Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#40 - Conquistador
Reply -5
(07/05/2013) [-]
An eye for an eye.
#53 to #40 - teranin
Reply 0
(07/05/2013) [-]
a furfag AND a feminist? ouch dude, way to be a hate magnet.
#156 to #53 - icameforthepron
Reply 0
(07/09/2013) [-]
what is this pic from? I must know!

for the God-Emperor!
#89 to #53 - Conquistador
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
You must be an idiot if you honestly think I'm either of those.
#91 to #89 - teranin
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
I'm taking a crack at your profile pic, I have no idea what fetishes/ideologies you actually stand for.
#92 to #91 - Conquistador
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
"Don't judge a book by it's cover".

I've been known to piss off furfags on this site years ago. But of course, newfags wouldn't know about it. Though, I am a nazi. But not a feminist. I believe both genders are equal.
#157 to #92 - teranin
Reply 0
(07/09/2013) [-]
Proof once again that having any faith in humanity might be a terrible mistake, I present to you Conquistador, a person who names himself after a spanish disease-ridden invading force that destroyed several cultures while simultaneously railing against people of other races destroying cultures, fueled by bad science and racist propaganda, and who wears that irony on his sleeve like a Jew wearing a star.     
   
Bravo, Conquistador, you are the worst humanity has to offer.
Proof once again that having any faith in humanity might be a terrible mistake, I present to you Conquistador, a person who names himself after a spanish disease-ridden invading force that destroyed several cultures while simultaneously railing against people of other races destroying cultures, fueled by bad science and racist propaganda, and who wears that irony on his sleeve like a Jew wearing a star.

Bravo, Conquistador, you are the worst humanity has to offer.
#158 to #157 - Conquistador
Reply 0
(07/10/2013) [-]
Oh look, a 12 butthurt libtard **** who thinks he know's what he's talking about. Sure haven't seen many of those before. So ignorant to the fact that I myself, also possess the indigenous DNA which those Spaniards sought to destroy. Bad science? So you call uncensored science that isn't butchered by liberal propaganda and brainwashing "bad"? I think someone needs to go find the nearest firearm, point it at their head, and pull the trigger.

I believe you mean the *greatest* humanity has to offer. Because the worse is a liberal faggot named "teranin" who spends his days rotting in front of a computer browsing a low quality liberal site run by 12 year olds trying to be "funny" while pounding his keyboard spewing **** as a result of his frustration just because someone thinks differently than he does, and what his mommy taught him.
#160 to #158 - teranin
Reply 0
(07/10/2013) [-]
ok, couple of problems with that.

1: I'm not a ******* liberal piece of ****, so pull your racist head out of your ass and use it to think for once in your miserable life.

2: I'm a Microbiologist, jackass, and my bachelor's thesis was on the seperate evolutionary paths of mitochondrial and nucleic DNA, which if you even knew the first thing about you might have some idea as to why you're full of ****

3: Most of the time, I am at work, you know, a job, like real people have, not semi-psychotic hatemongers that get their jollies off trying to find any evidence they can of their own superiority to make up for how inferior they are as a person

Please get a ******* education, and learn to read a situation before saying something so incredibly stupid.
#161 to #160 - Conquistador
Reply 0
(07/11/2013) [-]
AHAHAHAHAAHAHA MY SIDES. Your comment is so full of ****, you can sense it miles away. You a microbiologist? Why the **** are you on a site full of 12 year olds and spew memes like a complete jackass? Oh that's right. Because 99.9 percent of the time when anybody makes a claim about being highly accomplished on this site is a total prick laying a bunch of lies in a flawed attempt to throw their opponents off track. Not only that, but it seems you were on this ******* site all day. More proof that you're a 12 year old still living in mommy's basement pretending to be a big man on the internet.
#162 to #161 - teranin
Reply 0
(07/11/2013) [-]
I leave myself logged in at home and at work, so it always says I'm online regardless of whether or not I am. I have a bachelor's in Microbiology minoring in Information Systems from George Mason University. It was perhaps a bit disingenuous for me to imply that I am currently working as a microbiologist, I meant that I had a degree in that field not that it is my current job, which is a network DJ 4DM1Nistration position for a truck modification/plow install company. I find this site entertaining, and since I tend to be surrounded by nimrods at home and at work I enjoy some of the engaging conversations I have been able to have here.

