evolution. GTA 5 nudemod tinyurl.com/nenkvna http://j.gs/2X4R. File: -[25 KB, 320x336, Iel. jpgy h The Then at ' were True Check and mate. Christians: 1 Atheist
x
Click to expand

Comments(173):

[ 173 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#76 - abstract ONLINE (07/14/2013) [-]
User avatar #110 to #76 - icecreamonnips (07/14/2013) [-]
Godzilla attracted and destroyed Tokyo
Atheistzilla didn't
Atheists: 1
Christians:0
User avatar #4 - chrolt (07/13/2013) [-]
That's.. That's.. That's not how evolution works.
-20
#6 to #4 - stuffandotherstuff has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #5 to #4 - envinite (07/13/2013) [-]
it's just joke
User avatar #10 to #5 - martbeast (07/13/2013) [-]
it not just joke
User avatar #36 to #10 - iloverapingmen (07/13/2013) [-]
yes it is; he's trolling you fagboat
User avatar #51 to #36 - Dairycow (07/13/2013) [-]
A-are you ******* retarded?
User avatar #93 to #51 - iloverapingmen (07/14/2013) [-]
Great comeback, dochebag. What the hell does that have to do with anything? The guy on 4chan was very obviously trolling.
User avatar #94 to #93 - Dairycow (07/14/2013) [-]
sorry ill try not to be a dochbag next time.
User avatar #56 to #51 - martbeast (07/13/2013) [-]
Well, he DOES loverapingmen.
0
#92 to #36 - iloverapingmen has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #78 to #4 - vycanismajoris (07/14/2013) [-]
it's a troll, *****
#99 to #4 - stepsword (07/14/2013) [-]
the ones in detroit dont know that
#61 to #4 - anon (07/13/2013) [-]
Shh shh shh.... It's okay. We know. Just ignore them and maybe they'll go away.
#15 - biscuitsunited (07/13/2013) [-]
Just going to point his out, we evolved from ape-LIKE ancestors, not apes, APE LIKE
#107 to #15 - drizztrocks (07/14/2013) [-]
That picture doesn't make any sense if we're talking about theory.
#146 to #107 - slumberdonkey (07/14/2013) [-]
You should go ahead and kill yourself. Have you ever heard of... wait for it... wait for it.... wait for it the Isaac Newton's Theory of Gravitation? Because, you know, gravity is technically a theory. In fact. It will never NOT be a theory. You see, there are two different definitions for "theory". The one that you were thinking of was "Hmmm, i think i have a theory" whereas a SCIENTIFIC theory is one that has been tested before. But not just tested before. Did you know that 94% of scientists agree that evolution is true? That's right. The smartest people on the planet think that your stupid.
yfw
#185 to #146 - drizztrocks (07/15/2013) [-]
Damn neva seen a ***** so mad and wrong at the same time.
#149 to #146 - anon (07/14/2013) [-]
You're*
The smartest person on the planet (me) thinks that you're stupid.
User avatar #27 to #15 - metalmind (07/13/2013) [-]
Tecnically we are apes, african apes to be specific. Hominids are just a subbranch of apes.
Strange fact:
We are more closely related to chimps than chimps are to gorillas.
#25 to #15 - slumberdonkey (07/13/2013) [-]
Right, which means that we are similar to monkeys. We are like cousins to them. That does not mean we came from them. Some people are just stupid.
User avatar #28 to #25 - metalmind (07/13/2013) [-]
We did not come from modern apes or monkeys.
User avatar #24 - tuckthisphit (07/13/2013) [-]
If hodor has been hodored,then how come hodors still hodor ?
Atheists:1
Christians:0
Playstation:4
#79 to #24 - ottox (07/14/2013) [-]
All hail King Hodor of House Hodor, first of his name, King of the Andals, the Rhoynar and the First Men, Lord of the Seven Kingdoms and Protector of the Realm
#85 - thebritishguy (07/14/2013) [-]
All of the species exist, it's just all except the last one is extinct, the first one is not a chimpanzee but a distant relative of both chimpanzee and human.
#111 to #85 - bobbysilk (07/14/2013) [-]
I hate to be that one christian but if those species existed at some time and are now extinct, shouldn't there be fossils or a bit more of a trace of them that we should be finding today?

