Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#2 - anon
Reply 0
(07/09/2013) [-]
I don't want to live on this planet anymore. Seriously you ******* idiots, leave them the **** alone, there's a reason they haven't evolved to rely on humans to protect their ******* offspring
#43 to #2 - anon
Reply 0
(07/09/2013) [-]
Ahaha, this one did well. Glad you faggots are so ready to believe that someone would actually believe what I wrote XD
#27 to #2 - tabarzins
Reply -2
(07/09/2013) [-]
Yea man I agree. They should let the birds and other creatures feast on them so that only a couple of the them make it into the water. Or maybe some of them flip over and die of starvation because they can't get back on their feet. Then more of them get eaten by fish when the get into the water. That's the way it should work.
#17 to #2 - puppetstigma **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#30 to #17 - skubasteve
Reply -1
(07/09/2013) [-]
Interesting point, but consider this scenario: The weak offspring that would of died on the beach are now being introduced into the water. The weak off spring are eaten by a predator that normally can't feed on them. That predators food chain becomes stronger effecting other species / also possibly causing that predator to focus soley on this one.
#41 to #30 - puppetstigma **User deleted account**
-2
has deleted their comment [-]
#42 to #41 - skubasteve
Reply -1
(07/09/2013) [-]
Relatively decent understanding. Just because you increase a population doesn't guarantee it will benefit that species more so than harming it. A large variety of factors come into play including disease, competition for natural resources, increased predation, mating aggression, and territory. It's not always a case where increasing a population is healthy for it.
#45 to #42 - puppetstigma **User deleted account**
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#51 to #45 - feeding
Reply +1
(07/09/2013) [-]
#52 to #51 - puppetstigma **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#46 to #45 - skubasteve
Reply -1
(07/09/2013) [-]
Not when taking into account disease though. It could take simply just one turtle infected with lets say a parasite that would of died on the beach to be eaten by a predator that normally would not feed on said turtle. We have no idea what that parasite could possibly do to the now infested predator, to its enviroment, and the organisms that feed on it.

The point being is the less human influence the better, unless we are controlling our own factor in play.
#47 to #46 - puppetstigma **User deleted account**
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#8 to #2 - anon
Reply 0
(07/09/2013) [-]
We cause more damage than protect other species.
If we left them alone they would go into extinction before evolving into a status that can resist human activity.

Also some people like to eat turtle eggs.
#7 to #2 - anon
Reply 0
(07/09/2013) [-]
found the treehugger.
#4 to #2 - SwiftNinja
Reply +28
(07/09/2013) [-]
Yeah stopping 250 of them getting killed is such a **** thing to do. ******* idiots.
#40 to #4 - anon
Reply 0
(07/09/2013) [-]
actully it is against the law to help protect them getting to the ocean they give birth to so many beacuse so many die if you protect them you get over population now the the other anon didnt have to be a dick about but technically he/she is right
#10 to #4 - largeheadphones
Reply -4
(07/09/2013) [-]
But it's nature, we don't have the right to interfere with it.
#34 to #10 - azumeow
Reply 0
(07/09/2013) [-]
>Implying that humans aren't a part of nature.
#18 to #10 - anon
Reply 0
(07/09/2013) [-]
We are part of nature too, so everything we do is also nature.
#3 to #2 - themurp
Reply +3
(07/09/2013) [-]
Considering the **** we humans do. Guiding some baby turtles to the ocean is pretty damn good.
#11 to #3 - largeheadphones
Reply -5
(07/09/2013) [-]
BUT WE SHOULDN'T BE AFFECTING THE COURSE OF NATURE ANYMORE THAN WE ALREADY HAVE! If we keep doing this, then the birds that live in the area might no get the food that they usually get that they have been relying on for years, this is probably just some tourist attraction, which we have no right allowing.
#26 to #11 - anon
Reply 0
(07/09/2013) [-]
If its a turist attraction there will be turist who throw half eaten food around, that food will be eaten by the birds. Everyone lives.
#13 to #11 - anon
Reply 0
(07/09/2013) [-]
Don't be stupid, the birds obviously have other food sources
Why let turtles die when they don't have to!
#12 to #11 - trolololel ONLINE
Reply +3
(07/09/2013) [-]
Human beings evolved on earth. WE ARE NATURE. We do as we please.
Human beings evolved on earth. WE ARE NATURE. We do as we please.