Joker's got a point. Well, it's not like that everytime... Anyone else enjoying the shape of her side boob? I certainly am. joker jokes jokers


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #6 - luzbeldelaguerra (05/27/2013) [-]
Anyone else enjoying the shape of her side boob? I certainly am.
#8 to #6 - anon (05/27/2013) [-]
Why are you annoyed with the shape?
#14 to #8 - bostpost (05/27/2013) [-]

reading the comment? At this point, what difference does it make?
User avatar #68 to #6 - wtfduud (05/27/2013) [-]
Seems pretty normal
User avatar #39 - truemox (05/27/2013) [-]
I came here for Harley Quinn porn.

I am disappoint.
#41 to #39 - sagedivinity (05/27/2013) [-]
The sexual frustration is rising
#48 to #41 - anon (05/27/2013) [-]
>I spent 5 minutes taking the gag on and off
>No regrets
User avatar #85 to #48 - nexuser (05/27/2013) [-]
Huh? ok, now i actually need the joke explained...
#12 - nastoy (05/27/2013) [-]
#30 - limitbreaker **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#50 - fluthermucken (05/27/2013) [-]
I think the joker's about to have to throw a bitch out a window.
User avatar #78 to #50 - bonlino (05/27/2013) [-]
wouldn't he do that anyway?
#88 to #78 - fluthermucken (05/27/2013) [-]
That's the joke
#87 to #78 - fluthermucken has deleted their comment [-]
#21 - mindlogic (05/27/2013) [-]
FJ in a nutshell..    
gif unrelated
FJ in a nutshell..

gif unrelated
#60 to #21 - jonnyfunk (05/27/2013) [-]
This image has expired
it's funny cause fj is afraid of spiders
#32 to #29 - heartlessrobot (05/27/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Here, take a better one.
#33 to #32 - teenytinyspider (05/27/2013) [-]
#69 to #33 - funnyjunkelite (05/27/2013) [-]
what about the gif version?   
unless that is a gif, i've been having trouble loading gifs lately
what about the gif version?

unless that is a gif, i've been having trouble loading gifs lately
#51 to #21 - payseht (05/27/2013) [-]
girlfriend's an arachnophobe
User avatar #59 to #51 - meganinja (05/27/2013) [-]
My girlfriend was an arachnophobe, and she's a Funnyjunk user. So I saved this one picture with a spider that's covered in baby spiders, and sent it to her.

she's not my girlfriend anymore.
#61 to #59 - payseht (05/27/2013) [-]
changed a folder on her desktop to a spider icon with no name and waited

<tried recreating how it looks

Needless to say, she didn't love it
User avatar #62 to #61 - payseht (05/27/2013) [-]
the .ico I used for her was more realistic...
#26 to #21 - kuksprut ONLINE (05/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#27 to #21 - Twatsnot (05/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#40 to #21 - dbBlues (05/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#86 to #21 - ladyepic (05/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #79 to #52 - jonnyfunk (05/27/2013) [-]
go kiss a lady, you hetero!
User avatar #55 to #54 - sirevivitan (05/27/2013) [-]
And, forgot to ask: of which species is this spider?
User avatar #64 - cupcaketime (05/27/2013) [-]
As E.B. White once said:
"Explaining a joke is like dissecting a frog. You understand it better but the frog dies in the process."
User avatar #49 to #13 - vilememory (05/27/2013) [-]
User avatar #66 - thelostsheperd (05/27/2013) [-]
You need to login to view this link
Joker is my favorite thing
#35 - nosensephenom (05/27/2013) [-]
This seems to imply that stupid people are the only ones capable of determining when a joke is funny. Like, if someone dumb and/or slow were to watch Bo Burnham and not catch or not understand some of the Shakespearean humor, does that mean there is no joke? Or does this mean to say that jokes only exist insofar as the individual hearing the joke understands it?

I guess I disagree with this assertion on both levels. First, just because one is too stupid to stupid to understand a joke, that does not mean there is no joke. Secondly, I don't think words being said to someone are in a constant state of superposition between joke and nonjoke until someone hears the words and deciphers them. In the same way that a tree falling in a forest with no one to hear it doesn't matter, because the vibrations and waves will still be sent out into the universe, an assembly of words is still a joke regardless of the fact that there may be no one around to "hear" the joke, (By "hear" I mean decipher its meaning in the same way we decipher meaningful sound from vibrations).
#38 to #35 - emperorervinmar **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #43 to #35 - erotictentacle (05/27/2013) [-]
now now, he didn't say when someone didn't understand a joke, the joke wasn't funny.
If you have to explain a joke to someone, then it won't be nearly as funny, if funny at all, so the joke "is no more".
#46 to #43 - nosensephenom (05/27/2013) [-]
I'm not talking about the funniness of the joke at all. I specifically used "understands" instead of "laughs" hoping to avoid that confusion. I'm only talking about the existence of the joke. Perhaps I took "there is no joke" a bit more literal than Joker would've liked me to, but I think the question I discussed is far more interesting at the end of the day.
User avatar #76 to #35 - schneidend (05/27/2013) [-]
The act of explaining the joke ruins it, not the failure to understand.
#89 to #76 - nosensephenom (05/28/2013) [-]
The need to explain a joke would only come after someone has failed to understand a joke. "If you have to explain a joke" implies that there is a lack of understanding preceding the need to explain. "There is no joke" of course would mean that, if you have to explain a joke, there is no joke.
User avatar #90 to #89 - schneidend (05/28/2013) [-]
Sometimes, when others don't laugh, people will explain the joke. A lack of understanding is not required.
User avatar #17 - thedutchs (05/27/2013) [-]
Does he mean to say that the moment you have to explain a joke, it has lost it's delivery?

Or does he mean to say that when a joke isn't understood, it's no longer a joke?
User avatar #19 to #17 - perseeus (05/27/2013) [-]
Both, in a way.

When a joke has to be explained because it isn't understood
It has then lost it's delivery and is no longer considered as a joke
User avatar #31 to #19 - thedutchs (05/27/2013) [-]
Well then. That makes sense to me.
#37 - emperorervinmar **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#15 - emberstar (05/27/2013) [-]
Well.... I guess he's right.
Well.... I guess he's right.
#18 to #15 - lazygemini (05/27/2013) [-]
And i think you might be right. I think...
And i think you might be right. I think...
User avatar #4 - abnerk (05/27/2013) [-]
I actually think that explaining dumb jokes makes them funnier. I enjoy the stupid things in life.
#23 - doctorfoo (05/27/2013) [-]
I first read the title as Jokers got a joint.

Also, the title didn't need an apostrophe.
User avatar #74 to #23 - violentpixi (05/27/2013) [-]
Joker 'has' got a point.

Yes it does.
#91 - whatsbutthurt (05/29/2013) [-]
**whatsbutthurt rolled a random image posted in comment #71597 at Shin Anime Social Board **
#84 - patagon (05/27/2013) [-]
i don't get it
#77 - bleeduntildeath (05/27/2013) [-]
from now on when you see the joker, just spam "I don't get it"
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)