superman. meh... You moron, the one on the left is not from Superman returns(which is the one from 2006) It's the outfit from 1978 Superman Underwear blue red Superman
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (261)
[ 261 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
74 comments displayed.
#4 - sylaz
Reply +270
(06/19/2013) [-]
You moron, the one on the left is not from Superman returns(which is the one from 2006) It's the outfit from 1978 Superman
#5 to #4 - funnyjunkfanjimtan [OP]
Reply 0
(06/19/2013) [-]
( . ) ( . )
#46 to #5 - gravitystereo
Reply +8
(06/20/2013) [-]
yo can you **** off
#58 to #46 - funnyjunkfanjimtan [OP]
Reply 0
(06/20/2013) [-]
#99 to #58 - fuckingkeelin
Reply +11
(06/20/2013) [-]
seriously? what the **** are you doing?
seriously? what the **** are you doing?
#104 to #58 - crazyhindu
Reply +3
(06/20/2013) [-]
One can "**** off" by logging out of the website turning off the computer and walking away, forever, or until we forget and then you have successfully ****** off
#144 to #104 - funnyjunkfanjimtan [OP]
Reply 0
(06/20/2013) [-]
gawsh, you actually read that, so i guess it worked.
#145 to #144 - crazyhindu
Reply +5
(06/20/2013) [-]
******** YOU ACTUALLY MADE A COMMENT AND DIDN'T SCREENCAP IT!
#147 to #145 - funnyjunkfanjimtan [OP]
Reply 0
(06/20/2013) [-]
usually certain things are triggered, and people just end up appearing generalized.
#148 to #147 - crazyhindu
Reply +3
(06/20/2013) [-]
what?
#149 to #148 - funnyjunkfanjimtan [OP]
Reply 0
(06/20/2013) [-]
idk but i'm actually reading all the stuff here, i like the comments and stuffs
#151 to #149 - crazyhindu
Reply +5
(06/20/2013) [-]
Okay?
#153 to #151 - funnyjunkfanjimtan [OP]
Reply 0
(06/20/2013) [-]
#158 to #153 - unikornking
Reply +8
(06/20/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#277 to #158 - makonendrak ONLINE
Reply +1
(06/20/2013) [-]
Have an awesome night. Thank you for reading something on here.
#6 to #4 - funnyjunkfanjimtan [OP]
Reply 0
(06/19/2013) [-]
B============D~~
#232 to #4 - anon
Reply 0
(06/20/2013) [-]
Thank you. I kept thinking, "Is that Christopher Reeve?"
#10 - admshenanigans
Reply +125
(06/19/2013) [-]
alright seems im gonna have to say it thats not the 2006 superman, this chris reeve from the originals this is 2006 superman Brandon Ruth
#150 to #10 - anon
Reply 0
(06/20/2013) [-]
christopher reeves, the "s" is important.
#202 to #10 - Evilstar
Reply +1
(06/20/2013) [-]
Still doesn't know where his underwear goes
#209 to #10 - awesumjjman
Reply +1
(06/20/2013) [-]
SHAW
#124 to #10 - toddingram
Reply +3
(06/20/2013) [-]
Brandon routh is sexy
#15 to #10 - flusteredmoose
Reply +5
(06/19/2013) [-]
Please don't mention that pile of **** of a movie.
#26 - allion
Reply +104
(06/19/2013) [-]
don't stare at it
don't stare at it
don't stare at it

it's just so noticeable
#137 to #26 - mrcristal
Reply +2
(06/20/2013) [-]
#155 to #26 - antisocialtwilight
Reply +15
(06/20/2013) [-]
It's not gay if he's an alien.
#253 to #155 - anon
Reply 0
(06/20/2013) [-]
gaylien.
#42 - darthblam
Reply +47
(06/20/2013) [-]
All jokes aside, The Man of Steel is the best Superman movie ever. Not only that, in my opinion, it is quite possibly the best rendition of Superman ever done outside of the comics.   
They changed the story and worked their way through it in the greatest way to me.   
Kryptonians make more sense now to me, the relationship between Clarke and Lois Lane is actually believable and not childish ********, the villain for once actually has a non-cliche motive!   
And the fighting! My god! The fighting is just kick ass in this movie.   
   
