At least not on purpose. . If 1: God One thing I can say about the atheists, not too many of them blowing themselves up for science. A Reply tit Delete ilt Favo
x
Click to expand

Comments(199):

[ 199 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#32 - aarbun (05/27/2013) [-]
I think you forgot someone.
I think you forgot someone.
User avatar #37 to #32 - threadz (05/27/2013) [-]
he's the exception that proves the rule
User avatar #49 to #37 - Greevon (05/27/2013) [-]
I never understood that saying.
User avatar #69 to #54 - bodasion (05/27/2013) [-]
Holy **** , that actually makes sense. Thumb for you, Sir.

themoreyouknow.jpg
User avatar #3 - jacencaedus (05/27/2013) [-]
well, not on purpose anyway
User avatar #4 to #3 - jacencaedus (05/27/2013) [-]
sorry, just read the title
User avatar #21 to #4 - storkillen (05/27/2013) [-]
I was like: "God damnit, it said that in the title and he still has 12 thumbs"

But then I noticed your reply and I was K, have a thumb.
User avatar #73 to #21 - bighairyfart (05/27/2013) [-]
>See punchline in title
>Comment same joke
>"Sorry, just read the title"
>????
>Profit?
User avatar #79 to #73 - rjake (05/27/2013) [-]
to be fair, that was the top comment on the imgur post. they've probably both seen the comment
#151 to #79 - Rascal (05/28/2013) [-]
It's a conspiracy!
User avatar #124 - joochy (05/28/2013) [-]
what about nasa
User avatar #138 - KayRed (05/28/2013) [-]
No, don't lump atheism and science together. Any real man of science doesn't give a **** about theological arguments.
+9
#103 - yuihirasawa **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#114 to #103 - lolfire (05/28/2013) [-]
Love that movie
Love that movie
User avatar #120 to #114 - jackalcureofprusia (05/28/2013) [-]
Four lions, right?
#88 - lamnad (05/27/2013) [-]
well, not on purpose.
well, not on purpose.
#118 - fuckingtrolls (05/28/2013) [-]
Yeah because when you declare yourself an atheist you're automatically an expert on science.
User avatar #132 to #118 - bakonforall (05/28/2013) [-]
I don't see what you're saying. I do, however, have counterarguments to my two best guesses at what you are saying.

if you mean to say that declaring yourself an atheist does nto automatically grant one the mental capacity to blow oneself up, I would venture to say that it is probably not very difficult to blow oneself up, and that any idiot could manage it, even by accident.

if you mean to say that declaring yourself an atheist does not automatically make one a scientist, i would like to point out that declaring yourself to be of any religion does not automatically make you a priest.

if you mean to say something completely different, call me an idiot for not understanding and elaborate.
User avatar #147 to #132 - hammarhead (05/28/2013) [-]
but a preist is a figure of a religion. a scientist is not a figure of antireligion. you're not very good at this.
User avatar #148 to #147 - bakonforall (05/28/2013) [-]
It was meant as an analogy. priest is to religion as scientist is to science. I suppose i didnt explain what i meant very well, sorry.
User avatar #152 to #148 - hammarhead (05/28/2013) [-]
Athiest =/= Scientist
is all i was saying
User avatar #153 to #152 - bakonforall (05/28/2013) [-]
And all i was saying was that religious person is to religion as atheist is to science.
User avatar #133 to #132 - fuckingtrolls (05/28/2013) [-]
Was the paragraph long comment necessary?
It's pretty straight forward dude at least 10 other people got it.

I'm just making an argument on the statement made in the content where the commentator related science to atheists.

