Ted. Source: How i Met Your Mother. The lamb here is: sua::' m: ssed to be / teat. r vair' a I misdid tune out that marai unite . .. me that says eating animals


Anonymous comments allowed.
#61 to #14 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
Even though that says 'lolwtfcomics com', I'm pretty sure that's from SMBC.
#63 to #61 - maucorn **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #174 to #61 - zorororonoa (06/11/2013) [-]
i just found it on facebook. i dont know what the watermark is there for
User avatar #12 - Lintutu (06/11/2013) [-]
what point was she even trying to prove?
#15 to #12 - yunoacceptnumbers (06/11/2013) [-]
the usual 'i'm better than you'-so i'm making something up routine
#193 to #15 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
SO ******* TRUE
#62 - funkyrednipples (06/11/2013) [-]
the **** you gonna do bout it faggot?
#32 - heartlessrobot (06/11/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Bitch, it's already dead. The only thing that will happen if you don't eat it is it get's thrown out or someone else eats it.
#41 to #32 - ncdhff has deleted their comment [-]
#49 to #41 - thermobil (06/11/2013) [-]
Wanted, with Angelina Jolie.
User avatar #56 to #49 - ncdhff (06/11/2013) [-]
#34 to #32 - heartlessrobot (06/11/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Also, Cows and Chickens would be extinct if we didn't eat them, as they are already extinct in the wild. Pigs will be fine, but humans won't. After about a month of being released into the wild, "Domestic" pigs revert to "Wild" boars. The grow thick, bristly fur, huge tusks, and can grow to massive sizes. They're also omnivorous and predators, meaning if they shut down the meat industry and release the animals, Cows and chickens will go extinct, and people will be left fighting for their lives against millions of man-eating boars.
#40 to #34 - tyroneisanigger (06/11/2013) [-]
Are boars really that big?
(referring to pic)
User avatar #70 to #42 - nudnik (06/11/2013) [-]
Holy **** ...
#52 to #42 - tyroneisanigger (06/11/2013) [-]
Wow, that must have been a really powerful gun or something. What, did you pump like a full magazine into the boar? That boar is massive.
User avatar #54 to #52 - heartlessrobot (06/11/2013) [-]
I have no idea, but I'm pretty sure it scared the piss out of the kid.
User avatar #68 to #52 - floofy (06/11/2013) [-]
your sentence made me cringe.

1. revolvers dont have magazines.
2. its a .44 magnum.
3. According to the news artricle from way back it took on shot
User avatar #178 to #68 - slugnugget (06/11/2013) [-]
not everyone cares about guns like you.
User avatar #203 to #178 - floofy (06/12/2013) [-]
not everyone is a capt. obvious like you
User avatar #65 to #52 - sirbutterballs (06/11/2013) [-]
It looks like he used a hunting revolver. But how many shots did it take is the real question...
User avatar #92 to #65 - heartlessrobot (06/11/2013) [-]
Apparently one.
User avatar #115 to #92 - garaichu (06/11/2013) [-]
It says he shot it eight times before chasing and then finishing it with a point-blank shot.
User avatar #95 to #92 - sirbutterballs (06/11/2013) [-]
Hot damn that's pretty ******* badass for an 11 year old.
User avatar #98 to #95 - heartlessrobot (06/11/2013) [-]
A bullet through the brain is typically a kill, especially when the brain is the size of a coconut. But hey, hogs/boars/pigs are pretty ******* smart.
User avatar #102 to #98 - sirbutterballs (06/11/2013) [-]
Not to mention that boars are pretty feisty. A charging 1,000+ boar sounds quite terrifying. Although I imagine he caught it by surprise.
User avatar #104 to #102 - heartlessrobot (06/11/2013) [-]
Boars kill and eat bears, I'm pretty sure he caught it unaware or sleeping.
User avatar #80 to #40 - trollmobile ONLINE (06/11/2013) [-]
that's an old hunter's trick
you see the real size by looking at the crossbow, the guy behind isn't sitting right behind it, he's sitting a meter or more behind it, makes the kill look bigger in the photo.

same is done in fishing, you hold the fish on stretched out arms, makes it look bigger in comparison to yourself.
User avatar #93 to #80 - heartlessrobot (06/11/2013) [-]
Boars still get pretty ******* huge.
User avatar #107 to #93 - trollmobile ONLINE (06/11/2013) [-]
that they do, but the one above isn't as big as it looks.
User avatar #108 to #107 - heartlessrobot (06/11/2013) [-]
The below one, however, is.
User avatar #35 to #34 - thedutchs ONLINE (06/11/2013) [-]
It will take thousands of years for pigs to evolve like that...

