Iron Man 3. Yea, he's that excited. (Ninjashark, wherever you are, this ones for you). 10: 28 PM Movies Top Box Office Sunday, May , This Week: ' A Pain & Gain  iron man robert downey junior SonicTeam
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (268)
[ 268 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
62 comments displayed.
#11 - LonelyCamel
Reply +33
(05/08/2013) [-]
is it worth seeing it in theaters?
#161 to #11 - theskillzthatkillz
Reply -1
(05/08/2013) [-]
I loved it. Most of the people that hate it were fans of the comics so they were expecting something different, but I thought that the movie had a great plot.
#186 to #11 - mikelaboom
Reply -1
(05/08/2013) [-]
**** yes. I saw it in 3d
#38 to #11 - anon
Reply 0
(05/08/2013) [-]
the movie was meant to be under the "comedy" category.
if you go in to the theater expecting that you won't be disappointed.
i felt it was hella lackluster; especially dem plotholes/incredibly flawed transitions.
#56 to #11 - anon
Reply 0
(05/08/2013) [-]
Iron man 1 and 2 sucked, so no, besides, the mandarin is just an actor, not even the real villain, so the whole movie is just him fighting a fake, not the real mandarin. Like, the real mandarin isnt even in the movie til the end, just the fake.

#63 to #11 - thezillis
Reply 0
(05/08/2013) [-]
If you want a fun, silly movie filled to the tits with eye candy, yes.
#87 to #11 - anon
Reply 0
(05/08/2013) [-]
Not if you're a fan of the Mandarin.
#113 to #87 - punnybutsofunny
Reply -5
(05/08/2013) [-]
still he was the best in that movie
#150 to #11 - GShepard
Reply 0
(05/08/2013) [-]
no, let me describe iron man 3...it ******* sucked. i like to call it Iron Man 3: revenge of the fallen because that is what it reminded me of
#248 to #11 - greensoul
Reply 0
(05/08/2013) [-]
yes, more than once.. is awesome, dont even listen to the comicbook fans, expect something on the line of the first 2 movies and you will enjoy it as it is.
#27 to #11 - PlaystationGuy
Reply +1
(05/08/2013) [-]
I think it was the best of the three. I also thought it was funnier too. I liked how it was serious, funny, and had a lot of action. I would say see in the theater because the experience is better. Its cheaper than if you bought the dvd and better quality than if you downloaded.
#111 to #11 - teseus
Reply +2
(05/08/2013) [-]
If you're looking after a movie with a ******** of cliches which completely slaughters the way you've seen Iron Man as a kid, then don't. If you have nice memories about the comics or/and cartoons, by all means, don't watch the movie. I can't stress enough how much it slaughters The Mandarin. They built around him one of the most pathetic and easy to see plot twists I've ever seen.

But if you want a movie with explosions, generic villains with generic superpowers and that has a few good jokes once in a while, it's worth it.
Once again I warn you: don't watch it at all if you have even a basic knowledge about who The Mandarin (Iron Man's arch enemy) was.
#152 to #111 - funnyrage
Reply +3
(05/08/2013) [-]
but now thanks to you i know that mandarin was iron man's arch enemy and i can't watch the show...
#122 to #111 - teseus
Reply 0
(05/08/2013) [-]
If you're looking after a movie with a ******** of cliches which completely slaughters the way you've seen Iron Man as a kid, then yes.*