Seriously guys, if you haven't seen this movie yet, if you like Superman at all you will love it.
All jokes aside, The Man of Steel is the best Superman movie ever. Not only that, in my opinion, it is quite possibly the best rendition of Superman ever done outside of the comics.
They changed the story and worked their way through it in the greatest way to me.
Kryptonians make more sense now to me, the relationship between Clarke and Lois Lane is actually believable and not childish ********, the villain for once actually has a non-cliche motive!
And the fighting! My god! The fighting is just kick ass in this movie.

Seriously guys, if you haven't seen this movie yet, if you like Superman at all you will love it.
#56 to #52 - darthblam
Reply +7
(06/20/2013) [-]
Are you ******* kidding me? This isn't a review, this is a load of bias *********.
This guy looked nothing but the bad, bad that wasn't even present.
"Every cliche known to man?" Please, it's a ******* Superman movie, what the **** else would you expect half the time. They did a good job with it.
And remembering the names? Absolute ********, all characters mentioned were fine. You know why you don't remember names? Because they aren't said all the ******* time and you simply don't remember it. It doesn't matter how good the character is, unless it's maybe the main character's name you can't remember.

This review is ******** and I entirely disagree with it and your opinion, if this review is your opinion.
#73 to #52 - LovegoodJuggalo
Reply +4
(06/20/2013) [-]
I have to agree with darthblam. That review is complete and utter ********. Whoever wrote its knows absolutely nothing about, not only good cinematography, but good non-linear story telling. His brain is incapable of watching and understanding anything more complicated than the season finale of The Teletubbies. It's not about liking or disliking the film, its not everyone's cup of tea, but the guy who wrote this is just an asshole and completely ignorant when it comes to fantastic film making. In my opinion I felt this movie broke ground for comic book films, more than The Dark Knight, and maybe even more than the Avengers,<( At least when it comes to depth and three dimensional protagonists and more-so antagonists.)
#81 to #73 - tylerluvsmiki
Reply -4
(06/20/2013) [-]
Does "good storytelling" require a 45 minute, uninterrupted fight scene that takes up a third of the movie?
Is "non-linear storytelling" really just taking everything that was amazing about the first trailer, and then cramming it into the movie as an afterthought?
And I guess your idea of "three dimensional character" is a man who shaves his beard...
#86 to #81 - LovegoodJuggalo
Reply +4
(06/20/2013) [-]
God forbid a comic book action movie has action. And &quot;Cramming it in like an after thought&quot;? Are you kidding, if you were to actually pay attention during the film you would find that that the all of the flashback scenes revolve specifically around and correspond to present time events. It was masterful storytelling. Any child could see that. It upsets me that you cannot comprehend any level of character depth or development. I recommend you watch it again (online if you want so you won't have to pay) and actually pay attention to the film instead of bashing it with your obvious close-mindedness. Afterwards I'll be glad to hear your opinion. For now, please refer to my gif. And have a nice evening.
God forbid a comic book action movie has action. And "Cramming it in like an after thought"? Are you kidding, if you were to actually pay attention during the film you would find that that the all of the flashback scenes revolve specifically around and correspond to present time events. It was masterful storytelling. Any child could see that. It upsets me that you cannot comprehend any level of character depth or development. I recommend you watch it again (online if you want so you won't have to pay) and actually pay attention to the film instead of bashing it with your obvious close-mindedness. Afterwards I'll be glad to hear your opinion. For now, please refer to my gif. And have a nice evening.
#90 to #86 - darthblam
Reply +2
(06/20/2013) [-]
Thank you.    
I honestly just don't get what was bad about the movie to people. As a Superman movie it was amazing, as a movie in itself it was great. I'm glad I'm not the only one who sees that...   
   
