Pirates of the Carribean theory. Found it here: imgur.com/gallery/f9uJf0b. People rrerr' t ' ct, yryr. tgr. E . III I III III III III was employed into service
x

Pirates of the Carribean theory

People rrerr' t ' ct, yryr. tgr. E .
III
I III III
III III
was employed into service for the East India
Trading Company and was given command of the
Atall. rs. l. ‘Wen ch. t' !! after he set free a cargo of
slaves, his employer, Cutler Beckett, had Jack hund-
ed as a pirate and the Wench set '':Teri' ?, and suck. Erie
ter failing to rescue the ‘Wench, Sparrow struck a
bargain with the t' AIE EN captain of the Flying Dutch-
man, liars‘ Jones, to resurrect his helos' ed vessel.
Jones returned the ship to Jack in near perfect condi-
tion except for the permanently blackened hull. This
prompted Jack to rename her the Black Pearl. when
Jack tried to free himself form his daht, Jones -
mended we souls in , the same number of
slaves Jack freed front the Wench.
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+2027
Views: 69926
Favorited: 494
Submitted: 06/10/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to anonymoose submit to reddit

Comments(180):

[ 180 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#5 - ninjamyles **User deleted account** (06/10/2013) [-]
what i learned on funnyjunk today was......
what i learned on funnyjunk today was......
#58 - deathcampforjewtie (06/11/2013) [-]
100% Bolton approved.
#89 to #58 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
Giant Squid
#70 to #58 - halor (06/11/2013) [-]
indeed it is
indeed it is
#3 - erethilful (06/10/2013) [-]
Now I need to watch all movies again.
Now I need to watch all movies again.
User avatar #27 to #3 - namnori (06/11/2013) [-]
IMO only the first 3 are worth watching and still only the first is enjoyable
User avatar #34 to #27 - Hreidmar (06/11/2013) [-]
I don't understand why people didn't like the fourth one. I appear to be the only one that thought that the fourth one was a massive improvement over 2 and 3 (though light years behind the first.) Much as I like almost all of the actors in 2 and 3, the plot just became jumbled, random, and so dumb that it was hard to enjoy them at all.

/opinion.
User avatar #47 to #34 - oodlesandoodles (06/11/2013) [-]
Are you serious? What is your argument for this?

User avatar #56 to #47 - erethilful (06/11/2013) [-]
It wasn't arqument, it was opinion.
User avatar #59 to #56 - oodlesandoodles (06/11/2013) [-]
Basis, whatever
User avatar #186 to #47 - Hreidmar (06/11/2013) [-]
My basis is that in the fourth movie, they basically made it simple again. There was no attempt at making 4 or 5 storylines like the second and third movies did, and then to try to weave them all together, which I thought didn't work at all. I'm not saying the plot was any smarter... it was just as nonsensical in 'Stranger Tides...' but the fact that it was so simple allowed us to be able to ignore it, for the most part, and just focus on the antics of Captain Sparrow and Barbossa. Also removing Will and Elizabeth benefited the series, I thought. They were right in place in the first movie, but in the second and third they just seemed extra, and not nearly as interesting as Jack or Barbossa.
User avatar #187 to #186 - oodlesandoodles (06/11/2013) [-]
I understand that, but here's the thing. The fourth to tried to force a love story that had no basis, and just wouldn't work. They hastily introduced new characters and backstories by telling and not showing. The problem with the fourth one was that the script all seemed like it was written in a day. Dead Man's Chest was just as simple as Curse of the Black Pearl. It wasn't until At Worlds End when they tried combine what should've been spread out across three films into one
#75 to #34 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
I liked On Stranger tides
#2 - stabiloboss (06/10/2013) [-]
< Yiss. It makes perfect sense.   
   
   
apart from the suck
< Yiss. It makes perfect sense.


apart from the suck
User avatar #144 to #2 - xodia (06/11/2013) [-]
It's meant to say sunk
#60 to #2 - lomtura (06/11/2013) [-]
mfw owl
#28 to #2 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
When I read the suck part, my brain changed the sentence to "The Wench sucked"
#71 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
but when you apply the 3/5 rule that's only 60 souls
#108 to #71 - selfdenyingbeggar (06/11/2013) [-]
3/5 rule?
#109 to #108 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
back when americ still allowed slavery, the south wanted thier slaves to count toward the population of the state so they would have more power in congress.... the north only wanted the white population to be counted because that's who voted for congress. the compromised and determined that for every 5 slave you owned, 3 of them would be counted toward the population.



this was also back when congressmen knew how to compromise with the opposing side
#118 to #109 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
That last line topped it off. Thank you good sir. Thumb for you.



