Good feels. . Happy Gilmore "4- Boston is probably the only maj or city that if yen with them, they will shut down the whole everything. and find you. new RETWE
x

Comments(155):

[ 155 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#65 - mariasaturnina (04/20/2013) [-]
Only thing I have Happy Gilmore related.
Only thing I have Happy Gilmore related.
#41 - junkass (04/20/2013) [-]
Well, it's just that Boston is beaten by one country...
#46 to #41 - anon (04/20/2013) [-]
******* madagascar
#102 - Prada (04/21/2013) [-]
I was hanging with my buddies talking about the Marathon bombings and one chick said "Dzhokar is pretty cute, I'd do him"   
   
<our collective faces
I was hanging with my buddies talking about the Marathon bombings and one chick said "Dzhokar is pretty cute, I'd do him"

<our collective faces
User avatar #111 to #102 - sweetcatz (04/21/2013) [-]
I thought I was the only one who thought he was kinda cute...
#141 to #102 - hybredmoon (04/21/2013) [-]
**** I was in the break room watching the news and in waddled some fat, black, greasy land whale and said "Damn the older brotha pretty cute, I'd let him get it!" my rage dropped kicked my stupid filter into off position, so before I could think I replied "He'd need three sherpas and a g.p.s. just to find it under all them rolls."
She left the room crying.
This was yesterday, I'm probably going to get fired for it. I just cant seem to find the energy to give a **** .
User avatar #147 to #141 - sweetcatz (04/21/2013) [-]
People cant help who they are attracted to.
User avatar #148 to #147 - hybredmoon (04/21/2013) [-]
Horse...


Wait for it,


**** .
User avatar #152 to #148 - sweetcatz (04/21/2013) [-]
What
#153 to #152 - hybredmoon (04/21/2013) [-]
People can...no, just, no. I'm too god damned old and too god damned tired to explain things to idiots on the internet. Continue believing what ever the **** you want, I dont care.
User avatar #159 to #153 - sweetcatz (04/21/2013) [-]
Its not like I agree with what he did. I just think hes attractive. And I think the he was pressured into bombing by his brother.
#143 to #110 - jimmyjab (04/21/2013) [-]
I swear on everything in my life, I was watching ABC news and the newscaster literally said "Jafar." What the **** , this isn't Aladdin.
User avatar #149 to #143 - hybredmoon (04/21/2013) [-]
Jafar was an evil muther ****** though. He'd probably pull some **** like that.
User avatar #150 to #149 - jimmyjab (04/21/2013) [-]
Jafar was a bad ass ************ ... Plus he fits the stereotype of a terrorist.
#91 - superowned (04/21/2013) [-]
**superowned rolls 1**
#124 to #91 - falconxmard (04/21/2013) [-]
**falconxmard rolls 7**
#137 to #91 - repostsrepost (04/21/2013) [-]
Hey, that's one dollar more than the average black guy makes.
#108 to #91 - dapianoman (04/21/2013) [-]
**dapianoman rolls 506,965,220**
#113 to #108 - comanderspy (04/21/2013) [-]
could you imagine if you rolled 000,000,000?
User avatar #114 to #113 - dapianoman (04/21/2013) [-]
I'd probably get red text or something lol
Also I just found out Bill Gates makes like 6 times that amount a year
User avatar #33 - Loppytaffy (04/20/2013) [-]
It's probably the only place in America to get a decent cup of tea, too.
User avatar #83 to #33 - frenchgenocide (04/21/2013) [-]
Tea n Tea
User avatar #57 to #33 - snowshark (04/20/2013) [-]
Problem is you need to be able to swim to get it.

Bazing!
User avatar #64 to #57 - Loppytaffy (04/20/2013) [-]
Still tastes better than Tetley.
User avatar #1 - pheonixinstinct (04/20/2013) [-]
i have no clue why this is retentive to happy gilmore but ok
User avatar #32 to #1 - iggyblanco (04/20/2013) [-]
retentive?
User avatar #49 to #1 - seymourtets (04/20/2013) [-]
These fake twitter accounts are ******* stupid, I've seen that fake account and it has nothing to do with the character.
User avatar #116 to #49 - condormcninja (04/21/2013) [-]
The ones for memes are the worst.