or .. at least thinks that tyler's &quot;review&quot; is just stupid rambling ********.
Thank you.
I honestly just don't get what was bad about the movie to people. As a Superman movie it was amazing, as a movie in itself it was great. I'm glad I'm not the only one who sees that...

or .. at least thinks that tyler's "review" is just stupid rambling ********.
#113 to #90 - animationhac ONLINE
Reply +1
(06/20/2013) [-]
I just thought it could have used more. I didn't get the 'on the seat' feeling like I did with other comic book movies. I thought the movie was good just not what it could be. I believed it could have been much much more than it was. Super Man wasn't bad just I did want more from it.
#68 to #52 - funnyjunkfanjimtan [OP]
Reply 0
(06/20/2013) [-]
#84 to #42 - beefymuffin
Reply -3
(06/20/2013) [-]
Although the lore may have been good the overall movie i thought was awful. The acting was bad, the writing was bad, i didnt laugh at any of the corny one liners, i was not emotionally thrilled at all, nothing suprised me, all it was was a movie for people with a short attention span that like fighting and explosions.
tl;dr it wasnt very good
#110 to #42 - animationhac ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/20/2013) [-]
To be honest, I thought it was good just not great. It had a lot of potential just I felt like I was wanting more out of it. I thought it needed more something, something.

To people who don't read comics, the S doesn't mean 'hope' in kryptonian in the actual story.
#59 to #42 - Sethorein ONLINE
Reply +1
(06/20/2013) [-]
I didn't watch it.

Was it as blue filtered as the trailers made it seem?
#60 to #59 - darthblam
Reply +1
(06/20/2013) [-]
Blue filtered? I'm not quite sure what you mean by that...
#63 to #60 - Sethorein ONLINE
Reply +2
(06/20/2013) [-]
And an orange blue contrast. Note the difference when his skin tone is tinted orange to contrast with the blue background and orange sun.
#62 to #60 - Sethorein ONLINE
Reply +1
(06/20/2013) [-]
Natural light does not cause your skin to look pale with a hint of blue.

A lot of movies recently have decided to put blue and orange filters on every scene because apparently the contrast is supposed to be more appealing to the audience without being too noticeable.

I just find it nauseating.
#64 to #62 - darthblam
Reply +2
(06/20/2013) [-]
Ah, I see...
Honestly, I don't remember seeing anything like that. There are some scenes that were kind of like this, but it wasn't often.
But again, I really don't remember.. I just didn't quite notice it I guess.
#65 to #64 - Sethorein ONLINE
Reply +1
(06/20/2013) [-]
I learned about the effect and now I can't help but notice it T-T
#66 to #65 - darthblam
Reply +2
(06/20/2013) [-]
About the only real answer I can give is that I never noticed it.
Everything looked natural with the environment it was in to me. But I mean, that's good right?
#72 to #42 - iamthou ONLINE
Reply +2
(06/20/2013) [-]
I think that using zod, a lesser known superman villain, was part of christopher nolans involvement. I think nolan found an awesome formula with the dark knight trilogy by having lesser known villains being the enemy of the first film, because the first films are made to introduce the hero. the second film is when we can start to look more at the villains and how they work.
#76 to #42 - kraykan
Reply +2
(06/20/2013) [-]
it got bad reviews, but hey, to each his own.
#108 to #76 - vortexrain ONLINE
Reply +2
(06/20/2013) [-]
Speed Racer got bad reviews, and I liked it. Not because It had an engaging plot, or anything like that. I just like it.
#92 to #42 - Maadmann
Reply +2
(06/20/2013) [-]
I liked how it actually spent a GOOD amount of time explaining why Superman is, well, super!!!
#109 to #42 - foxtrotalpha
Reply +2
(06/20/2013) [-]
SPOILERS!







