Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#142 - psykobear ONLINE
Reply +7
(06/20/2013) [-]
Isn't it a good thing that they realize customers are displeased and change to suit them?
#177 to #142 - ohemgeezus
Reply -2
(06/21/2013) [-]
They didn't change to suit their "customers", they changed to suit their stocks because they realized how bad they ****** up
#181 to #177 - yusay
Reply +3
(06/21/2013) [-]
That's the same ******* thing. They want to sell more so they give people want they want. It's business. They're not your ******* father.
#183 to #181 - ohemgeezus
Reply -2
(06/21/2013) [-]
It's not the same thing, actually.
#189 to #183 - yusay
Reply +3
(06/21/2013) [-]
"They didn't change to suit their 'customers'"

They did it exactly to suit their customers so they would buy it. That's what business is.
#191 to #189 - ohemgeezus
Reply -2
(06/21/2013) [-]
no, no. If they really wanted to "suit their gamers" they would have done so just after their conference when everyone was in uproar about it. Only after E3 and their stocks were falling/people buying out PS4 did they finally decide to change it because they were losing money.

Come talk to me when you have the faintest understanding of business.
#194 to #191 - yusay
Reply +2
(06/21/2013) [-]
...That's less than a month. And that's barely a week after E3. The consoles won't be out till the end of the year. That's a very quick turnaround. It's not as if they waited until August to switch.

So apparently changing it was still wrong. I don't get you. Should they have used their time machine?

I'm sorry, but you don't understand business.
#195 to #194 - ohemgeezus
Reply -1
(06/21/2013) [-]
I never said changing it was wrong, are you dumb? I was talking about how they took too long to change it and how they only changed it as a last resort because they would lose a lot of money.
#197 to #195 - yusay
Reply +1
(06/21/2013) [-]
So you're saying that changing their policy so they would not lose money is not business.

Kid, you don't know what you're talking about and you're arguing for the sake of arguing.
#201 to #197 - ohemgeezus
Reply -1
(06/21/2013) [-]
based off the fact you call people you don't even know, "kid" and think that of all people, I started this argument, then I'd bed you're still in middle school.
#203 to #201 - yusay
Reply +1
(06/21/2013) [-]
You're arguing for the sake of arguing now.
#217 to #203 - ohemgeezus
Reply -1
(06/21/2013) [-]
and so are you, kid.
#224 to #217 - psykobear ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/21/2013) [-]
Wow... what did I come back to?
#218 to #217 - yusay
Reply 0
(06/21/2013) [-]