Go Ahead, Gun. .


Anonymous comments allowed.
#5 - grandtheftkoala **User deleted account** (07/08/2013) [-]
#247 to #5 - Cleavland Steamer (07/09/2013) [-]
[dies internally]
#21 - fuckthehabs (07/09/2013) [-]
** *********** rolled a random image posted in comment #97 at The LoL community and its rules... ** what actually kills people
#144 to #21 - anon (07/09/2013) [-]
tgfw you understand the reference.
#127 to #21 - anon (07/09/2013) [-]
Children: killing all living creatures since forever.
User avatar #24 to #21 - tankerdude (07/09/2013) [-]
fair enough
#1 - teranin (07/08/2013) [-]
Guns don't kill people, Omni-tools do
Guns don't kill people, Omni-tools do
User avatar #321 to #1 - masterspectre ONLINE (07/29/2013) [-]
I kept pressing RT hoping Shepard would stab him again and again.
User avatar #6 to #1 - sketchE ONLINE (07/08/2013) [-]
it was self defense
#8 to #6 - teranin (07/08/2013) [-]
"This is for Thane, you son of a bitch" Just because it's self defense, doesn't make it him any less dead
User avatar #9 to #8 - sketchE ONLINE (07/08/2013) [-]
i was making a joke. he deserved it
User avatar #33 to #1 - RequieminMortis (07/09/2013) [-]
This was one of the most immensely satisfying moments of the game.
User avatar #31 to #1 - darthblam ONLINE (07/09/2013) [-]
I REALLY enjoyed this..

Even as a pure Paragon player, Renegade moments like these just HAVE to be taken.
User avatar #205 to #31 - hydraetis (07/09/2013) [-]
And punching the reporter in the face.

Though killing that son of a bitch definitely was one of the best feelings in the game. Nobody ***** with Thane and gets away with it.
#192 - olesc ONLINE (07/09/2013) [-]
**olesc rolled a random image posted in comment #5172009 at My Little Pony fanfiction, backgrounds, songs, lyrics, and GIFs. ** the root of all evil
#44 - pebar (07/09/2013) [-]
#77 to #44 - necroshiz **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#113 to #44 - ShaunG (07/09/2013) [-]
That's an ad hominem attack. And it can go both ways.
User avatar #120 to #113 - douthit (07/09/2013) [-]
Not in this case, because LaPierre's position is the default in this situation. Those who would seek political action in the wake of disasters are the ones utilizing it to their benefit. Responding to someone attempting to change the status quo is not taking advantage of a disaster, whether they be right or wrong.
User avatar #124 to #120 - ShaunG (07/09/2013) [-]
You are correct. My comparison is inaccurate.

However, my point about the image representing an ad hominem attack is still correct. While using tragedies to achieve political goals makes her immoral, her argument and the political issue of gun control is amoral, and her terrible personality is not representative of the effectiveness of her policies.

I actually have no idea who she is, I just had a problem with the incorrect debating attempt. Australians don't see a lot of American politicians unless they are black and are the president.
User avatar #175 to #124 - pebar (07/09/2013) [-]
Dianne Feinstein is the senator from California. She is a career politician and has been in office since 1992. In all that time she has been a major advocate for gun control and she was behind the 1994 federal 10 year assault weapons ban. Not even 1 day after the sandy hook incident, she took the opportunity to to use it to advance her cause that she'd been pushing for decades. During the senate gun debates at the beginning of the year, she kept saying "think about the children" but she didn't give a damn about children, she just wanted gun control.

It's not an argument for or against gun control, it's just saying she's a bitch.
#182 to #175 - emrakul (07/09/2013) [-]
On an unrelated note, she also heads the Senate Intelligence Committee, aka the people who knew about the NSA spying program the entire time and were perfectly fine about it. She's been the biggest voice in Congress defending the program.
User avatar #238 to #120 - bigmanfifty (07/09/2013) [-]
But isn't the most logical thing you can do in the wake of a disaster is make changes?

