[Nukes Internally]. www.nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/. Mum and if. I'd be more afraid of the time machine that the Soviets have built! North Korea is the best korea
x
Click to expand

Comments(224):

[ 224 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #180 to #170 - rakuraimasuta (06/17/2013) [-]
Citizen Kane?
#1 - walkerjam (06/16/2013) [-]
I'd be more afraid of the 			*******		 time machine that the Soviets have built!
I'd be more afraid of the ******* time machine that the Soviets have built!
User avatar #210 to #1 - mcwachner (06/17/2013) [-]
I missed the joke here? Time machine?
#59 to #1 - John Cena (06/17/2013) [-]
That reminds me of red alert 3.
#65 to #1 - John Cena (06/17/2013) [-]
Is that from the spelling bee episode?
#66 to #65 - walkerjam (06/17/2013) [-]
Not sure what episode it is from, sorry. I just like Psych and found that gif so I saved it.    
Same with this one.
Not sure what episode it is from, sorry. I just like Psych and found that gif so I saved it.
Same with this one.
#68 to #66 - John Cena (06/17/2013) [-]
I love Psych.
So psyched for the musical this December.
#181 to #66 - ksmore (06/17/2013) [-]
That one is from the season 2 premiere, American Duos
#179 to #65 - ksmore (06/17/2013) [-]
Yes it is, it was immediately followed by this
Yes it is, it was immediately followed by this
#5 to #1 - bluwizard (06/17/2013) [-]
Based on most theories, if someone goes back in time it will not effect us. It will simply open a new string that will continue in a divergent path.
#21 to #5 - John Cena (06/17/2013) [-]
Confusing theories with hypotheses
#14 to #5 - John Cena (06/17/2013) [-]
"based on most theories"

im not disagreeing but a theory is just a theory so we don't know what would happen
User avatar #190 to #14 - toosexyforyou (06/17/2013) [-]
A theory is not just a guess dude. Theories are called theories because all the information and technology that we have today cannot disprove it. It's really just barely short of scientific law.
User avatar #206 to #5 - snowshark (06/17/2013) [-]
Aye. I personally like to call that extra-continuity time travel and time travel where you go back along the timeline of your own world as inter-continuity time travel.

The difference is that inter-continuity time travel doesn't change anything, as the effects of everything you do in the past are already being felt in the present since technically they've already happened. (See Red vs Blue: Church is the Teamkilling ******** for more details.)

Extra-continuity time travel means travel outside of our continuity, hence it's free play there to do whatever you want to.
User avatar #83 to #5 - baaltomekk (06/17/2013) [-]
What if we are in that divergent path right now?
#86 to #83 - pandorabox ONLINE (06/17/2013) [-]
there is no if, we most definitely are
User avatar #88 to #86 - baaltomekk (06/17/2013) [-]
That means there is one soviet in this world that has traveled back in time
#89 to #88 - pandorabox ONLINE (06/17/2013) [-]
or at least one doctor
User avatar #204 to #88 - snowshark (06/17/2013) [-]
Yeah... but given that the Soviet Union pretty much crumbled the guy who went back in time ****** up royally.
User avatar #205 to #204 - baaltomekk (06/17/2013) [-]
Who knows how bad they went down in the other timeline...
User avatar #209 to #205 - snowshark (06/17/2013) [-]
Probably Carl Marx. He seems like the kind of guy who knew his **** .
User avatar #211 to #209 - baaltomekk (06/17/2013) [-]
Let's build a timemachine and ask him!
User avatar #224 to #211 - snowshark (06/17/2013) [-]
Don't be stupid!

We can just borrow Old Man Marty's.
#4 - Swmmrman ONLINE (06/17/2013) [-]
Set one large enough to nearly blow up the world.. Madagascar survives...

www.nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/?lat=34.046788973464395&lng=-118.24631018066407&zm=2&kt=100000000000000

#40 to #4 - John Cena (06/17/2013) [-]
and conveniently enough so does the mcdonalds island
#110 to #4 - boenna (06/17/2013) [-]
I have made up my mind.

I'm moving to Madagascar...