But I agree that all the animals, because they aren't prepared for the wild, will most likely go extinct
User avatar #36 to #35 - heartlessrobot (06/11/2013) [-]
They don't evolve, the revert. They're always ready to go back, but something in their minds tells their body to stay pink and fleshy. Once they are released into the wild, they begin to change into boars.
User avatar #45 to #32 - carnagejc (06/11/2013) [-]
Supply and demand, how do they work?
User avatar #46 to #45 - heartlessrobot (06/11/2013) [-]
Yeah, there's demand. Just not from the self-righteous cunts.
User avatar #47 to #46 - carnagejc (06/11/2013) [-]
You missed the point entirely
User avatar #51 to #47 - heartlessrobot (06/11/2013) [-]
There will always be demand, that's MY point. And the demand for meat in every first world country is very high.
User avatar #55 to #51 - carnagejc (06/11/2013) [-]
My point was that if everyone stopped eating meat there would not be the same supply of it. There would not be wasted meat. (Of course there would then be millions of times more veg waste)

User avatar #57 to #55 - heartlessrobot (06/11/2013) [-]
Well, if you'll look at my other comment (wall of text) you'll see why it would be a bad idea. Also, billions would die of starvation and the worldwide economy would collapse in it's entirety, as the meat industry is massive and employs millions and millions of people.
User avatar #58 to #57 - carnagejc (06/11/2013) [-]
I am not arguing for it, I was just stating the above
User avatar #60 to #58 - heartlessrobot (06/11/2013) [-]
If you were arguing for it, that would have been a very weak argument. And there's two kinds of people. People that like meat, and liars.
User avatar #59 to #57 - carnagejc (06/11/2013) [-]
Dude I ******* love meat. One of my nicknames is Carnivore
User avatar #69 to #51 - desiduratum (06/11/2013) [-]
Meat in third-world countries is in even higher demand, but no one eats.
User avatar #18 - thebukman (06/11/2013) [-]
Dated a vegan once. Never doing that again, couldn't stand listening to her telling me all the things that's wrong with the world.

(Though some of her meals actually tasted great)
User avatar #24 to #18 - richardastley ONLINE (06/11/2013) [-]
Soy alternatives have come a long way, but as a former roommate of a vegan, I have to say it's ******* annoying hearing the banter. Whether they're right or wrong doesn't even matter once they start annoying me because I won't listen either way.
User avatar #31 to #24 - thebukman (06/11/2013) [-]
I loved teasing her whenever I ate meat with her family, just to see if I could start that whole "meat is murder" speech. Worked every single time. It was priceless to see the anger and rage build up inside of her, me and her dad had some good laughs about that.
#114 - dcrosby (06/11/2013) [-]
why isn't their more HIMYM on this site? pic semi related
User avatar #201 to #114 - himym (06/12/2013) [-]
Its nice to feel needed
#141 to #114 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
Becayse yau con't spall
#194 to #141 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
Irony level: maximum.
#200 to #194 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
That's the joke
#38 - sirbutterballs (06/11/2013) [-]
I made this last time it was fully posted. Definitely has come in handy..
#73 to #38 - Wumbologist (06/11/2013) [-]
**** isn't vegan
#88 to #73 - jinapayne (06/11/2013) [-]
If it is her **** it is
#27 - ichbinzweijahrealt (06/11/2013) [-]
"I'll have the lamb"
#16 - bonlino ONLINE (06/11/2013) [-]
Technically, vegetarians are the murderers. if they refuse to eat meat given to them, then they are murdering since that animal was killed with no purpose. that animal was killed for the intent of being consumed, but they refuse to eat it, making the meat have no purpose of killing.
#25 to #16 - goodmagitian ONLINE (06/11/2013) [-]
At least make a difference between vegan and vegetarian
#39 to #16 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
Wow, vegans are assholes.
#134 to #16 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
Except that by taking the meat the cycle of grow, kill, buy, serve, eat is continued since nobody would be willing to break any point of the cycle since the animal was killed for you to eat, you eat it, then more meat is needed for the next meal rather then lesson learned. If your going to make an argument use real rational rather then circular logic.
#162 to #16 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
ever heard of supply / demand balance? And this guy got 47 thumbs up. This site is full of idealistic idiots.
#168 to #16 - nubcase (06/11/2013) [-]
It's so that because there is a lower demand for meat, producers make less of it, killing less animals in the future.
User avatar #171 to #16 - azijay (06/11/2013) [-]
Some view it as insult to injury.
User avatar #48 to #16 - blbrian (06/11/2013) [-]
Sooo, killing something WITH a purpose is not murder?
User avatar #37 to #16 - scorcho (06/11/2013) [-]
dat logic. so if i kill your dog and you refuse to eat it, you are responsible for it's death? I'm not a vegetarian, but that argument is just stupid.
#19 to #16 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
what kind of logic is this? enough to get thumbed up 13 times...
#167 to #19 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
A little something called "a joke"
Apparently, Hayzer (comment 23) isn't a fan of them.
#23 to #16 - Hayzer (06/11/2013) [-]
No, it wasn't killed by them and it wasn't killed for them. Generally, animals will be reared to meet demand for meat so if they are abstaining from eating meat then they are reducing demand and probably meaning that less animals are killed.   
I'm not a veggie, but you're a moron.
No, it wasn't killed by them and it wasn't killed for them. Generally, animals will be reared to meet demand for meat so if they are abstaining from eating meat then they are reducing demand and probably meaning that less animals are killed.

