Revenge. Is sweet with a hint of the reefer. Other funniez: . tatt' Soerd. hug Him. Aww...to bad that leaving that note will get her fired. Drugging someone is illegal. Yup, Section 24 Offences Against the Person Act 1861 Maliciously DJ 4DM1Nis delicious brownies Food Porn
x
Click to expand

Comments(138):

[ 138 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#50 - demjimmies (07/09/2013) [-]
While everyone is bitching in the comments, i'm just admiring how great of a father the husband is.
While everyone is bitching in the comments, i'm just admiring how great of a father the husband is.
User avatar #43 - twdeathnote (07/09/2013) [-]
But what would she do for a klondike bar?
#96 to #43 - reistr (07/09/2013) [-]
god damn you deserve more thumbs sir
god damn you deserve more thumbs sir
#132 to #96 - twdeathnote (07/10/2013) [-]
I love you too.
I love you too.
#21 - dizzybreeze (07/09/2013) [-]
You all say she is cunt. But remember this. 2 WEEKS! at least 2 weeks her brownies has been stolen. I would have gone ******* mental. Because obviously the persons who did steal the brownies probably just laughed it of and said "Ya right as if we're gonna stop taking your brownies". I think this was the best way to ensure that my brownies never would get stolen again. I don't care if I ruin another person's career when they are slowly ruining my life by taking my brownies.
User avatar #66 to #21 - CrazyWhiteGurl (07/09/2013) [-]
And, if they don't give a **** about taking a Co-worker's brownies, maybe they're taking other stuff from the company as well. I wouldn't want a person like that working for me if I was an employer.

I don't care if their career is ruined, that asshole doesn't deserve a job to begin with if he's pulling that **** .
#104 to #99 - foaly (07/10/2013) [-]
That's smart.
#111 to #99 - jalthelas (07/10/2013) [-]
But what if some men like to secretly inspect a woman's things?
But what if some men like to secretly inspect a woman's things?
User avatar #86 - iloverapingmen (07/09/2013) [-]
Should've laced them with laxatives. Then everyone would know!
#38 - praisetalos (07/09/2013) [-]
And then you're fired and arrested for distributing.
And then you're fired and arrested for distributing.
User avatar #65 to #38 - fredthemilkman (07/09/2013) [-]
Fired maybe, but you can't be arrested for distributing if somebody steals your food.
#75 to #65 - praisetalos (07/09/2013) [-]
But you can be arrested for distributing marijuana. Most cases...
User avatar #134 to #75 - fredthemilkman (07/10/2013) [-]
it's not distributing if its stolen. I'm not dealing drugs if somebody steals my prescription drugs
#146 to #134 - praisetalos (07/11/2013) [-]
It would have to be prescribed then, right? Did it mention that it was prescribed?
User avatar #97 - theoriginaltyson (07/09/2013) [-]
Until the boss sees this and fires her for bringing drugs to the workplace
#1 - jazzyietheferret (07/09/2013) [-]
Aww...to bad that leaving that note will get her fired. Drugging someone is illegal.

Yup, Section 24 Offences Against the Person Act 1861

Maliciously DJ 4DM1Nistering poison, &c. with intent to injure, aggrieve, or annoy any other person. .

Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously DJ 4DM1Nister to or cause to be DJ 4DM1Nistered to or taken by any other person any poison or other destructive or noxious thing, with intent to injure, aggrieve, or annoy such person, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable to be kept in penal servitude
0
#48 to #1 - adplum has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #72 to #1 - rokulda (07/09/2013) [-]
haha DJ 4DM1Nistering
#108 to #1 - Rascal (07/10/2013) [-]
She should have laced them with arsenic. Lesson learned. Don't be a ******* theif.
#114 to #1 - EatyourChau (07/10/2013) [-]
i don't think it's considered spiking someone if they're the ones taking it lol. It's like leaving marijuana on the counter and they smoke it. spiking (y)
#35 to #1 - Rascal (07/09/2013) [-]
did she drug them or did they take her drugs?
#39 to #1 - Rascal (07/09/2013) [-]
Drugging someone? They willingly took the brownies haha.
User avatar #81 to #1 - drastronomy ONLINE (07/09/2013) [-]
DJ 4DM1Nister¨

