Old people can be awesome. . Today I got into an argument with my Aunt because she was upset that her daughter was dating a gin so I said Do you really mini: yo

Old people can be awesome

Today I got into an argument with my Aunt because she was
upset that her daughter was dating a gin so I said
Do you really mini: you should fall in Isidewith someones
genitals over their soul? Because than shallow and sad"
and my as year old grandmother who was sitting in her
roaming chair, and who hunt said a word tonne past hour
screamed "OH BURN" and hit our aunt with a my Nader
alt: -i‘ can til ct Li bata Fl tje_.; -rim
  • Recommend tagsx
Views: 49217
Favorited: 202
Submitted: 07/12/2013
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit Add to favorites Subscribe to easd


Anonymous comments allowed.
#3 - tostito (07/12/2013) [-]
#15 to #3 - qwertyuioplkjh (07/13/2013) [-]
I suck at everything...I can't even do this...
#73 to #15 - cazabrow ONLINE (07/13/2013) [-]
#152 to #138 - anon (07/13/2013) [-]
wow dude srsly
User avatar #11 to #3 - hydrosbro (07/13/2013) [-]
and running the fasted in 1st through 3rd grade is what mattered
#58 - istrollid (07/13/2013) [-]
>be a male metalhead
>have longhair
>just chilling peasfully with my friends(non metalheads)
>wild old man appears and asks "do you know what time it is gentelmenn"
>then he says oh sorry and ladies
>MFW he was talking to me
>have eternal hatred towards the elderly ever since
>also I cut my hair
#96 to #58 - anon (07/13/2013) [-]
I just call them Geriatric **** heads...
#111 to #58 - anon (07/13/2013) [-]
I have had the same ******* problem. One old man thought I was a ******* HIPPIE!
#141 to #58 - rugyakuku (07/13/2013) [-]
This is why I have beard
This is why I have beard
User avatar #72 to #58 - darksideofthebeast (07/13/2013) [-]
You cut your hair because of that.
You have brought mass shame.
User avatar #76 to #72 - istrollid (07/13/2013) [-]
it was not the first time something like this happend
User avatar #78 to #76 - darksideofthebeast (07/13/2013) [-]
Still, you let people get to you that much?
User avatar #80 to #78 - istrollid (07/13/2013) [-]
it happend 2 years ago and still to this day my friends occasionally bring it up and for the record im still a metalhead in case you were wondering
User avatar #81 to #80 - savirleo (07/13/2013) [-]
One of my own friends thought I was a girl when i was doing work in the library. My instructor also checked out my ass when I was working on a fire alarm, before he remembered there's no girl as tall as me
User avatar #82 to #80 - darksideofthebeast (07/13/2013) [-]
You shouldn't have cut your hair just to appear different to people.
It's your image
Keep it how you want.
#30 - alexjonez (07/13/2013) [-]
Somehow i found something relevant to this
User avatar #4 - Loppytaffy (07/12/2013) [-]
I just don't get parents;
"I want my child to be happy", what it actually means is "I want my child to appear normal, because normal by social standards is happy."
#46 to #4 - anon (07/13/2013) [-]
or "I want my child to do exactly what i want it to do, i mean, what i know how to do"
#57 to #4 - fuckyosixtyminutes (07/13/2013) [-]
What's not to get? You may not agree with what they're saying, but it seems like you understand their line of thinking perfectly.
User avatar #117 to #57 - Loppytaffy (07/13/2013) [-]
But they don't want their kids to be happy, they want them to be normal because aparently that equates to happiness.

Being gay is not "normal", so somehow it means that if their child is with someone of the same sex, they are not pursuing happiness, which is normality.
#121 to #117 - bobbyshallunite ONLINE (07/13/2013) [-]
kinda like, i want my kids to be a christian or play a sport or get good grades or whatever because the parents THINKS it is good for them. wether it is or not is a different debate
#153 to #121 - fuckyosixtyminutes (07/13/2013) [-]
Yeah, IDK why you guys are repeating this. It's only showing that you do indeed "get" it.
User avatar #13 to #10 - icameisawilostit (07/13/2013) [-]
But just think about how fabulous everyone would look...
User avatar #17 to #10 - redstag (07/13/2013) [-]
Oh the IronKnee
#31 to #10 - anon (07/13/2013) [-]
Why do these always have to do with america. There are a bunch of European and Asian countries that do not have homosexual rights as well. Not to mention in Africa and the middle east gays are still killed for what they are. I have never seen a group of people fight so hard for the right to be taxed.

