Gay Marriage. . If a man aise lie with mankind, as he lieth with a , both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put death; their bleed sha
x

Gay Marriage

If a man aise lie with mankind, as he lieth with a , both of
them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put
death; their bleed shall be upen them."
Leviticus 20: 13
The Scripture is clear. Hem: can any good Christian support gay
marriage?
Like . Comment . 19 minutes age . ,"
A marriage shall be considered valid only if the wife is a
virgin. If the wife is not a virgin, she shall be executed.
Deuteronomy 22: )
If my memory of high school is correct, you might want to reconsider
your position on the relevance of the Bible to our marriage laws.
he minutes age . Like
You make me sick. **** you.
3 minutes ago . Like
Write a comment.,..
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+2956
Views: 91947
Favorited: 410
Submitted: 04/21/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to darkslayer submit to reddit

Comments(674):

[ 674 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #50 - RockyTheEvilRock (04/21/2013) [-]
i dont know any man who has lain with all of mankind
User avatar #160 to #50 - xxleeroyjenkinsxx (04/21/2013) [-]
**** the world
User avatar #123 to #50 - potatoos (04/21/2013) [-]
OP
#51 to #50 - darkslayer (04/21/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #89 to #51 - nucularwar (04/21/2013) [-]
and all of womankind.
and all of alienkind.
#658 to #89 - anon (04/22/2013) [-]
ASIANS CAN ACTUALLY READ MINDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Asians hide their mind reading abilities by having completely expressionless faces so they don't accidently show facial expressions when people think things they don't like, find funny, astonishing, etc, and Asians segregate so their not nearly as susceptible to that happening.
Asians also segregate, and are untaltative to avoid accidently saying things that are similar to what people are thinking and going to say.

All Asians are keeping their mind reading abilities a secret, they don't want ANYBODY to know that they can read minds, they will never seriously admit that they can read minds!

Try thinking, and visualy picturing things in your mind that are as wild as you can when you are around Asians, and look for Asians who give people dirty/particlar looks for what appears to be for completely no reason.

PLEASE SPREAD THE MESSAGE!!!!! THE WORLD NEEDS TO FIND THIS OUT!!!!!
User avatar #728 to #658 - drewsky (04/22/2013) [-]
They still make you?
User avatar #52 to #51 - marijanelover (04/21/2013) [-]
You just made my day.
#552 to #51 - Kairyuka ONLINE (04/22/2013) [-]
#733 to #51 - nephera (04/22/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #614 to #51 - weazr ONLINE (04/22/2013) [-]
Excuse me. I may be retarded, but I don't get it. Anyone care to explain?
#667 to #614 - milkyshizznits (04/22/2013) [-]
It's a Doctor Who reference. The gif is of Jack Harkness, who's a notorious flirtation master in the show. He also swings both ways, so to speak. The actor's name is John Barrowman.
It's a Doctor Who reference. The gif is of Jack Harkness, who's a notorious flirtation master in the show. He also swings both ways, so to speak. The actor's name is John Barrowman.
#687 to #667 - weazr ONLINE (04/22/2013) [-]
Thanks, kind fella!
Here, take this gift from me.
#743 to #687 - irokk (04/22/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #742 to #687 - mariox (04/22/2013) [-]
Source? Please?
#745 to #742 - weazr ONLINE (04/22/2013) [-]
Denise Milani. Have fun in fappingland ;D