I'm not a veggie, but you're a moron.
User avatar #26 to #23 - TastyBurger (06/11/2013) [-]
The meat industry won't account for vegetarians, because there is no way of telling exactly how many there are. They do however try to account for religious diets, because its easier to tell how many Jews and Muslims aren't eating pork. But they mainly go by population and last years demand.
User avatar #28 to #26 - Hayzer (06/11/2013) [-]
Exactly, and demand is different due to vegetarians not buying meat, so they change their output.
User avatar #33 to #28 - TastyBurger (06/11/2013) [-]
Its a much lengthier process than that. If the demand for meat in store goes down, there's a good chance that they might buy less meat from the distributors. But a few stores buying slightly less meat than normal from the distributors isn't going to make the farmers to produce less meat. Farmers get paid by the government to grow a certain amount of food to feed the population. It would take decades and vegetarians/vegans to take up a pretty large portion of the population for them to start factoring them in.

But as it stands now, if you stopped eating meat, animals will still be killed for you.
#1 - teranin ONLINE (06/10/2013) [-]
I feel like this quote is relevant
User avatar #29 to #1 - nefarian (06/11/2013) [-]
Wait, what?
User avatar #50 to #29 - beerterror (06/11/2013) [-]
The weak gather and throw down the strong in the brutal aberration of natural order.
User avatar #81 - sirchaudhry **User deleted account** (06/11/2013) [-]
But srsly, guys. You do know that being a vegetarian has a tremendously positive effect on the enviroment?
I don't believe in caring for the animals and that stuff, because I believe in the ecological pyramid. But the reason I'm a vegetarian is because at this point, humanity is toying with evolution. You know something's wrong when chickens are given hormones at birth to grow faster. Chickens given hormones grow so fast that at one point, their bones simply break because they can't take the unproportional weight.
Also, the meat industry is horrifyingly cruel towards the workers. In my local store, I can get a pack of lamb chops for 14 NOK (approx. $2). Imagine what the hell they've done to oush the prices so low. The store takes about 50% profit, so that means they've bought the lamb chops for a single ******* dollar. What kind of food have they given that animal to make profit? More important, what kind of **** salary are the poor workers given?

So. That's why I'm a vegetarian. We're ******* toying with evolution at this point, guys.
User avatar #152 to #81 - alphawolffifteen (06/11/2013) [-]
Actually the environmental effects of reserving huge plots of lands for animals is extremely inefficient, and the gas consumed transporting meat to a freezing and packaging facility is outrageous. Food could be produced MUCH more efficiently if the land used to raise animals was farm land, and we'd all be a lot healthier too!
The only reason I'm not a vegetarian is the fact that I just cannot stomach the taste of any vegetable...and most fruits.
User avatar #86 to #81 - godtherapist (06/11/2013) [-]
No, you're an idiot. Being vegetarian has nothing to do with environmental concerns.

