evolution. GTA 5 nudemod tinyurl.com/nenkvna http://j.gs/2X4R. File: -[25 KB, 320x336, Iel. jpgy h The Then at ' were True Check and mate. Christians: 1 Atheist evolution GTA 5 nudemod tinyurl com/nenkvna http://j gs/2X4R File: -[25 KB 320x336 Iel jpgy h The Then at ' were True Check and mate Christians: 1 Atheist
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (173)
[ 173 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
User avatar #4 - chrolt
Reply +224 123456789123345869
(07/13/2013) [-]
That's.. That's.. That's not how evolution works.
#6 to #4 - stuffandotherstuff
-20 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #5 to #4 - envinite
Reply -7 123456789123345869
(07/13/2013) [-]
it's just joke
User avatar #10 to #5 - martbeast
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(07/13/2013) [-]
it not just joke
User avatar #36 to #10 - iloverapingmen
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(07/13/2013) [-]
yes it is; he's trolling you fagboat
#92 to #36 - iloverapingmen
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #51 to #36 - Dairycow
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(07/13/2013) [-]
A-are you ******* retarded?
User avatar #93 to #51 - iloverapingmen
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
Great comeback, dochebag. What the hell does that have to do with anything? The guy on 4chan was very obviously trolling.
User avatar #94 to #93 - Dairycow
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
sorry ill try not to be a dochbag next time.
User avatar #56 to #51 - martbeast
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/13/2013) [-]
Well, he DOES loverapingmen.
#61 to #4 - anon id: 92a6a914
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/13/2013) [-]
Shh shh shh.... It's okay. We know. Just ignore them and maybe they'll go away.
User avatar #78 to #4 - vycanismajoris
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
it's a troll, *****
#99 to #4 - stepsword
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
the ones in detroit dont know that
#14 to #4 - rheago
Reply +23 123456789123345869
(07/13/2013) [-]
#15 - biscuitsunited
Reply +110 123456789123345869
(07/13/2013) [-]
Just going to point his out, we evolved from ape-LIKE ancestors, not apes, APE LIKE
#107 to #15 - drizztrocks
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
That picture doesn't make any sense if we're talking about theory.
#146 to #107 - slumberdonkey
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
You should go ahead and kill yourself. Have you ever heard of... wait for it... wait for it.... wait for it the Isaac Newton's Theory of Gravitation? Because, you know, gravity is technically a theory. In fact. It will never NOT be a theory. You see, there are two different definitions for "theory". The one that you were thinking of was "Hmmm, i think i have a theory" whereas a SCIENTIFIC theory is one that has been tested before. But not just tested before. Did you know that 94% of scientists agree that evolution is true? That's right. The smartest people on the planet think that your stupid.
yfw
#149 to #146 - anon id: e761f659
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
You're*
The smartest person on the planet (me) thinks that you're stupid.
#185 to #146 - drizztrocks
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/15/2013) [-]
Damn neva seen a ***** so mad and wrong at the same time.
User avatar #27 to #15 - metalmind
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/13/2013) [-]
Tecnically we are apes, african apes to be specific. Hominids are just a subbranch of apes.
Strange fact:
We are more closely related to chimps than chimps are to gorillas.
#25 to #15 - slumberdonkey
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(07/13/2013) [-]