-Umbreon unrelated. Just felt like it
User avatar #710 to #614 - nofuckstogivehere (04/22/2013) [-]
It's Jack from Doctor Who. That is all you need to know.
#741 to #51 - ompalomper (04/22/2013) [-]
i can't think of anything that has been nailed as hard as this   
   
except your mom that is
i can't think of anything that has been nailed as hard as this

except your mom that is
#95 to #51 - bariummanisback (04/21/2013) [-]
I lol'd for 5 minutes
I lol'd for 5 minutes
#494 to #51 - anon (04/22/2013) [-]
oh god yes
User avatar #485 to #51 - dehfurk (04/22/2013) [-]
This is better than the post...
+116
#75 - kanade **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #297 to #75 - majormoron (04/22/2013) [-]
As I keep saying to many people, what meaning of "lying" do they mean? Are you sure they aren't saying that it is a sin to lie to your fellow man the same way as you do with a female?
#314 to #75 - anon (04/22/2013) [-]
>Old testament passage about virgin marriage
Yes, followed by the implication that either his wife was a slut or the other guy slept with his wife in high school.
I think his reaction is justified. He's not really reacting to the passage, just to the atheist being a dick.
User avatar #668 to #75 - jokersaysamuseme (04/22/2013) [-]
Some people just deserve a high-five...

in the face...

with a chair...
#81 to #75 - someponynew (04/21/2013) [-]
Her FW
Her FW
User avatar #299 to #75 - elcreepo ONLINE (04/22/2013) [-]
>tastament
>Further proof that bibles are for eating not reading

I'm sorry I had to
User avatar #534 - kingbulbasaur (04/22/2013) [-]
"Maybe God wanted gay guys to do it standing up."
#372 - lostdagame (04/22/2013) [-]
Here we go
User avatar #17 - OldSnake (04/21/2013) [-]
The scripture just says if a man lies with another man as he does with a woman, then they are sinning. So, if I sleep with a woman and find the experience terrible, but I sleep with a man and it's AWESOME, have I really slept with both genders in the same way?

Also, if you're bi or pansexual, just wear a hat when you sleep with one specific gender. Problem solved.
#60 to #17 - anon (04/21/2013) [-]
its going to be different because this time you can do but stuff
User avatar #376 to #17 - ningyoaijin (04/22/2013) [-]
Oh dear God you're right.
User avatar #393 to #376 - OldSnake (04/22/2013) [-]
Of course I'm right. Hats make everything better.
#575 to #17 - anon (04/22/2013) [-]
Are you a lawyer?
#21 to #17 - anon (04/21/2013) [-]
it doesn't say, "If a man feels the same way about lying with another man as he does with a woman"
User avatar #82 to #17 - hauntzor (04/21/2013) [-]
as he does with a woman

As long as I don't have sex with any dudes with vaginas, I should be good then.
#447 - hudspud (04/22/2013) [-]
Just throwing this out there: Leviticus, Deuteronomy and other Old Testament books of Jewish law are made invalid by the New Testament through the death and resurrection of Jesus. Most of it was to separate the Jews from other cultures of the time. In the New Testament there is a passage where a disciple is praying to god and becomes hungry. God opens a clothe before him revealing many animals for him to eat. The disciple refuses to eat some of them because the Old Testament says they are unclean. God says "do not call anything impure that I have made clean". (There are other examples of God shunning the Old Testament after Jesus's sacrafice but this is one of the prominent ones).

TL;DR stop using the Old Testament Law in stuff related to Christianity
#452 to #447 - captininsanoobacon (04/22/2013) [-]
John7:19,Matthew 5:17,John 14:15 all would disagree with you
#487 to #452 - hudspud (04/22/2013) [-]
These all predate Jesus's death. His death was what undid these laws, therefore they were valid up until he died.
Also John 7 is about the peoples hypocrisy in their interpretation of the old law and Jesus actually speaks against it in this verse, Matthew 5 is Jesus speaking of his mission on Earth; not to undo the Jewish faith but extend it, John 14 is Jesus talking about his commandments not the old testament. All of these seem like contradictory verses but once read in context it becomes apparent that their intent is not to keep the old laws.
User avatar #678 to #487 - RandomAnonGuy (04/22/2013) [-]
Is there a verse to support this?
#719 to #678 - hudspud (04/22/2013) [-]
This was in reply to these verses (John7:19,Matthew 5:17,John 14:15) being used to disprove my point when being taken out of context. I listed the full chapter as that as is the only way to get the true message, not through single verses.
#518 to #487 - guesswhosnew (04/22/2013) [-]
No book in the New Testament pre-dates Jesus' death, in fact the earliest canonical New Testament gospel is Mark and that was written many years after the death of Jesus. Don't speak on things you aren't educated on.