I don't even understand on how you came to the whole priest thing on your second counterargument.
User avatar #135 to #133 - bakonforall (05/28/2013) [-]
and i was making an argument on the word "expert" i suppose.
User avatar #156 to #135 - nickypickle (05/28/2013) [-]
well you're just a faggot
User avatar #157 to #156 - bakonforall (05/28/2013) [-]
I'm okay with that.
#136 to #132 - agentpurplek (05/28/2013) [-]
either way religion is stupid pastafarianism master race.
User avatar #137 to #136 - bakonforall (05/28/2013) [-]
agreed.
#178 to #118 - Rascal (05/28/2013) [-]
couldn't read **** .
User avatar #182 to #178 - fuckingtrolls (05/28/2013) [-]
Yeah I keep forgetting to make my comments white.
#202 to #118 - Ghostdoom (05/28/2013) [-]
Is it that hard guise?
User avatar #128 to #118 - alhemicar (05/28/2013) [-]
^
#143 to #118 - obeyweegee (05/28/2013) [-]
That text.
That text.
User avatar #145 to #143 - fuckingtrolls (05/28/2013) [-]
What text?
#1 - justanotherzombie (05/27/2013) [-]
No, but sometimes we do because of science.
#2 to #1 - justanotherzombie (05/27/2013) [-]
Damn didn't read the title till after I posted.
User avatar #107 - missrainbowdash (05/28/2013) [-]
Scientist: Thank goodness, it took forever to build this large hadron collider, whelp, time to turn it on.
User avatar #106 - xsnowshark (05/28/2013) [-]
Athesim =/= Science
User avatar #123 to #106 - sabcy (05/28/2013) [-]
THEN WHISKEY TANGO FOXTROT DO YOU GUYS BELIEVE IN
User avatar #129 to #123 - xsnowshark (05/28/2013) [-]
Like me personally?
User avatar #130 to #129 - sabcy (05/28/2013) [-]
sure why not, I'm always interested in others beliefs
User avatar #102 - leglesslegolegolas (05/28/2013) [-]
Plenty of atheists blowing THINGS up for science though! *cough*adamsavage*cough*
#42 - dikslapping (05/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#218 to #42 - Rascal (05/30/2013) [-]
damnit i can't save it since im on a public computer atm...
#50 to #42 - leotjynx (05/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #51 to #50 - dikslapping (05/27/2013) [-]
beautiful
#52 to #51 - leotjynx (05/27/2013) [-]
I made it myself
User avatar #53 to #52 - dikslapping (05/27/2013) [-]
excellent job
#7 - pocoyothegreat (05/27/2013) [-]
>Atheism
>Science
Can you stop mixing those 2 things like they are the same?
EINSTEIN was jewish. A lot of atheists believe in all kind of retarded BOLLOCKS.
You're a faggot. You're acting just like the religious bigots you despite so much, and giving non-religious people a bad name.
User avatar #134 to #7 - thelegitmetalhead (05/28/2013) [-]
You win all of my internets
#8 to #7 - Rascal (05/27/2013) [-]
im high duuuuuude

gon get sum luv toite bby?<3
#15 to #7 - xinquisitor (05/27/2013) [-]
A majority of the modern scientist community identify as Atheist, 93% I believe the figure was. So while science and atheism dont have to mix most of the scientific wonders of our age have been researched by an atheist.
User avatar #45 to #15 - luigicart (05/27/2013) [-]
citation please!
#126 to #45 - Rascal (05/28/2013) [-]
I think this might be what he is getting at:

"In 2009, the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press polled members of the American Association for the Advancement of Science on belief in a higher power. The study found that 51 percent of members polled expressed such a faith, compared to 95 percent of the American public. Additionally, the National Academy of Science charted belief in God as low as 5.5 percent among biologists and 7.5 percent among physicist and astronomers in a 1998 study."


http://news.discovery.com/tech/are-scientists-atheists.htm
#216 to #45 - xinquisitor (05/29/2013) [-]
Of course,http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/23/national/23believers.html?_r=0
The second page goes into more detail as far as stats.
#10 to #7 - roarflmao (05/27/2013) [-]
zzz if you're an atheist because you want proof for a god or whatever and believe in some pseudo scientific bs, then isnt that just a special kind of retard?

As an atheist you do not believe in any higher power, you might be a ******* lunatic or paranoid but aside from that there is no reason why you shouldn't trust science and ignore the rest and therefore this post shouldn't be considered offensive.
User avatar #99 to #7 - rainbowrush ONLINE (05/28/2013) [-]
You do know you're Jewish if your mother was Jewish. You don't have to believe to be it, which is absolutely retarded.
#110 to #7 - Rascal (05/28/2013) [-]
Einstein was of Jewish ethnicity but agnostic
#185 to #7 - Rascal (05/28/2013) [-]
i love your comment so much. you call him a retard and cause a giant string of comments.....over a joke. fantastic!
#46 to #7 - alexusapi (05/27/2013) [-]
Actually Einstein did not believe in a personal god. believing in god and being religious are two different things, you can believe in god and still be a full blown scientist, but if you're very religious, most of the more popular religions make scientific claims it can not prove.

Let's take heaven and hell for an example, if a man lives in the amazon forest away from civilization and has built a home for him and his wife along with his two children and treats his family very well and with a loving heart, brings them fruit and grows vegetables for them, how come then that just because he doesn't even know about the christian religion he's going to hell for not worshipping god? and if he still goes to heaven, why should we bother him with christianity? why tell him? just so we can put more rules on him and the possibility of hell?
User avatar #48 to #7 - srapture (05/27/2013) [-]
Sure, Atheists CAN believe **** like homoeopathy, astrology, etc. but think about it, if they think "An omnipotent being? No proof. Can't exist." then they're pretty unlikely to also think "magical healing crystals which show no scientifically detectable emissions? Seems legit.".
#127 to #48 - comicsguy (05/28/2013) [-]
What would you know if an omnipotent being could exist? We can't even fully understand our own world, not to mention space and the universe itself and you want, with your little human brain, try to answer the biggest question in the universe? When you get to know quantum physics, dimensions, time and stuff, you start to realize that there's so much room for theories and possibilities. I'm not trying to say "Of course there's a god out there and you're stupid for being an atheist", but I'm saying that someone can think "An omnipotent being? Can exist". Believing is a choice, just like the Big Bang theory, which by now is just a theory which everyone seems to choose to belive given that there are a lot more theories, like the stationary universe and such. I can honestly say I'm really interested in science and I believe in God too, and I think there's room for both without being in relation with each other
User avatar #208 to #127 - darrensankari (05/28/2013) [-]
So, the God of christianity then?
#196 to #127 - clockworkphysicist (05/28/2013) [-]
You...I like you.   
   