The most surprising part of the movie was how Supes killed Zod. I wouldn't have seen that coming in a million years.
#111 to #42 - malhaloc
Reply +2
(06/20/2013) [-]
I'm not a fan of Superman...like at all. I really don't like the kind of character that's just muscle and brawn. Not to say he's not smart, but they don't do anything with that. It's all about punching your enemies into submission. Now add that to the fact that he's unbeatable and you have an incredibly dull excuse for a main character. Now that being said. I actually liked the movie. It looked good, it explained a lot, it was well thought out. I do like the fact that we got to see a more flawed version of him, but I still cant stand the hero himself.
#114 to #42 - vortexrain ONLINE
Reply +2
(06/20/2013) [-]
I loved the final fight.
When Superman ended the fight, I just sat there thinking, "****, did he just do that?"
The only thing Superman related that I've ever read is "The Life and Death of Superman", but I know he just doesn't do what he did to end the fight.
It must've broken him to do that.
#122 to #42 - rhiaanor
Reply +2
(06/20/2013) [-]
I don't like super man, but my sister and nephew dragged y lazy ass to see it and, I can't deny that is was pretty amazing. I think it's better than Iron Man 3. I'm only saying that because of the damn villain twist.
#47 to #42 - darknemisis
Reply +6
(06/20/2013) [-]
I'm not really a fan of Superman and i freaking loved it!

****, I was in awe as I sat there ******** myself in the cinema sippin' on mah coke.
#2 - chaozdj ONLINE
Reply +38
(06/19/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#1 - walkerjam
Reply +34
(06/19/2013) [-]
New Superman just looks weird to me...
#77 to #1 - anon
Reply 0
(06/20/2013) [-]
It's his curlless forehead...isn't it?
#265 to #1 - wagastragas
Reply +1
(06/20/2013) [-]
its the bulge. it needs more of it
#20 to #1 - angelusprimus
Reply +2
(06/19/2013) [-]
That's kind of the point.
Instead of a costume new outfit is supposed to be alien clothes.
It looks weird because its not human.
#3 to #1 - apocalypticburrito
Reply +3
(06/19/2013) [-]
yeah now it feels like hes lacking something
a belt?
#33 to #3 - anon
Reply 0
(06/20/2013) [-]
I thought it needed a belt too.

I don't like change..
#9 to #1 - dreadedsin ONLINE
Reply +3
(06/19/2013) [-]
Really, I guess they are trying to remodel superheroes, they have done it in both DC and Marvel and it is because they are trying to keep up with modern times, for example Wonder Woman will no longer have the old outfit that we know from both the comics and the cartoons but is restyled to make it more up to date
#7 to #1 - hellfiazz
Reply +9
(06/19/2013) [-]
It's technically an alien piece of clothing. If you think of it like that, it becomes less weird. Well, it does to me, anyway.
#40 to #7 - youngduece
Reply +2
(06/20/2013) [-]
Yea like everyone else said, I think it's supposed to be more like alien clothes rather than the original Superman clothes which are supposed to be a costume
#19 - jinapayne
Reply +28
(06/19/2013) [-]
1978 you cinematically uneducated piece of ****
#22 to #19 - funnyjunkfanjimtan [OP]
Reply +1
(06/19/2013) [-]
subliminal
#71 - crazyish
Reply +17
(06/20/2013) [-]
Why does the Chris Reeve picture say 2006? Reeve's movies came out in the late 70's and 80's, and Reeve died before 2006.

The Picture should be of Brandon Routh from Superman Returns. Pic semi-related
#75 to #71 - funnyjunkfanjimtan [OP]
Reply 0
(06/20/2013) [-]
#83 to #71 - funnyjunkfanjimtan [OP]
Reply 0
(06/20/2013) [-]
#85 to #71 - Spikeydeath
Reply +2
(06/20/2013) [-]
He died in 2004
#118 to #85 - crazyish
Reply +1
(06/20/2013) [-]
October 10th 2004. I only remember it because it was five days after my birthday
#21 - angelusprimus
Reply +17
(06/19/2013) [-]
Is it just me, or is lack of red shorts really make his junk stick out more...
#51 to #21 - ScottP
Reply +7
(06/20/2013) [-]
It's the lack of color balance. That's what struck me about his new costume at first. A red belt would have fixed that color balance issue
#134 - jedisquirrel
Reply +16
(06/20/2013) [-]