Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#6 - mattkingg **User deleted account**
Reply +45
(07/06/2013) [-]
Suddenly, England's policy of not giving all policemen guns... is looking pretty good.
(i'm english btw)
#86 to #6 - Jameshaich
Reply 0
(07/07/2013) [-]
Oh yeah, guns are vital in the killing of kittens.
It's almost as if he didn't have a gun, the kittens would uprise and kill him.
#93 to #86 - mattkingg **User deleted account**
Reply -1
(07/07/2013) [-]
Oh yes i remember last week when i heard about a uk cop stepping on a kitten, or beating someones tog with their bare hands.
#18 to #6 - anon
Reply 0
(07/07/2013) [-]
you don't get it

only thing that can stop a bad guy with a gun is a good kitten with a gun
#24 to #18 - haseotakaeda
Reply -1
(07/07/2013) [-]
That's honestly the stupidest thing
It's a ******* terrible excuse to justify gun rights
#45 to #24 - anon
Reply 0
(07/07/2013) [-]
How about the fact that I am police proof if I wear heavy clothing and goggles? billy clubs, pepper spray, and tasers do all of jack **** against it. Meanwhile, I can stab faces all day long.
#68 to #45 - mattkingg **User deleted account**
Reply -1
(07/07/2013) [-]
We do have like, swat police that could come and shoot you, we just don't give every single police officer guns, because here it is not necessary, because not many civilians actually have guns. In america i can kinda understand, just because everyone has them, so the police are more likely to need them.
#101 to #68 - craigdavid
Reply 0
(07/08/2013) [-]
theres also the fact our society isnt retarded enough to make people convinced that they have the right to take another's life
#7 to #6 - craigdavid
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
of course it is, its a ******* retarded plan for the policing force to have weaponry and not hte populace, they have to have the same standards except in extreme circumstances
#16 to #7 - snickerstheif
Reply +5
(07/06/2013) [-]
British people don't have firearms though (except for a small minority)
#98 to #16 - commontroll
Reply +1
(07/07/2013) [-]
That's what he's saying. It's tyranny to have only the government have guns.
#100 to #98 - craigdavid
Reply 0
(07/08/2013) [-]
not exactly but youve basically got it, im saying the people representing the governing body, i.e. the police force, who uphold the law should not be allowed any weaponry which citizens wouldbe unable to defend against
#21 to #16 - anon
Reply 0
(07/07/2013) [-]
farmers pretty much
#8 to #7 - mattkingg **User deleted account**
Reply -1
(07/06/2013) [-]
I'm really sorry, I'm not sure if you're retarded, or if i am



Are you agreeing with me?
#10 to #8 - flemsdfer
Reply +3
(07/06/2013) [-]
he is agreeing with you. Police having guns and restricting those rights to the citizens is the dumbest thing ever. Her in the U.S. a police officer can do just about anything. Barg into your house without a warrant. Tackle and arrest you. Beat you up some.

What are you going to do? He had no reason or warrants but that's assaulting an officer if you fight back which only adds to the charges as he'll win with his superior equipment. Shoot him? You're branded a cop killer and his buddies will probably see the end of you. The most you can do is get the obscene charges thrown out in court and he'll go on his way with a slap on the wrist since cops have nice organizations that fight to the damn death to have them dropped of all charges every time. We'd be better off without ANY police in this country.
#22 to #10 - anon
Reply 0
(07/07/2013) [-]
in the end is it any bodys right to govern the will of men
#17 to #10 - anon
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
Yes. Let's trust the mob mentality of people.
Because that's so great and never leads to suppression of people.
#9 to #8 - craigdavid
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
yus, in a very empassioned manner so its easily excusable that you may have briefly thought otherwise