Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#152 - frostbeard (06/21/2013) [-]
And here i thought that someone is going to mention quetzalcoatl the mayan god
User avatar #229 to #152 - ReVolver (06/21/2013) [-]
Mayan Aztec
#260 to #229 - frostbeard (06/21/2013) [-]
sorry about that, im more into nordic history than any other, it was just that I've heard of quetzalcoatl only in age of empires 2 the conquerors, nothing more than that
#228 to #152 - ReVolver has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #187 to #152 - garaichu (06/21/2013) [-]
It's a neat drawing and all...

But why nipples..?
#266 to #187 - frostbeard (06/21/2013) [-]
Well you are right lad, this aztec god was known as a beast and not as an anthro, therefore no nipples on beast usualy, or are there? I dont know, too little time and having the dumb and the moment.
But since the half pic clearly shows that its/his/hers body is humanoid, there HAS to be nipples!
but there is one thing that bothers me...
Why did you ask that?
are you aroused by nipples?
(and when i mentioned hers, its beacuse we clearly can't see if quetzalcoatl has a anything down there or nothing, nobody knows except for the aztecs, but they're dead)
User avatar #371 to #266 - garaichu (06/22/2013) [-]
Quetzalcoatl was originally a huge serpent/dragon/snake/something like that, and as such was a reptile.
Reptiles do not have nipples. I get that it's humanoid but come on...

And I was mostly asking as a cheap joke.
And no.
User avatar #208 to #164 - raigen (06/21/2013) [-]
Not that i'm fond of either, it's just they INSIST on getting it correct.
#262 to #208 - frostbeard (06/21/2013) [-]
if someone would have just said anthros, that would have been an end to this discusion, still you are a man of truth
#153 to #152 - frostbeard (06/21/2013) [-]
wait, nevermind, someone already did, just didnt notice
 Friends (0)