Haha Nerds. . HEW’, HUHHUH t LOOK AT" ME, fft A - Lean. out THE? ’, ' CHA MAKING HAN MY' USELESS WHITE Us WITH THEIR THERE? awe TEETH AND ' t' OF ‘mun LITTLE BI
x
Click to expand

Haha Nerds

HEW’, HUHHUH t
LOOK AT" ME, fft A - Lean. out THE? ’, ' CHA MAKING
HAN MY' USELESS WHITE Us WITH THEIR THERE? awe
TEETH AND ' t' OF ‘mun LITTLE
BIPEDAL .
HUMANS
The geeks of the animal kingdom
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+1915
Views: 65857
Favorited: 126
Submitted: 05/21/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to bipplenurp submit to reddit

Comments(122):

[ 122 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#7 - lolzordz (05/22/2013) [-]
and then you gotta cook them because our geeky stomachs cant handle it raw...
and then you gotta cook them because our geeky stomachs cant handle it raw...
#137 to #7 - philm (05/22/2013) [-]
i laughed more at the gif than the content

(had to change the picture a little bit, because its flagged)
User avatar #139 to #137 - lolzordz (05/22/2013) [-]
you never seen that gif before? its been around quite a while
User avatar #145 to #139 - philm (05/23/2013) [-]
maybe the original, but not that one
#101 to #7 - notafunnyguy (05/22/2013) [-]
we CAN eat meat raw. just not the stuff you buy in stores, because its processed and the animals are filled with chemicals to make them bigger/meatier /grow faster.

but if you were to, say, kill a moose ( canadian here) in the wild, and eat the meat while its still fresh, it wouldnt harm you. unless that animal was sick. but , theoretically we can eat raw meat
#8 to #7 - John Cena (05/22/2013) [-]
I never understood that. Why can animals eat raw meat, but humans can't?
User avatar #10 to #8 - lasmamoe (05/22/2013) [-]
Carnivoric animals digestive systems are short and made for digesting meat in a very efficient manner.

We have a long digestive tract, made for digesting things like plants which takes a long time to digest, and meat is therefore poorly digested, as it litterally stays in our digestive tract for days.

This makes us more vulnerable to bacteria and parasites from the meat, staying in our system for so long.

Im not saying that we are not supposed to eat meat. That would bring a ********* towards me. I think we are adaptable to eating almost anything as long as we cook it. (Grains being an example of that).
User avatar #11 to #10 - HeartOfTheDL (05/22/2013) [-]
I thought it was because we learned to cook and season meat that we don't need that kind of protection that we would have if we evolved eating meat raw.
User avatar #18 to #11 - lasmamoe (05/22/2013) [-]
Well, we are a bit of a strange species to understand in terms of diet.
We know that horses eat grass.
We know that lions eat meat.
We know that monkeys eat fruits and vegetables.
But we don't really know what we are supposed to eat.

Our teeth are short and flat, made for grinding food like plants and nuts, things like that.
We do however have some sort of canines, that some people argue are made for chewing meat. These canines are so short and useless, that we would have a pretty tough time trying to eat any uncooked flesh from an animal.
User avatar #19 to #18 - HeartOfTheDL (05/22/2013) [-]
Isn't that typical of Omnivores though? If we take a bear for an example they both have teeth for eating plants and meat. Their elongated sharp teeth is meant for tough meat.

Our technology would have shaped our physiology thus the redundancy of sharp teeth. Our tools for cutting and cooking the meat made the sharper teeth redundant but we still needed a bit of help with chewing cooked meat. We don't need canines like animals do because we don't rip the flesh off the prey we intend to eat. It's probably what you were getting at I just dug deeper. I think I did, that or I just spewed a whole bunch of nonsense and for that I would apologise.
#114 to #19 - John Cena (05/22/2013) [-]
ASIANS CAN ACTUALLY READ MINDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They can hear, and see what you're visually thinking. This is the absolute complete truth!!!!!

The reason a lot of Asians have completely expressionless faces is so they don't accidentally show facial expressions when people think things they don't like, find funny, astonishing, etc, and Asians segregate so their not nearly as susceptible to that happening.
Asians also segregate, and are untalkative to avoid accidentally saying things that are similar to what people are thinking and going to say.

Try thinking, and visually picturing things that are as wild as you can when you are around Asians, and look for Asians who give people dirty/particular looks for what appears to be for completely no reason.