LOL GRUMPY CAT COPIED THIS JOKE FROM A YEAR AGO LOL!!
#2 to #1 - owmyballs (04/20/2013) [-]
Look at his hat, numbnuts.
User avatar #53 - shazmothree (04/20/2013) [-]
They should have asked England what happened the last time someone ****** with our city
#55 to #53 - anon (04/20/2013) [-]
England founded Boston. Remember that your city was created by England. **** you sincerely.

- An Englishman
User avatar #58 to #55 - sirbrentcoe (04/20/2013) [-]
all of America started as an English colony. We got fed up with that cunt of a king taxing us into poverty to keep us in 'check,' so we rebelled. And we are still a stronger nation than England, even with the recent economic setbacks and tragedies.
signed,
a still proud American.
User avatar #84 to #58 - shazmothree (04/21/2013) [-]
With that said, England is a pretty cool guy.
User avatar #86 to #84 - sirbrentcoe (04/21/2013) [-]
truth.
User avatar #69 to #55 - chiefrunnyjeans (04/20/2013) [-]
and then we kicked your ass and took it
User avatar #88 to #55 - turdburgalar (04/21/2013) [-]
Yeah,no
#78 - craazhy (04/21/2013) [-]
i live in boston and this gif is a solid reenactment of my reaction when i heard the news   
it wasnt just the fact that it was a bombing, because that 			****		 happens all day everyday in other countries and no one gives a 			****		   
but i just had this irrational frustration with the fact that someone thought they could come into boston and do something like that   
it literally felt like some kid took a 			****		 on my porch but obviously on a larger and tragic scale
i live in boston and this gif is a solid reenactment of my reaction when i heard the news
it wasnt just the fact that it was a bombing, because that **** happens all day everyday in other countries and no one gives a ****
but i just had this irrational frustration with the fact that someone thought they could come into boston and do something like that
it literally felt like some kid took a **** on my porch but obviously on a larger and tragic scale
#93 - anon (04/21/2013) [-]
hey does anyone have actual evidence that he was the guy who actually placed the bomb? Like an actual videoclip showing him placing the bomb down?

They could have just killed a random person that looks like a terrorist to satisfy the media. In other words, they want to make it seem that whatever crime you do, you wont get away with it, when you actually will. thats why they brought the whole ******* military just for 2 kills.

the only thing that i got from it, is CHALLENGE ACCEPTED.
#127 to #93 - anon (04/21/2013) [-]
American citizens don't carry IED's on a regular basis. innocent people tend to turn them selves in like a falsely accuses man already has
#131 to #93 - anon (04/21/2013) [-]
One of the injured who he lost both of his legs, was only feet away from the explosion identified one of the bombers. It was the younger brother, the injured man said he looked him right in the eye and saw him put the backpack down.
#139 to #93 - TimeWarpRaped (04/21/2013) [-]
There is evidence of them putting it down, and there's evidence of them walking away. I'd bet you $100 that they are trained, especially in guerrilla warfare tactics. They walk in sync and didn't say a word the whole time, but made notions and were brisk.
User avatar #99 to #93 - ainsley (04/21/2013) [-]
Yea, but most peoples suspicions were confirmed when it was on the news that these 'suspects' were having shootouts with the police and throwing bombs out of their car window
User avatar #112 to #99 - nevrit (04/21/2013) [-]
Yea, but keep in mind we weren't on there side. Maybe they did it, but maybe they were put up to it for a larger reason. Or maybe they didn't do it, and someone needed a scapegoat. When the entirety of America is after you and want you dead for something you might not have done, are you gonna sit still and get taken away? Some people would freak.
User avatar #115 to #112 - ainsley (04/21/2013) [-]
If you're innocent and know it then what's the problem?
User avatar #118 to #115 - nevrit (04/21/2013) [-]
Isn't that the general question? In this age where almost anything can be fabricated, including events, all one need do is make a picture or video in implication and instantly all will jump at the chance to blame the person. When someone asks if it is real, someone in an official position just needs to say it is real and everyone will believe. You weren't there for the tests, you only simply believe because someone important says this is the way it is.

All one needs do is fabricate a believable story. With enough "proof", angry people, and good lawyers you can easily be put away for the rest of your life. Especially if these large people want it that way. Maybe these guys just valued their freedom more than attempting to clear their name? Maybe they just weren't that smart.

