Tumblr at it's finest. This is worth $1.1 billion?. beg: Ilene: Nowhere in the IO does h my "Do Not Rape" yet the tth Satanic Hula Of The Earth is "Do not make  tubmlr
x
Click to expand

Tumblr at it's finest

Tumblr at it's finest. This is worth $1.1 billion?. beg: Ilene: Nowhere in the IO does h my "Do Not Rape" yet the tth Satanic Hula Of The Earth is "Do not make

This is worth $1.1 billion?

Tags: tubmlr
beg:
Ilene:
Nowhere in the IO does h my "Do Not
Rape" yet the tth Satanic Hula Of The Earth is "Do not
make sexual advances unlees given the mating signal."
Go ahead and just let that an in.
eaten: 1 god: o
this ‘WEEK i didit' t i was a
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+1189
Views: 51412
Favorited: 161
Submitted: 05/22/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to nancyboy submit to reddit

Comments(211):

[ 211 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#26 - zekeon (05/23/2013) [-]
I like you guys better when you don't argue about religion.

Argue about pony instead.

Here's a pony.

Argue over it.
User avatar #162 to #26 - haunterbrony (05/23/2013) [-]
ponii ponii ponii
User avatar #196 to #26 - froggets (05/23/2013) [-]
Ponies.. god... religion... is there any difference, both of them turn e
people against each other
User avatar #203 to #196 - zekeon (05/23/2013) [-]
They both have fandoms.
#32 to #26 - anon (05/23/2013) [-]
**** PONIES AND BRONIES
You're all ******* queers do you hear me? You guys LIKE DICK!! Right in your faggot assholes. You guys sicken me. You are the worst people in this society and you should all kill yourselves. ******* evil perverted wastes of life!

tl;dr Kill yourselves
#47 to #32 - anon (05/23/2013) [-]
I would like to retract my previous statement. After giving it some thought I realised that I'm an asshole.
Sorry to have wasted your time.
#50 to #47 - anon (05/23/2013) [-]
No **** you.
User avatar #142 to #50 - rooxass (05/23/2013) [-]
It's funny, because the retraction was from another anon.
#205 to #142 - anon (05/23/2013) [-]
God, I love the ol' switcheroo.
#54 to #26 - anon (05/23/2013) [-]
Blaze is best pony
#117 to #26 - anon (05/23/2013) [-]
Rainbow Dash is worst poni
User avatar #38 to #26 - babbysmithy (05/23/2013) [-]
Vitun vittu.
User avatar #98 to #38 - stenchschleifs (05/23/2013) [-]
voi vittu, voi.
User avatar #76 to #26 - felixjarl (05/23/2013) [-]
The left eye is not parallel with the right eye.
#81 to #26 - sodapops (05/23/2013) [-]
Oh yeah? OH YEAH?
Well, ponies are basically heathen sun-worhippers. Except those that are heathen moon-worshippers.
Atheists: 0
Christians: 0
Molestia: 1
#90 to #81 - anon (05/23/2013) [-]
All hail the New Lunar Republic!
User avatar #170 to #81 - timmity ONLINE (05/23/2013) [-]
**** this, dominion of the stars is where i`m going
User avatar #62 to #26 - Ehwhat (05/23/2013) [-]
I want to ___ inside Rainbow Dash
User avatar #86 - wrinklynewt (05/23/2013) [-]
i could rewrite all 10 commandments and add in a few more ones, call it the cult of llama butt, and i could say "oh, your religion doesn't have ___" in its commandments? you should convert

but that still doesn't mean my commandments have anything to do with llama butts
User avatar #87 to #86 - thelordofbutthurt (05/23/2013) [-]
This makes sense in so many ways... and yet... in none.
User avatar #88 to #87 - wrinklynewt (05/23/2013) [-]
meaning that just because it's "statanist" is irrelevant
you can write anything and call it anything, and if you get people to follow it then it doesn't matter
just edgy people getting to say "satanism is way better than christianity, it says not to rape"
User avatar #89 to #88 - thelordofbutthurt (05/23/2013) [-]
I just think its funny that people believe in religion regardless... but whatever.

