And the winner is. . BM _ Imp. They've got the technology to measure it that way, but still use printed numbers.
Home Funny Pictures YouTube Funny Videos Funny GIFs Text/Links Channels Search

And the winner is

BM _ Imp
...
+1785
Views: 62375
Favorited: 103
Submitted: 06/13/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to nooneofinterest E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(131):

[ 131 comments ]
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
User avatar #133 - talkingmouth (06/14/2013) [-]
HA
#130 - anonymous (06/14/2013) [-]
hjurr durr i get the joke im soo smart hurr right lel
User avatar #121 - AlexPaincakes (06/14/2013) [-]
I never understood this was a super position joke until now. A.k.a. Schrödinger's cat.

That made this joke even funnier.
0
#119 - kuukautisveri has deleted their comment [-]
#106 - tuckthisphit (06/14/2013) [-]
**tuckthisphit rolls 55** winner is the one who rolls dubs first !
#110 to #106 - curses (06/14/2013) [-]
Well would you look at that. It was over before it started. You win this day good sir.
#107 to #106 - tuckthisphit (06/14/2013) [-]
**tuckthisphit rolls 77**
#123 to #107 - anonymous (06/14/2013) [-]
**anonymous rolls 46**

I can do better
#113 to #107 - anisace (06/14/2013) [-]
again???
again???
User avatar #114 to #113 - tuckthisphit (06/14/2013) [-]
i rolled dubs twice in a row like ten minutes ago before this
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/4636764/Title/105#105
#136 to #114 - tormain (06/14/2013) [-]
Black magic!    
Burn him!
Black magic!
Burn him!
#112 to #107 - tuckthisphit (06/14/2013) [-]
**tuckthisphit rolls 37**
#131 to #112 - darkvengence (06/14/2013) [-]
**darkvengence rolls 42**

mfw not dubs
User avatar #124 to #112 - AlexPaincakes (06/14/2013) [-]
Should have stopped while you were ahead.
0
#108 to #107 - tuckthisphit has deleted their comment [-]
0
#109 to #108 - tuckthisphit has deleted their comment [-]
#98 - icemanfolyfe (06/14/2013) [-]
HEISENBERG!!!!!!!!!! not schroedinger you uneducated ***** ! IT WAS ******* HEISENBERG's UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPAL!
#128 to #98 - rigamortis (06/14/2013) [-]
"It is impossible to measure at the same time, the velocity and position of an electron"
User avatar #73 - henryfordthegod (06/14/2013) [-]
Only the true educated get this
#111 to #73 - anonymous (06/14/2013) [-]
i get it and im nit smurt xdddd
#101 to #73 - anonymous (06/14/2013) [-]
FOUND THE PSEUDO INTELLECTUAL!
User avatar #82 to #73 - infinitereaper ONLINE (06/14/2013) [-]
Or anyone who ever watched discovery or read a book.

The heaviest thing I ever read was probably The Fabric of the Cosmos. Holy **** man it's like reading the science bible.
#67 - slumberdonkey (06/14/2013) [-]
mfw people didn't get it
mfw people didn't get it
User avatar #54 - arsyro ONLINE (06/14/2013) [-]
Can someone remind me of the guy who made this a fact? Was it Sigmund or Eienstien or sometihng?
User avatar #125 to #54 - AlexPaincakes (06/14/2013) [-]
You're thinking of Heisenberg

It was his uncertainty principle that describes this.
User avatar #57 to #54 - fosforgasxiii (06/14/2013) [-]
Schrödinger.
User avatar #93 to #57 - arsyro ONLINE (06/14/2013) [-]
you sure?
#52 - pretzalman (06/14/2013) [-]
MFW I got that joke
MFW I got that joke
#45 - anonymous (06/14/2013) [-]
10/10 have never loled harder
#44 - anonymous (06/14/2013) [-]
We we're on the phone with him/ BAZINGA
#41 - thebritishguy (06/14/2013) [-]
how does it change the outcome? I heard that bananas about Shlongdingers ***** but I never got it
User avatar #49 to #41 - MRfunnyFACE (06/14/2013) [-]
In quantum physics the very act of observing causes electrons to act differently. Watch this link for a full explanation.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgyTEHo-nHQ

Dr. Quantum is the man.
User avatar #95 to #49 - thebritishguy (06/14/2013) [-]
WHAT?! that's against the rules, electrons have got to follow the rules, they can't just disobey the rules, what the **** is happening? this is a joke, what? jesus ******* christ man, I need to start smoking tea
User avatar #72 to #49 - jorah (06/14/2013) [-]
I believe It's a theory, not fact.
-1
#90 to #72 - thebritishguy has deleted their comment [-]
#134 to #90 - UnoSkullmanx (06/14/2013) [-]
Except that's completely wrong in every way. Theories are logical "guesses" that while there is some evidence that they may be true, they are still not proven. A scientific law is what's proven.
User avatar #76 to #72 - golemnardah (06/14/2013) [-]
Most of science is a theory.
User avatar #78 to #76 - jorah (06/14/2013) [-]
A lot of it is a fact.
User avatar #139 to #78 - MRfunnyFACE (06/15/2013) [-]
except for natural laws, such as gravity, all of science is a theory.

