Crooked Guy Cop. .. saying all cops are bad is like saying all Muslims are terrorists.... Crooked Guy Cop saying all cops are bad is like Muslims terrorists
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (376)
[ 376 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
244 comments displayed.
#1 - anon
Reply 0
(05/19/2013) [-]
Why wouldn't you let a cop search your car?
If you done nothing wrong, and are hiding nothing, why would it matter?
#24 to #1 - honkan
Reply -1
(05/20/2013) [-]
Up for some reading?
Up for some reading?
#32 to #24 - ganondork
Reply +3
(05/20/2013) [-]
I-I wanted to read...
I-I wanted to read...
#34 to #32 - honkan
Reply +3
(05/20/2013) [-]
There we go. Funnyjunk hates GIF images.
#33 to #32 - honkan
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Dang, that file. Gimme a minute
#6 to #1 - anon
Reply 0
(05/19/2013) [-]
Because unless they have a warrant they have no right to search my private property.
#36 to #6 - sketchE
Reply -2
(05/20/2013) [-]
but they have every reason to ask for your consent
#14 to #1 - marsupilami
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#22 to #1 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
That kind of attitude is what's making this country go to ****. **** off, terrorist sympathizer.
#52 to #1 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Because it's my ******* car and I don't ******* have to if I don't ******* want to.
Are you ******* sorry?
#69 to #1 - penisalphanugnut
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
My experience: My friend and I had just pulled into my apartment complex, so we sat in the car finishing our cigarette.

Not sure why but apparently someone thought we were smoking a joint. Cops came and asked to search, and I was all like 'I got nothing to hide. Go ahead'

Well, they found a joint. Not mine. Not my friends, but that of an old friend I had hung out with earlier in the day.
Well, it was in my car, I got in trouble.

TL;DR: someone may have had a roach in their pocket and it fell out. Best not to let them search,
#78 to #1 - undeadwill
Reply +3
(05/20/2013) [-]
I have nothing to hide however, If I walked to cops home and start searching through his things he would arrest me. Why? Would would he? He has nothing to hide.
He is an officer of the law. He is held to a higher standard and if he has nothing to hide he wouldn't mind the world prying into his private life. He has nothing to hide. After all he is the peace keeper and force of good why would he have something to hide?

Why is it that a college student privacy means less than a police officer? He is suppose to be the best of us. He wouldn't us seeing into his life. But we all human and we all have our secrets and to say that our secrets are owned by a man who is the "greater good" because I have done no crime does not mean my secrets aren't still valuable.
Privacy protects criminal and citizen alike, because every saint is a sinner and every cop is a criminal. So if you would have some sympathy and some shame, remember that if you have nothing to hide neither do they.
#7 to #1 - GhostOfRavenclaw
Reply +7
(05/19/2013) [-]
because it leads to further infractions against personal privacy and then oh **** we live in a police states
#11 to #1 - Shenanigins
Reply +12
(05/20/2013) [-]
Because the fourth amendment.
#37 to #11 - sketchE
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
which is not violated by asking.
#58 to #37 - Shenanigins
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
It's not violated by asking, however you are under no obligation to agree with them. We all have private things we want to keep secret.
#101 to #58 - sketchE
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
my question is why do you have that in your car?
#243 to #101 - Shenanigins
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Because it's my property and I"m allowed to have what I want in it, even if the morality of it is questionable.
#254 to #243 - sketchE
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
that still makes no sense. if you secretly enjoy big black dildos in your ass are you going to drive around with a box of them in your car? no. if you dont want people to know your a brony are you going to buy a shirt and wear it under your jacket? probably not. i have lots of private things i want to keep secret. they stay at my house in a locked box or hidden away. besides privacy is a myth 90 percent of people willingly give their personal information to companies that tell them they will be selling it to other people. but the cop who asks to search your car because youve been doing questionable things and decided to be an ass to the cop becomes the douchebag
#258 to #254 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
You voluntarily give information to those companies. If you were truly doing something wrong they would have evidence, and thus the legal right to search your car, otherwise you have the right to decline their search requests.
#264 to #258 - sketchE
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
but should a cop have to wait for a warrant every time? what if your driving is **** and you are giving signs of being under the influence. the cop has reasonable suspicion. hes likely going to test you by asking if youve been doing anything or to search your car. if your compliant hell likely give you a break. police have the legal right to detain you for 24 hours. a 30 second search wont hurt you
#268 to #264 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Yes, he should wait unless someone gives him permission, as is the ******* law. If you're weaving in traffic and wreak of alcohol that is probable cause, if you however are at some random check point and they ask to search your car they don't have probable cause, learn the law before you nitpick at it.
#271 to #268 - sketchE
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
ever hear the term preventative policing? usually if the cops set up a checkpoint they are looking for something or someone. if you mean a random roadstop thenthings like driving slowly in a neighborhood at night with your lights off are pretty sketchy things warranting a search. and yes ive seen people call cops scumbags for pulling them over for that.
#276 to #271 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
And unless they have probable cause you're the person they're looking for or have what they're looking for demanding to search something without a warrant/consent is still illegal. Riding around a neighborhood warrants a stop and search now? So if I have to pop out to get milk for the morning it's suspicious? It's innocent until proven guilty, not guilty til we don't find anything to book you on.
#282 to #276 - sketchE
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
why would you be driving around a neighborhood at night with your lights off (which alone is a ticketable offense) if your just going to ick up some milk? and im not talking about driving through. im talking about driving about 5 mph stopping in front of random houses.