Whats wrong with you people? You should change your damn country before you go criticizing other nations for the same point. That would be like the States criticizing Europe's hardon for ethnic cleansing and killing tribals.
#34 to #31 - ohnotwoone (07/13/2013) [-]
I mean i think this was written by an American who was pissed at opposition to gay marriage in his own country.
User avatar #33 to #31 - comandante ONLINE (07/13/2013) [-]
This was most likely written for Americans, but im sure taking the time, similar arguments can be made for other countries, however I do see your point.
#42 to #33 - adolfsama **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #44 to #42 - comandante ONLINE (07/13/2013) [-]
i know. i was commenting on how some people might be bothered by the fact that some examples used here are aimed towards Americans specifically.
User avatar #55 to #10 - indigobob (07/13/2013) [-]
I am fine with gay marriage in general but the only thing I am concerned about is the part regarded adopting kids.
I simply don't think it's alright to force anything upon kids, and ( while I don't know ,I am not a biologist nor a psychologist ) I am afraid that if a kid grows up in a gay marriage it would seem likely that the kid can subconsciously make it his sexuality simply because his parents did it too. Can anyone tell me whether this is possible or not?

Also, the kid would be teased in school and all that jazz, you got to think about that too

But other than that, gay marriage is fine
User avatar #63 to #55 - princeofbrokensoul (07/13/2013) [-]
hey may be teased in school but allot of people are. and im sure that the kid would not just make it subconsciously his sexuality just cause is adopted parents are.
User avatar #64 to #63 - indigobob (07/13/2013) [-]
also, not to mention that people will presume the guy/girl as homosexual because they lived with gay parents
User avatar #65 to #64 - princeofbrokensoul (07/13/2013) [-]
maybe or maybe not it really depends on how they react towards him/her
User avatar #67 to #65 - indigobob (07/13/2013) [-]
true, true. I just don't think that burdening children deliberately, be it gay marriage or anything else, is something that is wrong. Hope you understand
User avatar #84 to #67 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/13/2013) [-]
do you extend this belief to the illegal non medical genital mutilation of 90% 2 day old boys in the US and the selling of the amputated tissue to pharmasucital companies and private labs by the doctor for 1,600-4000 dollars wich go straight into his pocket ?
User avatar #85 to #84 - indigobob (07/13/2013) [-]
you know exactly in what way I meant it. Don't make me look ridiculous
User avatar #87 to #85 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/13/2013) [-]
I take that as a yes then.
User avatar #88 to #87 - indigobob (07/13/2013) [-]
do what you will
User avatar #89 to #88 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/13/2013) [-]
I'm just saying the equal protection act say's it is illegal to mutilate any genitals of any gender but Americans ignore the law and Doctors lie and say it is the parents choice (when they have a boy) beause the foreskins sell for 300,0000 a year.
User avatar #90 to #89 - indigobob (07/13/2013) [-]
I don't believe you should have the right to influence the gender of the baby, if that is what you are talking about.
User avatar #97 to #90 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/13/2013) [-]
kinda they lie and say it is okay to mutialte boy's but not girls even though they can preform equlivant mutialtion procedures on both genders ? what is it that makes vaginas so valuable they need to be protected from and touching of prodding but you van do what ever the **** you want to you kids penis even if it is extremely painful and has a 7-9% mortality rate.and a 30-33% complication rate and serves no medical benifits to a child at all.
Americans lack of morality or ethics or addhearence to the law because they want to keep making money sickens me.
one day the parents and doctors will have to answer for their crimes and they will likely burn in the pits of tartarus.
User avatar #127 to #97 - roflsaucer (07/13/2013) [-]
Are you.... are you saying we should circumcise girls, since we do it to boys?

It kind of DOES depend on the choice of the parent. If the parent says no to the circumcision the doctor CANNOT possibly perform it without losing his medical license. The reason it doesn't happen with girls isn't because of some gender-preference nonsense, it's because there is literally NO benefit to the child if you do it. At least in America, it is generally considered "unclean", however unfounded it may be, to have that extra foreskin, but how does this AT ALL apply to girls?
There is literally no medical or social reason for girls to undergo such a procedure, so why would they do it?

