would you people PLEASE stop. Creation is NOT a push with evolution, nor the fields of nuclear physics, astrophysics, stellar evolution, chemistry, biology, geo

would you people PLEASE stop

Creation is NOT a push with evolution, nor the fields of nuclear physics, astrophysics, stellar evolution, chemistry, biology, geology, or every other scientific field that directly refutes the nonsense in your storybook, so stop looking at them as equally valid ideas already! I'm tired of having to argue the obvious to the functionally retarded!

The formal !?' , T' Tif' latr. ' of ilgili' quite
different from the evea' 3, meaning of 'Al word.
m refers to a com 1' ml' tta'' lettin, ea. cenation of some
aspect of nature [i' i. , is_ suppor tll by itl '
of evedence.
Many !?'.. , memeories are so Realle!! rhh'
that no new evidence is ' to alter
substantially For example, no new evidence will
demonstrate that the Earth its not orbit around
the sun [heliocentric them P, or that living things
are not made of cells eore,’ |, that matter is
not composed of atoms, or that the surface of the
Earth 15 not divided imi'" d who lates that have
moved over gtfo ' time s l the many of
plate tectonics]. .. these othe foundational
fsl, memeories, the theory’ of evolution is
dit. 1 ported by so man observations and
co ' that scientists are
rarley.'. T' lall ma .the basic com nants of the
overturned 3; new evidence.
However, lri! Jed all !t' Jr.'.! ".. theories, the theory‘ of
evolution is subject to continuing‘ Mm' as
new areas of science emerge or as new
techno ' s enable observations and
experiments at were not possible previously."
  • Recommend tagsx
Views: 7710
Favorited: 13
Submitted: 06/27/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to teranin Subscribe to fucking-science submit to reddit

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #8 - stimtheone (06/28/2013) [-]
That's why it's not called a hypothesis.
User avatar #1 - malific (06/28/2013) [+] (6 replies)
So.. I play World of Warcraft.

I go to Un'goro crater, and see dinosaurs and bones and **** . I don archeology and find fossils and such. I go to Sholazar Basin and learn that Oracles evolved from Murloc's. I go to Pandaria and here a story about how Merloc's living in Pandaria with imbued with intelligence by the mystical waters of the content and became the Jin'yu.

Then I go visit Ulduar and learn that the Titans created the entire world, and I have to kill this dude named Algalon so he won't hit the reset button and start all this evolution back to square one.

Is Warcraft Evolution, or Intelligent Design?
User avatar #10 - captainoptimist (07/24/2013) [+] (3 replies)
There is another aspect to "theory" that is very important. It HAS to have the potential to be proven false. There is the possibility that a discovery could be made that would prove the theory of evolution false. It's not likely, but it's possible. That's what allows it to be a THEORY.

You cannot disprove Creationism. To do so, you would have to prove that there is no God, and there's no way to do that. Just as there is no way to prove the existence of God. Therefore, Creationism cannot ever be a theory.
User avatar #9 - pioneermhm (06/30/2013) [-]
I once got into a whole argument about this. Took him 8 posts to finally shut up
 Friends (0)