in responce to the gun controll laws.... .
x

Comments(126):

[ 126 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #5 - marzipancity (06/14/2013) [-]
Where's the silencer? I ain't gonna beat ******* if other ******* can hear me beating ******* .
#104 to #5 - jthwdragon (06/14/2013) [-]
its on the optics
#6 to #5 - anon (06/14/2013) [-]
If you beat those ******* too it's not a problem.
User avatar #7 to #5 - cowmoose (06/14/2013) [-]
That awkward moment when ******* hear you ******* ******* with your ******* ************** stick.
User avatar #69 to #7 - cheated (06/14/2013) [-]
How many ******* could a ************ **** if a ****** upper could **** ******* ?
User avatar #90 to #69 - chiopet (06/14/2013) [-]
how much wood could a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could even give a **** ?
#29 - sycotic (06/14/2013) [-]
#75 to #29 - creepyunclebob (06/14/2013) [-]
Don't show this **** on here, there are kids on this website. Next time I hear about a school assault-knifing I'm blaming you.
#57 to #29 - anon (06/14/2013) [-]
"Sniper Knifle"
User avatar #84 to #57 - tealcanaan (06/14/2013) [-]
"Tactical Baby Skull Seeking Assault Knife"
-MSNBC
#89 to #29 - alfrazzy (06/14/2013) [-]
I call it...


...the sniper knifle
User avatar #30 to #29 - ragnarfag (06/14/2013) [-]
>no silencer
#103 to #30 - jthwdragon (06/14/2013) [-]
there is a muzzelbreaker on the optics, if that helps
User avatar #106 to #103 - ragnarfag (06/14/2013) [-]
A loudener would be better or that one for shoting kniving down police helicopters.
User avatar #32 to #29 - Einsty (06/14/2013) [-]
A muzzlebreaker on optics. Genius.
User avatar #74 to #32 - gytisout (06/14/2013) [-]
someone might hear me looking
#102 to #32 - jthwdragon (06/14/2013) [-]
is that really the strange part of the picture
#2 - granadablashlack (06/14/2013) [-]
Tactical Cat Tank reporting
Tactical Cat Tank reporting
User avatar #60 - CaptainKill (06/14/2013) [-]
Is that a 2x1 piece of wood? Honestly, why would any hunter need more than a 1x1? I think only the police should be able to own 2x1's and larger pieces of assault wood.
#70 to #60 - anon (06/14/2013) [-]
Ever try to kill a bear with a 1x1? Ass.
#28 - sadf (06/14/2013) [-]
Sadly this is illegal in New York right now because of the magazine.
#116 - bloodofthedragon ONLINE (06/15/2013) [-]
remember, there is no such thing as to much tactical.
#138 to #116 - sohisohi (09/02/2014) [-]
What the **** am I looking at
#4 - therambohawk (06/14/2013) [-]
To The frontpage?
To The frontpage?
#19 to #4 - semierectnipple (06/14/2013) [-]
We can do this
We can do this
User avatar #58 to #51 - churrundo (06/14/2013) [-]
IT NEVER RUNS OUT OF GAS!
#72 to #47 - anon (06/14/2013) [-]
thats one jive ass stick
User avatar #45 - zardronix (06/14/2013) [-]
Illegal in California
User avatar #49 to #45 - ethkot (06/14/2013) [-]
Known to the state of California to cause cancer
#82 - dickstick (06/14/2013) [-]
Russians, have better sticks.
Russians, have better sticks.
User avatar #114 to #82 - vancecore (06/15/2013) [-]
Is'nt that like a festival in Mexico? The ones where they tie explosives onto huge mallets and go full potato?
User avatar #119 to #82 - captalexander (06/15/2013) [-]
is he kill?
#136 to #119 - anon (06/15/2013) [-]
Yes, the stick is kill. RIP stick.
#21 - bitchplzzz (06/14/2013) [-]
Ban it.
#1 - mooghens (06/14/2013) [-]
Is that a 30-round magazine? DAS IST VERBOTEN!!!
User avatar #115 to #1 - danytheop (06/15/2013) [-]
does that by chance say: That is forbidden? Sorry about being an english fag
#18 to #1 - supamonkey (06/14/2013) [-]
*Plays Star Wars' "Imperial March"*
User avatar #41 - SirWinkler (06/14/2013) [-]
It looks like you magazine can hold more than 10 splinter bullets. I'm afraid we're going to have to outlaw that.
#43 to #41 - anon (06/14/2013) [-]
yes we must outlaw it for the safety of american families, you don't need guns, we have the police force + enough time for a pizza delivery
#3 - braxtotxarb (06/14/2013) [-]
pic related
User avatar #44 - demandsgayversion (06/14/2013) [-]
>tactical
>self defense
#25 - anon (06/14/2013) [-]
What don't you americans get?
We KNOW guns don't kill people any more than pens create art.
The fact is, if a guy's got a criminal record, or a history of mental illness, that ************ SHOULD NOT be able to get one. Not now, not ever.