I don't see why you blame the Doctors and pharmaceutical companies, when while they make money off of it, they are NOT the reason such procedures happen. Not to mention the very idea of a girl having something akin to circumcision done at birth is preposterous. You completely missed the heart of the issue.
User avatar #131 to #127 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/13/2013) [-]
in other countries they preform clitorectomy's (removal of extra skin of the clitoral hood) for the same purosed false reasons the US preforms Cricumcisions. thier is no medical benifit hence is is called a cosmetic body modifaction not a medical procedure. and the law says parents have no right to make and body modifactions to thier childeren and the equal protection act say male and female genitals must recieve equal protection. the doctor making millions off it is a major reason it happens as well as social conditioning and a study found many doctors lie or mislead parents to get them to agree to the procedure and again legally the doctors can not sell the foreskins since they belong to the child but they do. since the US completely protects female genitals and not male genitals all the doctor are guilty of many counts of medical malpractice and grevious violent sexual assults and they violated all their codes of medical ethics.
User avatar #132 to #131 - roflsaucer (07/13/2013) [-]
I wasn't aware such a thing existed, but I'm not quite sure it's the same thing. I mean, I myself am circumcised and I have no complaints about it, so I can't rightly demand change in the whole system.
Not to mention, I think that the whole "Doctors selling foreskin" thing is a bit of a "One bad apple spoils the bunch."-type deal. I mean, think about it, first off the Doctor would have to be able to assist with childbirth, so he would need the corresponding degrees and licenses. In total, according the U.S. 2012 Census there are roughly 900,000 licensed physicians. Now, let's say around 50% can actually perform childbirth, we're left with 450,000 physicians. And now you said that Doctors have been caught lying about the procedure to get parents to have it done, and lets say about 100 were caught doing that. And now lets say for every one caught, there are 10 that aren't. Or, heck, even another 100. That leaves with only a .02% chance that your Doctor will lie to you about your child needing to be circumcised. Now, in 2010 there were about 4 million childbirths, and let's say half were boys. The amount of these boys being circumcised and having their foreskins sold by their Doctor would be around 40,000.

The whole point of me doing this math is to show, while you're certainly right Doctors doing this is an issue, it is not NEARLY as large of an issue as you are making it out to be. Not only that, but you're also not considering how many of these boys being circumcised are actually unhappy with it. Sure, having their foreskins sold is a bit freaky and uncomfortable, but the chances they're actually unhappy with the state of their own penis isn't very large.
User avatar #137 to #132 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/13/2013) [-]
also a study found only like 5-10% of the circumcisers have any degree in the studies of male genitals they only know how to cut forekins off nothing more.
User avatar #144 to #137 - roflsaucer (07/13/2013) [-]
No, I'm well aware of what was removed from my body, as well as the amount of nerve endings removed, and I could honestly care less.

Not to mention 90% of all boys in the U.S. is a bit of a stretch for the amount of people that don't know the functions, but let's go with that. And let's think for a second on the whole "Sue your parents and the Doctor" bit. Why in GOD'S name would you sue your own goddamn parents who were doing nothing but thinking about your own welfare, assuming that the Doctor did in fact lie to them in order to sell the foreskin.

And let's also consider the immense timeframe you put out for your data, "80 years". The amount of deaths due to the procedure would be 1250/yr, but the thing is however these Doctors have literally no way of avoiding some kind of repercussion, because the child had died due to the procedure they performed. And if they did not tell the parents of the risks, along with the chances of these risks happening, would only further complicate the issue. In the end, these Doctors would, without a doubt, lose their license for medical malpractice and maybe even face jail time.

Not to mention the "maiming" data you provided is also a bit of stretch in accordance with the whole "90%" you gave, since I find it HIGHLY unlikely that they couldn't figure out whether or not their genitals have been maimed by the procedure.