Right, which means that we are similar to monkeys. We are like cousins to them. That does not mean we came from them. Some people are just stupid.
User avatar #28 to #25 - metalmind
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(07/13/2013) [-]
We did not come from modern apes or monkeys.
#7 - brokenboulevard
-31 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#12 to #7 - anon id: 00ceb5da
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/13/2013) [-]
It's also called a joke.
#48 to #7 - zaphodcoolfrood
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/13/2013) [-]
Though you have reached a correct conclusion, you understand as little about evolution as the person you're "correcting"
#18 to #7 - panamaofjacks
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/13/2013) [-]
#46 to #7 - tomowrath
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/13/2013) [-]
User avatar #9 to #7 - killingsin
Reply +74 123456789123345869
(07/13/2013) [-]
That's not a chimpanzee, it's the common ancestor of humans and chimps which does not exist anymore.
#76 - abstract
Reply +71 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
User avatar #110 to #76 - icecreamonnips
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
Godzilla attracted and destroyed Tokyo
Atheistzilla didn't
Atheists: 1
Christians:0
User avatar #24 - tuckthisphit
Reply +45 123456789123345869
(07/13/2013) [-]
If hodor has been hodored,then how come hodors still hodor ?
Atheists:1
Christians:0
Playstation:4
#79 to #24 - ottox
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
All hail King Hodor of House Hodor, first of his name, King of the Andals, the Rhoynar and the First Men, Lord of the Seven Kingdoms and Protector of the Realm
#64 - rambomanthree
Reply +42 123456789123345869
(07/13/2013) [-]
christians who say, "if humans evolved from monkeys then how come there is still monkeys" are the dumbest thing ever. That is like saying "if america broke free from england, then how come england still exists"
User avatar #80 to #64 - shishkobob
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
By that logic, all of the species in between monkeys and humans should exist.
User avatar #98 to #80 - itsthatguyagain
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
Another thing that's so retarded about that is the fact that we didn't evolve from monkeys, but we share a common ancestor.
#86 to #64 - anon id: 5d2d0bff
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
Its actually more like ''If America broke free from England, how come Australia still exists?''
User avatar #124 to #64 - mynameisfoo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
I, on behalf of all even moderately intelligent Christians, apologize for those fools. They're kind of like that dumb friend that you can hardly stand to have around
User avatar #165 to #64 - hydraetis
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
That is an excellent analogy
User avatar #167 to #64 - wtfduud
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
It's actually more like "If you evolved from your grandmother, then how come your cousin still exists?".
#69 - takaneuva
Reply +35 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
#85 - thebritishguy
Reply +32 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
All of the species exist, it's just all except the last one is extinct, the first one is not a chimpanzee but a distant relative of both chimpanzee and human.
#111 to #85 - bobbysilk
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
I hate to be that one christian but if those species existed at some time and are now extinct, shouldn't there be fossils or a bit more of a trace of them that we should be finding today?