Do some research or don't attempt to argue with any modicum of correctness.
#545 to #518 - hudspud (04/22/2013) [-]
Nice attempt to reduce my Ethos though, even if it did make you look like a complete faggot in the process
#544 to #518 - hudspud (04/22/2013) [-]
The statements were made before his death ass-hat, regardless of when they were written down. I could have been more clear about what I meant by "predated" but there is no need to start rubbing one out over the fact that I misspoke.
#547 to #544 - guesswhosnew (04/22/2013) [-]
You also fail to realize that in Jesus' own eyes Torah was important (Torah being the first five books of the Hebrew Bible in which all of the laws are laid out).

Jesus was a Jew. He wouldn't have intended to make all of Jewish law irrelevant by dying.
#554 to #547 - hudspud (04/22/2013) [-]
As a Jew he that might not have been his intent but as the son of God it would have been. By being the ultimate sacrifice he put an end to many Jewish traditions and practices designed to keep themselves as the sole people of god, as well as other varied practices laid out in the Torah. Ex. animal sacrifice because he took those sins upon himself. His intent was not only to save humanity but to change the tradition of looking outwardly righteous (Pharisees and The laws of the Torah) to being inwardly righteous (The disciples and his teachings).

In reconciling humanity with God he made the Torah, whether intentionally or not, for the most part obsolete
#564 to #554 - guesswhosnew (04/22/2013) [-]
The tradition of animal sacrifice and all forms of sacrifice-based worship for Judaism ended when the Second Temple of Jerusalem was destroyed in roughly 70 CE.  It had been destroyed once before by the Babylonians and that in addition to the creation of the Diaspora throughout Babylonia shifted Jewish worship to the Rabbinate rather than sacrifice.     
   
Additionally your assertions about the Pharisees are also historically inaccurate as the Sadducees held the power in Judea at this time period and the New Testament accusations against the Pharisees came from writings that are post- second temple destruction in which the Pharisees gained power as the Sadducees' power was based in the fact that they were the only ones "qualified" to perform sacrifices.   
   
You cannot support your arguments with historical facts and I can.  Again, I plead of you, do some scholarly research.__   
   
   
Enjoy a gif that mocks you, courtesy of your local scholar/Jew/dick that will mock you for being incorrect due to your overwhelming lack of factual (provable) evidence.
The tradition of animal sacrifice and all forms of sacrifice-based worship for Judaism ended when the Second Temple of Jerusalem was destroyed in roughly 70 CE. It had been destroyed once before by the Babylonians and that in addition to the creation of the Diaspora throughout Babylonia shifted Jewish worship to the Rabbinate rather than sacrifice.

Additionally your assertions about the Pharisees are also historically inaccurate as the Sadducees held the power in Judea at this time period and the New Testament accusations against the Pharisees came from writings that are post- second temple destruction in which the Pharisees gained power as the Sadducees' power was based in the fact that they were the only ones "qualified" to perform sacrifices.

You cannot support your arguments with historical facts and I can. Again, I plead of you, do some scholarly research.__


Enjoy a gif that mocks you, courtesy of your local scholar/Jew/dick that will mock you for being incorrect due to your overwhelming lack of factual (provable) evidence.
#720 to #564 - hudspud (04/22/2013) [-]
Stop filibustering with your knowledge of Jewish **** , while it is impressive it does not relate to the topic for the most part and is a poor attempt to keep a failed argument going.
#748 to #720 - guesswhosnew (04/23/2013) [-]
Actually it is all relevant due to your ignorance of Torah. Jesus didn't "undo" all of Torah just by dying and being resurrected. That was never the purpose of the Messiah as interpreted by all of Judaism. With that in mind, Jesus therefore wouldn't BE the messiah if that were his cause.