And then there's the whole "Wouldn't know what sex was supposed to feel like." Sex is just as emotional as it is physical, and while it may certainly feel different due to the circumcision, this does not mean that it feels "bad". Whether someone truly things that they're missing out is HIGHLY subjective. I know there are guys with an issue of being unable to reach climax, but this isn't an issue of foreskin or no foreskin, but of their own personal bodies.
User avatar #145 to #144 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/13/2013) [-]
their is no question if you remove 70% or if the dr makes a mistake up to 90% of the nerves sex is worse and studies have also found circumcised men have a 500% higher chance of developing erectile dysfunction or premature ejaculation in thier lives also studies found that 100% of women found sex with intact men to be at least 50% better because the foreskin rubbed places that didn't get rubbed othertherwise. also thier is no proen medical benifit to the procedure so the only reason for doctors to continue doing it is to make money.
User avatar #136 to #132 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/13/2013) [-]
it is a huge issue 90% of boy in the us are circumcised and the parent don't know they have been mislead or lied to and even fewer know they can sue the doctor ,in fact most circumcised men don't even know the functions of the organ taken from them or that any man who was circumcised as a child can sue the doctor and their parents for a lot of money. nor do doctor tell everyone that they have killed at least 100,000 baby boy's in the US and Canada with the procedure in the last 80 years and horrible maimed at least 1.5 million others or that the fore skin contains 70% of the pleause sensors in the male body. if the boy's knew what they lost they would be very angry thats one of the main reasons they take them from defensless babies. no different then if you clitorectomized a little girl she would never know who sex was suposed to feel like.
User avatar #99 to #97 - indigobob (07/13/2013) [-]
wow, I don't know if what you are saying is the truth ( because I don't live in America ) But if it is then I hope that it stops really soon because it is simply horrible
User avatar #100 to #99 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/13/2013) [-]
yes it is but the women in charge of gender and human rights affairs threw out the petition that was sent in last year after reciving a large sum of money from the jewish womens foundation.
User avatar #102 to #100 - indigobob (07/13/2013) [-]
hope it gets taken down, sincerely.
User avatar #103 to #102 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/13/2013) [-]
as do I but I fear that to much money is being made to stop now, and I guess if you're going to sell your soul you may as well go all in.
User avatar #69 to #67 - princeofbrokensoul (07/13/2013) [-]
its all up to you man i believe they should get a chance to raise kids for themselves.
User avatar #70 to #69 - indigobob (07/13/2013) [-]
In any case I think the psychological influences should be researched thoroughly, be it allowed or not
User avatar #74 to #70 - princeofbrokensoul (07/13/2013) [-]
i think they did something on this already not sure the results though but go ahead and look it up on google but i dont think they really affect there children.
User avatar #77 to #74 - indigobob (07/13/2013) [-]
Well my point of view is that of vegetarians. Some vegetarian parents don't feed their children meat because they believe it is horrible and bad. Therefore, a kid, without a choice, grows up as a vegetarian because their stomach is unable to take meat later on.
In the same way, I am just saying it'd be a great shame if it could affect sexuality since I don't think that'd be right at all.

But I still think that there are definitely gay couples who could raise children better than a bog-standard hetero married couple
User avatar #106 to #77 - Kadzait (07/13/2013) [-]
Exactly like gay parents make their kids eat cock so they can't go without it later on right?
User avatar #79 to #77 - princeofbrokensoul (07/13/2013) [-]
well it would only work like that if the parent wouldnt allow them to date girls and just guys or if its a girl just date girls so yeah depends on the parents actions and points of view.
#93 to #55 - anon (07/13/2013) [-]
Are you stupid? All gay kids come from straight families. Your argument is invalid.
User avatar #95 to #93 - indigobob (07/13/2013) [-]
Did I ever say that they don't?
User avatar #142 to #10 - twofreegerbils (07/13/2013) [-]
I always appreciate the infallible logic that this list exemplifies.
#112 to #10 - buttholee (07/13/2013) [-]
While funny and clever, there are a couple things on that list that don't make much sense.

