possitivity everywhere. support repost research tinyurl.com/nenkvna http://j.gs/2X4R. trying to be mare positive ‘sheds electrons and becomes highly unstable‘ possitivity everywhere support repost research tinyurl com/nenkvna http://j gs/2X4R trying to be mare positive ‘sheds electrons and becomes highly unstable‘
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (24)
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#1 - chaosnazo
Reply +34 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
Yay, science!
Yay, science!
User avatar #3 to #1 - clifford
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
And that is going in my funnyjunk folder! Now all I know is that it looks cool, can you tell me what the hell it is (if something interests me I must find out more about it) ? If you tell me I'll tell you why obsidian is the best material to use when flint knapping.
User avatar #6 to #3 - chaosnazo
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
It's an simulation of two galaxies colliding
User avatar #8 to #6 - clifford
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/15/2013) [-]
Okay did not know that and now it is even more interesting!
The best material for flint knapping is obsidian, when lava contacts a large enough body of water it cools down forming obsidian, it is cooled down so quickly that it gives it a fine crystalline structure, much finer than any other "rock" that you can knap and thus has the ability to be sharper.
User avatar #4 to #3 - killinkyle
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
that is what is going to happen when the milky way collides with Andromeda in a couple million years.
User avatar #5 to #4 - killinkyle
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
billion* whatever
User avatar #9 to #1 - priestoftheoldones
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/15/2013) [-]
Is that two stars crashing together, deflecting, then pulling one another in and creating a new, larger star? Fukken saved.
User avatar #16 to #9 - notstill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/15/2013) [-]
I don't know what universe you came from to think that those look like stars.
User avatar #17 to #16 - priestoftheoldones
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/15/2013) [-]
Do you know what a newborn star looks like? A mini galaxy.
#10 to #9 - anon id: 77d2247b
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/15/2013) [-]
Galaxies, not stars.
#18 to #1 - sightlysuperset
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/15/2013) [-]
here take this
User avatar #11 - popkornking
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/15/2013) [-]
How does shedding electrons make it unstable?
User avatar #12 to #11 - wienersack
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(07/15/2013) [-]
Let me try to explain it the best I can,but I'll still probably be wrong, so someone can correct me all they want.
You need a certain number of protons, neutrons, and electrons for something to be stable, so too few of any of these will result in instability.
Again, I welcome anyone to correct me.
User avatar #15 to #12 - popkornking
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/15/2013) [-]
As far as I know, instability is only related to the removal of neutrons, removing electrons will only change the overall charge as well as increasing it's electron affinity
User avatar #25 to #15 - dawdawdwa
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/15/2013) [-]
Yes, but not that kind. Here you mean core instability.
The other guy means compound instability.

You`re both correct though, just there`s two kinds of instability.
User avatar #26 to #25 - popkornking
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/15/2013) [-]
I've never heard of compound instability, must be beyond my current knowledge
User avatar #13 to #12 - leonstar
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/15/2013) [-]
The electrons being missing will increase the re-activity of the element, making it bond more easily than it normally would. For example iron spontaneously rusting. You're mostly right about the certain number of protons and neutrons though. I thumbed
User avatar #14 to #13 - wienersack
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/15/2013) [-]
I thank you for the correction.
I thumbed back.
#21 to #12 - ajweston
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/15/2013) [-]
The element is always named by the number of protons in the nucleus. The charge and generally the re-activity of the particle is usually based on the ratio of protons to electrons (the more negative the charge, the more reactive the particle, usually)

The number of neutrons also affects the stability of the particle, the differing amounts for a set number of protons being called isotopes and the isotopes can be very different, for example, carbon 14 is radioactive whereas the more common isotopes are not.

#20 - fallenoffacliff
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/15/2013) [-]
I'm just going to leave this here
#22 - anon id: 0f6791bd
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/15/2013) [-]
So apparently FJ is now tumblr.

they don't even have replies anymore. they're just the status and that's it.
No comedic value whatsoever.
#19 - spacelubber
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/15/2013) [-]
But what if he's lithium?
User avatar #7 - supercaptainlarry
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/15/2013) [-]
Trying to loose weight? Go on the neutron diet...
#2 - aerius
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]