Muh Gravity. . III buildings; .. I don't like Dawkins not because I'm a christian (which I am) and not because I believe in the creation story (which I don't) but because he has such a VENDETTA
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Comments(350):

[ 350 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #2 - traelos (06/26/2013) [+] (28 replies)
Understand the levels of theories.

Gravity is a theory

Evolution is a theory

String Theory is a theory

The Flying Spaghetti Monster is a theory

One of those is 99.99999999999999999999999% likely to be true, another one is 90% likely to be true, another is 50% likely to be true, one of them isn't true.

They are all theories.
#3 to #2 - emotep (06/26/2013) [-]
The flying spaghetti monster is not a theory nor is it even a hypothesis.
User avatar #25 - Smidgit (06/26/2013) [+] (30 replies)
I don't like Dawkins
not because I'm a christian (which I am) and not because I believe in the creation story (which I don't) but because he has such a VENDETTA against religion
for goodness sake if me believing in God isn't hurting anyone and makes me happy then let me believe in God!
#40 - termz (06/27/2013) [+] (15 replies)
Evolution was proven in bacteria or some ****
User avatar #70 to #63 - sanguinesolitude (06/27/2013) [-]
thats a very unscientific view. There are no absolute facts, just very well supported theories. You should always question everything and accept only that which is logical and well supported, otherwise you are just being religiously atheist, which is as empty and ignorant a position as a religious fanatic.
#252 - abstract (06/27/2013) [+] (1 reply)
+7
#158 - anothereposter **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (33 replies)
#157 - drtrousersnake ONLINE (06/27/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Law of gravity
Theory of evolution
Laws (how) =/= theory (why)
User avatar #201 - amateriandarknut (06/27/2013) [+] (6 replies)
Gravity is a scientific theory validated through open science tests.
Evolution is a non-scientific theory "proven" through means that circumvent the scientific method that defines all credible science.
User avatar #223 to #215 - DmOnZ (06/27/2013) [-]
holy **** I'm an idiot...
User avatar #154 - vatra (06/27/2013) [+] (9 replies)
Law. Gravity is a law.
User avatar #160 to #154 - YllekNayr (06/27/2013) [-]
Both. There is a law of gravity, and a theory of gravity. The law is what happens. The theory is why it happens.
User avatar #262 - metalmind (06/27/2013) [+] (5 replies)
Oh god, the whole comment section is full of Americans that still don't get that evolution is prooven.
Not even the pope questions evolution. He accepts it.
+4
#156 - mrsadsap **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (6 replies)
#281 - almostninja (06/27/2013) [+] (6 replies)
It doesn't matter who is right, it boils down to one thing:   
   
Anyone that dedicates their energy to arguing someone else's beliefs is a cunt.   
   
Richard Dawkings is a cunt, and so are you, OP.
It doesn't matter who is right, it boils down to one thing:

Anyone that dedicates their energy to arguing someone else's beliefs is a cunt.

Richard Dawkings is a cunt, and so are you, OP.
#291 to #284 - almostninja (06/27/2013) [-]
I don't care if someone is wrong.
#237 - ZebraCocaine (06/27/2013) [+] (5 replies)
I wouldn't mind seeing a member of the Westboro Baptist church jumping out of a building to prove him wrong..   
(gif somewhat related)
I wouldn't mind seeing a member of the Westboro Baptist church jumping out of a building to prove him wrong..
(gif somewhat related)
#120 - anonymous (06/27/2013) [+] (2 replies)
typical argument coming from this pompous prick
User avatar #147 to #120 - IamEllis (06/27/2013) [-]
evolution is real. I'm catholic and I know that
User avatar #31 - spikethepony (06/26/2013) [+] (4 replies)
I don't see you evolving, either.
I hate this argument. They are both technically theories, but only because we don't have documentation on the entirety of this universe.
WHY CAN'T WE JUST LOVE EACH OTHER!?!
User avatar #71 to #68 - spikethepony (06/27/2013) [-]
I am aware. I just am tired of watching people fight over what is objectively meaningless.
#28 - heartlessrobot (06/26/2013) [-]
This image has expired
GRAVITY CHECK!
User avatar #276 - undeadwill ONLINE (06/27/2013) [+] (17 replies)
Why do people hate religion so much now a days?

I;m gay and an atheist I just don't get who someone else chooses to worship publicly or privately effect you?
#400 to #302 - dingoboy (06/27/2013) [-]
How many Muslims does it take to build a mosque??

I'll let posterity come up with some appropriate punchline. Lol!
User avatar #34 - daelril (06/26/2013) [+] (8 replies)
Can somenone explain why gravity is just a theory?
User avatar #79 to #34 - lazengahn (06/27/2013) [-]
The theories around gravity aren't about whether it's real

but more like how it's caused/what causes it
#6 - anonymous (06/26/2013) [+] (19 replies)
This is misleading, while there are many theories of gravity, there is in fact "The Law of gravity".

**** you OP
User avatar #93 to #6 - srapture (06/27/2013) [-]
The force itself can be observed as law, but it is a theory that the gravitational force due to the interaction of mass is what is causing this force. Therefore, gravity is a theory.
#229 - teoberry (06/27/2013) [+] (8 replies)
Dawkins is a conceited bitch who only looks out for himself. He refuses to debate Craig because it would 'look bad for him', yet made that video with Wendy Wright, who is a dumbass. He only wants to look good for the horde of new age faggy atheists. Another reason is because Dr. Craig destroyed him when it came to biology. He doesn't want to try that again, so he debates lesser people. Meanwhile, Craig is debating guys like Dennett, Grayling, and Wolpert.  Face it, atheistfags, your posterboys can't do 						****					. Hell, according to his own logic, Dawkins isn't atheist   
   
>mfw Craig absolutely destroyed Dawkins
Dawkins is a conceited bitch who only looks out for himself. He refuses to debate Craig because it would 'look bad for him', yet made that video with Wendy Wright, who is a dumbass. He only wants to look good for the horde of new age faggy atheists. Another reason is because Dr. Craig destroyed him when it came to biology. He doesn't want to try that again, so he debates lesser people. Meanwhile, Craig is debating guys like Dennett, Grayling, and Wolpert. Face it, atheistfags, your posterboys can't do **** . Hell, according to his own logic, Dawkins isn't atheist

>mfw Craig absolutely destroyed Dawkins
#316 to #229 - kaszak (06/27/2013) [-]
Dawkins has a policy of not enganging in a scientific debate with creationists that have no credible degree in biology. Dunno why he chose to speak with Wendy Wright.
Show me the source where Craig destroyed Dawkins in the field of biology, i'd like to see that.
User avatar #15 - keiishiyama (06/26/2013) [+] (1 reply)
I know some people think this is apparently a hard language to understand, but a scientific "theory" isn't a theory at all, guys.
#369 to #15 - teranin ONLINE (06/27/2013) [-]
Everyone should read this
[ 350 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)