title. .. World of warcraft


Anonymous comments allowed.
#82 - wakster (05/12/2013) [-]
User avatar #131 to #82 - halor (05/12/2013) [-]
but can it count to 3?
User avatar #177 to #131 - halor (07/30/2013) [-]
**halor rolls 32**
#139 to #82 - obese has deleted their comment [-]
#32 - swedishassassin (05/12/2013) [-]
Aliens: Colonial Marines.

'Nuff Said.
#118 - oborawatabinost (05/12/2013) [-]
This image has expired
User avatar #150 to #118 - playercz (05/12/2013) [-]
what game ?!
User avatar #154 to #150 - WolfPrince (05/12/2013) [-]
Jurassic park, Trespasser.
User avatar #164 to #154 - playercz (05/12/2013) [-]
lol, thanks :D
User avatar #166 to #164 - WolfPrince (05/12/2013) [-]
All in a days work.
#151 to #150 - tacosmells (05/12/2013) [-]
jurassic park.. im not sure which one though
User avatar #123 to #118 - realduck (05/12/2013) [-]
Thought I was in **** for the last hour. like yanking on a lawnmower cord over here with this content. finally got there. thanks buddy. also I'm a duck
#155 to #123 - awesomeduck (05/12/2013) [-]
and I duck also...?
User avatar #2 - vornic (05/11/2013) [-]
World of warcraft
User avatar #148 to #2 - triforcefox (05/12/2013) [-]
I don't care about your comment; I just like your profile picture.
#159 to #148 - vornic (05/12/2013) [-]
A deadpool fan... You know what this means :D
User avatar #3 to #2 - arthurdetoo (05/11/2013) [-]
If you are referring to their cinematic and complaining how the game looks in game.
you are an idiot.

if that is not the case, please elaborate XD
User avatar #146 to #3 - uzzwick (05/12/2013) [-]
pls no XD face here
we dont like them
#176 to #146 - anon (05/15/2013) [-]
User avatar #115 to #3 - vornic (05/12/2013) [-]
oh i'm not complaining. In fact i'm complimenting there cinematic in a way, it has to be the best cinematic I've ever seen in my lifetime. Although i'm not really a huge wow fan, i can still respect the game and how long its been famous.
Even though its a bit overrated
#10 to #3 - anon (05/11/2013) [-]

Shut the **** up you faggot.
#50 to #3 - anon (05/12/2013) [-]
User avatar #6 to #2 - breaken (05/11/2013) [-]
WoW came out in 2004
User avatar #7 to #2 - destaice (05/11/2013) [-]
An extremely large MMO that came out 9 years ago?
User avatar #12 to #7 - iamnotgoodwithname (05/11/2013) [-]
7 but close enough
#14 to #12 - jinkazama (05/11/2013) [-]
Umm. No. 9 is right.
User avatar #15 to #14 - iamnotgoodwithname (05/11/2013) [-]
pretty sure its 7 years since it had its 7 year anniversary a few months back
#16 to #15 - jinkazama (05/11/2013) [-]
Came out in 2004.
User avatar #18 to #16 - iamnotgoodwithname (05/11/2013) [-]
so im stupid and just did some math..turns out they had their 8th anniversary in 2011 no 7th
#25 to #18 - anon (05/11/2013) [-]
Everyone makes mistakes. At least you admit it.
#21 to #18 - anon (05/11/2013) [-]
Your name should should be iamnotgoodatmath
#97 - jotsn (05/12/2013) [-]
User avatar #4 - RevengeNL (05/11/2013) [-]
I had this feeling with bioshock infinite, it looked way more open world than it actually was
#138 to #4 - anon (05/12/2013) [-]
still a good ass game though
User avatar #8 to #4 - Willhelm (05/11/2013) [-]
>open world
pick one
User avatar #27 to #4 - whitenail (05/11/2013) [-]
Well while it may not have been Skyrim it certainly wasn't a linear corridor. Sure you were guided from stage to stage for the sake of the story, but there was a lot of wiggle room and a lot you could miss if you sped straight on through to the end.
#20 to #4 - angelusprimus (05/11/2013) [-]
Bioshock is tight story driven game, that works on careful implementation of timed events.
You can't make it open world without changing the very reason why it works so well.
User avatar #26 to #4 - lordmoldywart (05/11/2013) [-]
But at least the graphics didn't disappoint
#45 to #26 - jthwdragon has deleted their comment [-]
#66 to #45 - srapture (05/12/2013) [-]
No one cares about your pedantry.
No one cares about your pedantry.
User avatar #63 to #45 - lordmoldywart (05/12/2013) [-]
Whatever either term means, you know what I meant, and sorry but what you said is something that really pisses me off as well
#11 - himyouknowwho (05/11/2013) [-]
i am pretty sure there are a few that don't lie about their in-game footage
User avatar #73 to #11 - aloveableterrorist (05/12/2013) [-]
I apologize for my ignorance but could you please enlighten me as to the origin of this photograph?
User avatar #102 to #73 - zhaffy (05/12/2013) [-]
Crysis 3
User avatar #162 to #73 - himyouknowwho (05/12/2013) [-]
some modded level where someone from the modding and development website "crydev.com" have successfully extracted the character Psycho from the game "Crysis 3"