PLEASE SPREAD THE MESSAGE!!!!! THE WORLD NEEDS TO KNOW THIS!!!!!
User avatar #109 to #18 - abachonk (05/22/2013) [-]
Maybe to eat some little fish or bugs?
User avatar #83 to #8 - cabbagemayhem (05/22/2013) [-]
We can and it's much healthier than cooked meat, but it has to be clean and fresh. Some of the chemicals we feed livestock these days increase bacterial growth and disease, and make it more dangerous than it used to be.
User avatar #21 to #8 - elitejerkz (05/22/2013) [-]
EVOLUUUUUUUUUUUTIOOOOOOOON
User avatar #22 to #21 - elitejerkz (05/22/2013) [-]
j/k i have no clue
#44 - EdwardNigma (05/22/2013) [-]
I always liked how weak humans are basically. We can't run very fast, we aren't incredibly strong, we don't have fur or protection, we are very easy prey basically. But we were all "MATE. THIS IS ****** ." and made weapons, tools and houses, and we then ****** up animals all up and down the place.

Our very existence is a giant " **** you" to nature, and I love it.
#116 to #44 - ilovethepenis (05/22/2013) [-]
Well, to be fair, animals "train" their skills everyday. For example a lion hunts and thats all it does. It develops skills for one thing only and thus is really efficient at it.
But we humans, we can hunt, build, think, innovate and evolve, if we so desire. We arent tied to one branch of survival, we have evolved above all that.
#55 to #44 - mraye (05/22/2013) [-]
And our ability to stand upright means we can **** much more easily. True story.
#61 to #55 - playcolt (05/22/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Than how come my dogs can **** each other easier than when I try?
User avatar #47 to #44 - iwaspromisedcake (05/22/2013) [-]
My cranial capacity approves of both this assessment and your username.

I grant you my green thumb.
User avatar #56 to #44 - psykobear ONLINE (05/22/2013) [-]
We use to have fur, were stronger, and possibly faster. The human race as a species got weaker, less hairy (some of us) and weaker because of the lack of need.
User avatar #143 to #56 - psykobear ONLINE (05/23/2013) [-]
I seem to have repeated weaker. Well, we are much, much weaker. I meant to say slower, but **** it.
#94 to #56 - John Cena (05/22/2013) [-]
And our jaw muscles got weaker to fit our large brain. (Although some people seem to have skipped this stage.)
User avatar #51 to #44 - skumbaner (05/22/2013) [-]
"Dude, hold my beer"
... And so the first fire was made.
User avatar #52 to #44 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/22/2013) [-]
Well, humans also had endurance running for them. We did NOT ******* give up. We're able to run longer than any other land mammal, even if we aren't as fast. We chase **** down and it might get a hell of a far way away but we don't stop til we get our damn kill. By the time we reach it, it's too exhausted to fight back anymore.
+1
#58 to #52 - shutyourmustache **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #64 to #52 - joefakes (05/22/2013) [-]
Best endurance for a predator. Camels and Gazels can go much further, much faster.
#36 - heroiczebra (05/22/2013) [-]
Until we make contact with alien life. Then we're ******
User avatar #74 to #36 - thegreenmann (05/22/2013) [-]
Most people assume, Hollywood movies too, that aliens will bring about our extinction. They way I see it would be the other way around. Just think about it. Say we discovered a planet that is rich in oil and is also inhabited by an intelligent race. Now say we had the technology to travel to that planet RIGHT NOW when we are about to reach peak oil. I'd say we'd liberate the **** out of that race.
#37 to #36 - geomancer (05/22/2013) [-]
Everyone always assumes aliens are going to be more advanced than us. What if it's the other way around?
#42 to #37 - heroiczebra (05/22/2013) [-]
The we'd most likely make them slaves or something. I mean, the human race doesn't exactly have a good history with new races that we meet. alien lifeform thread?
User avatar #46 to #42 - strangesir (05/22/2013) [-]
I don't feel like saying anything else right now other than "Arbiter/Thel Vadaam is cool and I like him."