Point is, you weren't there so you don't know. None of us do, yet most will blindly follow with the media because they say how it is. Because we weren't there, we can't know why things happened the way they did. They might be guilty, or they might not be.
User avatar #120 to #112 - manager (04/21/2013) [-]
The bombs used at the marathon were pressure cookers.



One of the bombs thrown at the police during the shoot out was a pressure cooker so its a pretty safe guess to say it was them.
User avatar #123 to #120 - nevrit (04/21/2013) [-]
So you are told that pressure cooker was the form of bomb, and you are also told that they fought with the police and used the same bombs. Yet you did not examine either explosive, nor were you there for said shootout. Once again, point being you can only assume or believe, but you cannot know for sure.
#128 to #123 - manager (04/21/2013) [-]
So because I wasn't there, it never happened?


I wasn't there for WWII, that must mean Hitler never existed.
User avatar #154 to #128 - nevrit (04/21/2013) [-]
I see you don't understand the concept behind what I am trying to say. Unlike you I won't stoop to insults. Since this is a lost cause, I wish you a good day.
User avatar #155 to #154 - manager (04/21/2013) [-]
Watch some press conferences would be my word of advice.



I wish you a good day as well.
+2
#90 - russianbro has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #43 - mrgoodlove (04/20/2013) [-]
Don't **** with Boston... they've seen some **** .
#125 - anon (04/21/2013) [-]
lol no1 even realizes that CISPA will pass Senate and **** us over cuz we're all distracted by Boston bombing and the only reason SOPA didn't pass was because there was massive protest, but there is no protest now cause we're all distracted.
#135 to #125 - timerce (04/21/2013) [-]
actually this isnt true. wikipedia,google, and other companies support is what defeated SOPA. this time those companies arent on our side b/c while SOPA was aimed at shutting down websites, something companies like wikipedia and google dont want, CISPA is simply about collecting users information something less bothersome to giant websites like google who already do plenty of that
User avatar #66 - resbiansrock (04/20/2013) [-]
Boston=Madagascar
User avatar #87 - krobeles (04/21/2013) [-]
Oh for ***** sake...
I didn't realise that Boston had come under Martial Law untill just now...

I dont know if i should be sad or laugh, at the fact that America is now officially useing its military instead of its police to solve crime. The entire ******* country are baby steps away from a full blown military dictatorship. Possibly a Faith-based one at that...
#100 to #87 - JHDog (04/21/2013) [-]
it wasn't just a crime though, it was full blown terrorism
User avatar #105 to #100 - krobeles (04/21/2013) [-]
Sure. I always just kinda figured the police was for policing the population and general misdoings within the lands border, while the military was essentially for policing other countries.
#107 to #105 - JHDog (04/21/2013) [-]
that's not how it works. Yes the police works for the local government and general population, however when there's any kind of catastrophe (i.e., 9/11, Katrina, Boston Marathon) the military (mostly national guard) does get involved.
#109 to #87 - anon (04/21/2013) [-]
I'm guessing you're not from Boston, nor have looked too deep into the situation.

Martial Law was temporarily declared until they found the guy - because in the time he was running around he could have planted any number of additional bombs or shot any number of additional people. It's a matter of public safety. SWAT, National Guard, etc are called in due to insufficient staff and higher-risk situations (like said bomb threat). They had to comb a whole city to find the guy.

No one's getting a police state, and the US isn't on its way to a dictatorship. They were weeding out a bomber. Then it was over, and everyone went back to their lives.
User avatar #89 to #87 - Yojimbo (04/21/2013) [-]
They weren't, people were advised to stay indoors, but not required.
User avatar #92 to #89 - krobeles (04/21/2013) [-]
Could you give me the entire outline of just what happened, though? The sources i'de been able to find has been sorta indirect about it, and i feel bad speaking too loudly about a subject i dont fully understand.
User avatar #94 to #92 - Yojimbo (04/21/2013) [-]
This pretty well explains things quickly and simply:

www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/04/19/timeline-boston-marathon-suspects/2096123/

It's a timeline of the Boston Bomb situation
User avatar #98 to #94 - krobeles (04/21/2013) [-]
Wow. I cant believe the police actually found someone they were looking for. Good times. Good times.
Oh, and thanks for that. It cleared some **** up.
User avatar #106 to #98 - Yojimbo (04/21/2013) [-]
Sure thing man
User avatar #132 to #92 - popkornking (04/21/2013) [-]
"I feel bad speaking about something I don't understand" www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/4544699/Stand+with+Boston/62#62
User avatar #144 to #132 - krobeles (04/21/2013) [-]
Ahahaa. Hey. I made an impression upon you, or else you wouldn't remember. Neat.