User avatar #126 to #89 - cabbagemayhem (05/23/2013) [-]
I think it's funny that you think it's funny.
#220 to #126 - thelordofbutthurt (05/23/2013) [-]
I think its funny that you think its funny that I think its funny... funny isn't it?
I think its funny that you think its funny that I think its funny... funny isn't it?
#28 - roytmustang ONLINE (05/23/2013) [-]
Now if only I could figure out the mating signal.
#208 to #28 - kanpai (05/23/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#82 - silverlance (05/23/2013) [-]
No. 11   
"When walking in open territory, bother no one, if someone bothers you, tell them to stop, if they do not stop, destroy them"
No. 11
"When walking in open territory, bother no one, if someone bothers you, tell them to stop, if they do not stop, destroy them"
User avatar #136 - halotalim (05/23/2013) [-]
7. Though shalt not commit adultery.
Jesus says, "If a man looks on a woman with lust, he has commited adultry in his heart.
User avatar #138 to #136 - trifection (05/23/2013) [-]
Right. And I don't want to be that guy but..well...you see...When Jesus came and died for our sins, he created a new promise. The New Testament. The old testament laws were no longer in effect. He says in the New Testament, Luke 10:27 "He answered, "'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind'; and, 'Love your neighbor as yourself.'"
User avatar #139 to #138 - trifection (05/23/2013) [-]
It's like a positive spin on the ten commandants. Through love you negate all sin.
User avatar #140 to #139 - halotalim (05/23/2013) [-]
Jesus said that he did not come to destroy the law (Abolishion of old testament.) But to fulfil it. (Make it comnplete the way it needed to be.)