Not that you'll give a crap about any of what I just said there, but since I started this insult back and forth I felt your ******* assertion at least deserved a response.
#163 to #162 - Conquistador
Reply 0
(07/13/2013) [-]
Lulz, we know that's complete ********. You commented almost every other hour throughout the day. You can't even spell right. Not only that, but the memes you spew make you look like a child, especially that "muh fayth en hoomaniti" ********. Nimrods at home? Look at this site. It's nothing but circle jerks and bandwagons. You're not even allowed to think for yourself or have an opinion.
#164 to #163 - teranin
Reply 0
(07/13/2013) [-]
Here's why my statement isn't "complete ********". We're gonna do this with a direct list of answers to each assertion you just made

1: True, I comment a lot on this website, and post a lot of content, I enjoy doing so and am able to do so from work as well as from home, which ends up presenting the kind of situation you might mistake for me just sitting at home all day, when the reality of the situation is as I stated.

2: Accusations relevant to my spelling acumen? You're going to have to cough up some concrete, repeated evidence of that claim before anyone who has read even a small fraction of my comments could begin to entertain such a delusion.

3: I do sometimes use memes, that's true, but your feelings on the validity/maturity of discussing one's faith in humanity are not relevant to the actual nature of such a discourse, rather they are seated in your bigoted standpoint wherein you are preoccupied so deeply by your ethnocentricity that you view those not belonging to your race as subhuman, which drives your arrogant view that discussing humanity on the whole is naive and childish. At least, that's the way I take it, but since I am making an assertion as to how you think based on only evidence from this conversation, please, do tell me if I'm wrong on this.

4: I live in Virginia, and interact with far fewer people on a daily basis there than I do here, as the sheer number of people who can see and react to anything I say here is far greater than what there would be if I, say, hopped on a soapbox in the middle of Herndon and just started talking at passersby.

5: There are a lot of circle jerks and bandwagons on this site, you're absolutely right, but if you look deeper than the surface you can find a community of intelligent people who have depth to their character amid the swarm of circle-jerking wagon riders.

6: Were this last one true, I would not be both one of the most hated people on this site, but continually hit frontpage with **** like this.
#159 to #158 - Conquistador
Reply 0
(07/10/2013) [-]
12 year old*
#94 to #92 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
Wait. You believe that the genders are equal, but can't extend that logic to race? Or do you not subscribe to the racist aspect of Nazism?
#95 to #94 - Conquistador
Reply +1
(07/06/2013) [-]
Is it truly "wrong" to feel the need to preserve your race and culture instead of destroying it with interracial mixing and multiculturalism?
#96 to #95 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
Depends, does "Preserving your culture" involve infringing the rights of other cultures? I also take a small amount of offense (Not that it means anything) to the last part, since I live in one of the most multicultural parts of Canada. You're implying that my race and culture is destroyed (Not that I give a ****, caring about race and culture is pretty pointless since we're more divided by class than anything else. It just doesn't feel nice to hear you say that).
#97 to #96 - Conquistador
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
I don't care about other cultures/races as long as they don't come and interfere with ours. Racism in nature is natural anyways, no matter how much liberal brainwashing they use to cover it up. I just find it funny that many fools here hate the US, yet try to enforce one of the very things Americans enforce and pride themselves on (diversity).
#98 to #97 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
As I already said, I don't give a **** about culture and race. They're petty things that occupy the lesser man and are either the disdain or the tools of the greater ones. In a system where neither wealth nor poverty know political borders, man is no longer divided by race or by culture but ultimately class, wealth and influence. Perhaps it's even slightly better that way.
#124 to #98 - oxan
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
"but ultimately class, wealth and influence"

Wait, you're a Leftist?
#126 to #124 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
Bitch I might be.
#127 to #126 - oxan
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
Leftist enough. Hell, I always thought you were right wing.

So, what am I dealing with here? Democratic Socialist?
#128 to #127 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
According to one test I took I'm a cosmopolitan social democrat. I suppose what you said works too.