And that I think it depends on the enslaving them thing. Could be good aliens, could be bad, could be stupid. Who knows.
And I feel that I would lose lots of respect for the human race if we actually **** up a possibly peaceful alliance or something. I'd want to go live with the aliens instead, maybe.
User avatar #86 to #46 - tehlulzbringer (05/22/2013) [-]
why the **** would you want that?
#95 to #86 - clockworkphysicist (05/22/2013) [-]
I got that reference
I got that reference
User avatar #97 to #95 - tehlulzbringer (05/22/2013) [-]
what reference?
#100 to #97 - clockworkphysicist (05/22/2013) [-]
Cerberus...from mass effect....their an anti-alien organization...Your avatar is their logo.
Cerberus...from mass effect....their an anti-alien organization...Your avatar is their logo.
User avatar #138 to #86 - strangesir (05/22/2013) [-]
Because parts of the Human Race have let me down, including people in power, "normal" people, and all the other idiots.

I want there to be either less assholes and morons on this planet or me going to another one that is better with whoever I choose.

Dammit, I fantasy-rambled again
User avatar #110 to #42 - sovietghost (05/22/2013) [-]
it´s always the civilization with the most advanced technology which wins. we must be prepare ourselves.

tl;dr Technology FTW
#107 to #42 - John Cena (05/22/2013) [-]
think of it like this:
do you consider yourself an average person who share a rough view towards alien life with the majority of humanity? chances are you do
now do you have any intention to make a new lifeform your slave or the slave of others? chances are you don't.
as our society has grown more culturally tolerant we have seen ourselves more the protectors and caregivers of less advanced society's. just look at the way most first world nations treat isolated tribes; we often send them care packages and researchers make visits to these people to study their culture and make friends with them.
this is how i see extraterrestrial contact happening, at least if we're the "aliens"
#144 to #107 - heroiczebra (05/23/2013) [-]
So, are you saying that we, as a human race we should care for and protect all other life in the galaxy that are not capable of protecting themselves? That we should become the galaxy's caretakers?
User avatar #43 to #37 - bostpost (05/22/2013) [-]
The way I see it, we won't be able to communicate on an intergalactic scale. If there's any way we'll meet some other life out there, it'll probably be their doing.

They might even know we are here, but just not give a damn because we are not a good asset to their culture because we have always been a volatile species
#117 to #37 - John Cena (05/22/2013) [-]
Well if they find us, then their technology is pretty advanced.
#88 to #37 - John Cena (05/22/2013) [-]
I've read an article on this somewhere, and basically for a civilization to travel space they need to not kill each other first, and are therefore also be at least somewhat peaceful.
Also, ask yourself this: What is the main reason(s) we go to space?
Science and curiosity. Oh, and to prove we can.
I could rant about this for a good hour or so, bringing up all kinds of stuff, but I'll stop now.
#31 - crazyolitis (05/22/2013) [-]
And then feline aliens came by, out-geeking us.
And then feline aliens came by, out-geeking us.
User avatar #20 - hudis ONLINE (05/22/2013) [-]
I just realised a few days ago... We won the survival of the fittest.
#108 to #20 - John Cena (05/22/2013) [-]
For now, at least. We're living unsustainably. Unless we get our **** together or lower the population or, preferably, both, we're going to be the ones that kill ourselves.
User avatar #111 to #108 - hudis ONLINE (05/22/2013) [-]
Well yeah, but that's inevitable.
User avatar #129 to #20 - errdayimfjing (05/22/2013) [-]
Now go watch the movie Idiocracy
#23 to #20 - dickeating (05/22/2013) [-]
And then ****** up evolution as a result of our being "Superior".
User avatar #24 to #23 - hudis ONLINE (05/22/2013) [-]
Pretty much. I have this theory that it would've happened regardless of our existence, though. As in, if humanity never advanced as much as we did and we remained in a primitive state of being, another species would eventually surpass us and become the cruel overlords that we are to this day. So it may not be that we developed more than we were supposed to; perhaps it's just a flaw that evolution suffers naturally.
#25 to #24 - Shmooglavoue (05/22/2013) [-]
I'd hesitate to call it a flaw. For as much as we like to paint ourselves as cruel oppressors in the animal kingdom, consider that there are many, many species that will partake in the following without a second thought.

Cannibalism
Genocide
Infanticide
Patricide
Incest
Slavery
Environmental devastation

Not to mention horrible combinations of these

Cannibalism of own children
Cannibalism of own mate
Infanticide of mates previous children

As terrible as we humans can be, nature can be equally terrible, if not more so. Remember that, barring any religious possibilities, humanity are the creators of the very concept of morality.