not trying to sound like a faggot, but I know that's how it'll come out.
#119 to #111 - anon (07/14/2013) [-]
There are fossils. We've found several. Also, very specific conditions have to be met for fossils to form, and then we have to be lucky enough to look in that spot, if every dead thing made a fossil, there would be more bones than dirt.
User avatar #118 to #111 - Keoul (07/14/2013) [-]
There are fossils that's why we know they exist, we find the skulls n bones in caves and other places.
#126 to #118 - bobbysilk (07/14/2013) [-]
It's great that someone somewhere found something (in all seriousness). But to be honest the transition from whatever that species is to us isn't my main problem.
For me, accepting that the PROBABILITY of the entirety of evolution happening is near impossible, it's just easier for me to believe something outside of our physical existence is capable of creating the universe.
Who knows, he could have done it through the big bang and evolution, but the fact that something guided it would be a real confidence boost.


I know I'm being a faggot but internet...
User avatar #127 to #126 - Keoul (07/14/2013) [-]
Accepting that animals slowly transition to different forms to adapt to their environment is hard to believe? How about some examples of it occurring right now?

Elephants are slowly losing their tusks due to hunters killing the ones with large tusks for their ivory, the small/no tusk elephants survive and pass on their genes so now less and less elephants have tusks.

Fish are getting smaller and smaller due to over fishing, many regulations demand fishermen have a certain net size to allow the little fish to grow, however smaller adult fish also escape and their genes pass on making adult fish smaller and smaller to escape the nets.

Evolution is not as improbable as you think, heck even the bananas people eat can be considered forced evolution, they were originally tiny little things with barely and fruit and massive seeds, now look at them, seriously, google something like "normal bananas" and just look how much they've changed.
User avatar #133 to #127 - improbable (07/14/2013) [-]
by hunters killing elephants with large tusks, is this living thinking creature called "evolution" slowly removing elephant tusks?
#142 to #133 - hankiepankie (07/14/2013) [-]
Evolution is not a designer, and your argument (or joke) isn't very thought through. Tusks are still incredibly useful for elephants in order to survive and reproduce: the pros outweigh the cons.
User avatar #166 to #142 - improbable (07/14/2013) [-]
did you read that Keoul? What you said is a lie because that con does go on par with the pros of them having tusks. lying scum.
#171 to #166 - Keoul (07/14/2013) [-]
Tell me what pros there are for elephants to have tusks, i genuinely can't think of any.
Maybe protection from predators? but that wouldn't really matter when the predators have guns and the tusks are useless.
Mating? maybe to get the attention of females? Other animals like the peacock use flashy feathers but the elephants may use the tusks, however it doesn't matter when they're dead from hunters.

I am seriously curious as to what the pros are, tell me. When the con is death I don't think the pros would ever outweigh it.

Also here's a picture of an elephant without tusks so you can see that there are elephants who are losing tusks.
#184 to #171 - hankiepankie (07/15/2013) [-]
The reason why I said the pros outweigh the cons is because I have never come across research that said otherwise (until now: though that website has no citation). That picture is of a female Asian elephant--which don't have tusks, so that really doesn't prove a point. And as far as uses for tusks: digging, foraging, defense, ripping bark, even resting their heavy trunks; all of these things help it survive which in turn help them reproduce. Of course tusks have use--nothing in nature so prominent develops for no reason.
User avatar #173 to #171 - improbable (07/14/2013) [-]
did you mean to reply to hankiepankie? because he is the one i took my "info" from
User avatar #174 to #173 - Keoul (07/14/2013) [-]
Well you were the original person who said I was wrong so I replied to you, I posted a article I got my sources from and included hankie's name so you could both see it if you want.

