in responce to the gun controll laws.... .
Home Funny Pictures YouTube Funny Videos Funny GIFs Text/Links Channels Search

in responce to the gun controll laws...

+1286
Views: 47410
Favorited: 91
Submitted: 06/14/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to Ruician E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(125):

[ 125 comments ]
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
User avatar #132 - ethkot (06/15/2013) [-]
Come on! Now we have to ban sticks because when you do that to it, it looks like a gun!
#130 - snakefire ONLINE (06/15/2013) [-]
Nobody's taken' mai snipah
Nobody's taken' mai snipah
#125 - anonymous (06/15/2013) [-]
I thought self-defense became illegal too.
#120 - anonymous (06/15/2013) [-]
of the course the anti-sanity idiot makes a bunch of spelling errors
#116 - bloodofthedragon ONLINE (06/15/2013) [-]
remember, there is no such thing as to much tactical.
#110 - SubjectThree (06/14/2013) [-]
What about bows and arrows? They have several advantages over guns.

*Genuinely silent, and leave no smoke cloud.
*Can penetrate most commercial issued body armors because arrowheads cut and slice, and can go through the holes in a kevlar weave with ease.
*Can be poisoned
*Cheaper than guns
*Modern carbon-fiber arrow shafts cannot be broken off without risk of further damage to the victim.

Why aren't we banning these then?
User avatar #129 to #110 - ltsparky ONLINE (06/15/2013) [-]
They weren't mentioned in the Constitution
User avatar #124 to #110 - jorah (06/15/2013) [-]
Because they are useless for mass killing
User avatar #112 to #110 - secretdestroyers (06/15/2013) [-]
Because how many mass shootings can you name that have been done with a bow and arrow? As interesting as that would be to witness...
User avatar #126 to #112 - captainsheperd (06/15/2013) [-]
have you played Crysis 3?
User avatar #127 to #126 - secretdestroyers (06/15/2013) [-]
I have not. Although, I obviously should...
User avatar #128 to #127 - captainsheperd (06/15/2013) [-]
quite its basically arrow after arrow
#111 to #110 - anonymous (06/14/2013) [-]
thats more of a assasination weapon than a self defence weapon
User avatar #100 - mymiddleleg (06/14/2013) [-]
End result of Britains Armed Forces budget cuts
#108 to #100 - lolfire (06/14/2013) [-]
Haha, you lot in the mainland aren't allowed guns.
User avatar #98 - mattucheese **User deleted account** (06/14/2013) [-]
In theory since it doesn't have a stock it could be considered a "pistol". The law is stupid on pistols and says you can not have forward vertical grip on it. Thus making it a federal crime to have that grippod on it...
#95 - bbbaka (06/14/2013) [-]
ib4 goverment 						***********					 it   
   
GIF somewhat relevant
ib4 goverment *********** it

GIF somewhat relevant
User avatar #94 - chiefrunnyjeans (06/14/2013) [-]
oh no. it has a scary foregrip and magazine. hurr durr we should ban this guys
#93 - doctormisha (06/14/2013) [-]
This is..the only relevant thing I have
User avatar #85 - brenton (06/14/2013) [-]
<sarcasm>That magazine holds too many rounds. Still illegal.</sarcasm>
#82 - dickstick (06/14/2013) [-]
Russians, have better sticks.
Russians, have better sticks.
User avatar #119 to #82 - captalexander (06/15/2013) [-]
is he kill?
#136 to #119 - anonymous (06/15/2013) [-]
Yes, the stick is kill. RIP stick.
User avatar #114 to #82 - vancecore (06/15/2013) [-]
Is'nt that like a festival in Mexico? The ones where they tie explosives onto huge mallets and go full potato?
#78 - wobbles (06/14/2013) [-]
can someone clarify this for me? I am not American... do they want to ban all guns or what?
User avatar #96 to #78 - chiefrunnyjeans (06/14/2013) [-]
no, just "scary looking" semi automatic rifles. the only ones who support banning them are ignorant sheep.
#117 to #96 - hazelnuttz (06/15/2013) [-]
Really? Sheep? No one I've ever heard from has made a clear and solid argument as to why average citizens should need to be able to buy automatic rifles and high capacity magazines. I get not banning all guns, that's obvious, but you don't NEED to have a weapon that is capable of killing lots of people really quickly. The less of those there are around the less lives will be lost en-mass. How can anyone argue that fact?