not trying to sound like a faggot, but I know that's how it'll come out.
User avatar #118 to #111 - Keoul
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
There are fossils that's why we know they exist, we find the skulls n bones in caves and other places.
#126 to #118 - bobbysilk
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
It's great that someone somewhere found something (in all seriousness). But to be honest the transition from whatever that species is to us isn't my main problem.
For me, accepting that the PROBABILITY of the entirety of evolution happening is near impossible, it's just easier for me to believe something outside of our physical existence is capable of creating the universe.
Who knows, he could have done it through the big bang and evolution, but the fact that something guided it would be a real confidence boost.


I know I'm being a faggot but internet...
User avatar #127 to #126 - Keoul
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
Accepting that animals slowly transition to different forms to adapt to their environment is hard to believe? How about some examples of it occurring right now?

Elephants are slowly losing their tusks due to hunters killing the ones with large tusks for their ivory, the small/no tusk elephants survive and pass on their genes so now less and less elephants have tusks.

Fish are getting smaller and smaller due to over fishing, many regulations demand fishermen have a certain net size to allow the little fish to grow, however smaller adult fish also escape and their genes pass on making adult fish smaller and smaller to escape the nets.

Evolution is not as improbable as you think, heck even the bananas people eat can be considered forced evolution, they were originally tiny little things with barely and fruit and massive seeds, now look at them, seriously, google something like "normal bananas" and just look how much they've changed.
#130 to #127 - bobbysilk
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
That slow changing is natural selection which i totally and completely believe no doubt about it (your examples, as well and all the different species of animals such as cats and dogs prove it (even this transition from the other thing to apes and humans if you want)). I just don't think there's enough support for this natural selection to amount to entirely different types of animals. The elephants may have smaller tusks but they're still as much elephants as before.
User avatar #137 to #130 - Keoul
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
These small changes build up, it's tusks now but remember evolution takes places over millions of years, the elephant tusk thing took place over a few years, a decade at most.
User avatar #133 to #127 - improbable
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
by hunters killing elephants with large tusks, is this living thinking creature called "evolution" slowly removing elephant tusks?
#142 to #133 - hankiepankie
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
Evolution is not a designer, and your argument (or joke) isn't very thought through. Tusks are still incredibly useful for elephants in order to survive and reproduce: the pros outweigh the cons.
User avatar #166 to #142 - improbable
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
did you read that Keoul? What you said is a lie because that con does go on par with the pros of them having tusks. lying scum.
User avatar #172 to #166 - Keoul
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
#171 to #166 - Keoul
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
Tell me what pros there are for elephants to have tusks, i genuinely can't think of any.
Maybe protection from predators? but that wouldn't really matter when the predators have guns and the tusks are useless.
Mating? maybe to get the attention of females? Other animals like the peacock use flashy feathers but the elephants may use the tusks, however it doesn't matter when they're dead from hunters.

I am seriously curious as to what the pros are, tell me. When the con is death I don't think the pros would ever outweigh it.

Also here's a picture of an elephant without tusks so you can see that there are elephants who are losing tusks.
#184 to #171 - hankiepankie
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/15/2013) [-]
The reason why I said the pros outweigh the cons is because I have never come across research that said otherwise (until now: though that website has no citation). That picture is of a female Asian elephant--which don't have tusks, so that really doesn't prove a point. And as far as uses for tusks: digging, foraging, defense, ripping bark, even resting their heavy trunks; all of these things help it survive which in turn help them reproduce. Of course tusks have use--nothing in nature so prominent develops for no reason.
User avatar #173 to #171 - improbable
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
did you mean to reply to hankiepankie? because he is the one i took my "info" from
User avatar #174 to #173 - Keoul
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
Well you were the original person who said I was wrong so I replied to you, I posted a article I got my sources from and included hankie's name so you could both see it if you want.

Also you called me a lying scum which makes me sad so I'd rather you understand than him.
User avatar #176 to #174 - improbable
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
tbh i dont really care much for arguments on this site. i only join in when someone mentiones my name and then i say something closely related to the comment my name was in.
User avatar #138 to #133 - Keoul
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
You're not being helpful or funny you know that?
#177 to #111 - thebritishguy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
Here are the skulls of the species
#119 to #111 - anon id: de129f6c
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
There are fossils. We've found several. Also, very specific conditions have to be met for fossils to form, and then we have to be lucky enough to look in that spot, if every dead thing made a fossil, there would be more bones than dirt.
#104 to #85 - absolutnignog **User deleted account**
+1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #101 to #85 - emptysuperman
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
Creationists think we are Pokemon.
#121 to #101 - bronywhat
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
No, creationists think that evolutionists think we are pokemon.

Creationists think we are yugioh cards.
#95 - snakefire
Reply +30 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
#35 - sinclairr
Reply +26 123456789123345869
(07/13/2013) [-]
Not only do I hate people who say "IF HUMANS EVOLVED FROM CHIMPS WHY ARE CHIMPS STILL HERE!?" People, I also hate the opposite, " HUMANS EVOLVED FROM CHIMPS"   
   
No, they didn't. Monkeys, Apes, and Chimps are all different primates, but they evolved from a common ancestor, not from each other. It's like saying "Why are there Doves AND Crows? Hmm? Can't answer that? GOD EXISTS CDBJKCKJEHBEFB".
Not only do I hate people who say "IF HUMANS EVOLVED FROM CHIMPS WHY ARE CHIMPS STILL HERE!?" People, I also hate the opposite, " HUMANS EVOLVED FROM CHIMPS"