Also, what about me implied that I was right wing?
#129 to #128 - oxan
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
I don't particularly pay attention to names on the board most of the time. You were kind of lumped together with Church and repost, because you three all had names that had repetition.
#130 to #129 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
So you're a namecist. You think all repetitive names are the same, huh?
#131 to #130 - oxan
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
You got me. Weren't you aware that we communists refer to each other by number?
#132 to #131 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
I'm not sure if I'm a communist anymore. I'm certainly at least a Socialist. Hell, I'm young, I'm aloud to bounce around for now, aren't I?
#133 to #132 - oxan
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
Of course, comrade, but remember: anything but communism warrants a trip to the gulag, you reactionary class traitor!
#136 to #133 - feelythefeel
Reply +1
(07/06/2013) [-]
Sorry, mixing up the gulag with an exotic buffet down the road again.
#134 to #133 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
Of course. In fact, we're so eager we have a carpool going. You want to get picked up for your next gulag visit?
#135 to #134 - oxan
0
(07/06/2013) [-]
I am good communist, and good communists do not go to gulags, silly kulak.
#99 to #98 - Conquistador
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
Really? Genetics is a very important factor regarding evolutionary advancements. Including pre-mutated genes. If a group of people reside in an area for thousands of years, they're bound to mutate and become a more advanced form of life. Mixing prevents natural evolution by giving unnecessary genes to a population.

As is obvious, globalization is ****. Most of the powerful countries are falling apart. It's very hard to regulate a country which is in the EU, because the EU provides more barriers to jump through. Ever since Romania joined, gypsies have been going into other countries and started stealing from them too. Now they steal more than ever.
#100 to #99 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
You need to login to view this link
www.channel4.com/programmes/is-it-better-to-be-mixed-race/articles/is-it-better-to-be-mixed-race
www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/6475543/Its-a-wonderful-mixed-up-world.html

Also, I'd like to see any pureblood take a few rounds with Muhammad Ali, who part Irish and part black.

As for that second part, the EU has a lot of problems. Economic and political, and yes, even a tad cultural. Yet I wouldn't say that race has much to do with it anymore.

P.S. I lol'd at when you blamed it all on the gypsies. Even if traditional gypsies where still much of a thing after the whole WWII thing, it would probably be out of style to bash on them by now.
#101 to #100 - Conquistador
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
>undercoverblackman
>channel4

LOL! Gee such credible sources. Totally not propaganda driven. It's a known fact Africans have IQs in the 70s/low 80s. And that's just about anywhere, not just in the US. Known fact that hybrid children are prone to more genetic illnesses and have lower IQs. Look at ******* Latin America. And ask ANY European how bad gypsies are. ESPECIALLY in Romania. Hate against them will never end if they keep acting like the way they do. All you need is wikipedia.
#103 to #101 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
Ignore the linking to specific parts of the pages, I meant the whole page.
#102 to #101 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiracial#Ethnic_groups
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_genetic_variation#Health
I took a quick look through these two, couldn't find anything on the subject.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_intelligence#Validity_of_race_and_IQ
This suggests against the IQ remarks.

www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1880467,00.html
What about Time?

Final note, why am I the one providing all of the citations while you feel confident trying to refute them while providing none of your own? Even if you consider my evidence flimsy, it's better than nothing.
#104 to #102 - Conquistador
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
Lol, they even said scientists are afraid to go near the topic of race, being afraid that they might prove "racist" ideologies right. Only an idiot would think mating with the same race is the same as inbreeding. And of course, a minority "doctor" is the one pushing their beliefs into it. Using their logic, it's beneficial to **** chimps thinking your children will be better since "more genetic diversity is good". I honestly think a little genetic diversity is good, but too much is bad. By that I mean it's not good to **** family members but it's also not good to **** *******. And Muhammad Ali was a barbarian. Brute strength isn't needed in the modern world as much anymore. It's all about intelligence.
#105 to #104 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_African-American_inventors_and_scientists

I don't know, inventing the gas mask and performing the first successful open heart surgery would be pretty tough feats for an "inferior race."