Pic related; My new house on Madagascar
#177 to #4 - John Cena (06/17/2013) [-]
[url deleted] nuclearsecrecy com/nukemap/?lat=34.046788973464395&lng=-118.24631018066407&zm=2&kt=100000000000 000

there fixed
#230 to #229 - Swmmrman ONLINE (06/18/2013) [-]
Hmmm maybe 1 more zero would have worked. My link failed And i cant edit my link
#228 to #227 - Swmmrman ONLINE (06/18/2013) [-]
I think you blew up the app!
User avatar #232 to #228 - marmiteistasty (06/18/2013) [-]
oh noes!
#55 to #4 - killasmasha (06/17/2013) [-]
If that's a problem, you could just drop the 			*******		 thing ON Madagascar!
If that's a problem, you could just drop the ******* thing ON Madagascar!
#75 to #4 - moneybag (06/17/2013) [-]
they should put Madagascar in the lore of one of the fallout games
User avatar #7 to #4 - riddles (06/17/2013) [-]
just like that pandemic game....
#139 - lolfire (06/17/2013) [-]
The Tsar Bomba would literally destroy my entire country.
User avatar #184 to #139 - motherduck (06/17/2013) [-]
My town is pretty much at the edge of it in this picture.But seriously it would probably **** up 1/3 of the country
User avatar #161 to #139 - mrsonicrainboom (06/17/2013) [-]
thats why russia would pretty much win any war they wanted to
#162 to #161 - lolfire (06/17/2013) [-]
Well, we wouldn't put up much of a fight with our vast history of throwing bricks.
#165 to #162 - mrsonicrainboom (06/17/2013) [-]
and petrol bombs, dont forget petrol bombs.
#173 to #165 - lolfire (06/17/2013) [-]
Possibly my favorite throw in the last 4 years.    
This one was from the 2011 12th.
Possibly my favorite throw in the last 4 years.
This one was from the 2011 12th.
User avatar #164 to #161 - gatorade (06/17/2013) [-]
Well yeah if your through logistics out of the window.

Imagine if it was it's full planned size... Oh my....
-4
#166 to #161 - jorah has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #167 to #166 - mrsonicrainboom (06/17/2013) [-]
not really, Russia would probably win, they not only have more nukes but more soldiers and more missiles. plus, the amount of arms factory's there is unbelievable.
User avatar #198 to #167 - killinkyle (06/17/2013) [-]
we have more tanks then every country in the world combined

like, I don't think you realize what that means. We have 2500 tanks sitting out in the desert doing nothing. 2500. Not to mention we are a country in perpetual war with foreign nations, as well as the large armies stationed in the middle east that could be pushed into russia through the mountains.

Since we are pretty much butt buddies with the UN, and the fact that most nations would lose a **** load of money if the US fell, Russia would have pretty much every other first world country attacking them too, including, believe it or not, China.

Now, China is the only nation with an army that even competes with a america- If they lose america, they lose their top importer of goods and electronics- Which is a huge cut of their economy.

It would be a curbstomp on a global level. The new 7 day war, except this time, it involves 150 ICBM's targeting every major military base in Russia before they have the chance to sign a declaration of war.
User avatar #217 to #198 - lolfire (06/17/2013) [-]
The reason the cold war happened is because America CANNOT beat Russia.

Russia wins on man-power, field arms and anti-rocket systems.
(America's missiles couldn't touch Russia)

America wins on naval strength, range and aircraft.


However Russia's submarines are world class. They are more than capable of hitting America from anywhere in the world whilst being practically invisible.


Both countries would wreck themselves beyond recognition, but however, the last man standing would be Russia.
User avatar #218 to #217 - killinkyle (06/17/2013) [-]
Your joking, right?

The entire russian army pretty much disbanded because the communist goverment couldn't hold their economy together.

America holds one of the top economies in the world.

Russia has sold off half of their Submarines and equipment to foreign countries just to try and get back on their feet- And those Tsar bombs? They don't have those. As part of the pact, they dumped a bunch of nuclear weapons into the ocean/buried them.

