Joker's got a point. Well, it's not like that everytime... Anyone else enjoying the shape of her side boob? I certainly am. joker jokes jokers
Click to expand


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #6 - luzbeldelaguerra ONLINE (05/27/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Anyone else enjoying the shape of her side boob? I certainly am.
#21 - mindlogic (05/27/2013) [+] (31 replies)
FJ in a nutshell..    
gif unrelated
FJ in a nutshell..

gif unrelated
User avatar #39 - truemox (05/27/2013) [+] (3 replies)
I came here for Harley Quinn porn.

I am disappoint.
#41 to #39 - sagedivinity ONLINE (05/27/2013) [-]
The sexual frustration is rising
#12 - nastoy ONLINE (05/27/2013) [-]
#30 - limitbreaker **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#50 - fluthermucken (05/27/2013) [+] (3 replies)
I think the joker's about to have to throw a bitch out a window.
User avatar #64 - cupcaketime (05/27/2013) [-]
As E.B. White once said:
"Explaining a joke is like dissecting a frog. You understand it better but the frog dies in the process."
User avatar #17 - thedutchs (05/27/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Does he mean to say that the moment you have to explain a joke, it has lost it's delivery?

Or does he mean to say that when a joke isn't understood, it's no longer a joke?
User avatar #19 to #17 - perseeus (05/27/2013) [-]
Both, in a way.

When a joke has to be explained because it isn't understood
It has then lost it's delivery and is no longer considered as a joke
User avatar #66 - thelostsheperd (05/27/2013) [-]
You need to login to view this link
Joker is my favorite thing
#35 - nosensephenom ONLINE (05/27/2013) [+] (6 replies)
This seems to imply that stupid people are the only ones capable of determining when a joke is funny. Like, if someone dumb and/or slow were to watch Bo Burnham and not catch or not understand some of the Shakespearean humor, does that mean there is no joke? Or does this mean to say that jokes only exist insofar as the individual hearing the joke understands it?

I guess I disagree with this assertion on both levels. First, just because one is too stupid to stupid to understand a joke, that does not mean there is no joke. Secondly, I don't think words being said to someone are in a constant state of superposition between joke and nonjoke until someone hears the words and deciphers them. In the same way that a tree falling in a forest with no one to hear it doesn't matter, because the vibrations and waves will still be sent out into the universe, an assembly of words is still a joke regardless of the fact that there may be no one around to "hear" the joke, (By "hear" I mean decipher its meaning in the same way we decipher meaningful sound from vibrations).
#37 - emperorervinmar **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#15 - emberstar (05/27/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Well.... I guess he's right.
Well.... I guess he's right.
#91 - whatsbutthurt (05/29/2013) [-]
**whatsbutthurt rolled a random image posted in comment #71597 at Shin Anime Social Board **
#84 - patagon (05/27/2013) [-]
i don't get it
#77 - bleeduntildeath (05/27/2013) [-]
from now on when you see the joker, just spam "I don't get it"
#23 - doctorfoo (05/27/2013) [+] (1 reply)
I first read the title as Jokers got a joint.

Also, the title didn't need an apostrophe.
User avatar #74 to #23 - violentpixi (05/27/2013) [-]
Joker 'has' got a point.

Yes it does.
User avatar #9 - assumingcontrol (05/27/2013) [-]
I re-read this comic yesterday.
#1 - anonymous (05/26/2013) [-]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)