Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#13 - tyl (05/19/2013) [-]
Man wants to kill it, "despicable psychopath". Woman wants to kill it, "it's the compassionate thing to do". Gender equality is a myth. I will take my punishment now, as speakers of truth often do.
User avatar #105 to #13 - TheFreak (05/19/2013) [-]
What woman ever got away with justifying abortion as "the compassionate thing to do?" I mean, unless the kid had some confirmed birth defects, how the hell does that fly?
#121 to #105 - tyl (05/19/2013) [-]
They justify it any way they want.
User avatar #122 to #121 - TheFreak (05/20/2013) [-]
No they don't. Who do you think the anti-abortion people are yelling at? It's the WOMEN getting ABORTIONS. There are entire organizations devoted to giving women **** for getting abortions.
#73 to #13 - John Cena (05/19/2013) [-]
why are u everywhere i go, i always see tyl.

im gonna start pointing out every time i see you
User avatar #15 to #13 - monkee (05/19/2013) [-]
Gender equality is not perfect, but when you think of all the additional resources a woman must put into pregnancy then she has the right to make the decision. If the father wanted the child, and if there was some way to remove the fetus and implant it into the father, then sure, that is the fairest way. Come up with the technology instead of bitching about it. DO something.
#41 to #15 - John Cena (05/19/2013) [-]
and this is why the law needs a legal version of male abortion, the whole "you want it, i don't, it's completely your problem."
#34 to #15 - John Cena (05/19/2013) [-]
dude gender equality is almost nonexistent women do different things than men men have more upper body strength women have more lower body strength a normal man can almost always beat an athlete woman in hand wrestling and strength games
#21 to #15 - John Cena (05/19/2013) [-]
50/50 reason they would be in that situation...if the guy wants it (unless for medical reasons) it should continue..

should be some sort of paper which could be signed during pregnancy which defines if the pregnancy goes ahead (one side gives 100% rights to that child) at least that way the people who want to bail can do so without aimlessly killing their child (would also stop baby trapping)
User avatar #31 to #21 - violentpixi (05/19/2013) [-]
When it comes to pregnancy there is no such thing as gender equality. Think about it.
#103 to #31 - John Cena (05/19/2013) [-]
the kid is a 50/50 split, why should the man be given possible lifelong "what if" because a woman can't deal with the consequences of her action...

if a woman wants the child and the man doesn't he would be forced to pay

User avatar #118 to #103 - violentpixi (05/19/2013) [-]
Their action, surely, if he was the one putting his semen in her.
#16 to #15 - tyl (05/19/2013) [-]
I didn't think this one all the way through. Pardon me while I go invent male pregnancy.
 Friends (0)