holy **** i was confused for a sec
#23 to #1 - Rascal (07/09/2013) [-]
they weren't intended for someone else, they were her personal brownies.
User avatar #5 to #1 - torchrose (07/09/2013) [-]
They were spiking their own brownies, so the only charge is attempted drug use/possession

They can't be charged for someone stealing their ****
#6 to #5 - jazzyietheferret (07/09/2013) [-]
Except the note stated that the point of making them was so that the co-workers who were taking the brownies would fail a drug test, that the same employee just happened to bring about.
#7 to #6 - guythatagrees (07/09/2013) [-]
That would be decided in court and would depend on the lawyer. Now you see where our ****** up legal system comes into play.
User avatar #8 to #7 - apocalypticburrito (07/09/2013) [-]
whats more ****** up is the company wont take any **** and just fired the dude who fails
so yeah some poor person just got fired over ****** brownies
#9 to #8 - Rascal (07/09/2013) [-]
Karma's a bitch. Also if you steal anything, you have to be ready to deal with consequences.
#10 to #9 - Rascal (07/09/2013) [-]
thats not even close to a consequence for taking brownies
are you a feminist?
User avatar #11 to #10 - mhden ONLINE (07/09/2013) [-]
If you stole MY brownies i would sacrifice you to satin .

PS.
you dont need to be a feminist to **** someone up for stealing your stuff .
Also there was a prior note before this . She warned them . They ****** up .
ALL HAIL SATIN!

#31 to #11 - HarvietheDinkle (07/09/2013) [-]
This is satin, which is different than Satan.

you hardcore ************
User avatar #70 to #31 - ilovehitler (07/09/2013) [-]
Satan is for chumps, satin is where it's at.
#60 to #31 - Rascal (07/09/2013) [-]
That satin there looks strangely erotic...
User avatar #29 to #10 - captiancook ONLINE (07/09/2013) [-]
The note clearly states they had been stealing the brownies for over two weeks after the person had repeatedly asked them to stop. Anyone who steals after being being asked to stop deserves to deal with the consequences.
User avatar #62 to #10 - psykobear (07/09/2013) [-]
This has nothing to do with feminism.
Are you a moron?
#15 to #8 - inxtcy (07/09/2013) [-]
In the end they got fired for being a stealing bastard. ha
User avatar #3 to #1 - brokentrucker (07/09/2013) [-]
In all actuality, the chances are its just a ploy to get whoever it was to come forward and rage hard about it, when, in fact, the brownies were not spiked. This would have unveiled the illicit food nommers, and lead to great success.
#30 - beerholder (07/09/2013) [-]
someone who is intelligent enough to do such a prank must be intelligent enough to realize that it's illegal. And given the note, and the fact that the culprit knows her name, that would mean those are some hell of a good brownies if jailtime is worth it.

