The QWERTY keyboard. I'm not sure if repost but hopefully most people haven't seen it before, I just thought it was interesting.. the more You know
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (245)
[ 245 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#9 - stubborndrek
Reply +223 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
#212 to #9 - onenuttedchimp
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #210 to #9 - wooyoungkim
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
This is the ************* show that had candlejack in it. I reme
#42 to #9 - turbodoosh
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
**** yes Freakazoid!
**** yes Freakazoid!
User avatar #122 to #42 - lightninghedgehog
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
HULA GIRLS!
User avatar #8 - funnyjunktitan
Reply +155 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
You can also spell typewriter only using the top row
#170 to #8 - olejokle
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
+ the longest word you can type on one row :D
#214 to #8 - onenuttedchimp
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
Or you can spell Hitler by using just the top, middle and bottom row!
Or you can spell Hitler by using just the top, middle and bottom row!
User avatar #227 to #214 - themurrey
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
you don't need the bottom row
#237 to #227 - onenuttedchimp
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
What about Uncle Adolf?
What about Uncle Adolf?
User avatar #245 to #237 - themurrey
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/03/2013) [-]
better
#52 to #8 - anon id: 296efb91
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
QWERTZ begs to differ
#79 to #8 - anon id: da2f4f29
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
typewriter
#103 to #8 - anon id: 99966521
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
yeah, and the longest English word that you can spell only using your left hand is stewardess
User avatar #228 to #8 - imnotkickthecat
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
poop too
User avatar #45 to #8 - ithinkimfunny
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
It's also the longest word possible on the top row
User avatar #182 to #45 - capslockrage
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
No it's not.
rupturewort is longer at 11 letters, and I'm pretty sure there are longer words.
User avatar #198 to #182 - ithinkimfunny
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
Ok you got me with that one, never heard of it
User avatar #40 to #8 - catdownstairz
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
Stewardesses is the longest word you can write on the left side.
#161 to #8 - checkingnsfw
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
MFW when trying it on AZERTY
MFW when i have no face
#19 to #8 - filipnocd
Reply +33 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#156 to #19 - anon id: 68d8e252
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
I knew this would be here.
User avatar #162 to #156 - WheresMyAccount
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
well ******************
#29 - aasherknight
Reply +84 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
#2 - sinery
Reply +52 123456789123345869
(05/01/2013) [-]
Christopher Sholes.   
I have found God.
Christopher Sholes.
I have found God.
#75 to #2 - anon id: 3f4b550b
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
No, I think that would be Tim Berners-lee, inventor of the internet.
User avatar #218 to #2 - rockamekishiko
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
he is only the keyboard god
#4 - anon id: 1189de0a
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/01/2013) [-]
Who doesn't use Colemak or at least Dvorak these days?
#7 to #4 - anon id: 4632e244
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
This is literally one of the most hipster comments I've ever seen...

I just spent an hour reading up on what Colemak and Dvorak are... so thank you for expanding my mind... Then I got side tracked by new types of input devices.

#11 to #7 - anon id: e43d85e5
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
thank god i thought it was just me who immediately researched what they were!
#14 to #4 - anon id: 8c0e52ff
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
I use Dvorak. I did it to get used to it and found out that I like it. The only problem is I use both qwerty and dvorak keyboards and sometimes my mind changes from dvorak layout to qwerty layout in the middle of typing, resulting in unique words. If I had to choose one layout though, it would be dvorak.
User avatar #38 to #4 - Blargosnarf
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
Every single keyboard layout I have ever seen in my entire life, real life, tv, or otherwise.
User avatar #5 to #4 - threadz
Reply +48 123456789123345869
(05/01/2013) [-]
96%+ of computer users.
#123 - konradkurze
Reply +31 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
and that kids, is why Phanact had his hands upgraded to hit every key at once, so he can type like a ************ and comment on everything
and that kids, is why Phanact had his hands upgraded to hit every key at once, so he can type like a ************ and comment on everything
#225 to #123 - anon id: b7e7beb3
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
Must be the reason why I'm king of my castle
User avatar #169 to #123 - phanact
Reply +15 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
My secret has been exposed
#172 to #169 - xodia
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #173 to #172 - phanact
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
cool
#6 - breaken
Reply +29 123456789123345869
(05/01/2013) [-]
#33 - scotlandspie
Reply +22 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
Yes, so it's true then we abandoned the Dvorak layout because people typed too fast, but now that we don't care about paper jams why don't we go back to the dvorak?   
   