His attempts were to amend certain aspects of Torah such as reviving people and curing them on the Sabbath. This aspect is correct but no, his coming and death and resurrection never were a means to nullify Judaic law.

It isn't filibustering, it is an attempt to educate you so that you will be able to understand why you were incorrect.
#459 to #447 - joelrojano (04/22/2013) [-]
Yeah, well.. .Austin 3:16 says i'm going to whoop your ass.
#492 to #447 - anon (04/22/2013) [-]
So do we throw out the Commandments? Sweet!
Adultery, stealing, and murder all around!/s
User avatar #510 to #492 - rosietheamazon (04/22/2013) [-]
it is all around.
#639 to #447 - anon (04/22/2013) [-]
then why is it still relevant to the bible? christianity is really judaism 2.0
#91 - critique (04/21/2013) [-]
What if it's actually about lying...
"If you lie to a man the same way you lie to a woman..."
#630 to #91 - starshroom (04/22/2013) [-]
Considering the english text is a translation and it is highly unlikely that the words for lie (horizontal type) and lie (untruth type) are the same in Hebrew as well as English I'ma guess nope. I know, you probably knew, but maybe others didn't. ^.^ themoreyouknow.jpg
Pic sorta related cuz ignorance and Christianity
#209 to #91 - exodeath (04/22/2013) [-]
Well it says "both of them have committed an abomination," how are you in the wrong if you've been lied to?
User avatar #216 to #209 - critique (04/22/2013) [-]
You can lie to hos, but never to bros.
#346 to #91 - anon (04/22/2013) [-]
Exactly it's like another way of saying "bro's before ho's" except he is saying "you can lie to your girl all you want but don't be lying to your boys." God created everything else he surely created the bro code too.
User avatar #99 to #91 - Shenanigins (04/21/2013) [-]
"No, Bill, your ass does not look big in those jeans?"

Like that?
User avatar #107 to #99 - critique (04/21/2013) [-]
Also stay clear of "That dress makes you look slim". He might get suspicious.
#162 to #107 - Shenanigins (04/21/2013) [-]
This is what immediately came to my mind.
#2 - nicopwnz (04/21/2013) [-]
Let me heal the burn
#90 to #2 - jthwdragon (04/21/2013) [-]
the picture out of context from the show its from looks like someone that is cleaning away the black form them and making them self white
User avatar #285 to #90 - doctadeathbench (04/22/2013) [-]
this is not any other kind of white




this is...advanced white
User avatar #521 to #90 - ryuuyoru (04/22/2013) [-]
it's from avatar. that i katara healing her hands after ang accidentally burned them
User avatar #528 to #521 - kingrui (04/22/2013) [-]
no **** sherlock
#496 to #66 - slyve ONLINE (04/22/2013) [-]
This image has expired
This makes so much sense, it's ******* creepy.
User avatar #40 - rifee ONLINE (04/21/2013) [-]
Facts..


They make you sick
User avatar #379 to #7 - supermegaultra (04/22/2013) [-]
Molesting children isn't fun if they like it brahh ;)
User avatar #435 to #379 - bowlerpipe (04/22/2013) [-]
wow the way you type makes me want to shoot my dick off
User avatar #502 to #435 - supermegaultra (04/22/2013) [-]
Whatever. You win some, you lose some...and I lost this one...
#472 to #7 - anon (04/22/2013) [-]
you are fighting fire with fire
#555 to #7 - anon (04/22/2013) [-]
wha
#28 to #7 - anon (04/21/2013) [-]
8/10 shop
#495 - thatguyyoumightno ONLINE (04/22/2013) [-]
"If I quote from the bible, then what I am talking about is the right way to do things. But, if you quote from the bible, and its against what I'm saying, then you are a horrible person"

Facebook Logic...
User avatar #142 - deathzor (04/21/2013) [-]
Jesus ******* christ, is the ENTIRE frontpage Reddit?
#704 - cazabrow (04/22/2013) [-]
The only modern man who has obeyed EVERY rule of Christianity.


