Pro gay marriage comp. . PRO GAY MARRIAGE COMP. I don't know
x
Click to expand

Comments(132):

[ 132 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#17 - himyouknowwho (07/06/2013) [-]
look what i got!
0
#53 to #17 - bawler has deleted their comment [-]
#55 to #17 - bawler (07/06/2013) [-]
**bawler rolled user vegeta **
#83 to #17 - rakaka (07/06/2013) [-]
**rakaka rolled user octavia **
#108 to #17 - oliphan (07/06/2013) [-]
Reversed template for anyone who wants it.
#110 to #108 - oliphan (07/06/2013) [-]
And one with a down arrow.
User avatar #111 to #110 - himyouknowwho (07/06/2013) [-]
you are a hero!
#112 to #111 - oliphan (07/06/2013) [-]
Why thank you my friend.
Why thank you my friend.
#113 to #112 - himyouknowwho (07/06/2013) [-]
no. thank YOU, my friend
no. thank YOU, my friend
User avatar #22 to #18 - broale (07/06/2013) [-]
i like this one better
User avatar #105 to #18 - theawesomeguy (07/06/2013) [-]
i'll have to save that
#2 - wobblewub (07/05/2013) [-]
I don't know
-12
#27 to #2 - zyketor has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #76 to #27 - zorororonoa (07/06/2013) [-]
what?
#8 - Rascal (07/06/2013) [-]
Just curious, is there any atheists doing things like these or is it just people who believe in religion who does this?
#16 to #8 - Rascal (07/06/2013) [-]
I've met a few. They're mostly self described "white nationalists" that think the Jews are pushing homosexuality in the media to kill off white people.

Let that speak for itself
User avatar #78 - zorororonoa (07/06/2013) [-]
Wow, homosexuals are so gay
User avatar #60 - friednazi (07/06/2013) [-]
If we're supposed to have separation between church and state, why is gay marriage even a debate?
User avatar #75 to #60 - lordogames (07/06/2013) [-]
They have to fix the problem of who owns the house. When married, and you buy a house, the house goes to the man. In the case of men, which owns the house? And women, same problem. I think it's still ridiculous.
User avatar #104 to #75 - theawesomeguy (07/06/2013) [-]
maybe they could decide who owns the house
or do rock paper scissors or something
User avatar #133 to #104 - lordogames (07/08/2013) [-]
That's what i said. But that's a foreign concept to the government. Deciding. Except for when it comes to being gay...
User avatar #86 - studbeefpile (07/06/2013) [-]
Sure whatever, great comp.






That Irony 'definition' isn't even remotely close to an example of irony, it's just hypocrisy. I ******* hate it when people use the word Irony incorrectly.
User avatar #99 to #86 - dildoes (07/06/2013) [-]
Situational irony: When something happens that isn't expected to happen.
E.G. A person with a marriage that isn't entirely traditional, who is for a different definition of traditional marriage.
User avatar #107 to #99 - studbeefpile (07/06/2013) [-]
What the dildo did you just dildoing say about me, you little dildo? I'll have you know I dildoed top of my dildo in the Navy dildos, and I've been involved in numerous secret dildos on dildo, and I have over 300 confirmed dildos. I am trained in dildo warfare and I'm the top dildo in the entire dildo armed dildos. You are nothing to me but just another dildo. I will wipe you the dildo out with precision the dildos of which has never been seen before on this dildo, mark my dildoing words. You think you can get away with saying that dildo to me over the Internet? Think again, dildo. As we speak I am dildoing my secret network of dildos across the dildo and your IP is being dildoed right now so you better prepare for the dildo, dildo. The dildo that wipes out the pathetic little dildo you call your life. You're dildoing dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can dildo you in over dildo hundred ways, and that's just with my dildo hands. Not only am I extensively trained in dildo combat, but I have access to the entire dildo of the dildo and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your dildo ass off the dildo of the continent, you little dildo. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little "dildo" comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your dildoing tongue. But you couldn't, you didn't, and now you're dildoing the price, you dildoing idiot. I will dildo fury all over you and you will drown in it. You're dildoing dead, dildo.



