Feminism. in a nutshell. FEMINISM feminist Robot i am a Massive faggot farts Rape why raaaaaaaaaape Aaaaaaah
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#2 - bastille **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (1 reply)
#9 - holeymoley (07/10/2013) [+] (1 reply)
#3 - benevolentpsycho (07/10/2013) [-]
I respect women , but girls who always treat people like 			****		 shouldn't be allowed to talk.
I respect women , but girls who always treat people like **** shouldn't be allowed to talk.
User avatar #12 - timmywankenobi (07/10/2013) [+] (13 replies)
I dislike feminisim because when feminists, influential or otherwise, are presented with solid evidence demonstrating that domestic violence is NOT, in fact, a sexually directional behavior, that it is NOT consistent with their unifying theory of The Patriarchy, that women are actually MORE likely to be violent toward their partners than men, that men and women abuse their partners for the exact same reasons, that women are MORE likely, in fact, to engage in coercive control of a partner, that women are NOT much more likely to be injured or killed by a partner, that mothers are MORE likely than fathers to abuse children, that unilateral violence is 50% MORE likely to be female-perpetrated than male…

Well, what those with any power –those most invested in the ideology– did, in response to that solid, contrary evidence was to engage in boycotts, censorship, intimidation, terrorism, death threats, blacklisting, information suppression, denial, dismissal, shaming, false accusations, and cover-ups. And the ones who didn’t, who said, “hey, wait a minute. We need to look into this,” they were excommunicated.

User avatar #13 to #12 - timmywankenobi (07/10/2013) [-]
Domestic violence is a reflection of a system which is based on female subordination and male dominance. Violence, oppression, coercion, domination and abuse are integral aspects of masculinity, and behaviors not just normalized and reinforced by The Patriarchy, but intrinsic to it.

The negative qualities that make people beat up their partners are not human qualities, they are masculine qualities, and they are an integral part of how masculinity and femininity interact under The Patriarchy, a system where men have always held power.

the element of feminist theory that feminists were driven to death threats, blacklisting and violence to preserve, was the very element that makes hating men morally justifiable.

Robin Morgan said " Man-hating is an honorable and viable political act–the oppressed have a right to class hatred against the class that is oppressing them."

And if men aren’t that way–you know, aren’t violent, oppressive, coercive, dominating and abusive toward women, at least no more so than women are toward men–then all of a sudden it’s no longer justifiable to hate men, is it? Feminists have spent almost 40 years concealing evidence that contradicts the specific misconceptions that give women the right, as a class, to hate men, as a class. They’ve perpetuated stereotypes that violence, aggression, and abuse–especially of women–are “normal” male behaviors, encouraged and abetted by a culture that is shaped by male-dominance, in the face of evidence that men are no more ****** in their behavior toward women than women are in their behavior toward men.

#4 - Ken M (07/10/2013) [+] (4 replies)
tbh i think there should be a new word for feminist because silly people have hijacked it
i'm pretty sure equalist is already a thing but really there needs to be a new word because no one respects feminists anymore when by the very definition of feminism, most people on here are one
idk just some thoughts
User avatar #11 to #4 - timmywankenobi (07/10/2013) [-]
false: unless most people on here believe all men are violent and agressive and thus flawed by their masculine nature and women are perfect because feminitiy is perfect and has no flaws. anyone who doesn't subscribe to this "core belief" of feminisim is not a feminists they are more likely a egalitarian or something.
User avatar #6 - egosumproxi ONLINE (07/10/2013) [+] (1 reply)
What is the source of the comic again? I recognize it, but I cannot remember the name.
User avatar #1 - KingKobo (07/09/2013) [-]
And that's the story of GladOs
#30 - deletedmyaccount (07/10/2013) [+] (8 replies)
I've seen too much feminist and anti-feminist **** in the last month to even care anymore.

**** both sides, I'd rather an hero than listen to anyone tell me about how feminists are evil, or how the patriarchy is so bad.

Here's the truth; both sides have legitimate arguments, but these are made by sane people. The crazy radical people are louder and more interesting, and drown out the good. This plus the way too high number of people just ******* around and pretending to care means both sides look stupid and crazy.
User avatar #37 to #36 - timmywankenobi (07/10/2013) [-]
lol yes I did but only to make a impact and because it was a fitting anology. maybe I'm wrong and feminisim can be reformed but I have seen no signs of wilingness to change, only rejection of reality by the leaders of feminisim in order to make more money.
#23 - thisotherdude (07/10/2013) [+] (5 replies)
Feminist, they won't be happy until the get legal permission to systematically go door to door removing men's penises (hopefully they don't have enough sense to extract the semen, a bit of karma is always nice)
User avatar #27 - henryfordthegod (07/10/2013) [-]
Robot women

are from my army
 Friends (0)