Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#26 - bigmanfifty (06/27/2013) [-]
Sure, WWII had more casualties, but WW1 had ************ trench warfare.

You don't even wanna hear about trench warfare. At least ww2 had some changes of scenery, imagine being stuck in a muddy hole for years on end and then being told to get out and walk towards a bunch of machine guns.
#87 to #26 - anon (06/27/2013) [-]
I liked 'nam personally. Imagine having to crawl through those little rat holes the you just barely fit into and fighting for your life.
#54 to #26 - lolfire (06/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #46 to #26 - omfgitsstsix (06/27/2013) [-]
You want to know how they kept from sinking into the mud?
They covered the bottoms of the trenches with corpses.

Want to know how they kept the bodies from raising their heads into the view of the enemy?
They lines the top with corpses too.

WWI was either ****** up or the most metal time in history.
User avatar #85 to #46 - thesinful (06/27/2013) [-]
You speak as if those are mutually exclusive.
User avatar #70 to #46 - patriotpenguin ONLINE (06/27/2013) [-]
well corpses or duckboards whatever suits your fancy
#41 to #26 - comradewinter ONLINE (06/27/2013) [-]
The Eastern Front was hardly any different, except they didn't have the luxury of trenches. They were lying in ditches waiting for the orders to charge at machine guns that were a lot more effective than those in WW1.
User avatar #39 to #26 - gurtol (06/27/2013) [-]
Im pretty sure ww1 had more casualties over all
#40 to #39 - crilleballe (06/27/2013) [-]
Far from actually. I don't have the exact numbers but one of the greatest battlefields in WW1 was the west front. The German Empire vs. England and France. A total of 500.000 casualties. WW2 had more than 20 million casualties for the soviet union alone, and approx. 2 million all together for Nazi Germany and the Allies if i remember correctly.
User avatar #43 to #40 - fosforgasxiii (06/27/2013) [-]
10 million for WW1 and 55-60 million for WW2.
User avatar #36 to #26 - kaiizel (06/27/2013) [-]
lmao, are you kidding me? "At lest WW2 had a change of scenery". Oh sure, those concentration camps had a lovely view of the country side.
User avatar #57 to #36 - augustusxxiv (06/27/2013) [-]
I think he meant how the war was fought everywhere from El Alamein, to Guadalcanal, to Normandy, to Stalingrad, to the streets of Berlin, to Okinawa, to the skies of London.
#55 to #36 - anon (06/27/2013) [-]
The war wasn't fought in the concentration camps. O-o
User avatar #58 to #55 - kaiizel (06/27/2013) [-]
He's talking like the trenches were the worst thing out of the two wars.
 Friends (0)