That comment was made useing subjective logic, and it was challenging morals and ethics. Therefore, additional knowledge wasn't needed as it had not, and in fact has not, changed my view.

Saying something like "America is a military dictatorship, just look at the lockdown in Boston!" sounds very silly, as Boston wasn't really locked down all that much.

Its sorta the distinction between subjective and objective reasoning. Objective reasoning requires you to have knowledge and be a reasonable individual, where as subjective reasoning, more or less just requires you to have an opinion.
User avatar #28 - lolollo (04/20/2013) [-]
And that's exactly the right thing to do. If you want to deter crime and terrorism, you make it where the punichment is swift and certain. The next time someone thinks of trying to **** **** up in Boston, they'll remember that the last guy who did it got his ass beat by the whole damn city police force the second it happened.
#29 to #28 - anon (04/20/2013) [-]
Except he'll be sitting on death row for 30 years. You might get caught quickly but actually being punished, good luck with that.
User avatar #63 to #29 - paintmered (04/20/2013) [-]
Now that I think about it, 19 is the worst possible age to commit a life-sentence worthy crime.
User avatar #61 to #29 - paintmered (04/20/2013) [-]
Life imprisonment's pretty bad. Arguably worse than death.
User avatar #30 to #29 - lolollo (04/20/2013) [-]
That's not something the people who catch the criminals have any sort of say in. That's an issue with how the bureaucrats in the judicial system do business.
#31 to #30 - anon (04/20/2013) [-]
I'm just saying, most people who commit these crimes take forever to get punished, the death penalty looses its point if they let the person live for a lifetime.
User avatar #40 to #31 - Jackimole (04/20/2013) [-]
There is no death penalty in MA.
#42 to #40 - rotinaj (04/20/2013) [-]
It costs $47,000 per year to keep somebody in prison. If this guy lives 50 more years in the pen, he'll have cost the government as much money as it would take to feed hundreds of starving people for a life time. I wish we could have enough faith in our justice system to allow the death penalty to be used in some situations, then maybe money could be put to better use than giving mass murderers health insurance.
-7
#38 - uncookedspaghetti has deleted their comment [-]
#4 - gliese (04/20/2013) [-]
soo much money lost by shutting down the city, but they got their badguy so, good for them.
User avatar #71 to #4 - garymotherfingoak (04/20/2013) [-]
i agree with you here. it didn't take a whole army and a police state to catch 1 guy that already performed his endgame. 500 million dollars keeps thousands alive.
#36 to #4 - angelusprimus (04/20/2013) [-]
When choice is money or lives everyone but a complete idiot or sociopath would save lives.
What were they supposed to do? Let everything go on normally and give him more targets where large groups of people gather?
Maybe wait until he blows up a crowd at a bank, or some other tourist gathering.
And if you ARE a sociopath and just care about economy, think of THIS. Boston's tourist season is just starting.
Terrorist not caught "Lets not go there, they have a bomber loose"
Terrorist caught "Lets go to the city that stayed tall and caught the ************ "
Which do you think costs more money? City shut down for two days, or entire ruined tourist season?
User avatar #5 to #4 - noblexfenrir (04/20/2013) [-]
You mean they caught the guys that killed and injured many people and had a plan and setup to do it again, you're right how awful. Yes the day long shut down resulted in certain businesses and therefor money was lost, however the heavy expenditure of police and other related resources will put more than enough money back into the system.
#6 to #5 - gliese (04/20/2013) [-]
did i say it was bad? i think you took my comment the wrong way bud
User avatar #8 to #6 - noblexfenrir (04/20/2013) [-]
I may have, I took the "but they got their badguy so, good for them" as sarcastic.
#9 to #8 - gliese (04/20/2013) [-]
i really meant good for them. Why would i not want these terrorists captured?
User avatar #11 to #9 - noblexfenrir (04/20/2013) [-]
As I said, I thought it was meant sarcastically, not that I understood the reasoning behind if it was so.
#7 to #5 - gliese (04/20/2013) [-]
and the heavy use of police and other related resources will not put the money back into Boston's economy. Spending to use all those assets actually uses up money.
User avatar #10 to #7 - noblexfenrir (04/20/2013) [-]
I'm sorry but where do most of the officers and companies who supply the related resources live? Oh right Alaska my bad...
#12 to #10 - gliese (04/20/2013) [-]
do you have any idea of economics and opportunity costs?
using their assets like police, SWAT, EOD does not put money back into the economy.
User avatar #13 to #12 - noblexfenrir (04/20/2013) [-]
So overtime pay, resources that directly come from public businesses (supplies and what not), emergency responders, the supplies they require which are expended and then must be re-supplied from other public businesses, etc etc.