User avatar #27 to #25 - hudis ONLINE (05/22/2013) [-]
That's precisely my point. Any other species might have gotten to the same stage if we didn't. Nature is cruel, and we are just a warped reflection of it.
#29 to #25 - dickeating (05/22/2013) [-]
When you say things like that, you have to remember that all those things we consider 'horrible' are just as natural to many species as getting up in the morning and making a cup of coffee is for most people. It's in Human Nature, because of pretend ideologies that have realized themselves through human thought, to be 'good'. And really it's all just an extension of the instinct to be Better than one's opponent. The quest against cruelty to living things for instance, although to the person taking this idea on it might simply be something they are supportive of, it is rooted back deep into our instinct to do these things and follow these ideas so as to prove oneself as Better or Good. And ultimately, to impress potential mates.
User avatar #34 to #23 - spartusee (05/22/2013) [-]
No, we won evolution. We spit in its face.
#40 to #34 - dickeating (05/22/2013) [-]
We cannot evolve. Technically, we boycott evolution by allowing the lame and weak to survive, therefore continuing 'lesser' genes and stunting our 'growth' in the system of evolution. Don't get me wrong, I believe every human has the right to live no matter what their case (Conditions do apply to my belief). Before you call me a bigot I'd like to note that I love and care for 3 younger sisters, all of whom have Downs Syndrome.
User avatar #41 to #40 - spartusee (05/22/2013) [-]
Well dickeater you sound like a great guy, but what I mean is what you just said. We don't need evolution anymore, we're the best. Healthcare, surgery, medicine and physical therapy are good examples of how we don't need it anymore. I hate all the people saying "hur dur we mesin up evolootion,, omfg we ***** it up omg" all while sitting on their ass 9 times out of ten being unproductive. So if they want to ******* fix evolution so much they can just kill them selves for a start.
User avatar #45 to #41 - mutzaki (05/22/2013) [-]
That's implying we're anywhere close to being a perfect species.
I'm not saying we actually should, but killing off everyone who is especially prone to obtaining certain diseases and disorders, like diabetes, cancer, dwarfism and Down Syndrome, or simply setting up laws to prevent them from procreating, and only letting the healthier genes continue, would not only help the overpopulation problem, but it would just help the remaining humanity in general.
Since we are also prone to fixing things like an inflamed appendix, we're also nerfing evolution in getting rid of organs that are currently causing us harm, and are debateably useless. Even if they're not useless as it is for us right now, it's still clear that if evolution were to continue, they would naturally go away in due time, because they'd become useless.
#53 to #45 - drolom (05/22/2013) [-]
To you and dickeating: I think that by letting "weaker" people live and practicing medicine we are just stalling evolution and, more importantly, expanding our genepool. And the bigger the genepool is, the better chances of survival we have in case of a disaster, because we have a greater variety of genes and features at our disposal. This is important to notice since we don't know what the world would be like after a catastrophic event and what kind of genes would be needed. Note that mutations and new genes will still exist, they just won't become more common in relation to other genes.
User avatar #63 to #53 - mutzaki (05/22/2013) [-]
Well, Down Syndrome, cancer and different deformities sure won't help us after a disaster. You can just as well see it as if disaster strikes, we simply need the healthiest, most intelligent people there to survive. What you say is true in nature, when environmental changes can kill off some individuals, and those that have better means to survive the sudden change end up affecting the entire species into having those qualities. However, it doesn't make sense to draw that parallel with people carrying cancer genes. Humans are also so remarkable that we are almost always able to change ourselves by non-genetic means to handle different environments better. Extra clothing for cold, using machines to keep us cooler in warmer environments, building structures that resist earthquakes and so forth. Otherwise there's no way we'd have people living in, for example polar climate.