usually if they have been allowed to set up a checkpoint they have been given the right to do so by a judge. and how will they know if you have what theyre looking for if they dont search? does this box have a bomb in it? **** if i know because im not allowed to look inside
#287 to #282 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Then that's probable cause but being pulled over for speeding and demanding to search your vehicle without reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing are two different things, if you have probable cause then yes police searches would be legal.
Given the right to set up a checkpoint doesn't give them the right to a vehicle search, however if they're looking for a bomber and you fit his physical/ vehicle profile then yes that would warrant a search.
#289 to #287 - sketchE
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
what if they dont have one? or what if they suspect hes hiding in your car?
#291 to #289 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Then he has no right to search, innocent until proven guilty.
#294 to #291 - sketchE
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
thats a lovely mind set. your priacy is more important then other peoples lives
#299 to #294 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
It's not my mindset it's the law, regardless of what you or I think. By your logic we should have searches of every house in the US to find all the wanted fugitives.
#302 to #299 - sketchE
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
no but if a suspected person is believed to be in an area the people of said area should be more compliant. if you have nothing to hide then why does it matter? if you have something you dont want anyone to see keep it at home. theres already thousands of people who say they wish they could kill cops who have never had a run in with them and you think the cops want to make more?
#359 to #302 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
I've enjoyed the argument, but it's funny you play it off as a joke just because you lost. Either way, toodles.
#360 to #359 - sketchE
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
you seem to not realize id did the whole how will they get evidence part twice. but whatever have a nice day hope you big box of dildos doesnt fade from beingin the sun too long
#357 to #302 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures
A car is a possession, I highly doubt you're a criminal justice major since throughout this conversation you've been completely ignorant about, police policy, and court proceedings.
#358 to #357 - sketchE
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
ive actually been mocking you for a lot of it
#355 to #302 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Evidence by actions, by LEGALLY searching (trash and whatnot) police can already find and convict criminals fine without having the power to search whatever vehicle they com across. For some reason you have this notion that police can't get evidence without searching places without a warrant, seriously go take a criminal justice class if you want to know about it, it would save me a lot of trouble.
#356 to #355 - sketchE
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
im a criminal justice major. and searching your property is just as illegal as you think searching your car is. in fact the constitutional right doesnt mention a car. it says your home and person. your fourth amendments rights dont extend to your car. that would be covered by the 14th amendment which says the states have the right to determine things not listed in the constitution. so really a cop has every right to search your car but in many places its frowned upon
#353 to #302 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
People are arrested because the police have evidence of a crime and thus reasonable suspicion a crime was committed.
#354 to #353 - sketchE
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
but how did they get said evidence? if they arent allowed to search because they have to have cause and to get cause you have to have evidence and to get evidence you have to search... you get where this is going?
#351 to #302 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Going: "HEY LET US SEARCH YOUR CAR TO MAKE SURE YOU'RE NOT DOING ANYTHING BAD" is treating someone like a criminal. I don't have to prove my innocence by default I already am.
#352 to #351 - sketchE
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
then no one would ever get arrested because they are assumed to be innocent
#348 to #302 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Exactly if they're not searching my car i'm not being treated as a criminal.
#349 to #348 - sketchE
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
but theyre not even if they are make both your days easier by taking the thirty seconds to prove your not
#346 to #302 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
They're not going to even try to get a warrant without suspicion of wrongdoing.
#347 to #346 - sketchE
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
then your not being treated as a criminal
#342 to #302 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
And if they had reasonable suspicion I was said criminal they'd get a warrant to go along with it to search whatever they wanted.
#343 to #342 - sketchE
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
warrants take more than a few seconds to get are you going to willingly just sit on the side of the road for an hour or two?
#338 to #302 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Yes going "hey there's possibly a criminal in this area prove to us you're not aiding him, thus being a criminal."
#339 to #338 - sketchE
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
if they truly thought you were a criminal they would just detain you
#334 to #302 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Gardens don't constitute 14 bags of fertilizer, it's suspicious. And yes he is innocent, but sitting outside a neighborhood watching a guy supposedly do housework isn't treating a guy like a criminal.
#336 to #334 - sketchE
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
but saying "hey a guy who just blew up a building was spotted in this area mind if we check to make sure he didnt hide in your car" is?
#328 to #302 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Let's say it's conspiracy to commit murder by building a bomb, they see a guy lug in this huge barrel and ********* of fertilizer, boom probable cause, warrant, arrest, conviction. It's the way the legal system works cops abide by it every day and catch criminals without storming into houses without a warrant.
#330 to #328 - sketchE
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
what if he has a garden? and by your logic why are they watching him in the first place hes innocent
#322 to #302 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
And they had been proven guilty of conspiracy to commit XXX.
#325 to #322 - sketchE
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
how? when? the cop was never allowed to search or gain any evidence since they were to be considered innocent
#319 to #302 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Conspiracy to commit XXX is still a crime, so yes, they have committed a crime.
#320 to #319 - sketchE
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
but were not allowed to do anything until proven guilty
#315 to #302 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Again, it's innocent until proven guilty, we don't put people who have done nothing wrong in jail based on the fact that they could potentially do something wrong.
#316 to #315 - sketchE
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
ever hear of conspiracy? its an actual crime.
#310 to #302 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
(ran out of room above)
Is it too much to ask to have reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing before you invade my privacy?
#312 to #310 - sketchE
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
yes the privacy of the trash in your vehicle. im still concerned that your privacy is held above other peoples live potentially
#305 to #302 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
If a suspected person is in the area they have the right to make sure i'm not him and move along. I don't have anything to hide, but I shouldn't have to prove that to everyone who wants to know that I don't have anything to hide.
#309 to #305 - sketchE
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
but its too much to ask to open your back doors a trunk to prove that they arent hiding in your car? that thirty seconds
#5 to #1 - asadffdsa
Reply +14
(05/19/2013) [-]
I value my privacy
#39 to #5 - sketchE
Reply +1
(05/20/2013) [-]
thats a good one. your privacy is a myth
#53 to #5 - admiralen
Reply -2
(05/20/2013) [-]
why? its a cop, and youve done nothing illegal, the more you say no the more he wants to do it
#92 to #53 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
"the more you say no the more he wants to do it"

