Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#10 - KayRed
Reply +62
(05/10/2013) [-]
That article is ********. The writer says that the actor doesn't matter, all marvel movies need are the special affects "the hulk movies prove'. I really hope he is being sarcastic, if not, he's an idiot. Even with all the special affects, those movies would be **** without those actors portraying. This isn't replacing that asshole Terrance Howard with Don Cheadle; Ruffalo and Evans portray their characters awesomely (and Tom Hiddleston, but it is unlikely he'll be in the next one), and I doubt anyone else can portray them as well.
#198 to #10 - anon
Reply 0
(05/11/2013) [-]
Tom Hiddleston is returning as Loki in the next Thor movie
#150 to #10 - spankcakes
Reply +1
(05/11/2013) [-]
This will be the cast of next avengers movie and it will only cost 5 bucks to make it.
#112 to #10 - anon
Reply 0
(05/11/2013) [-]
I preferred Edward Norton's portrayal of Hulk
#80 to #10 - arborday
Reply -1
(05/11/2013) [-]
so... chris evans is on the level of JGL and ryan gosling? lolwut
#83 to #80 - KayRed
Reply 0
(05/11/2013) [-]
I've only seen Chris Evans as Cpt. America, and I thought he did a fanatastic job, and I never seen a movie with Ryan Gosling, so I would say yeah.
#85 to #83 - arborday
Reply -1
(05/11/2013) [-]
...

That is completely fair.
#36 to #10 - jeudyfeo
Reply +3
(05/11/2013) [-]
Yeah but Iron Man/Tony had pretty much the same amount of screentime as, Captn America, Hulk/Bruce, ect. and Robert Downey Jr. Got paid 50 Million while the rest of the cast got 4 million and below.
He's just saying they deserve more
#12 to #10 - infinitereaper
Reply -9
(05/10/2013) [-]
The old Hulk was better

And yes, special effects let people tell a story they couldn't without them.

Like Avatar. Great movie, great story, but impossible without effects.

Actors are important.
#57 to #12 - condormcninja
Reply +3
(05/11/2013) [-]
You could tell the story without special effects, it's called Dances with Wolves
#52 to #12 - carlfroch
Reply +2
(05/11/2013) [-]
Avatar? you mean Pocahontas 3d?
Avatar? you mean Pocahontas 3d?
#53 to #52 - infinitereaper
Reply 0
(05/11/2013) [-]
You people are all so original.
You people are all so original.
#13 to #12 - daboomee
Reply +15
(05/10/2013) [-]
>Avatar
>Great story

Oh, my sides.
#63 to #13 - vycanismajoris
Reply +2
(05/11/2013) [-]
Just let him ******* have his ******* opinion about a ******* movie, you ******* piece of ****, what ******* harm does it make if he ******* likes something and you don't, you ******* bitch ******. I bet your mom's taste is fashion is questionable at best.
#23 to #13 - infinitereaper
Reply +3
(05/10/2013) [-]
Meh I don't care about the hipster ******** surrounding this movie, it was good, "ripoff" oh ******* please half of the blockbuster hits today can be considered "rippoffs" but its about originality and unique twists.   
   
I liked it. Don't be hate'n
Meh I don't care about the hipster ******** surrounding this movie, it was good, "ripoff" oh ******* please half of the blockbuster hits today can be considered "rippoffs" but its about originality and unique twists.

I liked it. Don't be hate'n
#31 to #23 - deescalation
Reply +1
(05/11/2013) [-]
I don't count "but in space" as a unique twist
#46 to #31 - infinitereaper
Reply +2
(05/11/2013) [-]
Well you people can hate all you want but I liked it and thought it was good. That's enough for me. Thankfully I go through life enjoying a lot of different things. Can't say the same for a lot of other people.
#15 to #13 - Keleth
Reply -1
(05/10/2013) [-]
what was wrong with Avatars story? it set a ******* record for profits. i think a lot of people agree it was a great story
#25 to #15 - BmanX
Reply +3
(05/11/2013) [-]
Because the story was why people went to see Avatar, right?
#24 to #15 - shredmaster
Reply +2
(05/11/2013) [-]
Avatar was shiny Pocahontas, and it didn't deserve to be longer than 90 minutes. I didn't give one singular **** about any of the characters. The main protagonist was the most two-dimensional character I've ever seen. The effects were absolutely gorgeous, the plot itself was nothing special or unique at all.
#16 to #15 - daboomee
Reply +3
(05/10/2013) [-]
You mean other than the fact that it just basically ripped of Dances with wolves, Pocahontas and Ferngully? It's the same story over and over again about how "the white man is evil and wants to take over the natives".
#26 to #16 - infinitereaper
Reply 0
(05/11/2013) [-]
So what movies do you like then?
#69 to #26 - anon
Reply 0
(05/11/2013) [-]
The movies other people like that he hasn't actually seen.