All the commandments can be wrapped up in that verse too, it has become one of my life verses.
User avatar #219 to #140 - trifection (05/23/2013) [-]
Just to clarify; I responded to you, not in a sense of "You're partially right". I just wanted to post something along those lines while being relevant. I just don't want you to feel like I was trying to correct you.
#185 - CottonTail (05/23/2013) [-]
**CottonTail rolled a random image posted in comment #1989203 at Friendly ** mfw i misread the "mating signal"
**CottonTail rolled a random image posted in comment #1989203 at Friendly ** mfw i misread the "mating signal"
User avatar #197 to #185 - memeaholic (05/23/2013) [-]
perfect roll, dude
User avatar #198 to #197 - CottonTail (05/23/2013) [-]
thank you
#216 to #185 - solarisofcelestia ONLINE (05/23/2013) [-]
You tried, but failed to insert your dick.
Because of a zebra's powerful kick.
User avatar #94 - raykwanza (05/23/2013) [-]
The golden rule of most religions is to love your neighbour as yourself, or treat them as you'd treat yourself (or how ever you want to translate it). So technically if you don't like rape, you shouldn't rape your neighbour, or anyone else for that matter.
User avatar #103 to #94 - lolwtfme (05/23/2013) [-]
but i want to be raped....
#148 to #94 - thebritishguy (05/23/2013) [-]
If I really though that I should treat others as I wanted to be treated I would just totally suck peoples dicks
User avatar #99 to #94 - jedimindaugas (05/23/2013) [-]
The problem is that "neighbour" actually refers to your own people, primarily Jews vs Jews, as for the outsiders -do as thou wish.
Even even if neighbour referred to any friend or people in the area, it does not cover a random stranger in the middle of nowhere.
User avatar #110 to #99 - PartyPanda (05/23/2013) [-]
But it should.
User avatar #129 to #110 - jedimindaugas (05/23/2013) [-]
It could, it should, it does not.
User avatar #122 to #110 - comicsjoey **User deleted account** (05/23/2013) [-]
but it doesnt
#119 to #94 - wolfypolli ONLINE (05/23/2013) [-]
But I want to be raped.
User avatar #3 - disturbedfan (05/22/2013) [-]
Yes, but I'm pretty sure it's PRETTY DAMN OBVIOUS, no matter what list you look at that you shouldn't rape anyone.
User avatar #9 to #3 - sillylittlefuckers (05/23/2013) [-]
I disagree.
User avatar #15 to #3 - GhostOfRavenclaw (05/23/2013) [-]
and it isnt obvious to not kill people??
#34 to #15 - anon (05/23/2013) [-]
It was originally 'murder' as in you better have a reason in killing.
And no it's not obvious
User avatar #75 - notapancake (05/23/2013) [-]
So you are automaticly a satanist if you agree with that you should not rape.
#108 to #75 - anon (05/23/2013) [-]
That's like saying you're automatically a Christian if you agree with that you should not kill.
User avatar #141 to #108 - notapancake (05/23/2013) [-]
Indeed it is!
#17 - arrisarrad (05/23/2013) [-]
Haven't we been through this? Adultery includes rape. I mean, I'm against bashing people's beliefs, but if you do, at LEAST you should do it accurately.
User avatar #18 to #17 - dabronydude (05/23/2013) [-]
does raping the person you are married to count as adultery?
i do not know all laws.
User avatar #23 to #18 - arrisarrad (05/23/2013) [-]
Adultery is only an offense in biblical law, where there is no such thing as spousal rape. Legally, I think you can be prosecuted for it, but it's a murky area and hard to prove.
#19 to #18 - ssurtrebor **User deleted account** (05/23/2013) [-]
"Adultery includes rape." Did you miss that part?
User avatar #20 to #19 - dabronydude (05/23/2013) [-]
i read it as unmarried rape for some reason...
yeh i did miss it.
User avatar #22 to #20 - arrisarrad (05/23/2013) [-]
Man, I had this same exact argument the last time this popped up. According to the Bible, there is no such thing as rape within the marriage bed, so it isn't classified as adultery. But personally, I think that forced sex is possible within a marriage, but that it shouldn't be legally classified as rape. I think that in that case, spousal rape should be used as a point of merit for divorce. Prosecuting someone for rape in addition to the regular divorce proceedings seems superfluous, and if a person stays married to someone who rapes them, then they're just stupid. And I don't think we should make laws designed around the idiocies of the stupid.
#169 - bummerdrummer (05/23/2013) [-]
MAYBE I DONT NEED A LIST OF RULES WRITTEN 1000S OF YEARS AGO TO TELL ME HOW TO BE A GOOD PERSON
User avatar #176 to #169 - trimageryan (05/23/2013) [-]
MAYBE I DON'T NEED CAPS LOCK TO TELL ME HOW TO MAKE A POINT

I kid, I love you.
#149 - drewbridge (05/23/2013) [-]
Satanic Bible was written in 1967 as opposed to 3,000-4,000 years ago. It isn't against the 10 commandments, but it might fall under coveting/adultery, which are commandments.    
   
Pic related.
Satanic Bible was written in 1967 as opposed to 3,000-4,000 years ago. It isn't against the 10 commandments, but it might fall under coveting/adultery, which are commandments.

Pic related.
User avatar #151 to #149 - soultheft (05/23/2013) [-]
loophole as long as it ain't your neighbor you should be good
User avatar #156 to #151 - drewbridge (05/23/2013) [-]
cov·et (kvt)
v. cov·et·ed, cov·et·ing, cov·ets
1. To feel blameworthy desire for (that which is another's). See Synonyms at envy.
2. To wish for longingly