Also you called me a lying scum which makes me sad so I'd rather you understand than him.
User avatar #176 to #174 - improbable (07/14/2013) [-]
tbh i dont really care much for arguments on this site. i only join in when someone mentiones my name and then i say something closely related to the comment my name was in.
User avatar #138 to #133 - Keoul (07/14/2013) [-]
You're not being helpful or funny you know that?
#130 to #127 - bobbysilk (07/14/2013) [-]
That slow changing is natural selection which i totally and completely believe no doubt about it (your examples, as well and all the different species of animals such as cats and dogs prove it (even this transition from the other thing to apes and humans if you want)). I just don't think there's enough support for this natural selection to amount to entirely different types of animals. The elephants may have smaller tusks but they're still as much elephants as before.
User avatar #137 to #130 - Keoul (07/14/2013) [-]
These small changes build up, it's tusks now but remember evolution takes places over millions of years, the elephant tusk thing took place over a few years, a decade at most.
#177 to #111 - thebritishguy (07/14/2013) [-]
Here are the skulls of the species
+1
#104 to #85 - absolutnignog **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #101 to #85 - emptysuperman (07/14/2013) [-]
Creationists think we are Pokemon.
#121 to #101 - bronywhat (07/14/2013) [-]
No, creationists think that evolutionists think we are pokemon.

Creationists think we are yugioh cards.
User avatar #54 - TommyV (07/13/2013) [-]
But there aren't millions of the first ones...they've been extinct for over a million years
#23 - flufflepuff (07/13/2013) [-]
if box is giraffe, what know is the?

carpet: 1
pineapple: 0
Mario: 9

This is what your arguments sound like.
#64 - rambomanthree (07/13/2013) [-]
christians who say, "if humans evolved from monkeys then how come there is still monkeys" are the dumbest thing ever. That is like saying "if america broke free from england, then how come england still exists"
User avatar #124 to #64 - mynameisfoo (07/14/2013) [-]
I, on behalf of all even moderately intelligent Christians, apologize for those fools. They're kind of like that dumb friend that you can hardly stand to have around
User avatar #165 to #64 - hydraetis ONLINE (07/14/2013) [-]
That is an excellent analogy
User avatar #167 to #64 - wtfduud (07/14/2013) [-]
It's actually more like "If you evolved from your grandmother, then how come your cousin still exists?".
User avatar #80 to #64 - shishkobob (07/14/2013) [-]
By that logic, all of the species in between monkeys and humans should exist.
User avatar #98 to #80 - itsthatguyagain (07/14/2013) [-]
Another thing that's so retarded about that is the fact that we didn't evolve from monkeys, but we share a common ancestor.
#86 to #64 - anon (07/14/2013) [-]
Its actually more like ''If America broke free from England, how come Australia still exists?''
#35 - sinclairr (07/13/2013) [-]
Not only do I hate people who say "IF HUMANS EVOLVED FROM CHIMPS WHY ARE CHIMPS STILL HERE!?" People, I also hate the opposite, " HUMANS EVOLVED FROM CHIMPS"   
   
No, they didn't. Monkeys, Apes, and Chimps are all different primates, but they evolved from a common ancestor, not from each other. It's like saying "Why are there Doves AND Crows? Hmm? Can't answer that? GOD EXISTS CDBJKCKJEHBEFB".
Not only do I hate people who say "IF HUMANS EVOLVED FROM CHIMPS WHY ARE CHIMPS STILL HERE!?" People, I also hate the opposite, " HUMANS EVOLVED FROM CHIMPS"

No, they didn't. Monkeys, Apes, and Chimps are all different primates, but they evolved from a common ancestor, not from each other. It's like saying "Why are there Doves AND Crows? Hmm? Can't answer that? GOD EXISTS CDBJKCKJEHBEFB".
#83 to #35 - anon (07/14/2013) [-]
im not arguing against the theory, i just don't understand one thing. Humans chimps gorillas etc are all apes. And we all have the same ancestors but we just branched off differently. Isn't the point of evolution, to become better? why would they branch off to something lesser like chimpanzees and orangutans then we became the superior race. Shouldn't we have all just become humans, i don't get it.
#89 to #83 - sinclairr (07/14/2013) [-]
first off, we are not all apes, we're primates, apes are a primate.