By that logic, after 9/11, nothing should have been done or said
User avatar #86 to #44 - ivoryhammer (07/09/2013) [-]
Pat Robertson uses national disasters.
User avatar #92 to #44 - douthit (07/09/2013) [-]
If she wants my guns, she's gonna hafta send men with guns.
User avatar #221 to #92 - smellmyfaceforswag (07/09/2013) [-]
Dat avatar pic with dat comment. Win.
#196 - cptbarney (07/09/2013) [-]
Humans and guns can also join forces and destroy the evil water.   
99% of all humans have drunk water atleast once in their life time.   
just saying.
Humans and guns can also join forces and destroy the evil water.
99% of all humans have drunk water atleast once in their life time.
just saying.
User avatar #284 to #196 - ICEDgrunge (07/09/2013) [-]
He's like Caligula 2.0
User avatar #260 to #196 - theshadowed (07/09/2013) [-]
You know who drank water? Hitler. And the Illuminati.

#273 to #260 - crazylance (07/09/2013) [-]
sheeples ... hehe +1 to you good sir
#295 to #260 - cptbarney (07/09/2013) [-]
That's my point.
That's my point.
#17 - olizandri (07/09/2013) [-]
guns dont kill people, i kill people. with guns.
#19 to #17 - doodogger (07/09/2013) [-]
"If a guy messes with me, I shoot him with my load, all over his chest and face, and down his throat, because I don't give a **** , I'm crazy, like Mel Gibson. ...No wait, that just makes me sound racist."

"On top of guns I know karate and ninja stuff, so if you come at me I'll trip you then I'll suck your nuts... No-no, I mean I'll punch your nuts, sucking them would be gay and I'm totally not gay, I'm all about V-A-G-I-N-A! (whut?!)"
User avatar #47 - trogdorrules (07/09/2013) [-]
I think damn near anything can kill anyone, as long as the person wielding said object is determined enough to kill you with it.
#141 to #47 - anon (07/09/2013) [-]
try to go on a killing spree with a cucumber...
Even a knife wont bring you much success! Only fire arms and explosives are effective enough and (usually) easy to use for everyone no matter how weak or young/old.
User avatar #208 to #141 - hydraetis (07/09/2013) [-]
You could stuff the cucumber down the person's throat.
#140 - saiyajinwarrior (07/09/2013) [-]
Gun's Face When
User avatar #130 - ireallylikepotatoe (07/09/2013) [-]
Look, I don't want to sound like a libtard or anything, but I live in England where guns are not legal. Sure we have the occasional crazy guy shooting up some people but it's nothing like the scale of it in America.

If it's easier for you to get a gun then it's easier for a crazy guy to get a gun and that just isn't safe.

By all means have your right to bear arms, but you need to take precautions to make sure your guns stay in the right hands.
User avatar #239 to #130 - bigmanfifty (07/09/2013) [-]
Exactly. A gun should never be in the hand of an untrained civilian, that's just stupid.
#286 to #239 - anon (07/09/2013) [-]
On the contrary, why not do nuclear deterrence? EVERYONE has a gun, so EVERYONE who uses a gun has to get in a shootout. Those who use guns to kill other people almost never use it expecting a shootout. This has ALWAYS worked for Sweden.
User avatar #261 to #130 - fantomen (07/09/2013) [-]
Everything has it's ups and downs.
It may be harder for crazy people to obtain guns, but criminals can still get them fairly easily as evidenced by the fact that handgun crime as increased since Blair banned handguns. The people that were killing people before the ban weren't the licensed gun owners. It was criminals with illegal guns, And since the police couldn't track those guns, all the licensed gun owners lost their guns, but the criminals kept theirs.

And many people had their lives ruined by the stricter gun laws.
I know an English gunsmith that had to leave the country because he couldn't find work anymore. The government also seized and destroyed his gun collection worth over 10 000£, most of which were extremely rare antiques.
#27 - zeroxnight (07/09/2013) [-]
pencils kill people too
User avatar #280 to #27 - thegamerslife (07/09/2013) [-]
My dad was stabbed with a pencil when he was in school. still has the piece of lead in his hand.
#147 to #50 - illusiveshade **User deleted account** (07/09/2013) [-]
What i saw
What i saw
#26 - include (07/09/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#72 to #26 - anon (07/09/2013) [-]
#178 - osirusrising (07/09/2013) [-]
**** storm inbound.
User avatar #287 to #178 - bannon (07/09/2013) [-]
Bomber: Has a pilots licence to fly the place and has permission from his superiors. Pilots are also routinely tested to ensure they have the capabilities expected of them along with their bombs and planes.