Dat character shading!
User avatar #103 to #73 - skunkmilk (05/12/2013) [-]
Crisis 3
User avatar #71 to #11 - rockamekishiko (05/12/2013) [-]
User avatar #163 to #71 - himyouknowwho (05/12/2013) [-]
them too!
they have some pretty neat graphics, despite it runs on PS3
User avatar #84 to #11 - hektoroftroy (05/12/2013) [-]
#100 - theroflcer (05/12/2013) [-]
I think the biggest insult was the Sonic 06 Trailer and in-game footage presented at E3.

A lot of people defend the game buy saying it was rushed a year earlier then intended and thus, not a finished product.

If you watch the beta footage, it's more finished then the end result.
User avatar #112 to #111 - theroflcer (05/12/2013) [-]
and the*
that was presented*
by* saying

Happy now?
User avatar #145 to #100 - ivoryhammer (05/12/2013) [-]
Same with Superman 64, seriously look at the beta footage and then the release version.
User avatar #101 to #100 - rhiaanor (05/12/2013) [-]
sounds like colonial marines to me

did they ever come to a conclusion on the "investigation" into that?
User avatar #106 to #101 - theroflcer (05/12/2013) [-]
Just got back from the 'AngryJoeShow' review of the game.

Least the Multiplayer was pretty decent.
#114 to #100 - viewtifulbro (05/12/2013) [-]
The boss battles in that game were horrendous
User avatar #153 to #114 - mdluffy (05/12/2013) [-]
User avatar #156 to #153 - seratyo ONLINE (05/12/2013) [-]
#72 - superbigfupa (05/12/2013) [-]
my paint skills are off the charts
User avatar #88 to #72 - dildobarbarian (05/12/2013) [-]
That should be fixed to:

"New call of duty trailer and Cod fanbase expectations"