Second, even though you're anon, I'll still answer, or at least the best I can

What if a disease came about one day that killed Humans. It was lethal to all Humans. Soon, the Human race would be destroyed. Luckily, there are other primates such as chimps, gorillas, etc. to survive this disease, even if Humans cannot. This is also the reason there are different blood types, so if a disease killed only A+ blood, the other blood types would be safe.

It's all nature's way of making insurance of survival.
User avatar #139 to #35 - ineedacigarette (07/14/2013) [-]
inspirational
User avatar #49 to #35 - beerterror (07/13/2013) [-]
What has evolution to do with God's existence? I've never understood that.
User avatar #57 to #49 - sinclairr (07/13/2013) [-]
well, what the bible says (or at least out lines and is suspected by me, and it seems others) that God swiped his hand and all living creatures were created as they are today. Evolutionists think that it was science and evolution (duh) that took single cell organisms to what were small creatures to large creatures and finally, somewhere down the line, to humans.

so, in a very basic sense

Evolution = Science made things not god

Creationist = God made things not science
User avatar #178 to #57 - beerterror (07/14/2013) [-]
This has no point whatsoever. Also "science made things"? Wut?
I thought, that existence of the Divine, and what's written in a book from before ******* Rome are two different things.
#179 to #178 - sinclairr (07/14/2013) [-]
Let me put it simply so a person with an IQ of 2 understands

Creationist think God made humans
Evolutionists think a species evolved into Humans

Now I answered your question and if you don't like it shut the **** up
#180 to #179 - beerterror (07/14/2013) [-]
No you didn't. I asked what has evolution to do with God's existence.    
You told me what two groups of people think about the origin of species. Don't try to ridicule me when you are too stupid to understand what I was asking.
No you didn't. I asked what has evolution to do with God's existence.
You told me what two groups of people think about the origin of species. Don't try to ridicule me when you are too stupid to understand what I was asking.
User avatar #182 to #180 - sinclairr (07/14/2013) [-]
well, sorry

You're asking question with no one answer, it would be a different answer from who ever you ask.
#41 to #35 - RequieminMortis (07/13/2013) [-]
Both are generally spouted off by people who have a fundamental misunderstanding of how evolution works, and odd as it sounds, there ARE people who believe in evolution who don't fully understand it.

I also get annoyed by people who spout off about how "evolution is only a theory", as if that somehow negates the MOUNTAINS of evidence supporting evolution as scientific fact, then ignore any attempt to tell them that it remains a theory because it can still be modified with new evidence. To quote Isaac Aasimov, "creationists make it sound as though a theory is something you came up with while drunk one night."
User avatar #43 to #41 - jacksipian (07/13/2013) [-]
oxygen is a theory, gravity is a theory, everything is a theory, **** you people who think "theory" means its not proven
User avatar #59 to #43 - sinclairr (07/13/2013) [-]
there are still people who think the world is flat, there are still those who think the moon landing was fake, and there are some who think evolution is just a laughable fiction story.

Go figure
User avatar #63 to #59 - jacksipian (07/13/2013) [-]
wait... you mean the earth isnt flat? ...that cant be true, youre just making **** up now! how do you think we GOT to the moon? we just tipped the rocket over the edge! duh.
User avatar #31 - mrblueftw ONLINE (07/13/2013) [-]
But if Jesus is not real, then how do we live?
Christians: 1
Atheists: 0
Xbox: 1
PlayStation: 4
User avatar #42 to #31 - jacksipian (07/13/2013) [-]
no one said Jesus isnt real, its been proven that he was in fact a real person, now all the biblical **** that is said about him is wrong
#44 to #42 - mrblueftw ONLINE (07/13/2013) [-]
It twas a joke.
It twas a joke.
User avatar #45 to #44 - jacksipian (07/13/2013) [-]
im just saying
User avatar #87 - nyawgga (07/14/2013) [-]
I see them on Hardcore Pawn everyday
#11 - ohgodmysides (07/13/2013) [-]
If there are millions of Europeans and there are millions of Amerikans, who came from Europeans, where are all the millions of intermediates?   
   