Why are you even arguing this? Russia is not even a fraction of the power it was 30 years ago. It can barely support its own people, let alone an actual war.
User avatar #222 to #218 - jacksipian (06/17/2013) [-]
i agree with you and im on your side in this, but russia does have that whole "bury them with bodies" thing going for them :/ plus all of the stuff they do have left over from the Cold War has thicker armor than most of our stuff, America tended to focus on speed and maneuverability for our vehicles, while Russia tended to focus on armor and firepower for theirs. as far as missles and stuff go, ours are far more accurate than theirs because we wanted to minimize collateral damage, like we can take out any military base/city we wanted to and not have to worry too much about collateral damage, but Russia would take out a city/county to take out one target because they weren't as accurate, so they made up for that with a bigger blast so that even if they miss, they still get what they want. Though, this might have changed, im just going off of how it was during the Cold War. Feel free to correct me on whatever parts im wrong on, i love this sort of thing.
User avatar #223 to #222 - killinkyle (06/17/2013) [-]
I... Don't feel like going any further. This is an argument that will only lead to further red thumbs for either side, so I think its best to agree to disagree with them.

Just know that the Americans are a hell of a lot more advanced then they were during the cold war, due to our constant need to adapt to the wars we stuff ourselves into.
User avatar #225 to #223 - jacksipian (06/17/2013) [-]
well ya, i know we changed a lot, its just that i know more about where we stood then, than i do now BECAUSE we changed a lot :/
-7
#169 to #167 - jorah has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #186 to #169 - spidahridah (06/17/2013) [-]
How's 8th grade doing?
User avatar #213 to #186 - jorah (06/17/2013) [-]
I don't know, it's been a decade since I was in 8th grade. idiot.
User avatar #187 to #169 - regdestroy (06/17/2013) [-]
Yeah, The Expendables was a good movie.
-1
#212 to #187 - jorah has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #175 to #169 - mrsonicrainboom (06/17/2013) [-]
again not really, most soldiers from russia can start training from the age of about 12 and by the age of maybe 15 they can easily beat a fully trained us marine/navy seal in hand to hand combat or a gun fight, plus an extra maybe ten years of training and there vast numbers, not even murica would be able to beat them, plus its not about the soldiers, russia has enough nukes to literally take american off the map in one swift movement.
User avatar #193 to #175 - themurp (06/17/2013) [-]
First, nobody would result to using nukes early.
Second, chances are no-one would use nukes at all.
Third, Russia has a much lower population and would not only have poorly trained troops but they would have far fewer.
Fourth, Russia's industrial and agricultural capabilities are to low to sustain a war with the US.
Fifth, Russian civilians support of the Russian government would not be enough to unitedly fight a war under the imposed conditions of wartime.
-3
#171 to #169 - jorah has deleted their comment [-]
#9 - luthervonappledorf (06/17/2013) [-]
Was the Soviet bomb based on the Tsar Bomba?

That **** was badass.
#27 to #9 - John Cena (06/17/2013) [-]
Fairly certain that the tzar bomba wasn't a nuke, it was conventional explosives.

So big boom.
User avatar #30 to #27 - Maroon (06/17/2013) [-]
no, it was a nuke. Do you have any idea how much conventional explosives it would take to make an explosion that big?
User avatar #34 to #30 - kingpara (06/17/2013) [-]
50 Megatons of TNT
#91 to #34 - neurofuzzy (06/17/2013) [-]
ah... well **** .
#35 to #27 - WiggsMaGee (06/17/2013) [-]
Nothing we can produce through conventional means could produce an explosion the scale of the Tsar bomb...
Its 100 MILLION Tonnes of TNT
#80 to #9 - theoddanon (06/17/2013) [-]
Who the 			****		 calls one of the most powerful bomb in the world 'mike'
Who the **** calls one of the most powerful bomb in the world 'mike'
User avatar #96 to #80 - luthervonappledorf (06/17/2013) [-]
The same person who named a tv channel Dave.
#178 to #80 - John Cena (06/17/2013) [-]
They should've called it Scrambles the Death Dealer.
User avatar #122 to #80 - destructodan **User deleted account** (06/17/2013) [-]
Phonetic alphabet (alpha, brave, Charlie, etc)?
User avatar #13 to #9 - moc (06/17/2013) [-]
yeah it says it right there, he used the 50 kt one (the one that was tested) 100kt was the actual designed ammount
#15 to #13 - John Cena (06/17/2013) [-]
*mt
#36 to #15 - John Cena (06/17/2013) [-]
*kt
User avatar #47 to #36 - cartridge (06/17/2013) [-]
MT
#44 - allamericandude (06/17/2013) [-]
Fun fact: The reason why the Russians built the Tsar Bomba was because of their clunky missile guidance systems. Instead of making more accurate missiles, they just made bigger warheads and hoped that it would land sorta in the general area of their intended target. The US, on the other hand, had very precise missiles, so they didn't bother making bigger bombs.   
   
