because the person stalking you wouldn't try and stop you, or kill you before the police actually got there.
User avatar #285 to #283 - xjvlezmerised ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
u realize zimm didnt even have his gun out at anytime. The only time it was out was when he intended to use it which he did because he was being attacked. and yes i would try to do that. zimm is larger and slower then me and i believe he would have a hard time shooting me from a distance in the DARK
User avatar #87 to #46 - newforomador ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
One word to describe Trayvon? Dead.
User avatar #95 to #87 - armanthul (07/16/2013) [-]
you suck, you really really suck. you had a good chance of making a awesome joke out of that, and you ****** it up. instead of dead, you could have said: Rainbow (why you ask? because he was black, red, and ha skittles all over his body.)
User avatar #97 to #95 - newforomador ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
Damn, that is a good one. Too bad I'm horrible at jokes like that, thumb for you.
#105 to #46 - Rascal (07/16/2013) [-]
When he called the police didnt they tell him to stay in the car and not go after him yet he did? the whole thing could have been avoided if he listened to the police.
User avatar #113 to #105 - Bad Man (07/16/2013) [-]
That's exactly what happened. How would anyone react if they saw an armed person stalking them in the middle of the night a few feet from their house?
User avatar #260 to #113 - MKZeke (07/16/2013) [-]
Yeah, about that. Trayvon didn't live in Zimmerman's neighborhood. He wasn't a few feet from his house. Some people have said he was going to his uncle's house that was in the neighborhood, but various searches regarding his uncle lead to no mentioning of it. If you would bother to check your facts, every article blatently says he didn't live in the neighborhood. Also, how would Trayvon know Zimmerman was armed? Zimmerman's gun was holstered, and it was night. Unless Zim had neon lights attached to the holster, I don't even see how that's physically possible. I really want to know where you get your information from, cause its horribly, horribly wrong.
User avatar #284 to #260 - Bad Man (07/16/2013) [-]
You're right, thanks for nitpicking. He wasn't a few feet away, Martin's house was about 2 small apartment buildings away, which is about a minute's walk. And if you checked your facts, you'd know that they in fact did live in the same neighborhood with his father, not his uncle, and that Zimmerman lived on the street on the opposite end from where Martin was staying. He followed him as soon as he entered the subdivision and called the police when Martin hadn't even done anything wrong.
User avatar #294 to #284 - MKZeke (07/16/2013) [-]
Once again, you are wrong. He did not live there. Neither did his father. His father's fiancé did live there though, whom his father was visiting. I apologize for the slight mix up there, as I only looked to see if he or anyone he was related to lived there, which they did not. I see that you didn't comment on the gun again, so I'll assume you have no more arguments for that, but you did mention Zim had no reason to follow Martin. Wrong once again, friendo. There are two things you need to know about. 1. Zimmerman's neighborhood was a gated community. That means there are certain rules for outsiders of the community. You can look them up at your own leisure. 2. Zimmerman was the head of the Neighborhood Watch. You might have already known this, but you might be missing some information. If you have listened to the unedited phone call, Zim says that he was under the impression that Martin was under the influence of drugs and looked as if he was up to no good. That is part true, as various drugs were found in his system after the autopsy was done. Bit of backstory for you, but the neighborhood had been the victim of various break-ins lately, so this would be cause for caution. While Zim was advised to not follow and wait for the police, he was not directed to, so he was still allowed to pursue at his own discretion. So yes, while Martin had not done anything wrong, Zim still had reason to be curious about an unknown person acting suspicious. I hope this 'nitpicking' helps.
#60 to #46 - Rascal (07/16/2013) [-]
Dude, you're almost commenting on every ******* post I see
User avatar #160 to #60 - I Am Monkey (07/16/2013) [-]
I get that a lot, but I think it's just because my name stands out being neon blue. I never really leave more than 10 comments a day.
User avatar #92 to #60 - armanthul (07/16/2013) [-]
huh? this is the fourth time i ever have commented something on Fj...
#162 to #46 - Rascal (07/16/2013) [-]
Because Trayvon really got to tell his side of the story and what he saw. He's walking down the street at night, see's someone following him, gets scared ******** . Calls his friend. This person is still following him, get out of the car, and approaches him. If I was in his position, I'd feel extremely threatened. Am I about to get jumped?
Murdered? Robbed? Not to say I'd run up and beat the **** out of the guy instantly, but is that what really happened? Why? Because the guy who killed him said so?

Is it possible that Trayvon got scared for his life when being followed at night, ended up seeing the gun, and started to fight for his life? Just because he was a little wanna be thug poser kid, that doesn't mean he deserves to die.
User avatar #68 to #46 - bustercaller (07/16/2013) [-]
I get what you're saying. But stupid people just accept the information that's been given to them and judge according to that portrayal. It's easier than making a conscious effort to look for the evidence and decide on a viewpoint based on their findings
User avatar #53 to #46 - melwach ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
Yeah, that was kept out of most German media aswell.