I'll accept criticisms on my citations when you provide your own.

Finally, Muhammad Ali was a barbarian because that was his job. You don't do what he did by being polite.
#108 to #105 - Conquistador
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
"Mixed race people in the Brazilian slums are able to cope with stress than white people in suburbs".

AHAHAHAHAHA, my sides! That's because violence is in their nature. And 90 percent of the time, they're high on coke anyways. If you tried to civilize them, they'd probably sign up for welfare and sell drugs on the streets, because they're too dumb to better themselves. Most people in developed countries wouldn't be able to handle stress there because they grew up with healthy parenting and money.
#109 to #108 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
"To generalize is to be an idiot."
-William Blake
#111 to #109 - Conquistador
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
Generalize? This is RAW fact. Brazilian slums make South America look like Africa junior. And have you noticed almost every African oriented country is third world? Even the ones in the new world.
#125 to #111 - oxan
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
Gee, that probably has something to do with colonisation and generations of being treated poorly.

What, are you one of these people that think just because colonies were granted independence or that apartheid was officially ended suddenly everything would work out unless Africans were inherently inferior?
#113 to #111 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
My argument is that it's mostly not a nature thing, but a nurture thing. It's like child abuse, in that it's a hereditary social issue.
#115 to #113 - Conquistador
0
(07/06/2013) [-]
Maybe, but there are reasons why certain people act certain ways. It could also be a biological way of thinking. While living in Africa, they could have evolved a mindset different from other races. Even skeletal structure is different from other races.
#106 to #105 - Conquistador
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
Oh wow, even though simpler gas masks were in use since ancient Greece. Even so, that's a very small minority of black people. Most successful scientists were white. And those blacks lived in a non African oriented country. As for Africans in Africa itself, don't have much success. Guess what? I'm not even white. And my race usually has higher IQs than blacks as well.
#116 to #106 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
Ran out of reply space.

Yes, a population will acclimate to a new environment. They'll be able to survive, yet that still won't prevent it from becoming a burden. Do you think a civilization can satiate their agrarian needs in a desert? Probably not as well as in other places.

As for that comment on African resources, I meant in comparison to Europe. Europe was a goldmine of practical resources, with its abundant lumber, iron, coal etc etc. Regardless of what races lived there, some of them where bound to be successful.

That last part about killing the natives, couldn't I use that as evidence for the violence and inferiority of whites if I wanted to?
#118 to #116 - Conquistador
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
Look at the ******* Arabs. They lived in ******* deserts yet they achieved way more than Africans have. A lot of them even moved into Africa. They invented quite a bit of things.

Africa has more resources than Europe, I believe. You could, but my people kicked the Spanish ****** imperialists out and established our own country and have pride in our own indigenous heritage.
#123 to #118 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
Stability wise, it was better than it is now. Safe tribes are better than hellish nations. They did kick the Russians out, but only after the damage by them was already done, and USA had enough of an influence to stick around. Saudi Arabia is an example of a better Middle Eastern country because of the oil in question, another example of environmental affects on societal progress. If it weren't for that, I'd bet my good camel that it would be just as impoverished as the worse off parts of the middle east.

Also, there's a difference between making monuments and creating a stable industrialized modern society. It mostly relies on a stable and fertile environment, which the Europeans where lucky enough to have in spades.

I'm curious, where do you live? From what I've gathered, it must be a place where Nazism isn't too common, considering its foreign nature.

P.S. Sorry for the wait. IRL stuff.
#121 to #118 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
1.) Most of the problems you hear about in the middle east originate from foreign involvement. Not much of negative note happened for a while before the US and USSR got involved, and it all went downhill from there.

2.) That's why one of the most successful civilizations of the ancient age (Egypt) was in Africa, because there's a hug river there. Yet it didn't have much room to grow larger than it did, considering that it didn't have much else going for it like Europe did.

