Derailed thread (the oppsite version). In b4 "that escalated quickly"... No matter how many times I see this, I will never stop reading the whole thing while yelling. Derailed thread (the oppsite version) In b4 "that escalated quickly" No matter how many times I see this will never stop reading the whole thing while yelling
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (72)
[ 72 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
31 comments displayed.
#2 - mynameisnightwolf
Reply +22
(04/26/2013) [-]
No matter how many times I see this, I will never stop reading the whole thing while yelling.
#4 to #2 - quesocnkane
Reply +3
(04/26/2013) [-]
I wish i coud memorize it, then whip it out at parties and just school a *****.
#25 - schmuxy
Reply +12
(04/26/2013) [-]
that fact talks about the radiation...
#34 to #25 - derpmageddon
Reply -1
(04/26/2013) [-]
How can you destroy 100% of the land mass of the world, several times over, with radiation?
#36 to #34 - schmuxy
Reply +8
(04/26/2013) [-]
with that much radiation?

Almost certainly.

You're forgetting, for example that one nuclear reactor meltdown ****** up half of europe.
#38 to #36 - derpmageddon
Reply -5
(04/26/2013) [-]
I agree that it would kill living things, possibly all of them many times over. However, my point, and the point of the post, was that it was claimed that the land mass of earth would be destroyed. Radiation does not destroy rock and water.
#39 to #38 - schmuxy
Reply +5
(04/26/2013) [-]
Stop being a pedant for the sake of it.
#58 to #38 - ctenop
Reply +1
(04/26/2013) [-]
What you are doing is the definition of a faggot. Stop being a faggot, you faggot.
#7 - funnyjunkforlife
-6
has deleted their comment [-]
#8 to #7 - psi
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#19 to #7 - funnyjunkforlife
Reply 0
(04/26/2013) [-]
how i feel..
#24 to #19 - anon
Reply 0
(04/26/2013) [-]
This would be funny if you didn't delete your comment, faggot
#26 to #24 - funnyjunkforlife
Reply 0
(04/26/2013) [-]
#31 to #7 - posttwo
Reply 0
(04/26/2013) [-]
bad boy deleted his comment
#32 to #31 - funnyjunkforlife
Reply -2
(04/26/2013) [-]
how r u doing this...
#33 to #32 - posttwo
Reply 0
(04/26/2013) [-]
I'm posttwo.
That's how
#22 - anon
Reply 0
(04/26/2013) [-]
Chinese don't occupy 100% of the land tho ?
#23 to #22 - dunkleosteus
Reply +7
(04/26/2013) [-]
The quoted text says "enough to take out 100% of the land mass"
#17 - spectralbanshee
Reply +6
(04/26/2013) [-]
ha! Glorious.
#55 - gimlithedwarf
Reply -1
(04/26/2013) [-]
His logic is flawed ,it would be right if all the people of china lived over all territory equally (yeah I know i don't make much sense ,not exactly sure how to say).The truth is that most of the people in China live on the far east of the country,if I remember well around 90% people live in that part,so the bombs would probably get at least 50% of the people if they used them right.
#60 to #55 - meowthenin
Reply 0
(04/26/2013) [-]
Right. Not to mention, if they overlap the fallout areas it'd take even LESS to destroy the population. That's why nukes are so feared. It vaporizes the close surroundings, it destroys within a few miles, and kills all life for tens of miles with the fallout.
#62 to #55 - quantumlegend ONLINE
Reply +1
(04/26/2013) [-]
"The quoted text says 'enough to take out 100% of the land mass'"
#53 - recoveryone
Reply +1
(04/26/2013) [-]
He makes a good point, but that doesn't mean the US couldn't just drop a bunch of ******* nukes, and let radiation make China uninhabitable.
#64 to #53 - meowthenin
Reply 0
(04/26/2013) [-]
Yeah, the fallout is worse than when they used to salt the Earth when conquering.

Also, is your name a RvB reference? If so, you make me giddy.
#72 to #64 - recoveryone
Reply +1
(04/26/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#45 - occamsrazor
Reply +1
(04/26/2013) [-]
Wow I didn't know we had that few nukes, really makes ya think...
#50 to #45 - dashgamer
Reply -1
(04/26/2013) [-]
I see what you did there, and you did it like a boss.
I see what you did there, and you did it like a boss.
#35 - salts
Reply +1
(04/26/2013) [-]
90% of population...not area...china's population is not anywhere near evenly distributed ..not saying hes right ..but think things through before you post
#61 to #35 - quantumlegend ONLINE
Reply 0
(04/26/2013) [-]
"The quoted text says 'enough to take out 100% of the land mass'"
#75 to #61 - salts
Reply 0
(04/27/2013) [-]
ah that part went by me
#3 - dashandsmash
Reply +1
(04/26/2013) [-]
Comment Picture