So you let yourself be raped? Because the more you say no the more he wants it.
#110 to #92 - admiralen
Reply -2
(05/20/2013) [-]
except its not the same thing, one is to let an elected officer of the law search your car, the other is getting ******, its a bad reference, theres no bad after effects of letting him search the car
#113 to #110 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Unless he plants evidence in your car or finds something he can fine you for like a possible weapon.
#257 to #113 - sketchE
Reply -1
(05/20/2013) [-]
if your not allowed to have a weapon why do you have one? not all cops are ******** and that would be an outright hilarious case if a cop dropped a bag of weed in my car.
"i found drugs"
"ok ive never smoked in my life"
"well thats possession"
"i dare you to try and find any proof i ever touched that bag"
boom case over. you sue the cop and he loses his job. actually i shouldnt say cop. the ******* loses his job. most cops arent ******** but no one talks about the good cop who let him go after you broke eight laws and he was understanding because thats not a good story
#274 to #257 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
They consider knives and tools weapons.
#280 to #274 - sketchE
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
where do you live that your not allowed to have weapons? what i was refering to is like a convicted felon with or a minor with a gun. if your not allowed to have a weapon your breaking the law by carrying one in your car.if the state laws determine a table saw is a weapon making it illegal guess what you cant have one.
#285 to #280 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Its not that you can't have them but even the US if you have a knife or machete they can fine you for it. if you have it in your car
#288 to #285 - sketchE
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
thats funny ive had five rifle and three handguns in my truck driving around downtown. got pulled over declared my ******* weapon like your supposed to then went about my day. the cop didnt even care that my friends license plate wasnt visible or that he cut him off
#295 to #288 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Every where its different. New York is hard on that kind of ****
#259 to #257 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Because the jury is going to believe you over a cop stating he found drugs in your car, get real.
#267 to #259 - sketchE
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
really the jury of my peers who thinks every cop is a part of rampart? a jury of my peers who thinks that heroine should be legalized? yeah i think theyll be mistrusting of a cop
#270 to #267 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Juries have historically believed the police over a citizen in the majority of cases, if a cop says he found weed in your car and you go "Nah man it was planted" like 99.999999% of the people that came through that day, who are they going to believe? (SPOILER: Not you.)
#275 to #270 - sketchE
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
only problem is most of the jury would probably test positive while i wouldnt. and your probably right except after rampart the faith in police has fallen especially in drug related incidents. and basicly what your telling meright now is that if you were on a jury you would believe the officer willingly? the term inocent until proven guilty or beyond a reasonable doubt come to mind?
#279 to #275 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Not what I said at all, I said the average brain-dead soccer mom on the jury is probably going to believe police testimony over yours, not saying it's right but it's likely to happen. And if the officer says he straight up picked weed off your floor the jury would probably take that as enough evidence to convict.
#286 to #279 - sketchE
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
except a jury of my peers isnt just brainwashed soccer moms. and im allowed to request a change of venue or change of jury whenever i want. if i get picked up fro drug possession when ive never touched the stuff i want one stoner on the ******* jury because hell know no one would just leave their weed lying on the floor.
#290 to #286 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
The prosecution gets as much say in the jury as you do, they're not going to give you any serious advantage. A stoner most likely would be thrown out due to suspicion that he would be biased/unreliable.
#293 to #290 - sketchE
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
then ill get one person like you thatll prevetn the unanymous decision. just one person whos been slighted by an officer. and theres plenty out there just look at this thread
#296 to #293 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
A person with a record of being slighted by an officer wouldn't be allowed on the jury, the jury is supposed to be unbiased.
#300 to #296 - sketchE
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
and a bunch of people who clearly arent my peers by age or experience arent?
#301 to #300 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
You mean those people who are indifferent to your situation? Yes that's the point of a ******* jury.
#304 to #301 - sketchE
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
so there wasnt a single black person on the oj simpson trial? because people thought the cop was a racist trying to frame a black man.
#345 to #304 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
True, it is.
#340 to #304 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
That's number is purely speculation.
#341 to #340 - sketchE
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
yes it is and so is your that 99.99 percent of people will just believe what the cop says
#335 to #304 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Are you honestly telling me you think 100% of people have had some altercation with police officers that would constitute moderate/extreme bias?
#337 to #335 - sketchE
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
i think a good 70 percent of the population has a strong distrust of cops
#331 to #304 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
They search these peoples records, they see a guy with a contested ticket then find he thought the cop was ******* him he gets chucked.
#333 to #331 - sketchE
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
then no one would be on jury ever
#326 to #304 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Except they're not going to put a bunch of people on the jury who are biased like that.
#329 to #326 - sketchE
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
how are they going to know of a bias like that? sure there not going to put the person who says he ******* hates cops but the guy who got an undeserved ticket a few years ago
#321 to #304 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
I was responding to your comment about how "and so are you that all citizens are perfectly law abiding brain washed sheep when there is far more evidence of the oppisite" you brought the topic up, I gave you a retort.
#323 to #321 - sketchE
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