If you are not Ned Flanders, you aren't ******* going to heaven..
User avatar #725 to #704 - sirreginald (04/22/2013) [-]
He still slept with that actress who was left handed in one of the episodes...
User avatar #732 to #725 - samthediv (04/22/2013) [-]
and married that whore in Vegas.
#134 - teranin (04/21/2013) [-]
Leviticus 19:33 - When a foreigner resides among you in your land, do not mistreat them. 34 The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the Lord your God.   
   
Can someone explain how conservatives can hate gay marriage and immigrants at the same time?
Leviticus 19:33 - When a foreigner resides among you in your land, do not mistreat them. 34 The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the Lord your God.

Can someone explain how conservatives can hate gay marriage and immigrants at the same time?
#344 to #134 - hoskins (04/22/2013) [-]
I like this.
#486 to #134 - anon (04/22/2013) [-]
I understand the sentiment, but "conservative" is not equal to "Christian." I know a lot of Christian conservatives, but also a lot of Christian liberals. Also..."illegal immigrants" is not the same as immigrants. If someone comes here from another country legitimately that is one thing, people who side-step it are another. Our system is far from perfect, but the solution is to improve it, not to decide to break the law.
User avatar #305 to #134 - elcreepo ONLINE (04/22/2013) [-]
We just got them to stop maltreating blacks.

One thing at a time man, they're special kids and need to be treated as such.
#189 to #134 - anon (04/21/2013) [-]
I'm not 100 percent sure but when did anyone say we hate immigrants. We do not like illegal immigrants that spit in our countries laws and come over here illegally. They are entitled to get a ******* legitimate license of citizenship.

WHAT IS SO HARD TO GET ABOUT THAT
also gay marriage is completely bogus. It is essentially a religious argument now since civil partnerships are available to them. They even have the same benefits now as married couples. The only dam reason they are going for "equality" is they don't like being looked down upon because they aren't married i guess? Which makes absolutely no sense.
#191 to #189 - teranin (04/22/2013) [-]
Civil partnerships are available in 3 states, and are not recognized by the Fed.  gay Marriage is allowed in something like 10 states, and is not recognized by the Fed.  The issue is not the name of it, it's the money, man.  No tax benefits from the federal government, no mandate to allow kinship for estate taxes, can't visit their loved ones in the damn hospital...     
   
Furthermore,  look up Joe Arpaio, and then re-read the bible verse I posted, and try to justify the 			****		 he is endorsed in doing in his sick state to latinos, regardless of their citizenship.  He is generally considered to be "The best sheriff in America".  The whole idea is disgusting.
Civil partnerships are available in 3 states, and are not recognized by the Fed. gay Marriage is allowed in something like 10 states, and is not recognized by the Fed. The issue is not the name of it, it's the money, man. No tax benefits from the federal government, no mandate to allow kinship for estate taxes, can't visit their loved ones in the damn hospital...

Furthermore, look up Joe Arpaio, and then re-read the bible verse I posted, and try to justify the **** he is endorsed in doing in his sick state to latinos, regardless of their citizenship. He is generally considered to be "The best sheriff in America". The whole idea is disgusting.
User avatar #231 to #191 - CrossBowPloxz (04/22/2013) [-]
Gif source wtf
#254 to #231 - teranin (04/22/2013) [-]
it's from Birdy the Mighty : Decode.  Good anime.
it's from Birdy the Mighty : Decode. Good anime.
#212 to #191 - anon (04/22/2013) [-]
Well your wrong about the benefits part but okay buddy. They can petition for civil partnerships to be the same as marriage without the religious document. Its gay marriage which is not endorsed in religion at all. Your argument is very weak as far as that goes.