In my opinion, 2, 5, and 10 are just biased or don't make much sense.
#124 to #112 - anon (07/13/2013) [-]
well it just a joke so it really doesnt amtter this what oyu get for anylzing ever little detail some times a joke is a joke and i love you is i love you
User avatar #20 to #10 - imnotmanbearpig (07/13/2013) [-]
Go ahead, ban gay marriage. We'll just marry your girlfriends. Gay Men Will Marry Your Girlfriends
User avatar #9 - naziyahtzee (07/13/2013) [-]
My best friend is now in a relationship with a girl, and they're perfect for each other.
But her mum won't let her see her girlfriend at all. I'm not sure of the exact reason although she's mentioned that her mum is "scared she might be bullied" which is ******* ridiculous. Our whole friend group, which is quite big, is totally ok with it. Normally we have a problem with couples being all couple-y when we all hang out, but we let them do whatever because we all know the situation.
She's been cut off from dance lessons (which she does like 7 times a week) because her girlfriend does it too, when we invite her to parties her mum is always suspicious that we've invited her girlfriend as well, so the only time she ever sees her is at break times at school.
I just don't ******* get it. Now every time I hang out with her she'll look really sad and there's nothing I can do. How can any parent want that for their child?
Sorry for the essay, it just makes me really ******* angry.
User avatar #40 to #9 - pockyrin (07/13/2013) [-]
You could point out that your friend being gay rules out a parents number one fear about a teenage girl, no teen pregnancies!
User avatar #125 to #9 - benjamino (07/13/2013) [-]
You need to tell her mother. I get that it's probably scary, and maybe seems like you'd be sticking your nose in, but she's your friend and you should do this for her, and her girlfriend too. Don't get into an argument or anything. Just tell her mother straight up 'You are breaking your daughter's heart because of your own prejudices. Look at her, look at how she feels because she isn't allowed to see someone she cares about and ask yourself: is it worth it?'

Although if you feel like arguing, bring up she's sadder now than if she was being bullied- at least in one situation she'd have her girlfriend by her side.
User avatar #135 to #9 - nsfwbrowserv (07/13/2013) [-]
Why didn't she just... You know, tell her mom they broke up and then proceeded to see her GF?
User avatar #155 to #135 - naziyahtzee (07/14/2013) [-]
She doesn't want to lie to her mum and then get caught having lied, because then it'll make the situation worse.
User avatar #62 to #9 - faridahmalik (07/13/2013) [-]
If she can, she should run away from home for awhile. It'd be great if she can stay at a friend's place, and make her mom suffer for awhile.
User avatar #92 to #9 - ofmiceandmen (07/13/2013) [-]
Intolerance angers me too, buddy. I just see it like if what someone is doing makes them happy, then who is someone else to say otherwise? I just don't understand why a different way of life angers people so much. Let them be happy.
User avatar #16 to #9 - gandalfthered (07/13/2013) [-]
the only thing my mom said to me when i came out was: "Don't get HIV, or i will kill you"
User avatar #18 to #16 - redstag (07/13/2013) [-]
Oh more IronKnee. Yay!
User avatar #19 to #9 - blokrokker (07/13/2013) [-]
You and all your friends should go tell her mom to stuff it, because nobody in your friend's group agrees. **** that intolerance-disguising ******** .
User avatar #45 - nextgenmidgett (07/13/2013) [-]
these kind of old people were just like us when they were younger
User avatar #52 to #45 - chuca ONLINE (07/13/2013) [-]
except they went outside...and had lives...and ****** ...
but yea besides that we're the same
#23 - occamsrazor (07/13/2013) [-]
literally the first image result for "game of thrones sassy old lady"
#29 to #23 - tormain (07/13/2013) [-]
Isn't that margaery Tyrell's grandma
User avatar #38 to #29 - occamsrazor (07/13/2013) [-]
mhmm, I just didn't know her name
User avatar #91 to #38 - theredviperr (07/13/2013) [-]
It's Olenna, or 'the Queen of thorns'
#110 - razzar (07/13/2013) [-]
Nice fake story to get thumbs.. She didn't scream "OH BURN" for sure...
#50 - niggastolemyname (07/13/2013) [-]
She'll be needing this.
#5 - cupotruth (07/13/2013) [-]
This is why old people are cool.
This is why old people are cool.
#27 to #5 - thewisedane (07/13/2013) [-]
Old people = Colorblindness?
Old people = Colorblindness?
#28 to #5 - anon (07/13/2013) [-]
Because of untrue stories on the internet?
#109 to #8 - anon (07/13/2013) [-]
You forgot No County For Told Men
User avatar #21 - jackirl (07/13/2013) [-]
The world population is growing at an exponential rate and the way things are going it will most likely and realistically only be able to support a population of around ten billion. I think that Homosexuality is perhaps natures way of dealing with problems like this. Maybe through evolution and time when a population grows too large theres an increase. Humanity has become more civilized in the western world Europe and America but, on the other hand where a stymie in population growth is most needed is in third world countries were you can still be put to death for being gay. I guess they are also lowering the population in these LEDC's and less developed countries if they are being executed but still thats really ****** up to think about.