Driver: Has a licence to drive the car and has been tested to show that he should have been sensible enough to not drink and drive. Drivers must also submit to routine testing. In Ireland we also have the NCT or National Car Test in which vehicles are tested once a year (depending on the condition or year of the vehicle) so that the vehicle is regulated and kept up to a certain standard

Shooter or person in possession of weapon: ?

Sure, go ahead and have guns but at least have some sort of licencing where people are trained to use the firearms or they're tested, not to mention renewal of mental health evaluations every so often and submission of firearms to be checked for defaults.
User avatar #255 to #178 - megashot ONLINE (07/09/2013) [-]
it's not the gun that is blamed, it's the shooter's access to guns we blame
User avatar #268 to #178 - Hoobling (07/09/2013) [-]
Bombs are already illegal everywhere
Cars are integral to life and drink driving is illegal

No-one blames the gun, it's why Adam Lanza is in jail. I don't want all guns to be confiscated, but there is a problem in America when it comes to how easy it is to get hold of a gun. Lanza's mother didn't need 12 guns.
#191 - frantasium (07/09/2013) [-]
Absolutely anything can kill a person as long as the bearer is determined enough. Take a prison for example. It harbours perhaps the most determined people. A prisoner has the ability to smuggle in a very small disguised weapon, they then can proceed to kill someone with it and all of this is possible because of determination and instinct. It is in our nature to kill, some people don't adjust to the instinct removal process that most of us part-take in when we're in school or at home. Also, the governments of the world shouldn't try and waste their time on banning weapons because then our useful tools will be banned too. They should invest their time in protecting citizens while controlling the instinct, either by allowing gangs to eliminate each other or by training good people who possess weapons to openly allow themselves to defend other good citizens.
TL;DR The government should try and even out the war between good people and bad people by making it easier for good people to defend themselves. Also, removing guns is pointless because basic tools will have to be eradicated also.
User avatar #236 to #191 - timmywankenobi (07/09/2013) [-]
1.guns are designed only to kill they are not tools that were repurposed nor do they serve any other functions.

2. a semi auto rifle with a extended mag can kill a lot more people then a shiv my ****** .
#225 to #191 - saturninepariah (07/09/2013) [-]
* sees a well educated opinion and doesn't thumb down or rage*
#112 - kaboomz ONLINE (07/09/2013) [-]
This image has expired
guns are made to kill
if an inocent is killed the user and the governament should be blamed

the user for being a ******* psycho and the governament for making it possible for a psycho to have a weapon
User avatar #114 to #112 - satrenkotheone (07/09/2013) [-]
We should blame the Chinese for inventing gunpowder!
#270 to #112 - hailarty (07/09/2013) [-]
I prefer having a weapon in my home locked up in my safe. When the government will be able to ensure fully that no one will break in with intention to rob or murder my family, then they can start talking about banning defense tools.
User avatar #275 to #270 - thegamerslife (07/09/2013) [-]
why not quick access bedside safe? I like those little ******* .
User avatar #139 to #112 - sirformidio (07/09/2013) [-]
indeed, Guns are made to kill. and injure, in the case of the .22.
It is the responsibility of a gun owner to know, and understand this so he will not pull a gun without the intent to fatally wound someone else.
User avatar #277 to #139 - thegamerslife (07/09/2013) [-]
You shouldn't go for fatally wounding, you should go for quick kills. center mass and head shots. I'm not taking a chance with my life, someone breaks in, they are 99% chance a dead person (WA is gender neutral now. :/ )
User avatar #2 - alcoholicsemen ONLINE (07/08/2013) [-]
a lot of things kill people, guns are just quickest way to go about it
#87 to #2 - nittsurri (07/09/2013) [-]
Quickest? ***** get on my level.
#220 - snackman (07/09/2013) [-]
KNOCK KNOCK ************ !
#254 to #220 - lolchris (07/09/2013) [-]
Someone tell Ahmed to drop the RPG he's gonna kill us
#296 to #254 - snackman (07/09/2013) [-]
I cant stop ******* Laughing.
User avatar #176 - lorkhan (07/09/2013) [-]
Guns don't kill people, nuh uh... I kill people, with guns. Pow!
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)