Because school systems teach on qwerty   
because teachers grew up with qwerty   
and because we are lazy...
Yes, so it's true then we abandoned the Dvorak layout because people typed too fast, but now that we don't care about paper jams why don't we go back to the dvorak?

Because school systems teach on qwerty
because teachers grew up with qwerty
and because we are lazy...
User avatar #34 to #33 - AnonsForSure
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
learn colemak or die tryin
#58 to #33 - anon id: 0611927d
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
Same goes for why we Americans won't convert to the Metric system.
#124 to #33 - anon id: 3903b9d1
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
teachers don't teach typing. IM-ing teaches typing.
User avatar #176 to #33 - starshroom
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
I heard it's because the QWERTY became widely used before any other layout had the chance to compete or take it over. There are better (as in easier or more convenient) layouts available/possible, but by now the QWERTY are already the standard on virtually all keyboards: computers', touchphones', and typewriters. Though it might be better to standardize a new layout it's a difficult and unlikely process by now when "everyone already uses the QWERTY", UNLESS of course everyone decides they are totally down for it and exchanges their current for the alternate style and/or buys their next typey-thingy with the alternate keyboard layout.

Anyone else heard that? Or any criticism on this theory?
#249 to #33 - anon id: 0aaff943
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2013) [-]
dvorak came after the qwerty. can't go back to something that came after.
#250 to #249 - scotlandspie
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/08/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #47 to #33 - Firenter
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
Unless you live in Belgium or France, then you grew up on AZERTY and you can't play games that don't allow key rebinds :D
User avatar #95 to #47 - cadiuro
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
It really became an instinct to go looking for the 'Change Controls'-screen the first time I start a new game.
User avatar #51 to #33 - failtolawl
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
op was saying that the myth was it was to slowdown typists. but it was actually speeding up typists who ran into paper jams

he didn't say that qwerty is faster, nor slower.
User avatar #247 to #51 - scotlandspie
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/03/2013) [-]
we don't have to worry about paper jams anymore, so wouldn't dvorak be faster now?
User avatar #158 to #51 - henkstr
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
but qwerty IS slower than other layouts.
User avatar #72 to #33 - akkere
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
Because you're more likely to be able to buy a QWERTY keyboard than be able to buy a Dvorak one.

So many people have been shifted to using QWERTY that it'd be difficult to shift back with the way people prefer it.


You could still try to learn it on your own time, but shifting compatibility would take too much effort and too many people ask "What's the point?".

Personally, I don't mind; being able to type faster than everyone else is a good asset to have in the job market.
#23 - arctickoala
Reply +13 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
This is actually a classic example of what's called the "Lock-in" effect in economics. One technology (QWERTY) had a little advantage over its competitors at the time, and that pushed it over the edge into becoming a standard (that happened to carry over to the present). Same thing happened with VHS, except that time the advantage that pushed VHS into becoming the standard was porn.
User avatar #168 to #23 - Fgner
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
However, the QWERTY has so little disadvantage to DVORAK that it's not worth changing.

Everyone knows QWERTY, that's how it is. Our phone keyboards, our laptops, our desktops, everything is set up for QWERTY. Most people who type QWERTY don't have a very high WPM count anyway. So why bother switching billions of devices and doing all this work to change something that will only have a benefit for a very few people.

Also, DVORAK is uncomfortable for a lot of people because of it's "efficient" design - for instance people with big hands. I use micro keyboards because they're more comfortable and they don't take up as much space on my desk/laptop. When I tried DVORAK my hands just weren't comfortable.
User avatar #246 to #168 - arctickoala
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/03/2013) [-]
Exactly. The objectively 'inferior' (in this case just slightly, but the concept is still the same) technology is now the widely-accepted standard, and it's next to impossible to change once it's become the standard, or 'locked-in' technology.
User avatar #3 - theprogramer
Reply -6 123456789123345869
(05/01/2013) [-]
I can't stand how you structure your sentences.
#10 to #3 - dosburritos
Reply +13 123456789123345869
(05/02/2013) [-]
Comment Picture