Sorry, I had something else on my mind I just realized how absurd I sounded
#98 to #11 - swiftykidd **User deleted account**
+3
has deleted their comment [-]
#116 to #98 - punnybutsofunny
Reply -3
(05/08/2013) [-]
still the mandarin was the best in the movie
#118 to #116 - swiftykidd **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#124 to #11 - swiftykidd **User deleted account**
+5
has deleted their comment [-]
#191 to #124 - heathz
Reply -1
(05/08/2013) [-]
true that. imo this movie was awful.
#14 to #11 - TheExile
Reply +6
(05/08/2013) [-]
It was a decent movie. Definitely not as good as the other two, mostly because the ending wasn't so great. Also, I don't think the villain was good. I mean, he was a good actor and all, but the character he played wasn't an impressive villain. But yes, I thought it was worth going to see.
#15 to #14 - thefasrdog
Reply +4
(05/08/2013) [-]
Really? I thought it was the best out of all 3.
#18 to #15 - TheExile
Reply 0
(05/08/2013) [-]
I wouldn't agree with you, but to each his own. As I said, the ending really killed it for me. Also, because of The Avengers, and how they brought all of them together, I guess I kind of expected them to start making small appearances of the other heroes in the movies. No major roles, just maybe mentioning them a bit more, or giving some reason as to why all these other heroes aren't here to prevent a national disaster, etc. Kind of a huge plot hole imo.
#53 to #18 - thefasrdog
Reply +2
(05/08/2013) [-]
They kind of explained why they're not together at the end of the avengers. Also did you stay until after the credits? Also the ending in my opinion was great. I won't spoil it for anyone,but I though they tied it up quite nicely.
#37 to #11 - chonies
Reply +40
(05/08/2013) [-]
#12 to #11 - thefasrdog
Reply +252
(05/08/2013) [-]
hell yes.
#222 to #12 - lordjordn
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#266 to #222 - zelyx
Reply 0
(05/08/2013) [-]
DID HE STUTTER??
#13 - shashashanasha
Reply +80
(05/08/2013) [-]
boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=ironman3.htm
Why do people never use worldwide grosses?
Iron Man already made 710,000,000 dollars, not just 175,000,000
#32 to #13 - andrewjla
Reply -11
(05/08/2013) [-]
it made $175M in the U.S.
#41 to #32 - anon
Reply 0
(05/08/2013) [-]
US = World

At least in the eyes of a 'murican
#42 to #41 - andrewjla
Reply -10
(05/08/2013) [-]
no, just no
#207 to #13 - meganinja
Reply 0
(05/08/2013) [-]
Because these are made in America. Normally polls in America show only how much something is worth in America. As America is usually the largest consumer base, it's nice to know how much was made there.
#6 - nicopwnz
Reply +79
(05/07/2013) [-]
hfw
#86 - thegrohltroll
Reply +52
(05/08/2013) [-]
is he squeezing his nipples? his iron suite nipples ?
#93 to #86 - thechosentroll
Reply +1
(05/08/2013) [-]
Well, atleast we know they're definitely hard as ****.
#183 to #86 - eddiethead
Reply +1
(05/08/2013) [-]
They went with a George Clooney's batman type suit.
#109 to #86 - belster
Reply +2
(05/08/2013) [-]
If it is the suits nipples and the suit is wired up to good ol' Jarvis, then I'm going to assume he is helping Jarvis to get off..
#174 to #86 - VaultTechy
Reply +4
(05/08/2013) [-]
Hahahah "suite" would be pronounced "sweet"
He's squeezing his sweet nipples
#184 to #174 - thegrohltroll
Reply 0
(05/08/2013) [-]
I didn't notice that, ****
#78 - cconseaman
Reply +43
(05/08/2013) [-]
It sucked. They completely made a joke of Iron Man's arch nemesis.
#193 to #78 - rockamekishiko
Reply -2
(05/08/2013) [-]
exactly plus it was full of ******* plot holes everywhere
#81 to #78 - anon
Reply 0
(05/08/2013) [-]
THANK YOU! I thought I was the only one.
#84 to #81 - cconseaman
Reply +15
(05/08/2013) [-]
the directors argument for doing this was that people wouldnt like magic rings. In a universe with time travel, aliens, space travel, gods, and many other mildly absurd but awesome things they drew the line at magic rings.
#238 to #84 - anon
Reply 0
(05/08/2013) [-]
Magic rings sound kinda retarded to me.