Russia's FW.
Fun fact: The reason why the Russians built the Tsar Bomba was because of their clunky missile guidance systems. Instead of making more accurate missiles, they just made bigger warheads and hoped that it would land sorta in the general area of their intended target. The US, on the other hand, had very precise missiles, so they didn't bother making bigger bombs.

Russia's FW.
#133 to #44 - lufieh (06/17/2013) [-]
>The US, on the other hand, had very precise missiles
brought to you by Nazi scientists
#143 to #133 - allamericandude (06/17/2013) [-]
The Soviets had their own Nazi scientists, too. (That's why these two planes are so similar.)

But it's not like the thousands of US and Soviet engineers were just twiddling their thumbs and running coffee for the Germans. Some basic stuff was derived from the Germans, but the vast majority of it was developed on their own. After all, most German military R&D came to a halt after 1945, so a lot of their technology quickly became outdated.
User avatar #51 to #44 - hitero (06/17/2013) [-]
Ummm....the Tsar Bomba was an airplane delivered bomb...
User avatar #56 to #51 - allamericandude (06/17/2013) [-]
That was to test it. The idea was to eventually put it on one of those big rockets they typically used to shoot astronauts into space.
User avatar #6 - KayRed (06/17/2013) [-]
No big deal, except that new york has a huge population density, so if a north korea nuke hits new york, a lot of people will die..

...but let's be honest, the only place that nuke would be going is the pacific.
User avatar #49 to #6 - slumberdonkey (06/17/2013) [-]
Dude, North Korea's missile guidance system is literally run by Windows 7. I'm not exactly worried.
User avatar #12 to #6 - fantomen (06/17/2013) [-]
The biggest damage wouldn't be the half-million or so people that would die instantly from the blast. It would be people panicking all over the ******* country and causing riots and mass hysteria. That **** would also bring down the economy for decades.
#16 to #12 - yunoacceptnumbers (06/17/2013) [-]
Oh, I think if anyone was to nuke the US noone anywhere would have to worry about the economy of their country for longer than a few years...
User avatar #115 to #12 - KayRed (06/17/2013) [-]
True enough, just look at the boston bombings. Three people died, and all of a sudden the country became a rabid mob who wanted to kill some kid and his dickhead brother.
#182 to #115 - John Cena (06/17/2013) [-]
I live 80 miles away from Boston.

First off, I'd hardly say we turned into a rabid mob.
Second of all this was hardly "some kid and his dickhead brother" they were young terrorists who chose to let off explosions in a highly populated area during a time when a lot of people were going to gather.
User avatar #120 to #115 - fantomen (06/17/2013) [-]
And suddenly hundreds of cops were roaming the streets with machine guns and mine resistant armed trucks.
#71 - lolzordz (06/17/2013) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lDFLLKSkUg

i'd feel sorry for whoever gets hit by a nuclear bomb, koreans or americans..
#101 to #71 - John Cena (06/17/2013) [-]
Source is Hadashi no Gen, by the way.
User avatar #76 to #71 - EdwardNigma ONLINE (06/17/2013) [-]
******* goodness gracious thats scary.
User avatar #81 to #76 - lolzordz (06/17/2013) [-]
people love to talk **** about nuclear weapons without ever considering the horror it actually wreaks...
plus its so dishonourable and without skill/strategy to use it in a war. it really is nothing to brag about who has the bigger nuclear bomb
User avatar #92 to #81 - EdwardNigma ONLINE (06/17/2013) [-]
It truly is our most horrible creation. But it's one of the best too, in a way.
The fear of nuclear war has kept moderate peace, if you think about it. Hiroshima being bombed ended the war and while killing many people, it saved many more. If the world had no nuclear weapons, leaders would have less to fear. A nuclear weapon can clearly end a war very swiftly, with many consequences. The fear of radiation and hellfire wouldn't be there if we didn't have them. It's that fear that I think keeps peace. If I'm not mistaken, there is a global system that if any country uses a nuclear weapon, every other country with nuclear weapons utterly massacres the **** out of the one that used it. Going to war would be risky for the obvious reason that they could be nuked. But launching a nuke in a war isn't risky, it's outright suicide. Either way, you don't win.