yes but thats not the point. the point is there are more people who would side with the person who has no drug history and a clean drug test over the cop who they dont trust
#317 to #304 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Legally everyone is a law abiding citizen until proved otherwise, you don't have the right to treat them like a criminal until it is proven.
#318 to #317 - sketchE
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
thats not even the point of this argument
#313 to #304 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Not all black people thought that was the case, you're generalizing.
#314 to #313 - sketchE
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
and so are you that all citizens are perfectly law abiding brain washed sheep when there is far more evidence of the oppisite
#307 to #304 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
A black man and a man who has been abused because of his race by a police officer are different.
#311 to #307 - sketchE
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
really because memory serves that the general thought of the lapd at that time was they were all racist. you know the whole rodney king thing
#116 to #113 - admiralen
Reply -2
(05/20/2013) [-]
cause thats what COPS do, that was retarded, its like, i should be allowed to shoot this guy cause he might be a murderer
#124 to #116 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
I think you done goof'd
#132 to #124 - admiralen
Reply -2
(05/20/2013) [-]
then i should be allowed to shoot you cause you might be a murderer, then everyone would die, some **** is so unlikely you cant alter your behaviour because of it
#140 to #132 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Yeah you done goof'd hard.
#142 to #140 - admiralen
Reply -2
(05/20/2013) [-]
whatever, wont get a good answer out of you
#152 to #142 - undeadwill
Reply +1
(05/20/2013) [-]
Because you aren't making sense!
Your grammar is ******.
Your sentence structure is like reading Latin.
Your logic is that of retarded sheep whose brain is ******.
#160 to #152 - admiralen
Reply -2
(05/20/2013) [-]
and youre one of those people who cry about grammar on the internet, i dont see any point in refining it to please retards like you, youre not worth it, especially since you whine about it
#175 to #160 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
"refining grammar to please retards"
So by me correcting you that makes me a retard
But you continuing to type like a 5 year old some how that doesn't make you a retard?
#181 to #175 - admiralen
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
you correcting me doesnt make you a retard, you whining about it is, grammar has nothing to do with what we were talking about, and suddenly it is all were talking about, you put to much weight into it and i wont fix it up just to satisfy you
#195 to #181 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Translation "inability to fix my own ****** grammar"
#198 to #195 - admiralen
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
yeah im done with you, you have nothing more to add to the subject we were talking about, your stupid whining about grammar you can keep to yourself
#209 to #198 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
"I'm so done"- tumblr faggot
#214 to #209 - admiralen
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
feel free to think that
#251 to #214 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
So your solution is to take away the power?
They need people just not all of them
#272 to #251 - admiralen
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
they use the people to make a good world for the people, for they too are the people, then there are usurpers, cancerous assholes who abuse it, but if you take your time and pick the right people to lead they wont be able to take over
#240 to #214 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
No they exist but I live in Texas and have never seen one in my life.
#239 to #214 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Not really.
They don't need me when they got plenty of sheep that won't question orders
#242 to #239 - admiralen
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
they dont need you alone, they need the people, cause the people hold the power, what im trying to say is that the people dont know how to use the power
#234 to #214 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Also "Hillbillies with guns" Sweet **** you have no idea what America is like.
#236 to #234 - admiralen
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
>implying they dont exist
#233 to #214 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
So the alternative is to have the state do it?
#235 to #233 - admiralen
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
the state wont do it, cause the state needs you
#228 to #214 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Lol.
Libertarism is better than anarchy. But every free society needs a little anarchy everyonce and a while.
And here in the US we need a revolution
#231 to #228 - admiralen
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
You sure dont, people like you will just get raped by the hillbillys with guns and the bigger people then you, you just dont know what it means for people to have no laws binding them, people will steal from you, and **** you over, **** you, and beat your ass, some will kill you for no reason but because they can
#223 to #214 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
What country is that?
#224 to #223 - admiralen
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
sweden
#217 to #214 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Yeah want to know why I can think that?
Because I am free.
#222 to #217 - admiralen
-1
(05/20/2013) [-]
ive got more freedom in a better country that knows its ****, enjoy thinking anarchy is a good thing
#61 to #53 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Why not have daily searches through your house, you have nothing to hide right?
#63 to #61 - admiralen
Reply -2
(05/20/2013) [-]
theres a difference between a car and a house, whats there to hide in a car thats private but legal?
#91 to #63 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Not in the eyes of the law. If its okay to search one the other is okay too.
#64 to #63 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
It's not always about hiding anything, some people just don't want their **** ****** with which is protected under the constitution. Cops are under no obligation to be gentle with your **** during the search, that 16th century vase you're carrying in the trunk? Yeah he can chuck that **** on the ground if he sees fit during these things.
#67 to #64 - admiralen
Reply -3
(05/20/2013) [-]
its pretty stupid to say no, and the constitutions are old and outdated
#90 to #67 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Really? Outdated?
So those things in the bill meant to keep the government from arresting you because they feel like it?
Fining you over 500 dollars you for breaking no law?
Not using water boarding as an accepted interrogation technique.
The right to say, worship, or protest whatever you want?