&quot;Anyone who is not shocked by quantum theory has not understood it.&quot; Niels Bohr
You...I like you.

"Anyone who is not shocked by quantum theory has not understood it." Niels Bohr
#209 to #196 - comicsguy (05/28/2013) [-]
I like you too kind sir
User avatar #210 to #127 - srapture (05/28/2013) [-]
Of course it can't be denied that we know very little about the universe, and there very well could be one or perhaps multiple gods. However, without evidence, I wouldn't blindly believe in something like that. I can see how it can be considered a theory, but for other theories, we put them through scrutiny and try to poke holes in them as much as possible. People have been doing this to religious texts for a long time, mainly the bible. Someone simply believing it is illogical to shun the idea of an god is just fine, but dedicating your Sundays to them, praying to them, and pledging your life to them with no evidence is something I don't agree with.
I'm not really sure why you brought that up though, my comment being about other things that atheists would most likely not believe.
User avatar #174 to #7 - festiveorc (05/28/2013) [-]
Einstein's views about religious belief have been collected from interviews and original writings. He said he believed in the "pantheistic" God of Baruch Spinoza, but not in a personal god, a belief he criticized. He called himself an agnostic, while disassociating himself from the label atheist.

-Wikipedia, nig

But also, I agree, atheism and science are in no way the same thing. The agnostic approach would probably be the closest to empirical science.


User avatar #201 to #174 - clockworkmage (05/28/2013) [-]
I think it's more associated with science because something like %90 of scientists are atheists/agnostics. Though yeah, there are plenty of idiots out there that are far more idiotic than a Buddhist monk that spent his entire life dedicated to the philosophies of life.

Remember Stalin? He was an atheist, and as far as I'm concerned, not only was he the greatest secular murderer of all time, he was a ******* moron and a majority of the people's lives he destroyed were destroyed because he had no bloody clue on how to run a country.
User avatar #111 - supamonkey (05/28/2013) [-]
Well people do blow themselves up for science, it's just that it's never on purpose...
User avatar #125 to #111 - laelaps (05/28/2013) [-]
Thank you for reiterating the title for me.
User avatar #117 to #111 - jackalcureofprusia (05/28/2013) [-]
9/10
Hue'd loudly
#57 - justbrandonreally (05/27/2013) [-]
Blowing up my ******* Facebook feed with there ****** opinions maybe.
#105 to #57 - bennyboards (05/28/2013) [-]
*Their. If you gonna complain do it right, bitch.
#112 to #105 - Rascal (05/28/2013) [-]
Shut the **** up.
#113 to #112 - bennyboards (05/28/2013) [-]
Get an account and say that.
#170 - Rascal (05/28/2013) [-]
one thing i can say about the religious.
not posting hateful content.
#177 to #170 - neizane (05/28/2013) [-]
you you're hateful in your life, and you vote hatefully. remind me how this post is harming you again?
#183 to #170 - Rascal (05/28/2013) [-]
No, just hateful billboards, signs, and pretty much every other public way of getting their message across.
#191 to #170 - fausticorn (05/28/2013) [-]
They don't need to post hateful content when they spout 			****		 like &quot;God hates fags!&quot; just because their magic book tells them to.   
   
They're worse than the Ultramarines.
They don't need to post hateful content when they spout **** like "God hates fags!" just because their magic book tells them to.

They're worse than the Ultramarines.
User avatar #193 to #191 - mapleknight (05/28/2013) [-]
heresy
#206 to #191 - gilfhunter (05/28/2013) [-]
You describe westboro baptist, and identifying all christians as this is like identifying all muslims as al Qaeda. Just as ignorant.
#93 - biggrand (05/28/2013) [-]
I'd blow my self up for science!
#68 - foromil (05/27/2013) [-]
MFW title.
MFW title.
#76 to #68 - EmulateSnes (05/27/2013) [-]
MFW I know where that gif is from.
MFW I know where that gif is from.
#85 to #76 - avyon (05/27/2013) [-]
I don't. Care to Share?
I don't. Care to Share?
User avatar #89 to #85 - EmulateSnes (05/27/2013) [-]
here is one of the videos shes in.

You need to login to view this link
#90 to #89 - avyon (05/27/2013) [-]
Ah, it's from an erotic animation. Still, thank you kindly.
Ah, it's from an erotic animation. Still, thank you kindly.
#6 - pooflinger (05/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
[ 199 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)