To covet sex with someone, to really want to have sex with someone as far as to force it.
User avatar #157 to #156 - soultheft (05/23/2013) [-]
true
#25 - royoten (05/23/2013) [-]
Satanists don't even hail Satan, so why does Satan get the point for it?
“What nearly everybody in my life had misunderstood about Satanism was that it is not about ritual sacrifices, digging up graves and worshiping the devil. The devil doesn't exist. Satanism is about worshiping yourself, because you are responsible for your own good and evil.”
― Marilyn Manson
User avatar #41 to #25 - teoberry (05/23/2013) [-]
Why is it called Satanism then?
User avatar #60 to #41 - captainfuckitall (05/23/2013) [-]
It's not to piss off the christians. It's because Satan is one of, if not thee most antagonistic force in all of literature. But antagonism doesn't necessarily mean evil, and thus, that's where it comes from. Satanism is about empowerment, justice, free-will, and truth. You are supposed to improve yourself and seek out conflict in all things, because only in conflict do you grow and mature. It's also different from christianity in the sense that, while christians see a definite sense of good and evil, Satanists view them objectively, and do not see them as 'right and wrong', but simply 'as is', and that evil is a natural reaction to good as conflict is a natural reaction to peace, both of which should be embodied in all things in order to maintain balance
User avatar #49 to #41 - paelaer (05/23/2013) [-]
Because it's separated into two sects:
Theistic, which of course is the worship of Satan as a deity, which is where all the black magic and **** happens.
And then there's LaVeyan, named after the author of the Satanic Bible and founder of the Church of Satan, where Satan is the icon of mankind's sinful nature and is not fit to be worshiped, as LaVeyan Satanists see themselves as the controller of their own destinies.
#42 to #41 - royoten (05/23/2013) [-]
I think it's mainly to piss off Christians
#43 to #42 - teoberry (05/23/2013) [-]
What badasses.
User avatar #58 to #25 - captainfuckitall (05/23/2013) [-]
That's not totally true. Some sects of Satanism actually do believe in Satan and worship him as a real being. However, they do not consider him evil, rather they believe him to be a force of justice and empowerment
User avatar #63 - zuflux (05/23/2013) [-]
I think it sucks that satanism is by most people defined as worshipping the devil.

While it fundamentally is worshipping yourself. Or mankind for that matter.
User avatar #125 to #63 - avatarsarefornoobs ONLINE (05/23/2013) [-]
satanism is definitely quite demonized hehe
and while its certainly not as bad as it seems, i still dont think self worship is a great way to live your life...
User avatar #65 to #63 - gmross (05/23/2013) [-]
Then why call it Satanism? Why not call it ********************* or something similar?
#71 to #65 - anon (05/23/2013) [-]
Because Christianity equates Satan ("the enemy") with the desires of the body, so satanism accepts that label and chooses to worship everything that Christianity considers a sin as a humanist philosophy. Lust leads to physical and emotional fulfillment, Envy and Greed cause you to take for yourself and improve your condition, Wrath lets you deal with obstacles, Sloth and Gluttony are both fulfilling and are signs that you are accomplished enough to afford them as luxuries. Pride regulates the other sins so you don't commit them to excess.
User avatar #80 to #71 - sodapops (05/23/2013) [-]
Best summary I've seen.
User avatar #73 to #65 - anonrandom (05/23/2013) [-]
For the reasons below, while also to advertise opposition to Christianity, and piss off bible thumpers.
#130 - fuckyouimapancake (05/23/2013) [-]
Here you go guys, the satanist rules.
#134 to #130 - anon (05/23/2013) [-]
Do not kill?
Or is that too easy?
User avatar #223 to #134 - captainfuckitall (05/23/2013) [-]
You can kill all you want in the Satanic Doctrine, provided the killings are earned and just (I.E. killing a criminal, or defending yourself)
User avatar #180 to #130 - timmywankenobi (05/23/2013) [-]
I seriously doubt these rules were written by satan.
#175 to #130 - iwebby (05/23/2013) [-]
Satan seems like a pretty cool guy
#206 to #130 - shishiko **User deleted account** (05/23/2013) [-]
Those...