But yeah the police state is SOOO much better.
Somethings don't change one of those is the nature of freedom.
#98 to #90 - admiralen
Reply -2
(05/20/2013) [-]
i dont think you understand how society works either, everyone are infact people, just cause you have some **** that was written by people several hundreds of years ago doesnt make it different, the leaders are people, the police are people, everyone has morals, and problem with you is that you think the regular people knows whats best, people have the right to choose for themselves, but what makes you think you control anything right now? your country is ruled and controlled by citizens who know nothing about what they are voting for, you talk about freedoms and police states, but you know nothing of it
#121 to #98 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
People don't know what is best for them. Never said they thought they did, but is that any reason to make men slaves so to control them and bring them to a vision of your "Perfect world"

And I have control of my actions, my thoughts and my voice. Despite what you say these rights will ALWAYS exist.
And not everyone has morals and some have morality ****** into a destructive whore. If everyone had values we would have no need of the state or church. But we don't. People will do anything and everything possible to stay alive and stay in power.
And if everyone was just and moral than 11 million Jews and many more wouldn't have disappeared in Europe around the years between 1939-1945. If mankind was a moral being we wouldn't have had only 233 years of peace in recorded history. We wouldn't have fought war after war. If mankind was moral monsters would lie buried. But we aren't and we have done everything in our power to show we are incapable of morality or objective morality.
Morality can also be twisted.
Hurting is helping
Death is life
Murder is birth
Slavery is freedom
Ignorance is truth
War is peace
Morality is subjective and objective morality is slavery.

That Constitution first defense against tyranny and until the unthinking masses and fascists like you realize that unless you defend it those freedoms and rights will become privileges and then nothing at all.
#127 to #121 - admiralen
Reply -2
(05/20/2013) [-]
i dont think you get it, everyone arent ******* evil, and im not reaching for a "perfect world" i know we cant get it, people arent perfect, but thats the one reason people needs some control, you get your freedoms, just country are controlled by people who knows what they are doing, and doesnt have to fight for the retarded citizens attention, hurting is helping is exactly what im talking about, take away to give, the constitution is a overromatisised dokument with outdated laws, it needs to be updated just as the rest of society has been, some people are murderers, some people are what you consider "evil", but winners write history, every woman in berlin was raped when it was taken during wwii, **** happens, but you need to make it as little as possible for the good of everyone, problem with most people in your country is that you are way to selfish and dont understand that helping others will end up helping you
#151 to #127 - undeadwill
Reply +1
(05/20/2013) [-]
Everyone isn't*
I'm*
I*
aren't*
That's*

Faggot do you even grammar?

Not everyone is evil but they do exist and they have the will and drive to conquer.
You are basically saying slavery was good and Hitler did nothing wrong. And slavery to the state is not a future I wish to live under.

How old are you by the way? How old old are you and you still haven't learned the basics of grammar?
#155 to #151 - admiralen
Reply -1
(05/20/2013) [-]
big surprise, when youve got nothing more to go on you go for the grammar, im saying theres bad people on both sides always, but everyone have their reasons, hitler took out the jews so he could pay for the war effort and make the country he loved go forward, you were taught how evil he was, bu no doubt you would hear other **** if they had won
#167 to #155 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
No because I still can't ******* read your lazy typing.
It take a few ******* seconds to spell check your comment.

I still hate my own country for what they did at Wounded Knee, to Japanese Americans, and more. You say history is written by the victor but refuse to realize that the victor who writes the truth is the same one that tells you to Obey.
#174 to #167 - admiralen
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
if they write lies they tell you to obey aswell, just not as obviously, and if you cant read it thats that, you dont have to come back, and if you dont understand it youre just as stupid, i just wont bother fixing up my sentences for someone who will whine and cry about grammar
#179 to #174 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
"if they write lies they tell you to obey aswell,"

Explain this.
#182 to #179 - admiralen
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
the ones who will tell you the truth lets you make your own choice in the matter, the ones who tell you lies are trying to manipulate you
#205 to #182 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Yeah. You can't tell the difference.
#207 to #205 - admiralen
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
>implying you could
you recite freedoms like they mean anything to you, its other peoples ideals you have adopted without knowing what it means to be without it
#190 to #182 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Expect you see the people who lie and tell you to obey as the same. I see this. You don't.
#194 to #190 - admiralen
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
they are the same, but i prefer the devil i know before the devil with lies
#197 to #194 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
The devil you know and the devil who lies are the the same person
#203 to #197 - admiralen
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
in this they are not, one tells you the truth and their objectives, the other dances around it while the lies are drowning it alive
#73 to #67 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
The constitutions are the foundation of our legal system, if we write off one right it creates a precedent that unravels everything.
#94 to #73 - admiralen
Reply -2
(05/20/2013) [-]
i dont think you understand how society works
#97 to #94 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
I don't think you understand how the legal system works.
#100 to #97 - admiralen
Reply -2
(05/20/2013) [-]
i dont think you understand what cops are, you probably think they are aliens who are just waiting to take over the world
#102 to #100 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Now you're just being silly, cops are people, like you and me, but you can't deny the fact that some people are indeed bad. 90% of cops may be good, law abiding cops, that doesn't mean we should not restrict them at all just because some might not abuse that power.
#104 to #102 - admiralen
Reply -2
(05/20/2013) [-]
im not talking about not restricting cops, cops are bound to the law just like everyone else, but if cops cant have some privileges no one will be able to stop the ones who actually break the law
#154 to #104 - undeadwill
Reply +1
(05/20/2013) [-]
They do just fine without trampling freedom.
#157 to #154 - admiralen
Reply -2
(05/20/2013) [-]
except theyve got whining assholes like you who call them evil and wont let them do their jobs
#165 to #157 - undeadwill
Reply +1
(05/20/2013) [-]
I will let them do their jobs but if they have to crush the freedoms of the people to do it what's the point?
#170 to #165 - admiralen
Reply -2
(05/20/2013) [-]
you dont get it do you, they protect your damn freedoms, you prefer anarchists raping your mom?
#185 to #170 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
I am an anarchist.