I see the horror of nuclear weapons, the misery and suffering they can cause, but I also see something fascinating in them. I'm not sure what. Maybe I'm just a poor excuse for a human being.
User avatar #87 to #81 - erotictentacle (06/17/2013) [-]
fighting a war, trying to win, is about "winning" with as few as possible kills on your side.
There is no place for honour in these cases.
Honor is for duels
User avatar #125 to #87 - konradkurze (06/17/2013) [-]
america and israel dont care about honor, they care about "anything it takes to win"

if by unlikely chance they needed nukes to win, theyd use them
User avatar #95 to #87 - lolzordz (06/17/2013) [-]
so attack military bases, not civilians... thats just like kicking someone in the balls. besides, its not the civilians which want a war, just the country leaders who are power hungry dicks. i honestly dont know why soldiers fight for them other than the extremely false pretense that theyre fighting for their country.

point remains, no honour. nothing to brag about too...


User avatar #97 to #95 - erotictentacle (06/17/2013) [-]
well, isn't kicking someone in the balls the best way to take him down?
#99 to #97 - lolzordz (06/17/2013) [-]
if i kicked you in the balls i would feel like im the one who lost the fight
if i kicked you in the balls i would feel like im the one who lost the fight
User avatar #100 to #99 - erotictentacle (06/17/2013) [-]
i would feel like i lost the fight AND have a pain in the nuts tho
User avatar #102 to #100 - lolzordz (06/17/2013) [-]
really? if i got kicked in the balls in a fight, itd be 'the only reason i lost the fight'
i think thats really the point behind honour, knowing that you won fairly gives you true respect... if you didnt, everyone just knows youre a cheating pussy... and if america wants to be a cheating pussy, at least dont brag about it, doesnt make sense
User avatar #103 to #102 - erotictentacle (06/17/2013) [-]
well, who's gonna prevent them if they just kick in the balls all the time?
User avatar #105 to #103 - lolzordz (06/17/2013) [-]
i dont know.. its hard to explain honour to people who have no shame... i guess its more a cultural thing
User avatar #106 to #105 - erotictentacle (06/17/2013) [-]
yeah, prolly
#192 - xoyv (06/17/2013) [-]
minecraft
#72 - EdwardNigma ONLINE (06/17/2013) [-]
If I made and detonated a 100 Megaton bomb at my house, I'd be able to take out Brisbane as well.

Radical.
User avatar #112 - osimonmagus (06/17/2013) [-]
If the Tsar bomb was dropped on Manhattan, you would see New York burn from Virginia and windows would be shattered down to South Carolina. I wish they world would collaborate into building a 150 Megaton bomb and detonate it somewhere remote. People could buy a ticket and go see the bomb detonate and naturally it would be broadcasted Live all around the world. All the money from the tickets goes to a charity that will help end all conflict around the world. The crater of the bomb would become a monument for world peace and after that all nuclear weapons and nuclear weapon capabilities would have to be destroyed.
User avatar #154 to #112 - misticalz (06/17/2013) [-]
....
That would still kill millions of people.
User avatar #114 to #112 - darksideofthebeast (06/17/2013) [-]
World peace?
World peace????
NO MORE NUCLEAR WEAPONS?
What are you mad?
User avatar #123 to #114 - konradkurze (06/17/2013) [-]
as long as america and israel exist, there can be no world peace
User avatar #155 to #123 - darksideofthebeast (06/17/2013) [-]
I agree.
But it's not just America
America is the worst because they blame everything on terrorist.
User avatar #157 to #155 - konradkurze (06/17/2013) [-]
well actually, america isnt the worst, they just do alot of media hype about everything, its isreal thats worst because theyre getting away with a nazi-style occupation and pruge of palestine while usa does the simple media manipulation to make israel look like the 'good guys' by only allowing israel's side of the story to be told

