Imagine. dunno if repost or not. tags are gay
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (76)
[ 76 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#5 - hbombintown
Reply +40 123456789123345869
(04/28/2013) [-]
#42 - bullbrigade
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Meh, it would be a pretty crappy world if there was nothing to die for.
#48 to #42 - anon id: 76ae22d8
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
that is the stupidest thing I've seen said on the internet and I have seen a ton of internet.
why don't you go die for something and leave the world a better place a.k.a. you not in it.
User avatar #54 to #42 - therealtjthemedic
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Boring as **** too.
User avatar #57 to #42 - AdminsGayLover
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Maybe its boring, maybe its not. Isn't it worth a shot?
User avatar #43 to #42 - cadencee
Reply +15 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
As long as others do the dying?
User avatar #50 to #43 - bullbrigade
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
There's a difference between having to die for something and having something to die for. I pity you if there's nothing in this world you would die for.
#24 - hockeynerd
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
To say we would be peaceful is total ********. It is human nature to fight.
User avatar #32 to #24 - mexicoman
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
To say it is total ******** is total ********. Why are you ******** on the virtuous ideal of peace and cooperation? Just to be a nay-sayer? Are you advocating fighting because you just don't think life is worth living unless someone somewhere is getting hurt? It may be that we will always have conflict in the world. But we can objectively tell that as progress rolls along and we learn more, it leads to a safer world. Why argue against this other than to say that protecting the least admirable facets of humanity is some kind of obligation because 'we'z born that way'.
#68 to #32 - hockeynerd
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
If I could live in a peaceful place, hell yes I would. But, since the beginning of mankind, evil has always had a presence. And always will.
User avatar #70 to #68 - mexicoman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Perhaps so, but to see you tout that the message in this content is '********* because there will always be squabble and sorrow is shameful. You just come across as some whiny contrarian who doesn't like the smell of hippies when you throw some flabby argument like that out onto the public square.
User avatar #41 - sparkyoneonetwo
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
All the talk about who should or should be in the comic.


all the talk about how this is impossible to actually happen

all the comments that are here

and no one says anything about the jew that snaps the gun in half with nothing but his hands....

User avatar #38 - stuckatwork
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
I had to throw the song on and read along. Gave me real feels.
#27 - mexicoman
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
I love **** like this
I love **** like this

User avatar #52 - reican
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
don't use the gun on each others, save them for the alien invasion.
User avatar #26 - Cobaltsushi
Reply -7 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
America shouldn't be the ones waving the white flag. Whoever made this **** is ******* ignorant.
#28 to #26 - mexicoman
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
You seem to have a lack of understanding with regard to the United State's involvement with the middle east. Considering all of the collateral damage in lives, the illegal occupations, the opportunistic thuggery under the auspices of peace keeping, I would say that we as Americans are the most obliged to stahp and surrender our actions.
You seem to have a lack of understanding with regard to the United State's involvement with the middle east. Considering all of the collateral damage in lives, the illegal occupations, the opportunistic thuggery under the auspices of peace keeping, I would say that we as Americans are the most obliged to stahp and surrender our actions.
User avatar #31 to #28 - Cobaltsushi
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
What do you think that would accomplish?
User avatar #33 to #31 - mexicoman
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
An America where the people have less blood on their hands, for one. I personally would love to not be ashamed of my military and government.

A world where just maybe arbitrary military action is not tolerable (I would think thats something we should strive for).

A world where muslims do not get to have another good reason to hate us every other day. Leading to less in the line of terrorism.
User avatar #35 to #33 - Cobaltsushi
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Ashamed of the military and government?
I am more ashamed at the citizens of America.
User avatar #36 to #35 - mexicoman
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
The citizens are wrong in many regards, not voting, not taking the time to educate themselves, distracting themselves from the real issues with a superficial culture as they turn a blind eye to so goddamn much.

But they aren't the ones pulling the trigger, or issuing the orders. The perpetrators are human beings, making conscience decisions to do wrong, and the American people nine times out of ten didn't tell them to do it. The general would not say "**** you, that is an illegal order", the president would not say "**** you, the lives of others and the name of America is worth more than that", they all play ball.
User avatar #37 to #36 - Cobaltsushi
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
I believe you should put yourself in the boots of the soldiers out there.
Sure it is easy to say they are ******* baby killers and what not, but they are in knee high in stress and ****. Guerrilla warfare is a very hard thing to combat, so why take chances?
User avatar #39 to #37 - mexicoman
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
I don't think the troops are baby killers, if they weren't the troops it might be me overseas. Some share more of a burden than others, but these aren't Nazi's fighting for a toxic ideology. They are people like you or me who were stripped of their individuality and rebuilt into a collective that they don't get to control. They did this not because they want to cause harm (though some may have), they did it because they were told it was the honorable thing to do, and were afflicted by the other lies meant to take advantage of good intentions. We had a military that fought the real evils of the world, but you and I both know that to say that today reeks of naivete and ignorance.

But there is no excuse for those high on the chain of command, the president, and congress. Their overt role in this makes them clearly not fit to govern anything, and that is why I am ashamed.
User avatar #23 - majortomcomics
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Why is MLK there? He was a religious leader. And Albert Einstein was one of the biggest parts of the Manhattan Project. The artist is a ******* idiot.
#25 to #23 - anon id: b6fdc4fd
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
The artist is Pablo Stanley, he's a featured 9faggot, and he is pretty much stupid. As well as the faggot that uploaded this here.
User avatar #30 to #23 - mexicoman
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Martin Luther King was not your average Jesus pushing preacher, he had an agenda for a better world and was incredibly proactive.

Einstein was the Stephen Hawking of his time. You can rightly say that he was wrong in participating in the Manhattan project, but he worked on it at the time to subvert the 'axis of evil', which was the objectively evil side to WWII.
User avatar #71 to #30 - majortomcomics
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
I never said I disagree with the Manhattan Project.
User avatar #56 to #30 - icefried
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Objectively evil?
No such thing. Morality is subjective and so are the concepts of good and evil.
User avatar #69 to #56 - mexicoman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Some morals are subjective, genocide is not. What the japanese did in Nanking was wrong, Mussolini was a fascist who stifled his own people, Hitlers third reich perpetrated the worst systematic genocide in recent history. These are not fictional character assassinations drummed up to rile up the allies, and they are not moral grey areas. Anyone who tries to say otherwise is an incorrect dick, with shoddy morals. The worst the allies had done to my knowledge, were the Russian labor camps and American internment of the Japanese (which was a means of keeping the japanese under surveillance basically, not a hateful death machine). So in spite of the fact that the allies had dirty hands, it was not even close to equivocating with the wrongs of the axis. Just because your morals differ from mine does not mean that we are on equal footing, and that 'its just too subjective to declare one way or the other'. Sure, the Nazi's saw themselves as justified. They weren't stroking their beards and sipping the blood of their slain victims like sociopathic villains, but that does not pardon them from the title of 'evil', that they earned.
#53 - therealtjthemedic
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
that jew just ******* SNAPPED an AK in half