If they protect my freedoms than they won't mind staying in line with regulation and my "Whining"
#216 to #185 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Its still a better direction than fascism.
I rather have a libertarian government than one of anarchy
#189 to #185 - admiralen
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
but anarchy has nothing to do with freedom, cause anarchists will take away your freedom for their own freedom, its retarded, theres a reason all societys have had laws
#208 to #189 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Its a better direction than fascism.
#212 to #208 - admiralen
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
you say that now, but when you starve to death cause someone a little bigger then you rapes you and steals your food that leader who can control the assholes suddenly seems a little nicer
#112 to #104 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Cops already have privileges that assist them in fighting crime, but the people have rights too like the right to be secure in their possessions and against unreasonable search and seizures.
#114 to #112 - admiralen
Reply -2
(05/20/2013) [-]
except some **** you dont need, you dont need to carry ******* guns, getting your car searched hurts no one except people who are guilty and deserve the ****, you can talk about rights, but its an useless right
#117 to #114 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Useless right? Alright let's say it's abolished, the police now have the ability to search, your house, car, work, and take anything they want, gee what a fantastic idea.
#120 to #117 - admiralen
Reply -2
(05/20/2013) [-]
no, they cant take what they want, they can search for illegal ****, you keep reaching for such stupid ****, COPS ARENT EVIL, believe it or not, theyre regulated like ******* crazy, cause retarded people sue them over small ****, its like the dumbass that sued mcdonalds cause she burned her mouth on the coffee
#158 to #120 - undeadwill
Reply +1
(05/20/2013) [-]
******* **** kid shouldn't you be in school?

#161 to #158 - admiralen
Reply -2
(05/20/2013) [-]
and you go for personal attacks aswell, thanks for proving that you have nothing more to say
#169 to #161 - undeadwill
Reply +1
(05/20/2013) [-]
I can go on all day.
#187 to #169 - admiralen
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
good for you, it doesnt make any difference, in an argument atleast i get to see your views, in personal attacks you just write stupid **** i dont care about
#211 to #161 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
I know you are beyond help. You are so deeply ignorant to the world around you and its scary.
#188 to #161 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Because your viewpoint is as ****** as your grammar
#192 to #188 - admiralen
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
the freedom youre talking about is all about being a loner, in a society you need rules and people who keep the rules, besides, arguments are about learning both sides of your point, i know you wont get convinced by me, and i wont get convinced by you
#125 to #120 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
I was referencing your statement that the fourth amendment is useless, if it wasn't there they would have the ability to do everything I just listed. I never said all cops are bad, I said some are bound to be, so we should take precautions against them. Take 2 seconds to learn about the US legal system, because you obviously haven't got a clue about how it works.
#131 to #125 - admiralen
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
im not trying to say that, im trying to say the constitutions are outdated, and you talk about freedom, but you will let them control your every move and fight to defend it, and if some cops are bad, report it, and the good ones will get em, if your country wasnt so busy branding and hating all cops they probably wouldnt disrespect anyone
#183 to #131 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Again, our legal system is set upon precedents, meaning if we say it's okay to search one place just because it allows them to search somewhere else just because, it's not conjecture, it's a fact.
#171 to #131 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Exactly people are already being ****** now, why would you increase the power of someone who can already **** you and let them do it harder?This got slightly erotic.
#180 to #171 - admiralen
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
cause letting them search your car isnt an especially big deal, they wont **** you, and if they do report it
#163 to #131 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Precincts have jurisdictions, they can't just cross over all willy nilly and arrest whoever they want. And it might not always get up the chain, if all the low levels muffle the report no one knows.
#168 to #163 - admiralen
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
some times you are ******, but that is the same as it is now though
#153 to #131 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
(ran out of space above)
Again you're implying he's the only corrupt cop and others won't cover for him, there are a number of variables you have to take into account.
#159 to #153 - admiralen
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
theres always a good one higher up in the chain, and if the whole ******* precinct is corrupt get other precincts
#144 to #131 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
You're talking about freedom then suggesting we let cops go on fishing expeditions whenever they please, that's not freedom. And report it to who? The cops, so they can be "retrained" and go unpunished, you're living in an ideal world where bad cops are isolated incidents within their department, the majority of corrupt cops have other corrupt cops in their department, otherwise they wouldn't have a job. Again I'M NOT SAYING ALL COPS ARE SATAN HIMSELF i'm saying some can and will abuse their power, it's unavoidable so we should take precautions.
#149 to #144 - admiralen
0
(05/20/2013) [-]
you overestimate how easy it is to be a corrupt cop that breaks the rules, they will ******* fire and punish you for that ****, and theres always higher people up the foodchain, the bad people are rare, and in the end the bad ones leave evidence aswell, they will get caught
#3 to #1 - croc
Reply +58
(05/19/2013) [-]
What if I have my vibrator collection in the car and I don't want the cop, or anyone else for that matter, to see it. It's not illegal, but I don't want anyone to know my dirty secret.
#26 to #3 - stijnverheye
Reply +9
(05/20/2013) [-]
or you have a huge croc collections and you dont want anybody to see it
#370 to #26 - croc
Reply 0
(05/21/2013) [-]
How the **** do you know are you a ******* cop?
#99 to #3 - markowuzhere
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Now we know
he he he
#25 - YoursTruley
Reply +32
(05/20/2013) [-]
saying all cops are bad is like saying all Muslims are terrorists....
#177 to #25 - nickbeauchamp
-2
has deleted their comment [-]
#193 to #177 - lamarisagoodname
Reply -2
(05/20/2013) [-]
Did you say something?