Are some very respectable, relatable points.
#143 to #130 - imtheparty (05/23/2013) [-]
I can deal with this.
I can deal with this.
User avatar #132 to #130 - omfgitsstsix (05/23/2013) [-]
Those are very agreeable...
#137 to #130 - feeniks (05/23/2013) [-]
The eleventh.
#147 to #130 - thebritishguy (05/23/2013) [-]
"do not kill non human animals unless you are attacked or for food"
"if someone doesn't stop bothering you after you ask them destroy them"
seems legit
User avatar #222 to #147 - captainfuckitall (05/23/2013) [-]
Haha, now that you mention that it does seem odd, however, this has to do more with comprehension than anything. You cannot communicate with an animal, it has no idea what you're doing, when you are put into a position where an animals life is in your hands you must treat it with proper affection and respect, nor can you abuse any animals (although there IS a difference between abuse and discipline). But with a person, you CAN talk to them and ask them to stop or try to distance yourself from them, and even when you do they can ignore you or pursue you (think: a bratty gang of kids and one of them wants to prove they're 'hardcore' and won't leave you be), in such an event you have a duty to protect yourself as well as any others they are troubling, this includes anything from giving them a slap upside the head to totally incapacitating them to make an example to the rest of their gang. Respect goes both ways, and how can anyone respect you if you do not respect yourself enough to stand up when you are being harassed?
User avatar #234 to #222 - thebritishguy (05/23/2013) [-]
you have a point
#183 to #147 - razek (05/23/2013) [-]
Death = Shot, stabed, etc.

Destruction = pic
User avatar #178 to #147 - syntheticdoll (05/23/2013) [-]
I guess doesn't literaly mean destroy, more like to stop them.
User avatar #214 to #178 - thebritishguy (05/23/2013) [-]
I don't know what else "destroy" means, maybe by destroy it means kick them in the balls or something lol
User avatar #160 - laelaps (05/23/2013) [-]
It's too bad I understand the mating signal to be slutty clothes. So in Satanism she could literaly be asking for it
User avatar #225 to #160 - captainfuckitall (05/23/2013) [-]
Actually no, she couldn't. There are many points in Satanism about how it is in your right to express your individuality and personality as you see fit, provided you harm no one by doing so, just as well, people misunderstand that a mating signal isn't a wink or slutty clothing, it's 'hey, wanna **** ?' or whatever you and your partner do before sex. Now, if a girl says 'hey, wanna **** ?' and then suddenly decides she doesn't, you have full right to be angry at her (as she should know what she wants before going for it, and if she doesn't, she'll only be inconveniencing or hurting others), but that still gives you no right to rape her
User avatar #228 to #225 - laelaps (05/23/2013) [-]
well let's just agree it's a good thing I'm not a Satanist
User avatar #195 - JonathanNowFuckYou ONLINE (05/23/2013) [-]
Coincidentally, "Go ahead and let that sink in" sounds kind of like the mating signal...
#150 - thebritishguy (05/23/2013) [-]
Hitchens has the best commandments
www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNtsq3LYl1E
User avatar #44 - tooanontoquit (05/23/2013) [-]
what about the 7th commandment?

Thou shalt not commit adultery = you can only have sex with your spouse
#48 to #44 - anon (05/23/2013) [-]
Adultery =/= lechery.
User avatar #51 to #48 - tooanontoquit (05/23/2013) [-]
Lechery =/= rape

It's not rape if it's with your spouse. You can only have sex with your spouse. Therefore you cannot rape.
#55 to #51 - mattkingg **User deleted account** (05/23/2013) [-]
You could rape your spouse.
#168 to #55 - chromefile (05/23/2013) [-]
that's just boulderdash
User avatar #171 to #168 - timmity ONLINE (05/23/2013) [-]
your just a retard
#172 to #171 - chromefile (05/23/2013) [-]
you're*
#174 to #172 - timmity ONLINE (05/23/2013) [-]
thank you
#177 to #174 - chromefile (05/23/2013) [-]
you're welcome
User avatar #100 to #51 - jedimindaugas (05/23/2013) [-]
As far as I know rape is any sexual advance towards an unwilling person, therefore that commandment allows rape as long as it is between the spouses. This commandment is not there to protect individual people, but rather to protect the society from bastards( or whatever were those children called).
Those preached commandments are severely outdated, just like the whole religion.
User avatar #200 to #100 - tooanontoquit (05/23/2013) [-]
In that case it still wouldn't be considered rape at the time. When two people got married (often arranged) the husband had to consummate the marriage by having sex with his bride, this "transferred ownership" of the girl from her father to her husband. Back in these time the wife didn't get the right to say no to sex it was her obligation as the husbands property to do his bidding.