Immigration is a different matter but pretty much three things. 1. i never said i endorse killing/maiming or hurting them. 2. I endorse the removal of illegal immigrants with some form of punishment for the only reason that there are not illegal immigrants coming here illegally. 3. Punishment should be discussed and decided upon but there has to be some form of punishment.

Like i said gay marriage is complete bogus and will always be. They are basically spitting in my face when they petition for gay "marriage". They are literally going trying to say im a terrible person for having my standards and beliefs when i believe marriage is sacred and is entitled to only a man and women.
#253 to #212 - teranin (04/22/2013) [-]
Here. Read. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_union   
   
www.ncsl.org/issues-research/human-services/civil-unions-and-domestic-par tnership-statutes.aspx   
   
Civil Unions are NOT recognized by the federal government.  Furthermore, they are NOT available in every state.  That is a big problem.  Do some homework please before dismissing facts out of hand.     
   
As to your statements on immigration,  I wasn't claiming you are a conservative christian,  I was stating that behavior like that by conservative christians colors their objections about gay marriage in hypocritical light.     
   
Remember,  Jesus upheld the laws of the old testament until the end of days in the sermon on the mount,  book of matthew 5:17-20,  and as such,  if you follow any of the laws in the old testament, including the commandments, you must follow all of them,  because not a word may be changed until the end of days.  Also, remember, if you get horny looking at a married woman, be sure to gouge your eye out as it suggests in Matthew 5:27-30... Oh, and be sure to never divorce, because any relationship you or your wife have afterwords is adultery in the eyes of the lord, so you'll ride the train to eternal torment with Jezebel straight into the fun pit.  WHEEEEEE.
Here. Read. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_union

www.ncsl.org/issues-research/human-services/civil-unions-and-domestic-par tnership-statutes.aspx

Civil Unions are NOT recognized by the federal government. Furthermore, they are NOT available in every state. That is a big problem. Do some homework please before dismissing facts out of hand.

As to your statements on immigration, I wasn't claiming you are a conservative christian, I was stating that behavior like that by conservative christians colors their objections about gay marriage in hypocritical light.

Remember, Jesus upheld the laws of the old testament until the end of days in the sermon on the mount, book of matthew 5:17-20, and as such, if you follow any of the laws in the old testament, including the commandments, you must follow all of them, because not a word may be changed until the end of days. Also, remember, if you get horny looking at a married woman, be sure to gouge your eye out as it suggests in Matthew 5:27-30... Oh, and be sure to never divorce, because any relationship you or your wife have afterwords is adultery in the eyes of the lord, so you'll ride the train to eternal torment with Jezebel straight into the fun pit. WHEEEEEE.
#265 to #253 - anon (04/22/2013) [-]
Your so stupid its not even funny. Not only did i smash your argument you basically say the same thing. SO why are gay people not trying to get civil partnerships to have the same benefits as marriage? I covered this in my last post and you come back with the same stuff. Its really like you cannot seem to grasp that gay marriage is the worse thing that gay people can do to a person who believes in the Bible.

Listen even if im wrong about the benefits not being the same. My argument is so well thought out that i cover that with this. Well why dont they just try to make civil partnerships the same and push for that?

If you cannot grasp this concept and learn from it than you are being ignorant and stubborn.
#332 to #265 - teranin (04/22/2013) [-]
Ohhh, ok so your saying that they should be trying to get the right to federally recognized civil unions, not federally recognized gay marriage.  Ok, my bad I misinterpreted that single aspect of your argument while completely crushing the rest of it.   
   
So, quite simply I don't really disagree with that, and actually think the idea that a practice that is (at least for christians) such a sanctified act should not be receiving any sort of benefit from the law, as it selects them out as being better than everyone who is not married, thereby backing a specific religion with government policy.  That being said, were you aware that in Revelations 19 they discuss the marriage ceremony between Jesus (male) and the church (all male, pope is representative of church on earth, is clearly male) as being the crux point upon which all marriage sanctity lies?  It would be pretty easy to take this as an endorsement of gay marriage being of a greater sanctity than straight marriage.     
   