TLDR gays could be helping with the problem of exponential population growth albeit only in MEDC's and areas with higher development.
User avatar #22 to #21 - fukkendragonite (07/13/2013) [-]
I get what you're saying, but then you're also kinda justifying the cruel punishments for gays in backwards countries, which aint cool.

More acceptance of gays means less "Try and make this sham work" marriages and relationships which means less children. That's the main factor. The idea that nature is making people gay so that bigots can execute me is baffling at best.
User avatar #24 to #22 - jackirl (07/13/2013) [-]
Not to be rude but i think you kind of missed my point. I was suggesting that nature was making people gay to stop the growth of an already large population. This is the case in the developed world. In no way was i suggesting or justifying the brutal killing of gays, i really dont know how you got that... notice how i mentioned how ****** up that is to think about. I was only saying how the population was still being stymied in a similar way but i was not justifying it in the slightest. obviously the brutal killing due to ignorance is horrendous.I wasnt justifying what is happening just pointing out a factor which is coming about due to it.
User avatar #25 to #24 - fukkendragonite (07/13/2013) [-]
Maybe I am understanding, the general message I got was "Nature is creating gays to slow down exponential growth, because people get killed for being gay and that brings the population down". That's certainly what it sounded like to me.

Or did you mean two separate points? "Nature creates gay people to slow down growth, and hopefully people will see that soon, despite the fact that some countries still persecute gays"
User avatar #26 to #25 - jackirl (07/13/2013) [-]
The exponential growth will be slowed down by the fact gay people tend to breed less that straight people. I mean there are still surrogates and such but it is still at a much lower rate. I was stating how in less developed countries people have not noticed this. the population is being lowered by ignorant bigots murdering people and if this wasnt the case more people would come out of the closet in these places thus contributing more so to problems with world population. Again i wasn't stating that killing gays was a solution to population problems, thats deeply ****** up.
User avatar #36 to #26 - toadkillerdog (07/13/2013) [-]
actually, population growth is slowing down in all first world countries as it is. The US is one of the few that actually still has positive population growth, and that's just barely. Most of Europe and Japan will require immigrants to keep a viable working population, and countries that are improving like India are seeing their growth drop like a rock as they industrialize. Meanwhile the gay population is actually a constant percentage of the total, they aren't actually growing or shrinking, merely telling people they exist. I think it's about 3% of the total population is gay at any given time.

TL, DR There was always the same percentage of gay people as there is now, and they aren't going anywhere or growing.
User avatar #54 to #21 - thedudefromthegame (07/13/2013) [-]
Except nature doesn't "decide" what to do, it's always random. Evolution wasn't like ""hey maybe we should get like, claws or something"
BAM we get claws
Evolution was a mutation that could or could not be better for the species , and the ones that are better survive and pass on the "better" gene
#105 to #54 - anon (07/13/2013) [-]
Yes, that's how it works, congratulations. And now you could've thought it through because maybe that's how it is - a "mutation", occuring in brain, dna, genetics or wherever, a nature's way of keeping population in reasonable numbers - too many ones of the species and they'll run out of food, space etc. Homosexuality isn't just a human thing.
User avatar #107 to #105 - thedudefromthegame (07/13/2013) [-]
You're thinking of nature as a thinking person or being. Nature doesn't think. It just happens.

Nature is not a superhero, it doesn't protect humans or anything. It's not nature's way of saving our puny life. Also try to keep this as non-sarcastic as possible because it just looks like you're butt mad.
#1 - swizzll (07/12/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #154 - settlwlvs (07/13/2013) [-]
The lightbulb gets funnier as it progressively gets less accurate.
User avatar #123 - PenguinArmy (07/13/2013) [-]
this is why we should keep the old people around
User avatar #143 to #123 - jibbablabba (07/13/2013) [-]
old people kick ass
#119 - anon (07/13/2013) [-]
If its not about genitals then why is it about the same sex?
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)