These don't go back into the economy?
#14 to #13 - gliese (04/20/2013) [-]
no because youre using american money to pay for it. using $100 american for $100 dollars worth (american) of resupplied goods doesnt do anything just puts your balance back at $0. 100$ going out, then 100$ coming IN effectively puts you back at 0 . IF you sold those assets to CHINA then yes because they are paying you for these goods and Currency is not leaving it's coming in at no extra cost unlike your scenario.
User avatar #15 to #14 - noblexfenrir (04/20/2013) [-]
You have absolutely no idea what we are talking about do you?
#16 to #15 - gliese (04/20/2013) [-]
seems you dont if you think expenditures of Police, swat their equipment, EOD teams, gasoline actually puts money back into the economy. I actually took economics my first year of college so yes i do. Im not an world class economists but i do know a thing or two.
User avatar #17 to #16 - noblexfenrir (04/20/2013) [-]
Good but you would have realized I'm purely talking about the base economy of Boston itself. In which case 100$ of american money for 100$ of american goods but supplied from different states or even within the state itself can produce a increase in profit from basic utilization of each resource. You would be right if I was even remotely talking about what you were in the beginning, but I wasn't.
#18 to #17 - gliese (04/20/2013) [-]
it could but the expenditure (spending) of things like Police, SWAT, EOD, National guard gasoline for APC's cruisers, helicopters basically the man power they needed to find these guys does not put money back into the economy.
Your sentence in your first comment states "however the heavy expenditure of police and other related resources will put more than enough money back into the system"
you just said however the heavy spending (expenditure) of police and other related resources will put more than enough money back into the system.
No, it will not.
User avatar #19 to #18 - noblexfenrir (04/20/2013) [-]
In this specific case as I mentioned due to the overtime accrued by the police and emergency responders and resources expended that come from local sources, WILL put money back into the local economy.
#20 to #19 - gliese (04/20/2013) [-]
the officers spending their overtime will put money back in yes, i agree. But you said more than enough back in if you refer back to your first comment. These officers spending their overtime pay WILL NOT put more than enough money back into the economy. You think some guys spending a little overtime would of put Boston's GDP back up to where it would be had the bombs not gone off?
I rest my case for not knowing about economics and youre the one who seems not to know what he is talking about.
User avatar #21 to #20 - noblexfenrir (04/20/2013) [-]
I never said it would put them back up to where they were, I was simply saying it will account for a large enough portion to make the economic hit less damaging.
#22 to #21 - gliese (04/20/2013) [-]
some officers spending their overtime wont even really make a dent in the millions the city lost by being shut down for the past 2-3 days.
User avatar #23 to #22 - noblexfenrir (04/20/2013) [-]
They were only shut down for 1 day I believe and as I've said it's not just officers spending overtime. Resources utilized as I've said had a massive impact and other variables. The head of Loop Capital is quoted saying that the capital loss for the city is projected at, or very close to, Zero. With these reasonings and various others included in.
#24 to #23 - gliese (04/20/2013) [-]
the city was officially shut down for a 1 day manhunt but i dont think people did alot to help the economy like spending their money after the bombs went off. This whole week is a mini recession for the city of Boston.
Im just going top stop trying to explain this to you.
The city's economic loss is definitely not at zero or close too it and to think so after a terrorist bombed the marathon, the city being a literal ghost town for the past week and on top of that all the government spending that was used to make this manhunt a possibility is completely idiotic and naive
User avatar #26 to #24 - ctenop (04/20/2013) [-]
also just my two and eight, but most of the stuff will have been outsourced....In England you can't police where you live, my friend's dad in armed response has to get the train to London everyday. It is a shame they had to shut down all economic activities, one day sounds like little, but it has a lot of repercussions, and the money on the police will definitely be a loss to the area, as can a Chechnyan terrorist on the loose. Still, kudos that they actually found them.
User avatar #35 to #4 - EdwardNigma (04/20/2013) [-]
Money doesn't matter when justice is on the line.
#47 to #35 - hillbillypowpow (04/20/2013) [-]
says the riddler.
#37 to #35 - byposted (04/20/2013) [-]
It costed 500 million dollars for that whole episode and a civilian was the one who found the perp, not a pig.