Trying to put magical things in a technologically advanced universe? Not my cup of tea, on the face of it.
#283 to #238 - cconseaman
Reply 0
(05/09/2013) [-]
The magic rings come from technology found on a downed alien spacecraft. They really could have just said he found them on one of the alien ships from the avengers, it would have been wrong but still an alteration that the the fans could accept and the public could enjoy.
They ruined one of Marvels biggest badass's.
#117 to #78 - mattimeon
Reply 0
(05/08/2013) [-]
They did, it's kinda how I felt about the Green Lantern movie. But from a cinematic perspective it was amazing, but the target audience should always be the comic readers first then the general public. Alas it is never that way because money talks.
#126 to #117 - kikzs
Reply +2
(05/08/2013) [-]
but why? comic readers already have their comics. us, non-comic readers don't know ****, and maybe, just maybe, they want to recreate what they've already read in the comics in their own way, with their own twists, and have it be completely accepted by a major audience, not have to stick to how somebody else made it first.
#128 to #126 - mattimeon
Reply +1
(05/08/2013) [-]
I get what you're saying and I kind of understand doing that like take Bane for example. They altered him but he was still Bane. The Mandarin was a total badass and was a Villain not what Iron Man 3 did. I love Iron Man 3 and I understand why they did it. It still doesn't stop me from wishing it wasn't the way it is.
#170 to #128 - guymandude
Reply +1
(05/08/2013) [-]
I felt the same way. I still enjoyed the movie and understand the twist (it was pretty funny too), but I would have loved to see the Mandarin really put front and center and given a chance to show how big of an enemy he is in the series.

Because if you went by just the movies, which villain would look like the biggest in the series? Right now, it looks like Mickey Rourke as Whiplash. And that is certainly not the case.
#205 to #170 - mrbuu
Reply +2
(05/08/2013) [-]
they probably took the magic rings away because i think thanos is going to be the enemy of the avengers 2.
#153 to #126 - swiftykidd **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#166 to #78 - guymandude
Reply 0
(05/08/2013) [-]
DON"T READ THIS IF YOU DON'T LIKE SPOILERS

Yeah I couldn't believe that either. I was able to enjoy it past that, since I feel like they at least did it well by implying that the Mandarin as we know him wouldn't exist - he would be in a different form. They show that the Mandarin is supposed to be the other guy by giving him the big chest Dragon Tattoos.

I was unhappy that they left out the power rings though. I mean, if the Avengers hadn't come out, and they were going off of just Iron Man 1&2, then the way they did it would have made a lot of sense. But the Avengers did come out. They didn't need an exact scientific reason for them - they could have just called the power rings "alien generators" or something and people would have said "oh cool whatever let's see something awesome now." But instead they decided to go a route that left out a quintessential part of the character that they easily could have included.

I don't have a problem with leaving out certain character traits in favor of realism when it fits (ex.- Bain's addiction to Venom was left out of Dark Knight Rises), but they didn't have to worry about realism here. The "fake" Mandarin thing didn't even really bother me because I felt like they found an interesting alternate path to take without completely ditching the character. The power rings are what bothered me.

(although in retrospect I would have loved to see Ben Kingsley play a REAL Mandarin, because I feel like that would have been a much more badass spectacle)
#234 to #78 - anon
Reply 0
(05/08/2013) [-]
When i first saw that one scene, i couldn't believe it. i felt like i was watching some sort of blooper or outtake. That being said, i loved the movie and thought it as handled well

except the ending
#120 to #78 - TheNumerator
Reply +2
(05/08/2013) [-]
I thought it was an interesting twist, and I think maybe they meant it for the comic book readers who actually know about the Mandarin. Maybe they wanted to surprise them somehow?
#88 - ekohli
Reply +32
(05/08/2013) [-]
The last 20 minute scene on the ship yard seemed like it was directed by Michael Baysplosion.
#100 to #88 - anon
Reply 0
(05/08/2013) [-]
except michael bays movie is the shipyard all through out.
#125 to #88 - jarofdirt
Reply 0
(05/08/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#197 to #88 - tocho
Reply +1
(05/08/2013) [-]
Igor didnt explode.
#3 - shadowfj
Reply +30
(05/07/2013) [-]
YISS!!!
YISS!!!
#107 - giuetta
+21
has deleted their comment [-]
#1 - sirbrentcoe
Reply +16
(05/07/2013) [-]
rdj's face when
rdj's face when
#148 - BIGSEXYISBACKAGAIN
Reply +14
(05/08/2013) [-]