Slavery is A-ok. Assuming you're a member of one of the three major western monotheistic religions... Man, Indiana Jones was a dick
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - martycamp ONLINE (04/15/2013) [-]
Man, Indiana Jones was a dick
#7 - ssurtrebor **User deleted account** (04/15/2013) [+] (25 replies)
This law is no longer in effect. A half hour of Google would tell you that, but...I guess that's too much work for atheists.
This law is no longer in effect. A half hour of Google would tell you that, but...I guess that's too much work for atheists.
#2 - binn (04/15/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Comment Picture
User avatar #9 - beanieman (04/15/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Correction: This the law in two of the three major monotheistic religions, Judaism, and Christianity. In Islam a slave owner can not strike his slave, if he does so he must give the slave his freedom. He must also share his food with the slave, clothe him well, and a slave can only be asked to work for a limited period of time (roughly 30-45 minutes) after his master has slept.
User avatar #20 - theotherdudec (04/16/2013) [-]
The original translation actually says Servant or Maid. JUST SAYING!
#51 - vitunhenkka (12/25/2013) [+] (2 replies)
actually we still own slaves,their not living so it's okay to own them before ********* starts i'm talking about cars,computers and any other technology
#30 - vissova has deleted their comment [-]
#29 - sabat **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (3 replies)
#28 - telmarine (04/16/2013) [+] (1 reply)
relijun is ghey
#31 to #28 - improbablyyourdad (04/16/2013) [-]
Religion shouldn't get a pass for criticism, if you don't like it, leave.
User avatar #27 - masdercheef (04/16/2013) [-]
Regardless of how right or wrong it is, or the fact that it's no longer in effect... how the hell did this make sense to anyone in the first place? It's literally the same thing except the slave / servant / maid / whatever the **** dies a couple days later. It's like saying if you kill someone by shooting them in the head and they die instantly, you are to be punished, but if you kill them by shooting them in the stomach and let them die over the course of a week, you're innocent. Not stirring up **** , but legitimately wondering what the point behind this is.
#25 - masdercheef has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #24 - elyiia (04/16/2013) [-]
Why is there a need for distinction of the gender of the slave?
#16 - dahtzz (04/16/2013) [-]
"religious debates"

also pic slightly related
#5 - mayormilkman has deleted their comment [-]
#3 - anonymous (04/15/2013) [+] (1 reply)
You shouldnt compare these quotes to today.
This was the first law, where a master could be punished for harming his slave,
so compared to those times, it was a good law
#14 - selfdenyingbeggar (04/15/2013) [-]
Future humans will wonder how we thought it was ok to live as mind slaves just as we wonder about negros.
 Friends (0)