"Actual Game on release"
User avatar #107 to #88 - tomorrowsnightmare (05/12/2013) [-]
People still eat that **** up (no pun intended)
User avatar #104 - redeadhunter (05/12/2013) [-]
I don't really care that much about graphics. As long as it doesn't hurt my eyes and I can tell what's going on, I can enjoy/immerse myself just fine. What ***** with me is when cutscenes have the player character pull off badass acrobatic ninja **** or OHKO superpowers in that aren't even remotely possible in the actual gameplay.
#133 - sweetsolitude (05/12/2013) [-]
After graphics mods
(if 1) you're skilled or 2) there's a good modding community and 3) the game can be modded)
User avatar #136 to #133 - darthblam (05/12/2013) [-]
And 4, if your PC can even handle it.
User avatar #144 to #136 - ivoryhammer (05/12/2013) [-]
There are some mods that help computer performance in games.
#157 to #144 - anon (05/12/2013) [-]
its not gonna help you if you need a quad core and you have a duo one
User avatar #160 to #157 - ivoryhammer (05/12/2013) [-]
Yeah I suppose not, glad I never ran into that problem because I have a quad core
User avatar #137 to #136 - sweetsolitude (05/12/2013) [-]
True. Although I think cheap new computers nowadays can at least handle a texture mod, and there are performance enhancing mods.
#68 - oregmes (05/12/2013) [-]
luigi's ******* mansion beta
User avatar #13 - ohhahafunny (05/11/2013) [-]
I believe that they use in game footage from a PC, not a console, which upsets me.
User avatar #5 - maidenmk ONLINE (05/11/2013) [-]
its referred to as a 'vertical slice'. they make a small portion of the game to completion for presentation purposes to get investors on board. then they 'try' and make the game to that standard. Aliens colonial marines development and beta previews are a good example.
User avatar #17 to #5 - sulaco (05/11/2013) [-]
#119 to #5 - anon (05/12/2013) [-]
You got that from the recent IGN video, didn't you?
User avatar #130 to #119 - maidenmk ONLINE (05/12/2013) [-]
yeah, id never given it any thought before they talked about it. and now I am more sceptical about every game ad or preview i see.
#22 - OHNOitsNICHOLAS (05/11/2013) [-]
User avatar #117 to #22 - rhetoricalfunny (05/12/2013) [-]
I don't think there is a single game I have ever played that I would like more on a PC
no not even Skyrim
User avatar #134 to #117 - lolme (05/12/2013) [-]
Must be horrible seeing 120 pictures per second (I own a 120hz monitor. Before you try to say some ******** like "My TV has 240hz", your console only displays 30fps, so that doesn't matter.) crystal clear with much smoother and up-to-date graphics and using a mouse that's much more precise than a controller. The only thing I'm willing to play on a console are car games, but I prefer using a controller for the PC just because it's a smoother experience.
User avatar #142 to #134 - rhetoricalfunny (05/12/2013) [-]
It must be horrible. I have never found a single thing to complain about when playing my Playstation. Not a single thing. Not one.

I've played a PC on a few occasions, one of those high end desktop pieces of **** . I have played the same games I have on playstation. Battlefield 3, Crysis, Oblivion. Not one have I preferred. Not a single thing about the PC did I like more.

In fact the only thing I noticed is that it turns gamers into such whiny bitches.
"Must be horrible seeing 120 pictures per second" Yea, soooo horrible.
User avatar #158 to #142 - lolme (05/12/2013) [-]
Hah, you stating that you did not prefer a single thing just proves that you're a hardcore stupid fanboy.
Your console is a retarded PC with old hardware and yet you claim that you didn't prefer anything on a none retarded PC with up-to-date hardware. Silly human.
User avatar #168 to #158 - rhetoricalfunny (05/12/2013) [-]
"just proves that you're a hardcore stupid fanboy. "

Or that I just ******* prefer consoles. They provide me with an overall better experience. Why is it elitist PC retards don't understand this
User avatar #169 to #168 - lolme (05/13/2013) [-]
Because what you have is a PC without an OPERATING system running OLD hardware and you can get the SAME experience with HIGHER framerates, SMOOTHER gameplay, BETTER graphics, HIGHER resolution and with the SAME controller on a PC. You really aren't this dumb? Jeez.
User avatar #170 to #169 - rhetoricalfunny (05/13/2013) [-]
Then it becomes more ******* time, effort, and money than it is worth.

I am chilling here, a controller in hand (Which feels MUCH better than a mouse and keyboard every will.)

I'm the dumb one when you clearly don't understand what an opinion is?

Seriously, you ******* elitist PC ******* are the most retarded assholes in the world.


There's not a damn thing on PC I prefer over consoles. What I have with consoles, is a more comfortable area, a smaller profile, something I can transport between homes with ease, more comfortable controls.
Also, high framerates, smooth gameplay, nice graphics, and high resolution.
As well as a streamlined interface that lets me not worry about **** like files and retarded ways of launching the ******* game.