Also, thank you for knowing your **** . Its nice to see educated people on here sometimes.
#110 to #109 - selfdenyingbeggar (06/11/2013) [-]
Oh thanks
User avatar #111 to #108 - andrewjla (06/11/2013) [-]
black slaves only counted for 3/5 of a person back in the early American years.
User avatar #85 to #71 - WinnerofTheGame (06/11/2013) [-]
This guy.
#73 - jacklethesnake (06/11/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #115 to #73 - ispeakmeme (06/11/2013) [-]
Owlcat is shocked
User avatar #194 to #115 - owlcat (06/21/2013) [-]
I sure am. :0
User avatar #195 to #194 - ispeakmeme (06/21/2013) [-]
Well that was not what I had intended but it works.
User avatar #31 - anonemous (06/11/2013) [-]
ahem *Captain Jack Sparrow"
#137 - neocortex (06/11/2013) [-]
This image has expired
The captain always goes down with the ship
User avatar #37 - captainfuckitall (06/11/2013) [-]
This is also all explained in his biography, actually

It's not a theory, it's fact
#32 - ShockedNazi (06/11/2013) [-]
This isnt a theory, just go to the wikipedia page and it tells basically the same thing, also   thats not what theyre saying in the film
This isnt a theory, just go to the wikipedia page and it tells basically the same thing, also thats not what theyre saying in the film
User avatar #179 to #32 - brutallyhonest (06/11/2013) [-]
Yeah it's a deleted scene, on Youtube as well.
#154 - alltipswelcome (06/11/2013) [-]
I must say if this is real these films just made alot more sense.
I must say if this is real these films just made alot more sense.
User avatar #164 to #154 - anonymousattorney (06/11/2013) [-]
It does sound more logical, doesn't it?
#131 - fukyeahraptorr (06/11/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#146 to #131 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
Buried in the ????
#171 to #131 - deadpeople (06/11/2013) [-]
I wanted her to die so bad in the beginning, why, why did she destroy all the rum.
User avatar #151 to #131 - guidedhandsbitch (06/11/2013) [-]
because it rums away.
#87 - mrdrpage (06/11/2013) [-]
Wait... Is it permanently black because of the fire or because of all the 			********		 that was on it?
Wait... Is it permanently black because of the fire or because of all the ******** that was on it?
#126 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
You got it all wrong. The Black Pear never was a slave trade ship, its a totaly different class, designed for speed not cargo, and could never hold such a large number of people. Jack sold the souls of the 100 slaves to Davy Jones so he would raise the Black Pearl - the ship his father sunk when he retired form active piracy. Cutler Becket declared him as a pirate after this. The other story was made up as a cover to make him look better.
#147 to #126 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
Watchers proof that NOT ALL STORIES MADE UP/ MANY MANY R TRUTH!!
#123 - evilpotato (06/11/2013) [-]
But since the movie takes place around the year 1800, he still must free another 40 people.
#172 to #123 - deadpeople (06/11/2013) [-]
Oh my god this post is perfect.
#65 - poptartsniper (06/11/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#157 to #65 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
Ozai isn't Zuko's biological father.
#163 to #157 - kiermatv (06/11/2013) [-]
hold the **** up
User avatar #29 - goondas (06/11/2013) [-]
Why dont i remember them saying any of this in the movie? I remember that scene but none of those lines.
User avatar #49 to #29 - mylazy (06/11/2013) [-]
It wasn't explained in the movie. There are books though, and it is explained in those.
User avatar #30 to #29 - goondas (06/11/2013) [-]
Just rewatched it. Those things are not said in that scene at all.
#145 to #63 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
I AM SURE THIS IS THE SAME " DELETED SCENE" MATE ~ THAT WIKIPEDIA IS "HONESTLY" POSTING??? RIGHT- I know the hackers WHO ALTER THAT- "AYE' WENCHES OF DNA- CHASE/DIAMONDS
User avatar #125 to #30 - hooky (06/11/2013) [-]
User avatar #64 to #30 - theguywhofarted (06/11/2013) [-]
I think it's one of the "deleated scenes" of the third movie, look it up.
#156 to #30 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
It was a deleted scene
User avatar #44 to #30 - komandantmirkoo (06/11/2013) [-]
that is true. but i think the source material on this is a book or a comic. i know i read this somewhere before, like a wiki or something
User avatar #55 - bobthedilder (06/11/2013) [-]
Well I need to watch Pirates again
#69 to #55 - anon (06/11/2013) [-]
"Pirates" or "Pirates of the Caribbean"
[ 180 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)