Fuck facebook. For all those who think that Mark is a hero... Hill PM HIE, ill I ENE Til! FINITE ] I' ll EH. You guys are aware that the reason the US government doesn't want certain info released isn't to keep it from the public, but to keep it out of the hands of ter
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Fuck facebook

For all those who think that Mark is a hero..

Comments(161):

[ 161 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
Anonymous commenting is allowed
User avatar #6 - luidias (05/11/2013) [+] (12 replies)
You guys are aware that the reason the US government doesn't want certain info released isn't to keep it from the public, but to keep it out of the hands of terrorists and countries like North Korea, right...?


mind you, zuckerberg is still a massive dickmonger for selling out all our info.
#11 - drewbridge (05/11/2013) [+] (5 replies)
"I got arrested for hacking into the government and exposing classified information that could endanger lives? This is ******** !"

And yes, Zuckerberg is selling our web addresses for money so I can get more Toyota Sonata ads. I have never been more offended in my life.
#17 - trolololer (05/11/2013) [+] (5 replies)
Can we just stop for a second and admire how Julian Assange is so much similar to Barney Stintson?
#31 - teamrocketninja (05/11/2013) [+] (1 reply)
He gives out information. That I willingly post. On his website. To save companies the time of simply doing it themselves.
#37 - archiehicox (05/11/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Neil Patrick Harris looks terrible.
#53 - anonymous (05/11/2013) [+] (2 replies)
"hurr durr but Julian Assange released info that worsened relations"

You mean that info that showed us the U.S bombing and killing 11 children, and attacking the nurses who tried to treat said children.

Maybe they shouldn't have done that in the first place. I'd prefer to be aware of the things my government is doing rather than having them swept under the rug.

I will still never understand how people can have so much animosity toward him for releasing that video and not giving a damn about the men responsible for those deaths.
#78 - andyshandy (05/11/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Ah yes, alongside such great company as Stalin and Hitler.

Man Of The Year just means they were the most prominent figure that year, it doesn't say whether or not they were good or bad.
User avatar #64 - Crusader (05/11/2013) [+] (7 replies)
Because Zuckerberg does it legally.
The terms of agreement say that Facebook owns any information, videos, or pictures you post there.
That is why Facebook is free, it looks like it has no product, you are the product, you are what facebook is selling in order to stay functioning.
Don't act like it was some big secret, if you read the fine print and thought about it, you would have known this as soon as you made a facebook account.
User avatar #42 - reginleif (05/11/2013) [+] (7 replies)
It's pretty ****** up that the Swedes and the English are so caught up in their nationalist pride that they don't see the problem with their abusive governments making an obvious overreach in putting Assange in jail.

First off, who spends that much money trying to put a rapist in jail? Millions of dollars a day in just surveillance? The UK must really invest a lot of money in keeping itself rape free right? ^.-


Secondly, the Swedish laws that Assange is being charged under are ******* jokes...

Sex without a condom is considered rape?
Sleeping sex with someone that you have had consensual sex with multiple times in the past, is rape?

Also their laws conveniently keep them from questioning him at the embassy, for some reason he HAS to be on Swedish soil.

And if that wasn't enough, they won't even promise to not extradite him.

-sigh- Don't get me wrong, there is plenty wrong with the American justice system (hot cofee anyone?) but that's the thing...most Americans are willing to admit the ******** aspects of our CJS. People from England and Sweden (add Italy if you want to include the really corrupt Amanda Knox case), have proven that they can't or won't.
#130 - I Am Monkey (05/11/2013) [+] (4 replies)
"Private information" being things you willing posted to hundreds of people, many of which are strangers.

Don't get me wrong, Zuckerberg is somewhat of a douche, but if you think that's the same thing as stealing secret information from the government and expecting no consequences you probably have the downs.

Also, facebook is a service that almost everyone enjoys free of charge. They have to make money somehow and they don't rape you with ads like youtube. Should they make their consent more explicit before selling said information? Absolutely. But if some advertiser knowing I own a dog is the price of enjoying the worlds largest social network I would gladly pay it.
User avatar #86 - TarnRazor (05/11/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Julian Assange shouldn't be leaking critical information about a government that could lead to great danger to the United States.

Also, Zuckerberg's terms and conditions warn you about these things. You're pretty much agreeing for your information to be sold when you make a Facebook account.
#5 - gameshredder (05/11/2013) [+] (1 reply)
User avatar #44 - Sethorein (05/11/2013) [+] (34 replies)
Corporations? They were military secrets + political minutes.

I'm all for transparency of government, but a whole lot of what he released just worsened public relations and international relations.

Not to mention he used illegal methods to obtain the info, though I guess you can't really pursue legal means to get the info out there...
#12 - anonymous (05/11/2013) [-]
Mark Zuckerberg is such a tool.
#120 - porchmonkeywarrior (05/11/2013) [-]
Hey, that guy was sucking his own dick!
User avatar #109 - brettyoke (05/11/2013) [-]
>Puts private information on a FACEBOOK profile
>Pissed when other people see it
#98 - anonymous (05/11/2013) [-]
Lol, you children actually believe anything on the internet can be private.
User avatar #43 - happygrowman (05/11/2013) [+] (5 replies)
just looking at zuckerbergs weak, genetically deformed and stereotypically named self makes me so hateful...
User avatar #45 to #43 - Sethorein (05/11/2013) [-]
dude... he's a genius... Who cares if the 2% of genes required for outward appearance got ****** over for that. He managed to make billions at 20. As ****** as his business is, gotta tip your hat to that while you plot his downfall...
User avatar #9 - TehGirman (05/11/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Times Person of the year or whatever has nothing to do with morality, it has to do with influence and notability. Hitler was chosen once, because, even though he was a genocidal ******* , he got to power because he was charismatic and influential. Assange is a villain because he released information better kept quiet without even using a single brain cell to think of the consequences. He's an amoral dick and a coward as well, and what you fail to realize is that he stole the information, whereas on Facebook, you agreed to give it away, and it only uses the information you upload, which is visible to anyone who looks at your profile.

If you can't find the time to read that, the gist of it is that Assange is an ******* and OP doesn't know how anything works at all.
User avatar #33 to #9 - toughactintinactin (05/11/2013) [-]
Hitler was Time man of the year in 1938 just before showing his true colors to the rest of the world. Stalin was also man of the year in 1939 and 1942. It really is a popularity contest sometimes.
[ 161 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)