That's all we s=think you should change.
#81 to #25 - anon (06/14/2013) [-]
Right. Because criminals won't sell guns to criminals.
(dumb ass)
#131 to #25 - anon (06/15/2013) [-]
We get that. We also get that stricter gun laws won't stop criminals from getting guns.
#64 to #25 - fuckyosixtyminutes (06/14/2013) [-]
We don't care what you think.
#97 to #25 - newall (06/14/2013) [-]
you mean, maybe they should do background checks on people who want to buy guns?

Just like that proposed bill that was vetoed recently said?

Who'd've thunk it?
User avatar #26 to #25 - thelordofrepost (06/14/2013) [-]
Do you honestly think that all ******* Americans support gun control?
User avatar #48 to #25 - cheezbrgr (06/14/2013) [-]
there actually is plenty of background checks, the guy who shot up sandy hook was actually denied the ability to purchase a gun. He stole those weapons from his parents house.
#65 to #48 - thumblocked (06/14/2013) [-]
In Canada those parents wouldn't have been allowed to store those weapons at home, only at the range. They actually do it that strictly here, crazy.
#36 to #25 - anon (06/14/2013) [-]
A lot of Americans support more/better background checks. Our problem(or at least mine) is the bills for gun control usually contain things about banning guns or certain magazines, which people don't like.Plus all guns aren't suddenly going to disappear simply because they get banned
User avatar #68 to #36 - blaazen (06/14/2013) [-]
Yeah it's amazing that the criminals don't obey the laws, right???
#113 to #68 - anon (06/15/2013) [-]
Yeah, so let's get rid of all laws, cause they don't work. Murder laws, theft, drug dealing, fraud laws. If absolutely all people on earth will not follow laws, there's no point in having any, right?
User avatar #52 to #25 - snickerstheif (06/14/2013) [-]
You can't purchase a weapon with a criminal record you dingus
User avatar #59 to #52 - poetsofthefall (06/14/2013) [-]
As long as the offense was expunged from your record, you can.
#33 to #25 - durkadurka (06/14/2013) [-]
This content is making fun of the notion that "military like features" magically make firearms into machineguns of death.
#110 - SubjectThree (06/14/2013) [-]
What about bows and arrows? They have several advantages over guns.

*Genuinely silent, and leave no smoke cloud.
*Can penetrate most commercial issued body armors because arrowheads cut and slice, and can go through the holes in a kevlar weave with ease.
*Can be poisoned
*Cheaper than guns
*Modern carbon-fiber arrow shafts cannot be broken off without risk of further damage to the victim.

Why aren't we banning these then?
#111 to #110 - anon (06/14/2013) [-]
thats more of a assasination weapon than a self defence weapon
User avatar #124 to #110 - jorah (06/15/2013) [-]
Because they are useless for mass killing
User avatar #129 to #110 - ltsparky (06/15/2013) [-]
They weren't mentioned in the Constitution
User avatar #112 to #110 - secretdestroyers (06/15/2013) [-]
Because how many mass shootings can you name that have been done with a bow and arrow? As interesting as that would be to witness...
User avatar #126 to #112 - captainsheperd (06/15/2013) [-]
have you played Crysis 3?
User avatar #127 to #126 - secretdestroyers (06/15/2013) [-]
I have not. Although, I obviously should...
User avatar #128 to #127 - captainsheperd (06/15/2013) [-]
quite its basically arrow after arrow
User avatar #63 - Jewssassin (06/14/2013) [-]
One of my local gun stores has an "Assault Bat"
Its a black baseball bat with a scope on it and fake blood stains, "only used once" $80.
[ 126 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)