Go pick up a book and learn about Jihad.
#245 to #193 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
What did he say?
#248 to #193 - davidavidson [OP]
Reply -1
(05/20/2013) [-]
Learn about what?

All I learned was this
#261 to #248 - cabbagemayhem
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
He also made love to his dead wife. When he was discovered, he said it was to give her pleasure in the afterlife, but Mark 12:25 contradicts the need for that.

"For when they shall rise from the dead, they neither marry, nor are given in marriage; but are as the angels which are in heaven." Mark 12:25
#255 to #248 - lamarisagoodname
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
I have the Qur'an right in front of me and I would love to know on what basis you translated any of that, and where you came up with a surah called "Koran"

Do you honestly have that little self respect that you believe any picture you see on the internet?
#332 to #255 - davidavidson [OP]
Reply -1
(05/20/2013) [-]
Research it dude. I'm not even kidding. They try and make excuses for it on youtube even
#344 to #332 - lamarisagoodname
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
I have here a Qur'an printed with authorization from Al Qurah university (largest university in Saudi Arabia) and I cannot find these verses in the Qur'an or the Hadith, what exactly am I looking up?
#172 to #25 - doodnotheface
Reply -1
(05/20/2013) [-]
A C A B
#27 to #25 - davidavidson [OP]
Reply +15
(05/20/2013) [-]
Saying I'm calling all cops bad is like not making sense.
#28 to #27 - icheatjews
Reply +3
(05/20/2013) [-]
haha well said
haha well said
#378 to #27 - YoursTruley
Reply 0
(05/21/2013) [-]
-______- yea yea...
#379 to #378 - davidavidson [OP]
Reply -1
(05/21/2013) [-]
I still love you m8
#389 to #379 - YoursTruley
Reply 0
(05/22/2013) [-]
love ya too
#12 - whycanticaps
Reply +13
(05/20/2013) [-]
I still don't understand all the hate for cops. They are just doing their job
#19 to #12 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
If you don't understand the hate for cops, then you're not paying attention. Pull your head out of your ass.

There are no good cops. All the good cops already resigned because of all the corruption. If you happen to have had an ok experience with a cop, it was only because he happened to be in a good mood when you met him.
#220 to #19 - rieskimo
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
You sound like the type of moron that dresses like a thug, has a tricked out car like a drug dealer, blasts your music like an asshole and then cry every time you get stopped and questioned by a cop.
#184 to #12 - jajathezombie
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
In my experience, how cops interact with you depends entirely on where you are. Cops in high-crime areas tend to be nicer while cops in low-crime areas tend to be dicks. They have a quota to fill, so cops in high-crime areas are more likely to let you go for minor offenses since they fill their quotas pretty easily. Meanwhile cops in nicer areas have a harder time filling their quotas so they're more likely to bust you hard on anything they can possibly find. I live in a low-crime area just outside Baltimore city, so in my district I'll get pulled over for going 2mph over the speed limit and given the maximum fine, but I've driven through the city and blazed through red lights right in front of cops and they didn't even do anything.
#232 to #184 - psychopsychedelic
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
Quotas were removed in the 80's.

I hate when people say they have quotas.
#244 to #232 - jajathezombie
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
They're unofficial but implied.
#41 to #12 - xturboxx
Reply +4
(05/20/2013) [-]
When you run into a few crooked cops, it makes you change your outlook on all of them.
#13 to #12 - metalguitarest
Reply +23
(05/20/2013) [-]
Yes, they are just doing their job. However, hassling a bunch of teenagers just because they look "sketchy"is ****** up and judgmental. Now I know everyone judges but I'm not going to search you because you make me uncomfortable. Police Officers are not aloud to search a house or car with out a warrant and a lot of them force it or plant drugs on you and then haul you in. So yes there is a lot of hate for cops. Let's also not forget the countless cases of police brutality, corruption, and despicable actions taken by a high number of police officers.
#186 to #13 - mrhaihoang
Reply +1
(05/20/2013) [-]
Zimbardo prison experiment, even normal participants when given power of guards (aka prison cops) became crooked and bully the prisoners after a while, just because they can.
#253 to #186 - thorsragnarok
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
It is important to mention that not all the guards did that in the experiment. but the guards who did not exert their power did nothing to stop the guards who did. And on the topic of cops some of them will even tell you that most cops have a God complex, my friend when he was in drivers ed the place had a cop come in and talk to them bout that kinda ****.
#266 to #13 - anon
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
the problem is that the police forces have power, and a cop can break into my house and shoot my dog and the worse that can happen is that he is suspended but still getting payed ! Cops who abuse their power should get more severe punishment
#284 to #266 - metalguitarest
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
I understand that completely. I mean I have nothing to hide so I could care less but they really hassle these kids. If they talked to these kids with respect they would listen
#227 to #13 - cakefaceify
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
If you look sketchy though it's their job to check it out. Planting drugs is another thing entirely, but how do you expect an officer to be able to tell the difference between one group of hooded teenagers who got into trouble last week, and another group of hooded teenagers minding their own business. It's not easy trying to make sure everyone gets along.
#23 - Sinless
Reply +15
(05/20/2013) [-]
I remember back when I was young and had some semblance of confidence in police.

Then one night, a few days after I got back from a camping trip, I got pulled over. He thought I was sketchy looking and asked to search my car. Fine, whatever; I didn't own any drugs at the time or paraphernalia. However, I did apparently own a weapon.

