Derailed thread (the oppsite version). In b4 "that escalated quickly"... No matter how many times I see this, I will never stop reading the whole thing while yelling.
Click to expand


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#2 - mynameisnightwolf (04/26/2013) [+] (1 reply)
No matter how many times I see this, I will never stop reading the whole thing while yelling.
User avatar #25 - schmuxy (04/26/2013) [+] (5 replies)
that fact talks about the radiation...
#7 - funnyjunkforlife has deleted their comment [+] (28 replies)
#8 to #7 - psi has deleted their comment [-]
#22 - anonymous (04/26/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Chinese don't occupy 100% of the land tho ?
User avatar #23 to #22 - dunkleosteus (04/26/2013) [-]
The quoted text says "enough to take out 100% of the land mass"
#17 - spectralbanshee (04/26/2013) [-]
ha! Glorious.
User avatar #55 - gimlithedwarf (04/26/2013) [+] (2 replies)
His logic is flawed ,it would be right if all the people of china lived over all territory equally (yeah I know i don't make much sense ,not exactly sure how to say).The truth is that most of the people in China live on the far east of the country,if I remember well around 90% people live in that part,so the bombs would probably get at least 50% of the people if they used them right.
User avatar #62 to #55 - quantumlegend ONLINE (04/26/2013) [-]
"The quoted text says 'enough to take out 100% of the land mass'"
User avatar #53 - recoveryone (04/26/2013) [+] (2 replies)
He makes a good point, but that doesn't mean the US couldn't just drop a bunch of ******* nukes, and let radiation make China uninhabitable.
User avatar #45 - occamsrazor (04/26/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Wow I didn't know we had that few nukes, really makes ya think...
#37 - anonymous (04/26/2013) [+] (5 replies)
that's only the average yield, though. there are some multi-megaton explosives.
User avatar #44 to #37 - CaptainWaffles (04/26/2013) [-]
That, and that's only the fireball. There is still leveling of buildings and intense thermal, xray, and gamma radiation in addition to the massive blastwave well beyond that. The killing radius of a bomb like that could easily get a few more miles in radius.
User avatar #35 - salts (04/26/2013) [+] (2 replies)
90% of population...not area...china's population is not anywhere near evenly distributed ..not saying hes right ..but think things through before you post
#3 - dashandsmash (04/26/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #74 - biggrand (04/27/2013) [-]
there's a pc thread going on right now in /b/ that is half spec, half porn. just browse the thumbnails of this ****

You need to login to view this link
User avatar #66 - Chizypuff (04/26/2013) [-]
All the people questioning the logic, he said 100% of the landmass-not the population
meaning it doesn't matter how scattered Chinese people are or aren't- People aren't landmass
#65 - bozhko (04/26/2013) [-]
**bozhko rolls 85**
#59 - tunnell has deleted their comment [+] (1 reply)
User avatar #54 - EFGsBrother (04/26/2013) [+] (1 reply)
In reality, the total amount of fissionable materials we have at our possession is incredible. At the highest point of the U.S.'s nuclear stockpile, we had roughly 20,491 MEGAtons worth of explosives. Using this ********* math would give about 1533.9 megatons. By a factor of 13.35 times, he's off. Using his equation that 0.3Mt=98.5 sq kM, the actual area the US arsenal could level is about 6,727,878 Km. Considering that much of China's population is near the ocean, even leveling that would provide sufficient death so that China would be sufficiently ****** .
Of Course this is done under the assumption of the U.S. height of nuclear power, but is nuclear war was really that eminent the U.S. would stock up a hell of a lot more on the nukes.

TL;DR This faggot sucks
#48 - anonymous (04/26/2013) [-]
way to remember nuclear fallout
User avatar #6 - grimmreaperz (04/26/2013) [-]
almost every thread there gets derailed somehow
#1 - anonymous (04/25/2013) [-]
4chan at it's finest.
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)