All the things you pointed out are based up current market standards for the treatment and cost of the cattle we currently grow. By simply changing that which we eat to different cattle and how we raise it those same concerns disappear.

For example, raising fish in a tank costs exceedingly more money than just fishing it out in the wild, and while current fishing laws are terrible if we were to agree on a better international standard the consumption of fish would cause very little impact on the world.

On the same lines, we could trade in Cow meat for Insect meat. Insects are a much better source of protein and are much easier to grow and process.

TLR you are talking about socio-economic problems, not meat problems.
User avatar #96 to #86 - sirchaudhry **User deleted account** (06/11/2013) [-]
Woops, it looks like i forgot to mention the enviromental part.
In short terms, it's like this: Imagine the sick amount of land you would need to grow cattle, and how much food you would need to make sure the cattle grew. Now compare that to the amount of resources you would need to grow any vegetable. The amount of carbondioxide released into the air due to meat industry is tremendously big.

Also, do you have any examples of -how- we would "change that which we eat to different cattle", when all of the meat industry runs in the same way?

Tl; Dr: Every component in society is relative to another one.
#117 to #96 - skullnigga (06/11/2013) [-]
that's ******* ********* , releasing carbon dioxide doesnt do jack **** , humans havent even contributed half as much as natural emissions have, www.skepticalscience.com/human-co2-smaller-than-natural-emissions.htm, also if you're making the reference that cow carbon dioxide emissions contribute to global warming, then you're an idiot, global warming is false, it's just earth going through the natural cycles, and these cow emissions probably dont even contribute to even half of one percent of the total carbon dioxide emissions, i do agree for your other reasons to be a vegetarian but this one is asinine
#118 to #117 - sirchaudhry **User deleted account** (06/11/2013) [-]
Are you seriously implying global warming isn't man-made? If so, sir, you have deserved this.
#123 to #118 - skullnigga (06/11/2013) [-]
yeah no **** i clearly stated that in my argument, and yes, global warming is a natural process, it isn't man contributing
#124 to #123 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
Your grammar is absolutely atrocious. Jesus Christ....
#126 to #124 - skullnigga (06/11/2013) [-]
grammar ≠ intelligence
User avatar #135 to #126 - xboxonerules (06/11/2013) [-]
Holy **** , guys. Global warming is not man made. Climate shifts will happen long after we're dead, too. The fact that we release CO2 into the atmosphere is speeding the process up.
#137 to #135 - skullnigga (06/11/2013) [-]
finally someone who agrees with me
finally someone who agrees with me
User avatar #138 to #137 - xboxonerules (06/11/2013) [-]
Not 100%. Man is contributing to the speeding up of Global warming, but it isn't a product of man.
User avatar #140 to #138 - skullnigga (06/11/2013) [-]
man probably doesnt even contribute half of a percent to global warming, so it isnt an alarming percentage
User avatar #142 to #140 - xboxonerules (06/11/2013) [-]
Considering this acceleration has never happened since the cooling of the Earth, yeah it's very alarming.
User avatar #143 to #142 - skullnigga (06/11/2013) [-]
i was saying the percentage that man contributes to global warming isnt alarming
User avatar #144 to #143 - xboxonerules (06/11/2013) [-]
Man is producing the amount that's unstable. I'm saying the percent generated by cows is insignificant.
User avatar #149 to #144 - skullnigga (06/11/2013) [-]
but is the percentage the man is contributing greater than that of natural emissions?
User avatar #198 to #149 - xboxonerules (06/11/2013) [-]
#122 to #117 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
Carbon dioxide is DESTROYING the environment, and it's completely due to anthropogenic activities. You're just parroting ******** conservative propaganda without any evidence to back it up. If you honestly think that excess carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is harmless, than you're unbelievably ignorant.
#131 to #122 - drcow (06/11/2013) [-]
Its actual NOT carbon dioxide its methan because its 70x stronger the carbon dioxide and the earth is just going through its natural cycles we are just speeding it up
User avatar #125 to #122 - skullnigga (06/11/2013) [-]
okay, say carbon dioxide does affect the enviroment, look where most of it is coming from, not us, natural emissions
#130 to #125 - havetogofast (06/11/2013) [-]
Good thing we still have the forests to soak it all up- Oh wait.
Good thing we still have the forests to soak it all up- Oh wait.
User avatar #101 to #96 - godtherapist (06/11/2013) [-]
I love how vegans/vegetarians like to always say "You can grow SOOO much plant matter on the same land you grow just one cow"