Thats why when people disregard evolution saying, "oh but its just a theory," they are not really making a valid argument.
User avatar #132 to #78 - fitemeirl (06/14/2013) [-]
no because whenever we think we know what's going on some smartass comes around (like Einstein or newton) and proves everyone wrong. that's why we call it theories. theories are tested and proven hypotheses, they stand true until someone comes along and disproves them.
#46 to #41 - iamthedeigner (06/14/2013) [-]
How do you test temperature? You place a thermo in and see how much molecular kinetic energy it absorbs. How do you test force? You place an instrument on on an object to absorb the force. How do you see an object? You absorb some of the photons (a 						*******					) it releases. It's an idea that you must interact with anything to measure anything, and it is much more prevalent in quantum mechanics, where the slightest upset, including absorbing some of its photons, can change the outcome of a seemingly probability based (by chance) series of events.
How do you test temperature? You place a thermo in and see how much molecular kinetic energy it absorbs. How do you test force? You place an instrument on on an object to absorb the force. How do you see an object? You absorb some of the photons (a ******* ) it releases. It's an idea that you must interact with anything to measure anything, and it is much more prevalent in quantum mechanics, where the slightest upset, including absorbing some of its photons, can change the outcome of a seemingly probability based (by chance) series of events.
#43 to #41 - sreggin ONLINE (06/14/2013) [-]
its one of the fundamental quantum gerdunken, i dont remember which one, double slit maybe
User avatar #42 to #41 - stonerjesus ONLINE (06/14/2013) [-]
Basically nothing and everything exists all at the same time until something observes it. Is the cat dead or alive? Both, until you open the box to find out.
User avatar #77 to #42 - golemnardah (06/14/2013) [-]
You missed the point of Schrodinger's cat. The cat is both dead AND alive until further observed.
User avatar #140 to #77 - stonerjesus ONLINE (06/15/2013) [-]
That's... exactly what I said in different words.
User avatar #47 to #42 - thebritishguy (06/14/2013) [-]
not this time Jesus, the cat is either dead or alive anyway, besides the cat is an observer also. is this not true?
#48 to #47 - stonerjesus ONLINE (06/14/2013) [-]
Damn... you're right
Damn... you're right
#50 to #48 - thebritishguy (06/14/2013) [-]
I beat Jesus? yus
#40 - thechosentroll (06/14/2013) [-]
This image has expired
I understood that joke. I feels smarterer now.
#32 - ichbinzweijahrealt (06/14/2013) [-]
MFW i understood the joke
#26 - getlemansmiley (06/14/2013) [-]
So, number 4 and 5 are racing. 3 won
#28 to #26 - anonymous (06/14/2013) [-]
... Stupid. That's all i have to say to you.
#27 to #26 - fatsackmcgee (06/14/2013) [-]
Three and four.
#29 to #27 - getlemansmiley (06/14/2013) [-]
I need new glasses....
User avatar #135 to #29 - honkan (06/14/2013) [-]
If it helps, I made the same mistake.
#30 to #29 - miwauturu (06/14/2013) [-]
You certainly do if you're using a donut wrapped in bacon as glasses
User avatar #68 to #30 - namnori ONLINE (06/14/2013) [-]
I think it's a bagel
#22 - cptnigelofwolf (06/14/2013) [-]
Observing a quantum wave function collapses the wave function. Before looking at it it is theoretically all over a statistically predicatble area. Picture a sine wave drawn on a 0-100 scale. Depending on when you measure it, it could be anywhere from 0-100, but upon measuring, the sine wave collapses and maybe lands on 33. I've dumbed it down a bit but the concept is the same. The electron traversing this quantum wave is throughout the entire wave, more likely to be in some spots than others, but is in fact all over it. Analogously electrons used to be thought of as being in an orbit around a nucleus, but upon inspection with an electron microscope they are more of a cloud or an area which the electron lives in. The electron isnt everywhere in that cloud all the time, but it still looks that way until its actual stopped at a single point and measured. Trust me, I are a scientist.
#20 - supremegaws (06/14/2013) [-]
**supremegaws rolled a random image posted in comment #112 at It comes with a toy ** Mfw i lost too
User avatar #18 - shnoople (06/14/2013) [-]
I heard that one of the writers of Futurama had an advanced degree in mathematics, and actually created an entire math theorem just to realistically explain a plot point in an episode.
#115 to #18 - clockworkphysicist (06/14/2013) [-]
Gee, did you just so happen to hear it from the content about it yesterday?
#56 to #18 - fistpump (06/14/2013) [-]
In the special features on one of the DVDs for the four feature-length Futurama episodes, there is a 15-20 minute math lecture that just talks about and explains some of the mathematics in the show. I didn't understand any of it. But it was pretty neat how they did that.
#24 to #18 - lankyman (06/14/2013) [-]
Yeah, 'The Prisoner of Benda', you only the see the full theorem for a second before its put in action. Best episode of that series (6th season), full of sci-fi shenanigans.
[ 131 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)