I had to.
User avatar #1 - tomowrath (07/05/2013) [-]
can any biblist confirm the "non virgins get executed thing"
User avatar #38 to #1 - IamSofaKingdom (07/06/2013) [-]
Much of the old testament gives guidlines to the laws of that social construct. A lot of those situations are out of date in our current period. In their culture virginity meant everything in a wife (the only other major concern was probably dowry) so if she wasn't a virgin she not only fooled her husband but broke their laws as a society by having premarital sex. It is kind of like laws we have now that only pertain to our culture.
User avatar #100 to #1 - sprok **User deleted account** (07/06/2013) [-]
Things the Bible also forbids :
Tattoos
Ham
Getting remarried after divorce
Women speaking in church
Eating shrimp, lobster and other seafood
User avatar #6 to #1 - pockyrin (07/06/2013) [-]
The old testament is absolutely chock a block with god directly telling people to murder their kids if they talk back, invade enemy nations and rape their women etc. The main problem I have with the bible is that the old testament, ie before christ, is about the tales of the jewish god and parables about do bad things and you'll get smote the **** down, it's a vengeful hateful god.

Then new testament you get Christ who was born and raised a Jew, traveled the world on his stepdads boat all sisterhood of the traveling pants style, and brought back a lot of ideas from various religions, and preached peace and love, meek inheriting the earth, love everyone stuff. God is a nice lovely god, he even sent his son to die to erase original sin because he loves us so much.

So yeah my main problem with religions based around the bible is that from the ground up source material, it's already made to be conflicting because it's stories about two completely different gods and religions. That's why I think people are so confused whether they are supposed to smite gays or love them as their neighbor.
User avatar #5 to #1 - imakejewburgers (07/06/2013) [-]
There's a reason why the Old Testament has been thrown out in regards to rules and guidelines.
User avatar #12 to #5 - calawesome ONLINE (07/06/2013) [-]
you have a point.
User avatar #117 to #5 - tomowrath (07/07/2013) [-]
Hey man, long time no see
User avatar #130 to #117 - imakejewburgers (07/07/2013) [-]
Hey. How you been?
User avatar #131 to #130 - tomowrath (07/07/2013) [-]
not too bad, got a job, yourself?
User avatar #132 to #131 - imakejewburgers (07/07/2013) [-]
Alright, turned down some work so I could be lazy. What're you doing for work?
#3 to #1 - Rascal (07/06/2013) [-]
'tis true. Deuteronomy is full of **** like that.
#15 to #3 - Rascal (07/06/2013) [-]
the old testament is more fun than you think.
"Oh hey, lets kill everyone but my people" - God
#28 to #3 - Rollerofdouble (07/06/2013) [-]
**Rollerofdouble rolled a random image posted in comment #2707397 at Friendly ** Excellent...
#4 - Rascal (07/06/2013) [-]
just look it up first of all don't just take someone's word for it
#19 - Rascal (07/06/2013) [-]
Wow didn't know the liberal disease is already on funnyjunk, just what it needed.
#67 - inthurrnet (07/06/2013) [-]
I don't get the '' Jesus hanged out with 12 guys ''   
Does it make you automatically gay if you hang out with friends?
I don't get the '' Jesus hanged out with 12 guys ''
Does it make you automatically gay if you hang out with friends?
User avatar #68 to #67 - uhidk (07/06/2013) [-]
it's called a joke.
User avatar #69 to #68 - inthurrnet (07/06/2013) [-]
I guess he didn't think it through very well then
User avatar #74 to #69 - uhidk (07/06/2013) [-]
that doesn't make any sense but okay.
User avatar #84 to #74 - inthurrnet (07/06/2013) [-]
I know it was a joke, but what i meant was that it was a bit poorly executed. But yeah, i'll stop now, since i don't want to turn this into an arguement
User avatar #87 to #84 - uhidk (07/06/2013) [-]
good.

also i couldn't help but notice that we signed up on the exact same day. i thought that was pretty cool.
User avatar #90 to #87 - inthurrnet (07/06/2013) [-]
Oh that's awesome.
User avatar #80 to #69 - sanguinesolitude (07/06/2013) [-]
i got it
User avatar #29 - bandoslootshare (07/06/2013) [-]
gay people has always been aggressive against things for some reason. its almost as if they have something up their butts.
User avatar #21 - scootpilgrim (07/06/2013) [-]
Honest question, why should marriage be a right?
#42 to #21 - budva (07/06/2013) [-]
Why shouldn't it?
User avatar #24 to #21 - theantidote (07/06/2013) [-]
Well it's just an equality reason. Why should straight people have the right and gay people not? It was the same with men and women, and blacks and whites in the past whereas their "rights" differed for some reason or another, but we seen how that turned out
User avatar #25 to #24 - scootpilgrim (07/06/2013) [-]
that... doesn't really answer my question. Why should it be a "right" for straight people in the first place? It's just a type of status.
#26 to #25 - ekusas (07/06/2013) [-]
Because marriage is not only a status, it matters alot in legal matters aswell. Also, being able to attain a status, has and will always be, a symbol : Disciminating attainabillity of said status when attained status does not directly effect the lives of others has to be considered not only dumb, but also illigal - As you said, its not so much the right to be marriaged, its the right to have rights.