>Implying that one cow doesn't feed dozens of people
>Implying that it doesn't take more than three times the amount of plant matter to get an equal amount of energy as from meat
>Implying that growing plants doesn't cause any adverse effects to the environment, like mono-cultures, and pesticide use, and nitrate absorption rates

User avatar #103 to #101 - sirchaudhry **User deleted account** (06/11/2013) [-]
>Implying growing vegetables releases nearly as much carbondioxide as feeding cattle
#119 to #103 - feeding (06/11/2013) [-]
Did some one say "feeding"?
#120 to #103 - skullnigga (06/11/2013) [-]
>imploding carbon dioxide emissions do jack ****
>imploding cow emissions actually contribute to overall emissions
>imploding natural emissions cause more damage then manmade
User avatar #121 to #120 - sirchaudhry **User deleted account** (06/11/2013) [-]
>Implying I'm talking about cow farts. Dude. I'm talking about all the work around feeding cattle, and how much carbon dioxide that produces.
#127 to #121 - skullnigga (06/11/2013) [-]
except carbon dioxide emissions dont do 			****		, and if they did, a huge percent of it is coming from natural emissions
except carbon dioxide emissions dont do **** , and if they did, a huge percent of it is coming from natural emissions
User avatar #136 to #127 - xboxonerules (06/11/2013) [-]
He's right, cows don't contribute nearly as much carbon dioxide as everyone thinks they do, granted they do contribute an amount, just hardly any to be worried about.
User avatar #109 to #103 - godtherapist (06/11/2013) [-]
No I didn't. I said that plants have their own list of problems.

And here is another: Price.

The government already pays subsidies to farmers to not grow plants so that way the price of foods stay stable. Imagine what would happen if every farmer grew vegetables; the economy would collapse upon itself.
User avatar #111 to #109 - sirchaudhry **User deleted account** (06/11/2013) [-]
What about opening up for trade with farmers in Africa? That way, all parts would win. The American household could have more vegetables in their kitchen, and Africa would have an increased BNP in several countries.
User avatar #112 to #111 - godtherapist (06/11/2013) [-]
Because casing a huge shift in the geo-political climate would cause a war.

You can't just feed dump millions of dollars into Africa.
#129 to #96 - drcow (06/11/2013) [-]
Your point is invalid because