I think it's extremely sad that the boy had to die for ******* up once badly - and that's why I don't like to see widespread firearms possession. But the event was shown much too one sided. It's pretty bad to not just knock someone down and run away when you feel threatened but to smash his head (!) to the ground repeatedly. That's some real aggression which can have terrible consequences for your victim.
#76 to #53 - Rascal (07/16/2013) [-]
I'd say it'd be more sad if zimmerman had died because some thug ****** up once, which is why i'm happy we have firearms as an equalizer.
User avatar #58 to #53 - ningyoaijin (07/16/2013) [-]
To be fair, I'd do the same if the guy looked tough. Gotta make sure he stays down, you know.
#187 to #58 - telfyr ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
if a guy is screaming for help is he really so much of a threat you have try to kill him
#67 - destroyerofcunt ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
thing is i just don't give a 			****		 about any of this.
thing is i just don't give a **** about any of this.
#177 - Rascal (07/16/2013) [-]
I'm glad zimmerman was found innocent. He was attacked and according to Florida state stand your ground law he was in the right. You may not agree with the law but it still exists and he had every right to defend himself. It's a fact that the law exists so there's nothing you can say. He was innocent. I'm not commenting on the morality of the situation, just the legality.
User avatar #184 to #177 - holycrapimacupcake (07/16/2013) [-]
But he does not have the right to kill a minor.
User avatar #193 to #184 - gladiuss (07/16/2013) [-]
Under the Florida, "Stand your ground" law, yes he does.
User avatar #195 to #193 - holycrapimacupcake (07/16/2013) [-]
Son in Florida a man can get away with manslaughter, so long as he claims self defense?
User avatar #200 to #195 - gladiuss (07/16/2013) [-]
The way the law is worded? Yep. I agree it's a damned stupid law, but it is, (god I hate this phrase), what it is.
User avatar #251 to #184 - GIJorge (07/16/2013) [-]
So, if a big black dude attacks me I should ask for an ID to make sure I can shoot his ass in the head?
Dude, get real. A guy attacks you? You're in your every right to shoot him in the kneecap and put your finger on the wound and giggle like a little girl, even if he is ******* 15. He violently assaulted you, he placed himself in that situation. You have every right to defend yourself.
User avatar #295 to #251 - holycrapimacupcake (07/16/2013) [-]
Now did I say that? Defend yourself, or hell ******* run.
User avatar #298 to #295 - GIJorge (07/17/2013) [-]
You said he had no right to kill a minor. **** his age. If he's old enough to attack you, he's old enough to get shot at for that.

And that "Hurr Durr my angel was only 17, think of the chilluns!" ******** is just that. ******** .
User avatar #302 to #298 - holycrapimacupcake (07/18/2013) [-]
Alright, calm down. I was simply stating that if you can avoid shooting him, then don;t shoot him. Or if a cop tells you to stay in the ******* car, you stay in the ******* car.
User avatar #303 to #302 - GIJorge (07/18/2013) [-]
You couldn't avoid shooting him, and it was a deserved payback. i would shoot him. Any one I know would shoot him. any one with a half functional brain would shoot him. The only idiots that wouldn't under such circumstances are white guilt liberals, because poor black sweet, drug dealing, violent and robber child, he was just oppressed.
And cops didn't say anything to him, the 911 dispatchers did. And you have no legal obligation to follow what they say. And during the pursuit, they told him to stop chasing Tray-Tray, which he did. That stupid ****** should have gone home to do some more "purple drank".
User avatar #304 to #303 - holycrapimacupcake (07/18/2013) [-]
...I'm done...can;t even explain my viewpoint here.
User avatar #305 to #304 - GIJorge (07/18/2013) [-]
Which is "don't shoot some one under age", I guess?
User avatar #306 to #305 - holycrapimacupcake (07/18/2013) [-]
No, I just don't think that unless your life is in genuine danger, don't shoot.

Yeah if someone has a knife and you have a gun **** yeah shoot the guy.
User avatar #307 to #306 - GIJorge (07/18/2013) [-]
What if the guy is 6'2" tall, on top of you, slamming your head against the ground and threatening to kill you, are you on your right to shoot him?
User avatar #308 to #307 - holycrapimacupcake (07/18/2013) [-]
Yes, you are, I do see your point, I see everyone's point in this matter, I just have my viewpoint on this as a pacifist.
User avatar #309 to #308 - GIJorge (07/18/2013) [-]
There you have it. It's justifiable.
And mate, I'm guessing that you'd pull the trigger too. When it comes down to you vs them... **** them.
User avatar #310 to #309 - holycrapimacupcake (07/18/2013) [-]
Not denying I would, but I'd find another way first. I only fight as a last resort.
#315 to #310 - Rascal (07/18/2013) [-]
Your viewpoint is wrong.
User avatar #318 to #315 - holycrapimacupcake (07/19/2013) [-]
My viewpoint is right in some eyes, and wrong in others. It is neither here nor there.
User avatar #311 to #310 - GIJorge (07/18/2013) [-]
That's the thing: you had no option. He attacked you.
All of the FACTUAL evidence point to it being a legit case of self-defense. There is absolutely no way that it wasn't.
He was attacked, he shot the attacker. Period. It's that simple.
#117 - Rascal (07/16/2013) [-]
If the media reported on every ****** that killed someone then we would have 500 channels of nothing but people reporting on ******* killing people 24/7 and that's just in the USA.
User avatar #84 - wersand (07/16/2013) [-]
Do you guys really think they will get away with it though? This is clear cut murder case, I don't see how you people keep missing the significance of the case.

