Freedum. . ift! ( l, commits
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Freedum

ift! ( l, commits
...
+962
Views: 39557
Favorited: 44
Submitted: 04/21/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to somedsoup E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(242):

[ 242 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
Anonymous commenting is allowed
User avatar #28 - pappathethird (04/22/2013) [+] (7 replies)
The roots of this conflict are much deeper than just 9/11.
User avatar #34 to #28 - carnagejc (04/22/2013) [-]
All the way down to the oil wells.
#64 - felixjarl ONLINE (04/22/2013) [-]
#86 - sometimeswefuck (04/22/2013) [+] (1 reply)
yes...."helping iraq".....heh...heheh...
#37 - jiltist (04/22/2013) [-]
Well I mean but they were pretty expensive buildings....
#32 - butiloveu (04/22/2013) [-]
To be fair, if some destroys your two 						*******					 you would destroy their bodies also.
To be fair, if some destroys your two ******* you would destroy their bodies also.
#27 - magsschroedinger (04/22/2013) [-]
Sure you destroyed the _ right_ country?
#103 - teutoburg (04/22/2013) [+] (2 replies)
>Playing civilization
>randomn country captures a worker
>YOU WILL BURN IN HELL YOUR ENTIRE COUNTRY WILL BE RAZED THE ONLY REMINDER OF YOUR EXISTENCE WILL BE EMPTY ROADS LEADING TO PILES OF RUBBLE
User avatar #9 - luidias (04/22/2013) [+] (26 replies)
canadafag here. I'm usually a pacifist about this kind of crap, but quite honestly, the US got rid of saddam hussein, who was a brutal, unfair leader. Even considering civilian casualties, Iraq is still better off. Saddam killed a LOT of people (and his actions TARGETED civilians specifically, unlike the US military, who targets terrorist groups and will avoid killing civilians if possible)

tl;dr however much the war in the middle east sucks, IMO it's better than having let the area fester and succumb to corruption and genocide, even if america's motives were questionable.
#133 - ruinsage (04/22/2013) [+] (3 replies)
This image has expired
Get's mad when bombed
bomb's everyone else
#22 - anako (04/22/2013) [-]
User avatar #20 - psykobear (04/22/2013) [+] (2 replies)
The buildings were not empty.
That is all.
#25 to #20 - antoniospaghettio (04/22/2013) [-]
Neither are the countries.
User avatar #52 - bossdelainternet (04/22/2013) [+] (25 replies)
I cannot even fathom how incredibly stupid this post is.
#75 to #71 - flemsdfer (04/22/2013) [-]
Take a break from the comment area dude.
User avatar #60 - haker (04/22/2013) [+] (8 replies)
So an attack on U.S. soil isnt cause for retaliation. No one seems to think the same about pearl harbor. Should the U.S. have just said. "Its just some ships, its not worth going to war over." No they attacked the U.S. and the U.S. retaliated.

Around 3700 people died at pearl harbor. Around 2600 of them were military.

Around 3000 people died in the 9/11 terrorist attacks. 55 of them were military.
#111 - flufflepuff (04/22/2013) [+] (1 reply)
America is hated...
#95 - anonymous (04/22/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Mind when terrorists tried to attack Scotland?

We kicked the boy in the balls bragged about it on the bbc news then went back to it.

They've not been back since.
#44 - anonymous (04/22/2013) [-]
AMERICA TALKS ABOUT FREEDOM.... WHEN ACTUALLY ISRAELI'S PUPPET STATE
User avatar #30 - Foxchase (04/22/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Gotta love how people never do a complete background check of the Afghan and Iraqi wars, but merely just scratch the surface.
-5
#164 - zigap has deleted their comment [+] (19 replies)
#171 to #164 - suddenlypotatoes (04/22/2013) [-]
The person that was killed shot and killed a police officer and was killed during a shootout. The other one is in jail. I don't see how that is anywhere near terrorism.
#43 - tcald (04/22/2013) [+] (5 replies)
#11 - kanedam ONLINE (04/22/2013) [+] (2 replies)
i'm not going to speak about morality or something like that... i dont really care about the war of other countries.

i just have to state one thing:
a terrorist act is a terrorist act, and a war is a war.
you cant attack a country for a terrorists act, and you cant declare war on terror. its a complete confusion of the definition of these things... but well, i know you CAN. i just think its wrong to use these words...
either its an act of war, then attack a country, or its a terrorists act, but then you cant blaim a whole country.

I hope people understand what i mean.
[ 242 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)