A. The cattle industry does NOT give off carbon dioxide i
#199 to #129 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
Are you ******* retarded?
#202 to #199 - drcow (06/12/2013) [-]
No actual it gives off methan which is 70x stronger then carbon dioxide
#94 to #86 - sirchaudhry **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#85 to #81 - metroidblade (06/11/2013) [-]
yeah we are and i find it ******* delicious
#128 to #81 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
That's true and i agree with you but you have to take into consideration the amount of environments and forests that have been destroyed to grow your food. Also there's the people who have to work all year round to keep the crops growing. It's a two-way street.
User avatar #153 to #81 - fruzzinoid (06/11/2013) [-]
The reason I'm not a vegetarian is because I'm a fat mofo who lacks the wilpower to stop eating bacon cheeseburgers. Let's get real here guys.
User avatar #176 to #81 - slugnugget (06/11/2013) [-]
User avatar #180 to #176 - RoyalNightmare (06/11/2013) [-]
In the United States, there is no definition for "Free Range" outside of "Being allowed an hour of uninhibited movement." So really, that means nothing.
User avatar #181 to #180 - slugnugget (06/11/2013) [-]
buy meat directly from farms then. Its not difficult to find non chemically enhanced meat.
User avatar #182 to #181 - RoyalNightmare (06/11/2013) [-]
You'd be surprised at how difficult it can be. Furthermore, I don't buy meat period.
User avatar #183 to #182 - slugnugget (06/11/2013) [-]
you better eat fish bitch or imma cut you.
User avatar #184 to #183 - RoyalNightmare (06/11/2013) [-]
I'll pass. Especially since women who eat fish have up to 30x more mercury in their systems than those who don't.
User avatar #187 to #184 - slugnugget (06/11/2013) [-]
just dont eat too much tuna. and you wont have that very unlikely occurrence of 30x mercury.
User avatar #188 to #187 - RoyalNightmare (06/11/2013) [-]
"Up to". Note, that the "30x" was indicative of the maximum possibility, not the likely standard. There's also the fact that Salmon and whatnot have been completely manipulated. Fun fact. Salmon meat isn't supposed to be pink. Basically, people have added so many things that I wonder what an actual fish would taste like.
User avatar #189 to #188 - slugnugget (06/11/2013) [-]
well catch your own damn fish then. FISHING IS A THING. THERE ARE MANY PLACES TO FISH. and there are goddamn fish mongers everywhere. dont give all fish a bad rep because you read some copypasta facts about a minor selection of breeds.
User avatar #190 to #189 - RoyalNightmare (06/11/2013) [-]
Alright, since you're clearly not one of the "reasonable" types, allow me to put it bluntly.

I'm fully aware that natural fishing is possible. It's by no means difficult. I'm not here to give "all fish a bad rep" whatsoever. In fact, you're the one who brought up fish. I was only giving you a few of the reasons why I have no interest in buying/consuming them. I do my research through peer-reviewed articles and respected publications. I'm no parrot, and use my judgement.

So don't you dare come at me unnecessarily aggressive, especially when you don't know what you're talking about. Good day.
User avatar #191 to #190 - slugnugget (06/11/2013) [-]
being aggressive on the internet? oh sorry women if I scared you. your facts are intangible and damn right lame. Im trying to convince you that eating meat because of substantial PETA published reasons is idiotic. it sounds like you dont eat meat or fish because your lazy.

I could same lazy crap like i wont eat store fruit and veg because its grown in a chemical field of pesticides which was made my destroying the habitats of moles, rodents and other field animals. I could say I dont want store crops because their crop machines dont stop when animals are in them and will just crush them and grind them along with the other plants. im sorry that you cant enjoy meat or fish because its damn right delicious and simple to access food.
User avatar #132 to #81 - xboxonerules (06/11/2013) [-]
Actually, chickens are bred to grow faster, hormones aren't necessarily used incredibly often, only because tha'ts all the media reports about. However, because they are bred to produce so fast and their breast meat is so large, nearly 100% of all broilers are artificially inseminated because they can't do it themselves. And about the price of meat, it is so cheap because lamb is a low price producer and other parts of the lamb are being profited off of, in net of the carcass, it's more of a profit than you think. And by the way, we've been toying with evolution for centuries since we started using horses and dogs. It's nothing new. I'm going to continue eating meat because 1) I like the taste 2) Even if I chose not to, they would still produce animal product, but it'd be thrown away and wasted. All of this is based off of my animal sciences class at OSU.
#116 to #81 - imonaboatman (06/11/2013) [-]
Thank you, so much. We've definitely ****** up the natural order of things in the environment. I'm not a vegetarian, but I only eat hormone-free meat, because what they do to both the animals and workers is disgustingly cruel. We may have to kill animals for food, but they shouldn't have to live their lives as immovable and broken creatures simply so the industry can make a greater profit. They're doing the same thing with crops too, and it's destroying the landscape and putting countless farmers out of work.

>pic unrelated
#8 - mattymc (06/11/2013) [-]
I make no apologies for my carnivorous habit, i may not live as long as a vegan but . I appreciate that these creatures died for my hunger, so i eat their bodies
#21 to #8 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
Pescetarians (usually called vegetarians anyway but they eat seafood) are the ones who are supposed to live longer, because they eat more balanced diet and get enough protein through the fish.