most of the so-called "injuries' suffered by israeli soldiers are just makeup to put on a show for the cameras
User avatar #158 to #157 - darksideofthebeast (06/17/2013) [-]
America is just as bad if not worse than the nazi's
They make you believe stuff is happening and they blame it on others when they themselves probably set it up just to keep this 'War on Terrorism' Going when there are no real terrorist's
America is their own terrorist.
User avatar #168 to #158 - jorah (06/17/2013) [-]
"No real terrorists"?
You clearly have no idea what you're talking about.
User avatar #174 to #168 - darksideofthebeast (06/17/2013) [-]
America just likes to hype **** up
I shouldn't have said no real terrorist because there are...
But America isn't the most truthful country.
User avatar #207 to #174 - jorah (06/17/2013) [-]
No country is truthful
User avatar #172 to #158 - konradkurze (06/17/2013) [-]
well americans more like the USSR, it wants everything as one global union under it as russia once did, theyre using this 'war on terror' to use arabs as the punching bag and make all other countries slie under usa's "protection"

historically USA created the UN to establish a "One World Government" and managed to convince alot of european countries to join, and has been following a policy of "join us of be attacked till you submit"
usa is more stalinist in that its perfectly happy to have all types of people of all nationalities, races, etc and make them all equally servants to the state

if usa was nazi-ish theyd at least have some pride in their people and keep bloodlines clean, not absorb every race, usa is stalinist while israel does the nazi-style ethnic cleansing
User avatar #116 to #114 - osimonmagus (06/17/2013) [-]
I'm also from the United States.
+7
#109 - admiralamory **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#188 - kiricy ONLINE (06/17/2013) [-]
well thats my whole country gone...............
User avatar #216 to #188 - acemcgunner (06/17/2013) [-]
**acemcgunner rolls 707** could go to the end of the country
User avatar #208 to #188 - ishalltroll (06/17/2013) [-]
Meh, you guys are gonna have a glorious battle on that island soon enough. Because for some reason Turkey and Greece both want that thing you're living on.
Then again both of those countries are currently pretty raped in any possible way. So yeah, that's that.
User avatar #189 to #188 - thefasrdog (06/17/2013) [-]
Don't worry I think Cyprus would be the last choice for a country to nuke...
User avatar #191 to #189 - kiricy ONLINE (06/17/2013) [-]
yeah haha,not like we're important enough for nuclear war
User avatar #197 to #191 - Mahazama (06/17/2013) [-]
But you have a huge British base on Cyprus.
You're totally ****** .
#108 - haxorman (06/17/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #3 - xsap (06/17/2013) [-]
why does it have to be new york... everything that ever happens is in new york *****

i aint safe
#42 - John Cena (06/17/2013) [-]
Not totally incorrect.
The Tsar bomb was the biggest Bomb ever exploded on earth. However it doesn't eman the US wasn't capable of it, and the US has been testing bombs a little over 10 tiems to the power in Yield JT and Kn TNT since then.
User avatar #45 to #42 - allamericandude (06/17/2013) [-]
See my comment, #44.
#43 to #42 - John Cena (06/17/2013) [-]
A lot of mistakes. tl;dr, the US is capable of greater power then any country on earth.
#145 - John Cena (06/17/2013) [-]
I tried to blow up the NATO HQ, and suddely I discovered that the NATO HQ is in ******* Belgium and not in the US. Strategic placement at it's best, let those damn Belgiumians take the blast instead of us, MUHAHA!
User avatar #201 to #145 - napalmpie (06/17/2013) [-]
Yes but the North Korean bomb wouldn't even erase Brussels.
hahaha
#195 - azteh (06/17/2013) [-]
For anyone who cares (nobody)

If you drop a 1 Gigaton nuclear bomb on Odder A city in Denmark
Denmark would be covered in the Thermal radiation radius
#203 to #195 - mudkipfucker ONLINE (06/17/2013) [-]
This image has expired
He's right, you know
User avatar #185 - rieskimo (06/17/2013) [-]
How did US's nuclear ability come into question in the comment section? This is a post comparing N. Korea's nuclear capability with the largest bomb detonated on earth.
#10 - whatshouldibenamed (06/17/2013) [-]
**whatshouldibenamed rolled a random image posted in comment #71 at Sometimes I laugh. **
[ 224 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)