No, they didn't. Monkeys, Apes, and Chimps are all different primates, but they evolved from a common ancestor, not from each other. It's like saying "Why are there Doves AND Crows? Hmm? Can't answer that? GOD EXISTS CDBJKCKJEHBEFB".
#83 to #35 - anon id: 8b017e9f
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
im not arguing against the theory, i just don't understand one thing. Humans chimps gorillas etc are all apes. And we all have the same ancestors but we just branched off differently. Isn't the point of evolution, to become better? why would they branch off to something lesser like chimpanzees and orangutans then we became the superior race. Shouldn't we have all just become humans, i don't get it.
#89 to #83 - sinclairr
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
first off, we are not all apes, we're primates, apes are a primate.

Second, even though you're anon, I'll still answer, or at least the best I can

What if a disease came about one day that killed Humans. It was lethal to all Humans. Soon, the Human race would be destroyed. Luckily, there are other primates such as chimps, gorillas, etc. to survive this disease, even if Humans cannot. This is also the reason there are different blood types, so if a disease killed only A+ blood, the other blood types would be safe.

It's all nature's way of making insurance of survival.
User avatar #139 to #35 - ineedacigarette
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
inspirational
User avatar #49 to #35 - beerterror
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/13/2013) [-]
What has evolution to do with God's existence? I've never understood that.
User avatar #57 to #49 - sinclairr
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/13/2013) [-]
well, what the bible says (or at least out lines and is suspected by me, and it seems others) that God swiped his hand and all living creatures were created as they are today. Evolutionists think that it was science and evolution (duh) that took single cell organisms to what were small creatures to large creatures and finally, somewhere down the line, to humans.

so, in a very basic sense

Evolution = Science made things not god

Creationist = God made things not science
User avatar #178 to #57 - beerterror
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
This has no point whatsoever. Also "science made things"? Wut?
I thought, that existence of the Divine, and what's written in a book from before ******* Rome are two different things.
#179 to #178 - sinclairr
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
Let me put it simply so a person with an IQ of 2 understands

Creationist think God made humans
Evolutionists think a species evolved into Humans

Now I answered your question and if you don't like it shut the **** up
#180 to #179 - beerterror
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
No you didn't. I asked what has evolution to do with God's existence.    
You told me what two groups of people think about the origin of species. Don't try to ridicule me when you are too stupid to understand what I was asking.
No you didn't. I asked what has evolution to do with God's existence.
You told me what two groups of people think about the origin of species. Don't try to ridicule me when you are too stupid to understand what I was asking.
User avatar #182 to #180 - sinclairr
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/14/2013) [-]
well, sorry

You're asking question with no one answer, it would be a different answer from who ever you ask.
#41 to #35 - RequieminMortis
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(07/13/2013) [-]
Both are generally spouted off by people who have a fundamental misunderstanding of how evolution works, and odd as it sounds, there ARE people who believe in evolution who don't fully understand it.

I also get annoyed by people who spout off about how "evolution is only a theory", as if that somehow negates the MOUNTAINS of evidence supporting evolution as scientific fact, then ignore any attempt to tell them that it remains a theory because it can still be modified with new evidence. To quote Isaac Aasimov, "creationists make it sound as though a theory is something you came up with while drunk one night."
User avatar #43 to #41 - jacksipian
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(07/13/2013) [-]
oxygen is a theory, gravity is a theory, everything is a theory, **** you people who think "theory" means its not proven
User avatar #59 to #43 - sinclairr
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/13/2013) [-]
there are still people who think the world is flat, there are still those who think the moon landing was fake, and there are some who think evolution is just a laughable fiction story.

Go figure
User avatar #63 to #59 - jacksipian
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/13/2013) [-]
wait... you mean the earth isnt flat? ...that cant be true, youre just making **** up now! how do you think we GOT to the moon? we just tipped the rocket over the edge! duh.