Walls. . viii" I ID HMS pr; nu IT Ili, ii LEESE f . walls
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #25 - highhopes (06/26/2013) [-]
Why are people complaining? It isn't their wall. I think it's rather rude and selfish to expect the owners to be ok with whatever you paint on THEIR walls. Sure, sometimes they can be pretty cool, but most of the times... It seriously look like **** . Just stop. You're not being an artist, you're vandalizing other people's properties.
User avatar #37 to #25 - eatmaishorts (06/26/2013) [-]
i live near this place, the guy asked the owner if he could paint the wall, and he said yes. So then, some douche gets pissed and takes it down and THAT happened
User avatar #41 to #25 - zombiefied (06/27/2013) [-]
Implying its an illegal piece
#11 - anon (06/26/2013) [-]
So tits is art but cocks are not? Sexist.
#14 to #11 - mementomorit has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #39 to #11 - gibroner ONLINE (06/26/2013) [-]
they can be if they're drawn as well as those tits
User avatar #23 to #11 - jackspadess (06/26/2013) [-]
No, you are wrong. And it is not just the subject that makes art. Its the quality and craftsmanship of the art that makes it art. Tits that have been drawn with time and effort are art, however, cocks that have been drawn with no time or effort are not. Its not sexist, and stop looking for things to turn into sexism.
#13 to #11 - anon (06/26/2013) [-]
Pff please, it's the quality that's off not what the picture is of. There's no shading, it doesn't... pop. That's hardly a real looking cock.
User avatar #5 - psychadelicace (06/26/2013) [-]
in my city there is a big Jules Winnfield painted on the side of a shop the owner loved it so it's still there
#12 - anon (06/26/2013) [-]
User avatar #42 to #12 - zombiefied (06/27/2013) [-]
>implying it was an illegal piece
User avatar #20 - gnillort (06/26/2013) [-]
User avatar #6 - Major Mayhem (06/26/2013) [-]
Is it just me, or does the top building look considerably longer then the bottom building.
User avatar #8 to #6 - ubercookieboy (06/26/2013) [-]
Look at the pavement tiles.

I'm thinking it's just the perspective of the camera.
User avatar #7 to #6 - augisnvm (06/26/2013) [-]
These are not taken from the same exact spot.
User avatar #35 to #7 - snaresinger (06/26/2013) [-]
It's heavily implied that it is, though. I think his point was that it's misleading.
#24 to #7 - anon (06/26/2013) [-]
It is from the same place... The reason the wall looks taller is cause the picture is taken further away
User avatar #18 - prettyflyforaderp ONLINE (06/26/2013) [-]
if i owned a building and somone made those on my property i dont give a **** what business im in they would stay there forever
User avatar #27 to #18 - killerliquid ONLINE (06/26/2013) [-]
Depending on if it's good graffiti (like the before pic in the content) I would let it stay there.

Or, if I could afford buying a building of my own then I would make it a graffiti building
User avatar #28 to #27 - prettyflyforaderp ONLINE (06/26/2013) [-]
oh yea it has to be good graffiti, and thats now one of my dreams to become rich and buy a building in ever town in every state and have it be for graffiti artists
User avatar #31 to #28 - killerliquid ONLINE (06/26/2013) [-]
#17 - sircollinshaw **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#40 - dragel (06/26/2013) [-]
I have the sudden urge to play this game now.
User avatar #38 - jesusnipple (06/26/2013) [-]
If you look at the bottom picture, it's available for lease. They removed the graffiti so people would not be discouraged to lease this building, people may think it's a bad neighborhood if they see it slathered in "street art"
 Friends (0)