Checkmate!!!!   
Anthropologists: 0   
HWG: 1
If there are millions of Europeans and there are millions of Amerikans, who came from Europeans, where are all the millions of intermediates?

Checkmate!!!!
Anthropologists: 0
HWG: 1
User avatar #21 to #11 - animedudej (07/13/2013) [-]
they are drowning in the atlantic
User avatar #16 - xoyv (07/13/2013) [-]
... **** , i think i just got that


natural selection
#13 - anon (07/13/2013) [-]
Homo sapiens killed the Neanderthals
#17 to #13 - ScottP (07/13/2013) [-]
If they are in fact "homo" sapiens...is that why they're all extinct?
User avatar #32 to #17 - metalmind (07/13/2013) [-]
There is actually no evidence of homo sapiens sapiens killing homo sapiens neanderthalensis.
According to current theories they just outcompeted them, as they had more complex social structures, and better weapons.
#53 - MasterManiac (07/13/2013) [-]
I know that humans didn't evolve from chimps, but some other ape-like species. However if you go back far enough we all supposedly evolved from some single celled life form. Fast forward a lot and you get a point where "monkey" species are beginning to evolve. Surely the survival of the fittest (by which these previous species mentioned in the post don't currently exist) would mean that we should have long destroyed our monkey brethren since we are basically identical species, yet far more advanced than they are. Can anyone hit me up with some knowledge here since I seem to have confused myself right now?
I know that humans didn't evolve from chimps, but some other ape-like species. However if you go back far enough we all supposedly evolved from some single celled life form. Fast forward a lot and you get a point where "monkey" species are beginning to evolve. Surely the survival of the fittest (by which these previous species mentioned in the post don't currently exist) would mean that we should have long destroyed our monkey brethren since we are basically identical species, yet far more advanced than they are. Can anyone hit me up with some knowledge here since I seem to have confused myself right now?
#102 to #53 - neutrino (07/14/2013) [-]
Humans have broken survival of the fittest. Our intellect has allowed us to evolve culturally as well as biologically and this has caused us to advance far further than any other form of life on earth. We have no need to compete with lesser species. The only thing that could feasibly harm humans as a species would be another group of humans. For a while, there were multiple human species, and we fought. Now, only homo sapiens is left. We feel no need to go to war with monkeys and apes. We have nothing left to prove. So we leave them alone. They don't need to beat us, they just need to beat other wildlife.
#112 to #53 - anon (07/14/2013) [-]
We, the Homo Sapiens Sapiens, got the oportunity of killing some cousins of ours when we went form Western Africa to the territory where lies northern France nowadays.
These cousins were named Cromagnon afterwards, and they were killed by us.

Damn that's sad.
User avatar #58 to #53 - fasthink (07/13/2013) [-]
We both had the same common ancestor. This common ancestor was spread out throughout different regions, which means some of it's population had to adapt to a different climate, which evolved into humans. The rest of the population, adapted to another climate, and became more well suited for that area, and evolved into chimps. I don't have an image illustrating this very well so words will have to do.
#148 to #58 - hallowedfrogg (07/14/2013) [-]
Have this
Have this
User avatar #109 to #58 - trollolololgabe (07/14/2013) [-]
that other climate really ****** them over. Poor monkey ancestors.
User avatar #2 - guywithafork (07/13/2013) [-]
When I finished thinking about this I was 30 posts down, So I had to rape my left arrow for this **** .

They stopped breeding with the middle 4, and monkeys continued breeding with themselves, humans started breeding with themselves, and for a brief generation they watched all the cave men fags die.
[ 173 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)