so.... I have reasons to believe this never happened.
User avatar #28 - zomgodness (07/09/2013) [-]
> ***** over people by saying she added marijuana to the brownies
> Leaves evidence behind saying that she was the one who did it and was originally in possession of the drug
> ???
> ******* idiot
#32 to #28 - commanderbright (07/09/2013) [-]
unless the marijuana was a lie just to make them **** their pants and leave the brownies alone (Y)
User avatar #71 to #32 - ilovehitler (07/09/2013) [-]
or come forward and get mad about it
#144 to #71 - commanderbright (07/10/2013) [-]
and no one would confess, then continue take brownies
User avatar #58 - landrower (07/09/2013) [-]
ahem, she would be ****** by putting this poster up...
#78 - kittykatbat (07/09/2013) [-]
She should have spiked them with LSD, and instead of writing about the drug test half of the people in the office would just be completely ****** .
#117 - demothrin (07/10/2013) [-]
i dont think she would get done for intoxicating people because technically they were her brownies and if someone happened to eat some its thier own fault
#116 - Rascal (07/10/2013) [-]
and then you show management this note and get whoever it was fired and file charges for poisoning
User avatar #110 - herecomesjohnny ONLINE (07/10/2013) [-]
bitch don't say anything you'll get sued for intoxicating people
#109 - iftheshoefits (07/10/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #41 - zapgod (07/09/2013) [-]
and now they have written proof that you have access to pot and have drugged your co-workers, good job smart person!
#56 - Nightelfbane (07/09/2013) [-]
>everyone saying she's an idiot for leaving behind evidence that she did it
>no name on the letter
#63 to #56 - Rascal (07/09/2013) [-]
She has her name on the brownie container.
#61 to #56 - dashgamer (07/09/2013) [-]
The name was on the tub of brownies, it's a female, she has a nine year old daughter, she made previous notes.
There is more than enough there, even without the name, to put together the identity of this person.
#121 to #61 - TimeWarpRaped (07/10/2013) [-]
Exactly! Thank god someone else understands that this post is stupid **** . No one else seems to be able to connect the dots.
User avatar #69 to #61 - navadae (07/09/2013) [-]
name aside, the rest could still be considered 'circumstantial evidence'
User avatar #67 - chuckstein (07/09/2013) [-]
Just fill the brownies with a **** ton of crushed poppy seeds. I have a friend who got fired because she eats poppy seed bagels and poppy seeds show up on drug tests. That way, no drugs, no traceable evidence.
#22 - justanotherzombie (07/09/2013) [-]
She pulled a real cunt move if she really did spike them.    
Like sure get pay back, make like ex lax chocolate icing for the brownies.   
But to potentially ruin someones career over food, how fat do you have to be.
She pulled a real cunt move if she really did spike them.
Like sure get pay back, make like ex lax chocolate icing for the brownies.
But to potentially ruin someones career over food, how fat do you have to be.

User avatar #26 to #22 - mechaemperor (07/09/2013) [-]
Bitch, you don't **** with brownies a kid makes for her parent's.
User avatar #27 to #26 - mechaemperor (07/09/2013) [-]
That apostrophe has nothing to do there...
#24 to #22 - aliksander ONLINE (07/09/2013) [-]
If it was a once or twice thing then OK it's a little overboard. But these people were stealing her brownies for 2 weeks even after she tried to get them to stop, That makes them spiteful thieves. They deserve what's coming to them.
User avatar #122 to #24 - namnori (07/10/2013) [-]
She could have stopped bringing them in and just ate them at home
#128 to #122 - Rascal (07/10/2013) [-]
is that your advise, when someone steals something? If the stealing person isn't starving, i don't care at all for him.
User avatar #130 to #128 - namnori (07/10/2013) [-]
No, I'm just saying it was an option
#136 to #130 - aliksander ONLINE (07/10/2013) [-]
Remember that the next time someone steals something from you. Someone steals your car? Hey, you should have left it in the garage.
User avatar #143 to #136 - namnori (07/10/2013) [-]
That's a little too far..
It's different when it's just food that you're bringing to work.. They can't steal it if you stop bringing it in, or at least just keep them with you.
#145 to #143 - aliksander ONLINE (07/10/2013) [-]
The principle is the same, the examples are only different in degrees. Whether you steal 50 cents or $100 from someone, you are still stealing from them. It doesn't matter the amount you are stealing, you're still in the the wrong, especially if you are a multiple offender while the person is pleading with you to stop.
#55 to #24 - Rascal (07/09/2013) [-]
Exactly, a life full of pre-judement and economical hardship! that sounds about even for stealing brownies.
[ 138 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)