The only argument I've heard from gun advocats is that they want to have the same, if not, more powerful weapons then the bad guys have. Well. Considering the badguys are more often then not just average citizens like you gun advocates... the irony is perfectly clear.

And if you're worried about criminal gangs getting hold of now illegal automatic rifles and going on shooting sprees, well you can rest assured that there will still be FAR LESS shooting sprees then the alternative. And in any case you'll still have your concealed hand guns etc and be able to defend yourself if you're smart about it.

Advocating for the right to buy assault rifles won't save a crowd of people from getting mowed down at a fair, or in a mall, or anywhere really. But if the gun wasn't available to begin with, far less people would be killed.

If you don't agree feel free to say why
#135 to #117 - wobbles (06/15/2013) [-]
banning guns for regular people is just bad.

If a criminal wants to kill someone, do you think that a gun law would stop him? Most of the worst shootings happen at gun-free zones, where are people just couldn't protect themselves with a gun.

And by the way if someone like REALLY wants to kill someone, a small revolver or a knife can be more dangerous because they are stealthy.
User avatar #133 to #117 - chiefrunnyjeans (06/15/2013) [-]
In the UK there was an increase in gun crimes after they banned them.
1. 30 rounds is standard capacity
2. You obviously don't know enough about guns to be having this debate
3. They are semi automatic rifles, not assault rifles. Do you get all your information from msnbc or cnn? I ask because it's all wrong.
4. Open carrying of semi automatic rifles would make shooting sprees all but extinct. If you saw law abiding citizens with guns around you would you commit a violent crime? I think not. However if they weren't it would be so much easier to ****** people because they can't fight back can they?
5. Semi automatic rifles and standard capacity magazines are what keeps places like detroit safe. I should know because I live right by there. Store owners use AR-15's to shoot and kill would-be robbers.
6. Second amendment makes any argument you come up with invalid. Welcome to America. Respect all rights to the fullest extent or gtfo
0
#134 to #133 - chiefrunnyjeans has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #88 to #78 - thelastamerican (06/14/2013) [-]
It really depends. Some Americans want to ban all guns. Some want to ban only certain guns that are/have been used in warfare. Some want to ban only certain accessories that can be used with guns. Some want every citizen to be allowed to choose. Some want it mandated that every citizen be required to own a gun. Some want it mandated that every citizen is conscripted into the military for a certain amount of time when they come of age.

What it comes down to is that some people want to be left alone to take care of themselves, and some people want to take care of everyone else.
User avatar #80 to #78 - pebar (06/14/2013) [-]
Some people do, and they're trying...
But thankfully they will not succeed. They couldn't even get background checks for private sales through the democrat controlled senate.
*evil laugh*
-6
#77 - njjsoccerkid has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #86 to #77 - exarzero (06/14/2013) [-]
******* going around making his name really close to others and doing this. Not his content.
User avatar #79 to #77 - pebar (06/14/2013) [-]
the name isn't the same
User avatar #66 - Tazdingo (06/14/2013) [-]
Too bad the magazine is too big for it to be legal.
#76 to #66 - anonymous (06/14/2013) [-]
Only in fascist states like California and a couple others.
#101 to #76 - anonymous (06/14/2013) [-]
>implying fascism is bad
User avatar #121 to #101 - skinless (06/15/2013) [-]
it is
#109 to #101 - anonymous (06/14/2013) [-]
>implying it's not
User avatar #63 - Jewssassin (06/14/2013) [-]
One of my local gun stores has an "Assault Bat"
Its a black baseball bat with a scope on it and fake blood stains, "only used once" $80.
#62 - Thenewguygunther (06/14/2013) [-]
n0-scope
User avatar #71 to #62 - vedgetable (06/14/2013) [-]
isnt no-scope just a regular shot..
[ 125 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)