The machete I used to go camping, laying next to the other camping **** I was too lazy to unload. He cited me for a ******* knife I had in the trunk. I didn't really trust cops before that but it made me realize that you can't risk it.

I never let them search me willingly now.
#35 to #23 - sketchE
Reply +5
(05/20/2013) [-]
where the hell do you live that your not allowed to own a knife? the cop did his job but the government where you live is ******* retarded
#71 - princesslilian
Reply +12
(05/20/2013) [-]
#237 to #71 - falloutfanatic ONLINE
Reply +2
(05/20/2013) [-]
curios question: if they ask you to step out of the car, do you have to comply?
#252 - helter **User deleted account**
+5
has deleted their comment [-]
#95 - theshadowed
Reply +4
(05/20/2013) [-]
I like British Police. We have a few dicks, but not as much as America it seems
#109 to #95 - wacemindu
Reply -1
(05/20/2013) [-]
Maybe the Americans just bitch about it more.
#374 to #95 - oxYKellark
Reply +1
(05/21/2013) [-]
No we have awesome cops, some people are just bitchy and scream brutality when an officer is just trying to do his job, while still being completely within his rights that no one bothers to look up for their home state.
#247 to #95 - lyiat ONLINE
Reply +3
(05/20/2013) [-]
We have plenty of good cops. People just love to ******* ignore it for the sensationalism of the bad cop motif, which is rarely ever the damn case.
#62 - shamusmcfearson
Reply +4
(05/20/2013) [-]
Refusal to allow your car to be searched does NOT create probable cause for them to search it anyway. Basic rule of thumb from all my professors (yes, believe it if you want to or not, but I do major in Law Enforcement) is that if an officer is asking to search your vehicle, they have no probable cause to do so.
#29 - chuca
Reply +4
(05/20/2013) [-]
it's kinda sad when you realize that most cops( at least where i live) don't care about people at all and just look at it as power and a paycheck

yes there are good cops left, they're just heavily outnumbered by the ones who abuse their power as they see fit or ones that simply don't care at all
#55 to #29 - admiralen
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
almost all start out wanting to help, then they get ******* hated constantly by everyone for trying to maintain order and protect people, it drives them down and makes them dislike you, they also get to see the worst humanity has to offer almost always, takes away your faith in people
#30 to #29 - sparkyoneonetwo
Reply +1
(05/20/2013) [-]
Not so long ago a very large amount of my cities police where all fired for abusing power and **** like that, thing are much better now
#42 to #30 - chuca
Reply +1
(05/20/2013) [-]
i don't think that'll ever happen here because it's not so much that they're corrupt like extorting prostitutes and gangs or anything, they just think that as a cop they're untouchable, plus most of my city's problems are just druggies and pot smoking kids, so most of the time they are going around intimidating teens instead of actually helping people
#59 to #42 - admiralen
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
that is helping though, people think cops are useless, but think how many crimes people dont commit cause theyre afraid of the law and cops, they work to prevent crime from happening
#238 to #59 - chuca
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
maybe some, but around here most really don't care about people, and yea some of it is cause people always hating on them but most is that's how they're trained to act and it becomes how they respond immediately

for example me and my friend( i believe we were around 16 at the time) were walking down the street when a cop pulled over and asked us our names, so my friend asks, like not rudely or anything why they needed our names and he says, word for word "you're gonna tell me your names or i'm gonna kick the **** both your asses" and to alot of people this seems like bs but this is how most cops act around here whether you're polite or not

also it turned out the reason he even wanted our names was they were looking for some kid in the area, though they didn't even have a description to go off
#241 to #238 - admiralen
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
thats one asshole though
#249 to #241 - chuca
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
yea, but i've had experience with cops, admittedly sometimes where i was in trouble, and this is how most of them are

another time my grandmother was walking her dog and she was just coming back, we live in a apartment and another lady was bringing her pitbull out, now this was one of the stereotypical super aggressive attack pitbulls that the people probably beat, anyway it ends up attacking my grandmother's dog, lady couldnt get a hold of it and my grandmother ran into the hallway and the pitbull chased them in
this happened over about 10,15 mins so by that time the cops had been called and a cruiser showed up, my grandpa was outside by this time too and when he saw the cop started yelling at him that the pitbull was attacking my grandmother and her dog in the hallway, which you could hear anyways, and instead of going and making sure the dog didn't kill anybody, he started yelling back at my grandpa and tried to arrest him for yelling at him

eventually the lady got a hold of her dog again and got it back into her house, after which the cop left

i have meet nice cops, but honestly in my city there are only two i know of that don't act like assholes off the bat
#278 to #249 - admiralen
Reply 0
(05/20/2013) [-]
thats one unefficient police station, you should do it like we do in sweden and make it hard to be a cop so only decent cops can be ones, then it will be better status to be one since you wont be a donutmunching fat guy no one respects
#43 to #29 - azraelthemage
Reply +1
(05/20/2013) [-]
It all depends on where you live really. Small town cops tend to take things too far (I once saw three cop cars pull over one freaking minivan) and are action hungry at times. Though cops in large cities do tend to take they're job seriously. I'm not saying all cops in large cities are like that, for there's always someone in it for the paycheck. However, location/crimerate does effect their attitude.
#45 to #43 - chuca
Reply +1
(05/20/2013) [-]
definitely, in my city most of the problems we have are druggies and teens, so most cops treat you like one or the other right off the bat, and then wonder why they get a reputation for being pricks
#15 - ghostlytaco **User deleted account**
+4
has deleted their comment [-]