But, the question remains why gay people want to be wed into a religion that doesnt approve of their personal beliefs - But i dont think thats wise to discuss ever, as it is every mans right, to be having whatever status said person wants, aslong as it doesnt effect the lives of others. So who im i to say you cant be a gay cristian mormon jew ?
#35 to #25 - teenytinyspider (07/06/2013) [-]
If there were no rights for married people and two people want to live together and one kills over, then there is no "Join Heirs with Rights of Survivorship" which is generally what married people fall under who own a house at the time they were married, and that means that every aunt, uncle, and 6th-cousin can come along and try to fight the spouse and kids for the house
User avatar #115 to #35 - scootpilgrim (07/07/2013) [-]
But you can leave everything to your partner without being married if you put it in your will.
#116 to #115 - teenytinyspider (07/07/2013) [-]
A will can be contested. Trust me, I've seen it happen.
-7
#9 - icewraith has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #23 to #9 - jajathezombie (07/06/2013) [-]
The Jews are actually pretty cool. It's like they have this superiority thing that is so advanced they just don't give a **** what anyone does, because everyone else is doomed anyway for not being of the chosen people. I'm totally okay with that, I wish every religion would do the same.
-3
#31 to #23 - icewraith has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #44 to #31 - jajathezombie (07/06/2013) [-]
Huh?
#64 to #9 - winrobert (07/06/2013) [-]
"Ahem"
#10 to #9 - Rascal (07/06/2013) [-]
The Jews don't protest because signs are expensive.
#20 to #9 - Rascal (07/06/2013) [-]
ah, of course. how strange that a country made of mainly white people has a gay community made mostly of white people.
User avatar #7 - arcanemonkey (07/06/2013) [-]
****
This
Guy


XD
#14 to #7 - walnoot (07/06/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #13 to #7 - bitchplzzz (07/06/2013) [-]
so is it

****
this
guy


.. or

****
this
guy
#101 - Rascal (07/06/2013) [-]
While it is true that gays don't deserve to be ostracized because Jusus wouldn't have; marriage is a Christian ceremony and it is important to acknowledge that.
#81 - almightysausage (07/06/2013) [-]
the market for custody lawyers is gonna boom when they allow same sex marriage!

And no, not because same sex marriage does not work, but because if a gay couple were to split up then they can just leave, no law involved with custody and such.
#79 - sanguinesolitude (07/06/2013) [-]
This image has expired
saved.
User avatar #62 - soggypancakes ONLINE (07/06/2013) [-]
That lady in the fourth to last is like, "We're getting tired of these guys and their **** ."

I don't have great editing skills and I am lazy.

:I
#103 to #62 - theawesomeguy (07/06/2013) [-]
photoshop skills are off the charts
User avatar #109 to #103 - soggypancakes ONLINE (07/06/2013) [-]
I love you?
User avatar #59 - smokingman (07/06/2013) [-]
I don't support gay marriage.
In fact, I don't support marriage.
Why the **** does it still exist?
And why the hell would gay people want to marry?
Social recognition?
#63 to #59 - theonemica (07/06/2013) [-]
I agree with you, I hate the fact that marriage is a government regulated thing. It's stupid.

Here's a quick list of rights/benefits that being married gives you (which, since gay marriage is illegal, means gay couples don't benefit from).

www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/marriage-rights-benefits-30190.html
User avatar #65 to #63 - smokingman (07/06/2013) [-]
Well thank you, that comes in handy.
User avatar #70 to #59 - Ruspanic (07/06/2013) [-]
If you love someone enough to spend your life with them, it makes sense to have things like joint property ownership, shared income, hospital visitation rights, and being able to make decisions for the other in case of death or incapacitation. Besides that, the legal contract of marriage helps further stabilize the union, helping to ensure that any children you might have grow up in a stable household.
User avatar #73 to #70 - smokingman (07/06/2013) [-]
That's why marriage should be a simple contract between private parts, and shouldn't be regulated by the government.