3.)Have fun trying to get any notable amounts of lumber out of a rain-forest with basic stone tools.
#122 to #121 - Conquistador
0
(07/06/2013) [-]
Lol, Middle East was crap even before foreign powers got involved. They were just tribes waging war against eachother. During the cold war, they did band together and kick the ruskies out. But they started killing eachother again. US got involved pre-911 because of bin laden, and Saddam Hussein was violating international laws. Saudi Arabia seems to be the only civilized Arab country, since they have the best living standards and export 70 percent of the world's oil. And no, I don't really believe conspiracy theories, since most are often unbacked, and any opinion against it is followed by insults and personal attacks. Especially on here.

Egypt was doing fairly well, but they were defeated by other desert dwellers I believe.
Hey, some stones made good tools. But it's still no match for steel. Noneoftheless, my people managed to make ******* pyramids bigger than Egyptian ones with stone and wood tools.
#119 to #118 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
1.) Again, that's location. They lived in a key area that was a major way point between many worldwide locations. Not to mention that they are the present result of the literal first civilization in human history, meaning that they've had a bit of time to devolop.

2.) If you're talking precious metals, then maybe. Yet I'm talking practical resources, such as water, iron, lumber and coal. The reason that Europe was the birthplace of industrialization was that it was the only heavily populated place to host all of these resources in abundance.

3.) I could what? Have more resources than Europe? I doubt it.

4.) I'm having a hard time taking you seriously when the word ****** is your most commonly used noun. No offense.
#120 to #119 - Conquistador
0
(07/06/2013) [-]
Africans were the ones who originally moved out and evolved. The ones that stayed had just enough time to improve in their own environment. And now look at modern Arabs. Middle East is crap.

Some parts of Africa had lots of water. Such as the jungles, which were called RAIN forests. Africa also has the second largest river in the world. Jungle also has lumber. Yet tropical African countries are still dirt poor.
I honestly don't care. After all, this is the internet.
#117 to #116 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
RE: That other comment, the general consensus is that when it comes to mindset it's nurture first, nature second. Any good parent can teach an angry baby to be an at least somewhat calm adult, and any bad parent can teach a calm baby to be an at least somewhat angry adult.
#107 to #106 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
I'm pretty sure I read a article once that stated that Western success had drastically more to do with location (IE resources and climate available) than anything else. I'm having no luck finding it now, but it's out there somewhere. My take on it is that it's pretty much was more the environmental part of nurture than nature. If white people started in the deserts of Africa instead of the resource laden Europe like black people did, I don't suppose we'd be very lucky either.

Also, do the words incomplete list mean anything to you?
#110 to #107 - Conquistador
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
Africa is a ******* big ass continent. You're telling me that puny continent has all the resources in the old world? Hell no. Africa has diamonds, oil, lumber, minerals, etc. And not all of Africa is desert. Some of it is jungle or savanna.

"Mixed race people are more attractive". LOL! If you lived here and seen the half black, half Mexican *******, you'd want to puke. They are oddly shaped, have huge egos, and usually fail in school.
#112 to #110 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
For the most part, Europeans had it much better in the climate and resources department. Especially considering that Africa mostly lacks the key ingredients to industrialization, which are coal and iron.
#114 to #112 - Conquistador
0
(07/06/2013) [-]
Climate doesn't ******* matter. A population set in an area for a large amount of time will most likely adapt biologically. If you put desert dwelling Africans in Northern Europe, they'd freeze their asses off. And Africa has an ass load of metals and minerals. Which is why Europeans recently tried to EXPLOIT them because Europe is becoming dry. That's why they sailed to our continent and tried killing everyone and colonizing it.
#50 to #40 - anon
Reply 0
(07/05/2013) [-]
And that's how the entire world ends up blind.
#56 to #50 - anon
Reply 0
(07/05/2013) [-]
Not if you take both his eyes the first go around.
#49 to #40 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(07/05/2013) [-]
That avi makes me both want to be your friend, and punch you in the face at the same time.
That avi makes me both want to be your friend, and punch you in the face at the same time.
#90 to #49 - Conquistador
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
omg so hardcor
#93 to #90 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(07/06/2013) [-]
Just saying, I'm not sure if it's cool or stupid. I suppose with this kind of reaction it could be both.
#42 to #40 - yisumad ONLINE
Reply +1
(07/05/2013) [-]
dat avi
dat avi