Times have changed and with women's rights now there can now be rape between married people, but in the context of the time their wasn't this loop hole.

As for the religion being outdated I think it's doing pretty well for being 2000 years old, you can't exactly update a religion. Yes times and customs have changed and some people twist words for politics but they stray from the overarching principals
User avatar #235 to #200 - jedimindaugas (05/23/2013) [-]
Emphasis on "at the time". As you mentioned, the society has received multiple patches for improvement while the commandments remain the same and do NOT cover it. Hiding it behind interpretations is like giving make up to a dead horse and claiming it to be a stallion.
Die already you evil religions.
User avatar #240 to #235 - tooanontoquit (05/26/2013) [-]
You can't just take the ten commandments and make "multiple patches for improvement" the Bible is 2000 years old; they don't make revisions. Yes they are out dated but it's a matter of honoring the original and ideals that still hold true.

Christianity is about being good, kind, and helpful people. It's not about being a stickler to obscure rules. The ten commandments were about preventing people from making bad choices. At the time the ten commandments covered all rape because rape is bad. Now there's a lope hole, but that loop hole doesn't mean it's now allowed its still a bad action.

If you go into a church and claim it is okay for a husband to force sex on his wife, not many people will agree with you. Society has moved forward.

Individual christian sects have conferences and debate about these same issues. For instance while some infamous groups are against gay marriage, some like the United Methodist Church have agreed to allow it.
User avatar #241 to #240 - jedimindaugas (05/26/2013) [-]
Then what about the ideals that are no longer true and are repulsive? Why do we just skip the horrible parts, promote the right ones and then claim that it's what religion is all about?

You keep talking what religion is all about, but instead of looking at the core, you refer to its community, the people that were influenced by outside factors and have improved. The core, from which it all stems is beyond rotten and unchangeable - the Book, that is supposed to be The Guide, is all about a cruel and vicious deity nobody would ever want to worship, let alone fallow. Yet still it is the most sold book in the world and is quoted time and time again to oppose something people do not agree with (yet). When people went to war, they found a line promoting it, when there were slaves, it justified it, but when there's a good line, we do it and proclaim that it was done only because "the Bible tells so". Convenient, isn't it?

This is illogical. We have a guide, but act on our own, and then recommend the guide to the others.
User avatar #242 to #241 - tooanontoquit (05/27/2013) [-]
Apparently you have never read the Bible.

It's about a caring, loving, and forgiving God. If what you describe "nobody would ever want to worship, let alone follow" then why do people follow it? Why do people say that it had turned their life around? Why has the religion lasted for thousands of year if "nobody would ever want to worship, let alone follow" it?

Now the Bible has lots of parables (stories with important lessons) in it. The "evil" quotes you're talking about are from these stories where people make the wrong decision and at the end of the story you're supposed to see why that was a bad decision. The "evil" quotes (not that you could actually think of any) are taken out of context.

As for war, God promotes peace and being friendly to neighbors and looking for peaceful solutions. However you can agree that there are times when it is necessary to defend your self or others. An example you can relate to is having to go to war to stop the Nazis from killing so many people. As for slavery the Bible does not say for or against it but merely mentions it in passing because it was a custom at the time. It does say that we should treat slaves better like they are real people.

You might want to actually read the Bible before you claim to know what it is all about.
User avatar #69 to #44 - megatrollinator (05/23/2013) [-]
Adultery =/= Non-Consensual Sexual Intercourse
#97 - huntress (05/23/2013) [-]
beg:
Ilene:
Nowhere in the IO does h my "Do Not
Rape" yet the tth Satanic Hula Of The Earth is "Do not
make sexual advances unlees given the mating signal."
Go ahead and just let that an in.
eaten: 1 god: o
this ‘WEEK i didit' t i was a
> satanic hula of the earth
[ 211 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)