Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#156 - delivering (04/28/2013) [-]
That statement is not true, and it was never true.

Hundreds of people were born moments after that picture was taken. They are not in it.

#160 to #156 - freebirdkid (04/28/2013) [-]
that's why it says 'living or dead', on your definition of living, babies in the womb are living
User avatar #163 to #160 - jrondeau **User deleted account** (04/28/2013) [-]
The atoms that make up the people that have not yet existed are contained in this picture, therefore the person is, in some sense, contained in the picture.
#164 to #163 - freebirdkid (04/28/2013) [-]
that's what I was saying... based on delivering's definition of living, the baby in the womb is living or maybe he see's it as not living, then he would have a vaild point...
User avatar #168 to #164 - jrondeau **User deleted account** (04/28/2013) [-]
My fault, I thought you meant only babies that are currently residing within someone.

I was talking about even those people whose sex cells have not been formed yet, e.g. the grandchildren of the most current generation.
User avatar #157 to #156 - helgrind (04/28/2013) [-]
But the atoms that they are composed of are contained within the frame. Michael Collins isn't.
User avatar #159 to #157 - darthsanti (04/28/2013) [-]
That is true. But what about that rich people that pay for throw their own ashes to space?
#162 to #159 - marchinghurdler (04/28/2013) [-]
Unless they are much more rich than I'm thinking, or there is a bigger project behind it all, it's quite unlikely that the ashes escaped the orbit of the Earth. If that's the case, it's likely their ashes are in low orbit, within the frame of the photograph.
 Friends (0)