You get a nice piece of paper, write your names on it (masculine or feminine, it shouldn't matter), and sign it.
It gets validated as a regular legal contract, and TADAAAAA!
Problem solved.
User avatar #77 to #73 - Ruspanic (07/06/2013) [-]
Isn't that pretty much the same thing? Marriage (in this context) is a legal contract. It's just a standardized legal contract that people don't have to write themselves.

The only difference I can think of is that status-quo legal marriage comes with tax benefits, which can be justified insofar as the state has an interest in stable households and birth rates.
User avatar #82 to #77 - smokingman (07/06/2013) [-]
I would propose the abolition of marriage-related tax benefits, and the introduction of child birth/adoption related ones, even for single men/women.
Most married gay couples are very interested in having children, one way or another, and I don't see why a child grown by a gay couple would be any less valuable than any other one, for the state.
User avatar #85 to #82 - Ruspanic (07/06/2013) [-]
While tax benefits could help struggling single parents, they could also serve as an incentive for single people to have children. It's not a good idea to encourage single parenthood.

As for gay couples - I agree with you. That's why the legal definition of marriage should be changed to include same-sex couples, and why same-sex couples should be eligible to adopt.
User avatar #92 to #70 - timmywankenobi (07/06/2013) [-]
you are describing a pre 1970's Marriage contract not a modern one.
User avatar #94 to #92 - Ruspanic (07/06/2013) [-]
If I'm wrong, please correct me.
User avatar #95 to #94 - timmywankenobi (07/06/2013) [-]
most of it is the same but there are a few added things that only benefit the female .
-10
#37 - sajeth **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#98 to #37 - hankiepankie (07/06/2013) [-]
You should know, being an atheist, that marriage is a social construct, not something prescribed by God, and it manifests itself differently in every culture. And, being an atheist, you should also respect science, which has proven that homosexuality is by no means unnatural. In a free society such as the one we are supposed to belong to, don't you agree that we should not limit marital tradition to one set up by perverted Judeo-Christian values?
0
#118 to #98 - sajeth **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#120 to #118 - hankiepankie (07/07/2013) [-]
Wow, you really just compared homosexuality to rape murder and incest. How are they even comparable. Are you trying to use a slippery slope argument? You must be able to see the fallacy in that.
0
#123 to #120 - sajeth **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
0
#122 to #120 - sajeth **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#124 to #122 - hankiepankie (07/07/2013) [-]
My bad, I mistook the meaning of your argument: it's even more moronic than I had first thought. Give me one good reason--just one--why heterosexual couples should have the right to marry who they please, yet same sex couples shouldn't.
0
#125 to #124 - sajeth **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#126 to #125 - hankiepankie (07/07/2013) [-]
So my suspicion is confirmed: you are just a ignorant mouthbreather. If you haven't noticed, the norms of a society change throughout time--the fact that so many people are speaking out against your idiotic comment shows that our values have changed from a decade or so ago. Our "norms, values and morals" certainly changed when we repealed Plessy v Ferguson. If you had been in the 60's you would have been saying "Hey, I think the negros should be equal to us, I just don't want 'em to go to my daughter's school!".

As for the 'over-sexualization' and gay pride parades-- that's their first amendment right you ******* moron. Get over it. We did; in 1789 when ratified the goddamn thing.

And your argument in the first paragraph; it makes no ******* sense you jackass.
0
#127 to #126 - sajeth **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#128 to #127 - hankiepankie (07/07/2013) [-]
Well I'm just about done commenting because I just realized I'm most likely arguing with an eighth grader who doesn't know what a logical fallacy is. But I will say...

You are the one who argued values and norms of society if you don't recall--which is based on a majority, so you're just arguing with yourself now, champ.

I'd also like to point out that you have now compared homosexuality to the likes cannibalism, incest and rape, and, now, marriage equality to slavery. Lets just take a moment to realize that you are not arguing with logic, but rather, hate.

Lastly, I'd like to say that you are even worse than all of those dimwitted christians in the comp, you ignorant, uneducated halfwit.
0
#129 to #128 - sajeth **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#57 to #37 - whatugawkinat (07/06/2013) [-]
You dropped your wallet....I picked it up for you, but couldn't help noticing this picture of you that fell out.
User avatar #43 to #37 - flaminggodzilla (07/06/2013) [-]
Go kill yourself
-1
#46 to #43 - sajeth **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #71 to #37 - Ruspanic (07/06/2013) [-]
what lifestyle?
#72 to #37 - theonemica (07/06/2013) [-]
I support marriage equality, but only because it grants a lot of benefits/rights that gays currently don't get.