Vegans dont. They dont eat diary OR meat, so they dont get iron, protein, calcium etc easy.
User avatar #155 to #21 - nogphille (06/11/2013) [-]
1. protein is in everything we eat
2. iron is found in soy, spinach etc.
3. tofu and milk from nuts, soymilk etc contains calcium too.

people who think being vegan means living unhealthy are ignorant.
#195 to #155 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
Found the vegan.
User avatar #197 to #195 - nogphille (06/11/2013) [-]
nah, i just eat less meat than you do.
User avatar #9 to #8 - Shramin ONLINE (06/11/2013) [-]
Vegans are an unhealthy bunch and do not live long.
Mixed diet is the way to go, you know, being omnivores and all that.
User avatar #66 to #9 - Shiny ONLINE (06/11/2013) [-]
Veganism can be unhealthy, but a traditional vegetarian diet is fine. Vegans are much more limited than "no meat".

In fact, vegetarianism is a lot more beneficial to guys.
User avatar #10 to #9 - Hells (06/11/2013) [-]
I agree, if we weren't meant to eat meat we wouldn't have canine teeth.
User avatar #84 to #9 - nogphille (06/11/2013) [-]

consume less meat and you'll live longer.

i'm not talking only of red meat.
User avatar #169 to #84 - Shramin ONLINE (06/11/2013) [-]
Vegans are limited to mushrooms for protein, Vegetarians as Shiny mentioned not so much.
Being a vegetarian can be alright, if you eat the right vegetable.
Being a Vegan is unhealthy.
User avatar #179 to #169 - nogphille (06/11/2013) [-]
check my other message above..
being a vegetarian/vegan means having to look into your food more and planning your meals more thoroughly than you normally would.
however, ALL nutrients, minerals and vitamins can be found in substitutes.

protein is actually found in everything you eat.. just in much lower percentages..

seriously, look into nutritional values of food..

being a GOOD vegan is healthier than being omnivore.
User avatar #185 to #179 - Shramin ONLINE (06/11/2013) [-]
Being a Vegan is unhealthy in any respect, Please prove me wrong with factual websites.
User avatar #196 to #185 - nogphille (06/11/2013) [-]
protein in fruits and vegetables:
iron and calcium in fruits etc:
You need to login to view this link

please, tell me which vitamins, minerals, proteins, whatever anyone who doesn't eat meat or even consumes other animal products is deprived of?
#164 - undeadwill (06/11/2013) [-]
This image has expired
What I hate about peta vegans and the whole meat is murder thing,
They ignore the fact that many animals today are kept from going extinct because there is demand for their meat. Bison today are making a come back today because their meat is very lean which is valued in the current health food trend. Without it there would be no reason to raise these animals.
Some animals today lack the ability to care of themselves (like cows) and would not make it in the wild today. So by eating them we create demand by creating demand we create a reason to help these animals live on.
And finally not eating meat has major draw backs on your health, children who are breast fed from vegan mothers who do not take supplements can kill the child from malnutrition and people who don't take the supplements are increased risk for illnesses related to the lack of certain nutrients.
Rant over.
#172 - despare (06/11/2013) [-]
Girls like these...
Girls like these...
User avatar #13 - Cobaltsushi (06/11/2013) [-]
some vegetarian meals are ******* delicious, like living lasagna
User avatar #3 - apronboobsface (06/10/2013) [-]
little fact for anyone who cares: that's Jensen Ackles' (dean from supernatural) wife
#67 to #3 - myrtille ONLINE (06/11/2013) [-]
that's ironic since dean LOVES hamburgers
that's ironic since dean LOVES hamburgers
#4 to #3 - givemecoke ONLINE (06/11/2013) [-]
#7 to #3 - faithrider (06/11/2013) [-]
awwwwwwwwwwwwww yeah...   
i didn't realize her name was nora. i saw she was listed as nora and i thought they meant nora, barney's gf...
awwwwwwwwwwwwww yeah...

i didn't realize her name was nora. i saw she was listed as nora and i thought they meant nora, barney's gf...
User avatar #156 - wrought (06/11/2013) [-]
I don't eat plants either because it takes time and effort to grow as a plant and I can't tune out the screams of plants being killed while I eat them.
people are fine though, because they eat meat and are dirty, planet ruining beasts
#72 - lizardtroll (06/11/2013) [-]
MFW it's not a ******* "Ted" twitter post
Leave a comment

Top Content in 24 Hours

 Friends (0)