These guys will go to prison and rot there, that is why this is not big news. Surprise, nobody gives a **** when there is definitely going to be a conviction.
#90 to #84 - Rascal (07/16/2013) [-]
the internet will do anything to make blacks look bad.
User avatar #45 - thehans (07/16/2013) [-]
did she have skittles?
cause you know, that **** is scary
#63 - ancel (07/16/2013) [-]
She's white, no ones in America cares if whites get killed by blacks because only whites can be racist.

I hate democrats.
User avatar #239 to #63 - baconbaconator (07/16/2013) [-]
What does that have to do with democrats?
User avatar #104 to #63 - fukkentyranitar ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
Is this sarcasm?
User avatar #115 to #63 - sinclairr (07/16/2013) [-]
I feel like just a few years ago people were all saying "Oh, look, a white woman was killed! If it was a black woman, we would never know, because the media never reports on black's news"

Eh.... Maybe it's just me...
User avatar #106 to #63 - vuican (07/16/2013) [-]
I hear you man.
User avatar #110 to #63 - zzforrest (07/16/2013) [-]
Oh gotta love the fact that 60% of crime is done by black people, and that is including other races so whites don't even commit 40% of crime. Also the most common type of violence against blacks are initiated by, take a guess, other black people.
I think a game should be made about how long you can talk about these statistics to a democrat before they call you stupid.
#163 to #63 - nextgenmidgett (07/16/2013) [-]
black people so 			*******		 racist against white people yeah, our ancestor "enslaved you"  (like every other 			*******		 empire has done over the millenniums, and they still bitch about it,  ive never heard  a jew 			*******		 go on about the holocaust  like they do about slavery
black people so ******* racist against white people yeah, our ancestor "enslaved you" (like every other ******* empire has done over the millenniums, and they still bitch about it, ive never heard a jew ******* go on about the holocaust like they do about slavery
#173 - Rascal (07/16/2013) [-]
******* ******* kill white people almost every day. They think that this little ****** trayvon is innocent, just walking "wit a hoody and sum skiddles" It doesnt matter what you're ******* carrying on your body, if you make somebody else feel threatened for their life then they will take action to protect themselves. Trayvon martin was a fully grown, 17 year old ****** with a bad temper who had gang affiliations. **** the ******* that think he's just a little kid and that this has something to do with racism, they obviously havent looked at the evidence, so go back to drinking koolaid
#65 - nonwhite (07/16/2013) [-]
On the night of June 5th 2011 in Minneapolis, Minnesota, McDonald and four of her friends, all of them black, walked a half mile to buy some food. At first the the police stopped and questioned them but then let them go. Then they walked past some white people in front of a bar calling them “faggots”, “ ******* ” and “chick with dicks”.

Either she or one of her friends went over and told them not to talk like that. A white woman, Molly Flaherty, smashes her beer mug in McDonald’s face. Flaherty then says, ”I can take on all of you bitches” and throws the first punch. A fight breaks out.



tumblrm9v85hE9JT1rffp73o1400At one point McDonald and Dean Schmitz are out in the middle of the street. McDonald is 22, Schmitz is a man in his 40s. McDonald pulls out a pair of fabric scissors from her bag. Schmitz charges. She stabs him right through the heart. She may not have seen it at the time but over his heart was a tattoo of a swastika, a white supremacist symbol.

McDonald and her friends flee, Schmitz dies on the way to the hospital. The police arrest her for second-degree murder, facing up to 80 years in prison. In male prison at that, probably much of it in solitary for her own “protection”.
#81 to #65 - Rascal (07/16/2013) [-]
One less Negro to roam the streets. Good.
I'm really sorry for the white fellow though...
User avatar #122 to #65 - xgarthx (07/16/2013) [-]
Just looked up the story, that is indeed a ***** . He has a penis, and he is a man.
User avatar #119 - fishtacos (07/16/2013) [-]
Allow me to summarize all three sides of the Zimmerman trial ********* .
Side 1) BOut time we had some white justice hurr durr slavery never shouldve ended.
Side 2) Hurr Durr racists everywhere because one black kid got killed that means everyone is racist
Side 3) IT'S A GOVERNMENT CONSPIRACY MAN THEY'RE USING ZIMMERMAN TO COVER UP SYRIA AND RUSSIA AND THE TERRORISTS
And then there's me, just sitting here masturbating.
[ 313 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)