I don't think marriage should be a government regulated thing at all though.

However, you said earlier that "presenting/glorifying normal sexuality" which implies that homosexuality isn't normal. So what makes it abnormal? The fact that it's not the majority? In America, blacks are the minority, but they're considered a normal color. In the world, whites are the minority, but they're considered a normal color.

Perhaps you think it's not normal because it's not "natural." Well define natural. Natural would be things that regularly occur without any kind of interference in nature, correct? Things that just happen in nature? Well, considering most animal species have homosexual animals, that's natural. And you can't just say it's because they don't care what they **** - there are animals that ONLY have sex with others of the same sex. IIRC, there was a chimp/monkey couple that was forcibly separated and they both ended up extremely depressed until reunited.

And the thing is, we're not pushing a sexualized society any more than straight people are. And I honestly think the reason gay pride parades are so sexualized is to try to get people more used to it or something. I don't like how sexualized they are either. The majority of us gays are normal (hell, most of the pride parade gays are normal), but sometimes everyone just really let's go of that for one day (i.e. at the parades).

TL DR Homosexuality is normal. It's been around for a long time and is naturally occurring in nature. Marriage IS stupid but equal marriage rights is necessary because of the benefits and rights that come along with it.
#96 to #72 - hankiepankie (07/06/2013) [-]
^This guy knows what he's talkin about! (except I don't think a chimp and a monkey had a relationship with each other)
#134 to #96 - theonemica (07/08/2013) [-]
I wasn't sure what species they were, they were the same, though. xD
-2
#88 to #72 - sajeth **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #91 to #88 - Ruspanic (07/06/2013) [-]
Not everything that's normal for society is good for society, either. Social norms are not sacred.
-1
#119 to #91 - sajeth **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #61 to #37 - grandmabetty (07/06/2013) [-]
The fact you're an atheist and think gay marriage is wrong makes you even more of a bitch than the Christians who think gay marriage is a sin. They live life by a book, you don't. If you want to sound like a smart Atheist then you need to rethink your opinion.
#40 to #37 - budva (07/06/2013) [-]
No this just makes you an ass hole. Opposing something and preventing people from having happiness for no genuine reason. Prick.
-5
#45 to #40 - sajeth **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #47 to #45 - flaminggodzilla (07/06/2013) [-]
The reason you don't see parades presenting/glorifying normal sexuality on the streets is because they have the right to marriage and don't need to protest.
-2
#48 to #47 - sajeth **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #51 to #48 - flaminggodzilla (07/06/2013) [-]
You completely missed the ******* point. They have a right to publicly present what ever the **** they want so long as it's in the guide lines of the law. Straights/Christians have a right to protest against gay marriage, and yes they do have anti-gay rights parades, don't kid your self kiddo.
0
#89 to #51 - sajeth **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#49 to #45 - budva (07/06/2013) [-]
gay pride doesn't represent the majority of gays... I just don't understand how you want people to be denied basic equality rights just because they like people of the same sex which is not a problem whatsoever. It really just stems down to people being assholes.
-4
#50 to #49 - sajeth **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #56 to #50 - flaminggodzilla (07/06/2013) [-]
So, what if they are different, blacks and whites are different, should blacks be treated any differently?
User avatar #54 to #50 - flaminggodzilla (07/06/2013) [-]
You know people saying **** like you do started a ******* civil war. Remember segregation?The Jim Crow laws were state and local laws in the United States enacted between 1876 and 1965. They mandated de jure racial segregation in all public facilities in Southern states of the former Confederacy, with, starting in 1890, a "separate but equal" status for African Americans. The separation in practice led to conditions for African Americans that tended to be inferior to those provided for white Americans, systematizing a number of economic, educational and social disadvantages.
-1
#66 to #54 - sajeth **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#102 to #66 - Rascal (07/06/2013) [-]
not that im an expert on the subject but i thought a man ******* another man was quite common in the past ? for example spartans when they went to wed and **** the missus for the first time dressed the females up as men so as to be more attracted. although this may be bull i picked up on the internets
-1
#121 to #102 - sajeth **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#52 to #50 - budva (07/06/2013) [-]
Why shouldn't they be equal though. There is no difference other than the sex of the person. It's people like you that drag issues like this out preventing any real social progress past stupid things like equality that should have been done and dusted decades ago. Prick.
[ 132 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)