Consoles are what I prefer, there is not a single thing on PC I prefer. And no amount of capslocking from some retard over the internet will change that.
User avatar #171 to #170 - lolme (05/13/2013) [-]
"High framerates" No. "Smooth gameplay" Not always the case either. "Nice graphics" Get your head out of your ass, you must be trolling. "High resolution" YOU MUST BE trollING. The resolution your console outputs is about to become normal, IF YOU INCREASE IT WITH FOUR. The resolution your console outputs was phased out by most TV producers around 4-5 years ago.

I hope you're writing this from your Xbox since you hate the PC's so much and since you don't prefer anything on the PC over the Xbox.

You can also easily transport a laptop around. Even easier than transpoting a console.

Have a nice day you ignorant trash of a subhuman, haha.
User avatar #172 to #171 - rhetoricalfunny (05/13/2013) [-]
Subhuman? Because I don't have the same opinion as you? Wow. You really are an Adolf Hitler huh.

Everything I said is subjective. Every example s PC user provides as evidence for their god console, is subjective. It is opinion based. You are such a ******* retard. You're calling me a fanboy yet here you are losing your **** because someone doesn't like a PC the tiniest bit. I can just here you.
"Mom, rhetoricalfunny doesn't like PC's"
Jesus ******* christ, you need a goddamn life. I am content with my console. It is perfectly capable of exceeding its role as an entertainment system.

Half the **** you're writing isn't even intelligible. Can you speak english, cause you sure as **** can't write it. Did you know you can type without capslock?
User avatar #173 to #172 - lolme (05/13/2013) [-]
Hahaha, make sure you don't rip your hair out now you ignorant fool of a human.
User avatar #174 to #173 - rhetoricalfunny (05/13/2013) [-]
Unlike you, I have a life. The words of someone on the internet means nothing.
User avatar #175 to #174 - lolme (05/13/2013) [-]
Hahaha, okay.
#124 to #117 - anon (05/12/2013) [-]
You must be retarded.
User avatar #127 to #124 - garymotherfingoak (05/12/2013) [-]
although i somewhat agree, what makes you think checking the "post as anonymous" gives you more bragging rights and respect?
User avatar #110 to #22 - princeofbrokensoul (05/12/2013) [-]
at least xbox gets games you dont
#96 to #22 - comicsguy (05/12/2013) [-]
B-but consoles has pretty exclusives
#121 to #96 - anon (05/12/2013) [-]
>Xbox emulator
>PS3 emulator
>Wii emulator.
your argument is invalid,
User avatar #126 to #121 - garymotherfingoak (05/12/2013) [-]
>implying every PC can run them at 60 fps flawlessly

plus each emulator is severely limited compared to the console

plus there's no PS3 emulator
#167 to #149 - OHNOitsNICHOLAS (05/12/2013) [-]
**** your multiple platforms
this isn't hoarders
I've got emulators, no need to take up more shelf space
User avatar #77 - guiguito (05/12/2013) [-]
tfw you never complain because you get everything for free
#147 - notevenow (05/12/2013) [-]
Dead. ******* . Island.
#69 - pilotdudeman (05/12/2013) [-]
Thats mostly because the snapshots are tested on computers with atleast 2-4 GB of video memory and have a cpu thats atleast 4-8 cores and runs the games at maximum texture load effortlessly.
Meanwhile, these games are mostly run on consoles that are litterlyaround 1/5 the power of these Jesus-Powered PCs. Fapbox 3Sexty has only 256MB Video ram while Jesus-windows PC has 4GB

< Pic related, it's a shot og GTA4 on my PC, and the quality is crap
#95 to #69 - anon (05/12/2013) [-]
While video memory and core count are easy to quantify, they are not great indicators of performance. Anything over 2gb gddr5 is overkill(for now) unless you're modding or using high res multi-monitor setups. Higher cpu count doesn't mean more performance anymore than cutting a pizza into more slices means a bigger pizza. You go for whatever core count the game is optimized for. Only mentioning this because the next gen consoles are going to have high video memory and cpu count. However, they are still going to be significantly lower end than their predecessors were in their time.
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)