500 MILLION DOLLARS.
#67 to #51 - deadpoolisgod (04/20/2013) [-]
I like you...
#70 to #67 - spazzin (04/20/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#39 to #37 - EdwardNigma (04/20/2013) [-]
Would you rather the guy be free?
To get away with murder and severe injury of many more? People lost their ******* limbs, others lost their lives.

I believe in justice. I believe in whats right. How can you give any hint of a **** about money in this case? Human life is such a glorious gift, by all odds we shouldn't be alive or where we are now, but we are. This man took that away from several people and ruined it for even more. I don't know a damn thing about politics, because I don't care, I'm on no side, I'm not even in America, so I don't see how I'm a liberal faggot for believing in whats right. People care too much for money.
#59 to #39 - icametocomment (04/20/2013) [-]
I need to be able to multi-thumb posts.
I need to be able to multi-thumb posts.
#75 to #37 - yomommabinshoppin (04/20/2013) [-]
This is a conservative asking this, but how does the desire for justice make you a liberal?
User avatar #101 to #75 - byposted (04/21/2013) [-]
Shutting down an entire city and basically enacting a low-form of martial law is not the proper thing to do if you're only LOOKING FOR ONE GUY.

The Police went into people's houses without warrants or permission in certain areas. They never found anybody and it costed the taxpayer $500,000,000
#104 to #101 - yomommabinshoppin (04/21/2013) [-]
also I want sources cited...
#103 to #101 - yomommabinshoppin (04/21/2013) [-]
Well, lets see, 500 million dollars, I am going to estimate that it would cost every citizen in the nation about 1.50, I think the people would be willing to donate a buck and a half to **** over an asshole that killed 5 people...
#79 to #44 - korben (04/21/2013) [-]
just found this very related
#48 to #44 - seananderson (04/20/2013) [-]
that would be the perfect comment if not for the joker though
#81 to #48 - jordanthebored (04/21/2013) [-]
its a scene from the film
#68 to #44 - cammyT (04/20/2013) [-]
so 			******		 true
so ****** true
#97 - anon (04/21/2013) [-]
They shut down everything in Boston, encouraged people to stay in doors, had police and FBI looking for the guy nonstop, and it still took them 4 days.

Meanwhile he's having shootouts with police officers and throwing bombs out the window....

Good job
-16
#126 - goldardeltaco has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #145 to #126 - rhiaanor (04/21/2013) [-]
4/10 you trolled 2 people.
0
#157 to #126 - garagesale **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #160 to #126 - danielph (04/26/2013) [-]
I believe he is saying that by committing such atrocious acts it is having a counter-productive effect on trying to spread their religion. If I understood his comment correctly, he is being sarcastic and those who believe he is "trolling" fail to see this, although I may be wrong.
#129 to #126 - clothesiron (04/21/2013) [-]
Are you mentally retarded?
User avatar #136 to #129 - sketchE (04/21/2013) [-]
dont feed the troll
-11
#130 to #129 - goldardeltaco has deleted their comment [-]
#133 to #126 - thetom (04/21/2013) [-]
and then you realize it was 2 angry russians and had nothing to do with the islamic religion....
and then you realize it was 2 angry russians and had nothing to do with the islamic religion....
User avatar #161 to #133 - danielph (04/26/2013) [-]
They were Muslim and were from a predominantly Muslim region.
-6
#146 to #133 - goldardeltaco has deleted their comment [-]
-6
#134 to #133 - goldardeltaco has deleted their comment [-]
[ 155 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)