This is so accurate. What happened to WoW over the years. Ill? iroll' iti' d. MEI Tr. ETA and -If niggers
x
Click to expand

Comments(47):

[ 47 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#8 - iyr (05/30/2013) [-]
#11 - kokkodellrrisch (05/30/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#2 - Bobtheblob (05/29/2013) [+] (10 replies)
#9 - dukeofdickbutt (05/30/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Cant wait for ESO
User avatar #7 - hkd (05/30/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Damn, Burning Crusade was awesome...
User avatar #37 - ThpiderMan (05/30/2013) [-]
I played from vanilla beta and straight through to the end of WotLK. I bought Cata, played it for about 3 hours, and turned away disgusted. The game kept getting easier and easier and the classes continued to get more and more homogenized, while specialization in talents became less and less effective as blizzard looked to make it more "user-friendly", ie thoughtless and effective regardless of layout.
User avatar #33 - serpens (05/30/2013) [-]
Hit 70 just about a month before WotlK went up to eighty and continued to have fun with it for a while but ended up quitting before cataclism came out but it seemed pretty fun sounding before
User avatar #31 - sinonyx (05/30/2013) [-]
i didn't play much of BC, but i actually realy liked most of WotLK
#13 - roarflmao ONLINE (05/30/2013) [+] (5 replies)
I agree that its accurate up to MOP, from what i've heard mop was pretty good but it was made for retards, so like the original painting with a safety helmet
User avatar #32 to #13 - sinonyx (05/30/2013) [-]
when you said "made for retards" all i thought of was DnD 4.0 .. that **** was pathetic
User avatar #10 - whycanticaps (05/30/2013) [-]
Cata wasn't awful, but they screwed with the talent system for panda, it feels more and more like a grind trying to quest.
User avatar #47 - roflstorm (05/30/2013) [-]
PANDA PRIEST POSSEEEEEE
User avatar #40 - masdercheef (05/30/2013) [-]
I'd say that up to WoTLK was pretty good, and even Cataclysm, to an extent. MoP was just the end of the line for me, though. In my opinion, if WoW had stopped getting expansions after WoTLK, it would have been just fine.
#36 - EpicTie (05/30/2013) [-]
I started late BC so I never really got to experience the game before WotLK. Ignorance is bliss I guess.
User avatar #35 - imdatboy (05/30/2013) [+] (3 replies)
MoP pretty much saved wow after that cataclysmic failure.
#42 to #35 - tyraxio (05/30/2013) [-]
I know it's an unpopular opinion, but I agree. I think the title is the problem. What MoP brings back in (while Pandaren and Pandaria could definately be left out, and seems inconsistent with the universe) is the war between the Horde and the Alliance which was practically forgotten throughout Cataclysm.
#21 - abdullahmag (05/30/2013) [-]
wotlk was the end for me.
User avatar #20 - fitchy (05/30/2013) [-]
way too true.
#19 - Cerendona (05/30/2013) [-]
MOP felt like a job to me
User avatar #5 - vonboon (05/30/2013) [-]
i checked it out a few months back the talents are ******
User avatar #1 - Zaxplab (05/29/2013) [-]
nice thumbnail.
[ 47 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)