I think that, in the future, once we've reached enough of an understanding of genetics and such, humanity will end up setting up laws that preven carriers of particularily unwanted genes from procreating. Though, I think there's always going to be the possibility of adopting genetically advantageous children if you still want to be a parent. But this is just my speculation.
#67 to #63 - drolom (05/22/2013) [-]
Well spoken, you present good points. And perhaps in the future gene therapy and other forms on genetech have become more common, efficient and accepted so that we wouldn't necessarily need to restrict procreation, instead we could just heal genetically caused diseases ond disorders through genetic manipulation.
#68 to #67 - mutzaki (05/22/2013) [-]
That's a very good point. The way we view genetics could simply change as we might be ablt to "construct" our children pre-birth.
#69 to #68 - drolom (05/22/2013) [-]
Yes, it will be interesting to see what the future holds for us.
User avatar #87 to #53 - wtfduud (05/22/2013) [-]
We are not expanding the genepool, since globalization, people have started taking mates from other countries/races/cultures, which creates something in the middle, little by little all races are becoming more similar to eachother, sooner or later there will only be a mix of all countries in the world. And the more people there are to evolve, the longer evolution will take.
#90 to #87 - drolom (05/22/2013) [-]
A good point. It is true that when considering this topic we have to take globalization into account, but it will take a very, very long time before this mixing you mentioned will occur, and I have a feeling that the human race will encounter some kind of global disaster (natural of caused by ourselves) before this has the time to happen.
#49 to #45 - hellfiazz (05/22/2013) [-]
I don't know if you know buddy, but that's fairly close to euthanasia.
User avatar #57 to #49 - mutzaki (05/22/2013) [-]
I don't see your point.
#1 - John Cena (05/21/2013) [-]
I was just thinking of this last night.
Thanks OP
#50 to #1 - John Cena (05/22/2013) [-]
Me too actually. This is weird
#2 to #1 - bipplenurp (05/22/2013) [-]
This OP delivers even when he doesn't mean to...   
   
   
always
This OP delivers even when he doesn't mean to...


always
User avatar #80 - hotschurl (05/22/2013) [-]
The description sounds like a guido trying to start a fight

HEW’, HUHHUH t
LOOK AT" ME, fft A - Lean. out THE? ’, ' CHA MAKING
HAN MY' USELESS WHITE Us WITH THEIR THERE? awe
TEETH AND ' t' OF ‘mun LITTLE
BIPEDAL.

User avatar #89 to #80 - jouten (05/22/2013) [-]
It's actually not the description. I don't know what it is but it sometimes just appears if you upload a picture. Try it
User avatar #118 to #89 - hotschurl (05/22/2013) [-]
Its an automatically created description that tries to "read" the text in the uploaded picture, then proceeds to fail miserably sometimes leading to hilarious outcomes
User avatar #4 - miscarriage (05/22/2013) [-]
I'm surprised they hit them with the arrows.


I doubt they can see through their caveman hair.
User avatar #28 to #4 - breadbasket (05/22/2013) [-]
I can't even see through my pubic hair.
#125 - doomfish ONLINE (05/22/2013) [-]
#85 to #75 - chaosheartless (05/22/2013) [-]
It's very unusual for a sexy anime picture like this to not have any pussy lip outline at the panties...I was looking for the purpose of science!
It's very unusual for a sexy anime picture like this to not have any pussy lip outline at the panties...I was looking for the purpose of science!
#121 to #75 - wartroll (05/22/2013) [-]
Well I...uh....
#77 to #75 - atoma (05/22/2013) [-]
I'd tap that
User avatar #92 to #77 - alexxander (05/22/2013) [-]
Print it out, and it will be as real as it ever will be
User avatar #146 to #92 - atoma (05/25/2013) [-]
I was checking through some of my comments just now and first now I realized that you wrote that because you didn't get the joke. she's got "piano panties" and I posted a picture of a pianist.
#38 - insomniacmeat (05/22/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#96 - manazetsugi (05/22/2013) [-]
-someone probaly thought of this alredy
-someone probaly thought of this alredy
User avatar #98 to #96 - carnageboy (05/22/2013) [-]
Damn.. that rat thing just got ate
#9 - jonnyfunk (05/22/2013) [-]
This image has expired
**jonnyfunk rolled a random image posted in comment #148 at Read Description ** deal with it, nature!
#60 - bdowns (05/22/2013) [-]
**bdowns rolled a random image posted in comment #9 at Bad jokes gone right **
#32 - John Cena (05/22/2013) [-]
Never thought of that
#79 - suiker (05/22/2013) [-]
Human's face when
User avatar #93 to #79 - mummyslittlebitch (05/22/2013) [-]
you're stretching that photo a bit
#105 - pehtran (05/22/2013) [-]
**pehtran rolled a random image posted in comment #2207529 at Friendly ** damn nature
[ 122 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)