So, I guess my question is, why do you think that your religious beliefs should be held up on a special precipice in a country where the government is not allowed to endorse any specific religious beliefs?   
   
Also, the first word of your reply makes this reaction picture valid.  Next time you call someone stupid, spell the whole insult correctly.
Ohhh, ok so your saying that they should be trying to get the right to federally recognized civil unions, not federally recognized gay marriage. Ok, my bad I misinterpreted that single aspect of your argument while completely crushing the rest of it.

So, quite simply I don't really disagree with that, and actually think the idea that a practice that is (at least for christians) such a sanctified act should not be receiving any sort of benefit from the law, as it selects them out as being better than everyone who is not married, thereby backing a specific religion with government policy. That being said, were you aware that in Revelations 19 they discuss the marriage ceremony between Jesus (male) and the church (all male, pope is representative of church on earth, is clearly male) as being the crux point upon which all marriage sanctity lies? It would be pretty easy to take this as an endorsement of gay marriage being of a greater sanctity than straight marriage.

So, I guess my question is, why do you think that your religious beliefs should be held up on a special precipice in a country where the government is not allowed to endorse any specific religious beliefs?

Also, the first word of your reply makes this reaction picture valid. Next time you call someone stupid, spell the whole insult correctly.
User avatar #557 to #265 - coolcalx (04/22/2013) [-]
because of the precedent set in Brown V BOE of Topeka Kansas.

civil unions are unconstitutional.
#161 to #134 - anon (04/21/2013) [-]
its almost like they care more about making sure straight white people have it best than biblical morality
#239 to #161 - anon (04/22/2013) [-]
straight white men*
#35 - orangepikmin (04/21/2013) [-]
BURN!!!
User avatar #10 - KayRed (04/21/2013) [-]
When gay marriage is passed, I'm gonna have SO many gay orgies with illegal mexican immigrants.
User avatar #144 to #10 - kibuza ONLINE (04/21/2013) [-]
Why wait? gay orgies aren't illegal.
You can bone (or get boned by) as many Mexicans as you want!

Go get 'em tiger!
User avatar #233 to #144 - KayRed (04/22/2013) [-]
It's more of a celebration orgy.
User avatar #378 to #233 - ningyoaijin (04/22/2013) [-]
... A celebratory orgy?

A celebratorgy?
#390 to #378 - KayRed (04/22/2013) [-]
You sick mother ****** ...

I hope you get that copy righted, make it a brand name, make millions of dollars, and choke on it.
0
#385 to #378 - KayRed has deleted their comment [-]
#619 - butiloveu ONLINE (04/22/2013) [-]
fifth Commandment says 'You shall not murder'
bible says -'put them to death'
Retard says 'How can any good Christian blah blah blah' because some one said it in the bible

mfw
#623 to #619 - fabelousnagger (04/22/2013) [-]
but can't you get away with murder if you add " sinner" or "witch" or "hertic" ect?
User avatar #657 to #623 - kallesyndrom (04/22/2013) [-]
The thing is, killing another human being is, in the bible, only seen as murder if you kill an innocent person. If you kill someone who "should" be killed, it is righteous. Apparently.
#607 - illmakethatsammich (04/22/2013) [-]
The fact that they follow the Jewish Hebrew scriptures is funny because as Christians you're meant to follow the New Testament. This stronzo is just finding 			*******		 reason to support his argument. MFW coming across these assholes.   
   
   
Never thought my text and traditions subject would come in handy.
The fact that they follow the Jewish Hebrew scriptures is funny because as Christians you're meant to follow the New Testament. This stronzo is just finding ******* reason to support his argument. MFW coming across these assholes.


Never thought my text and traditions subject would come in handy.
#396 - canadianguyeh (04/22/2013) [-]
Apply HOLY WATER to burned area.
Apply HOLY WATER to burned area.
[ 674 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)