Logic?

#1 - splendiddust

Reply +32 123456789123345869

(04/14/2013) [-]

well of course not homosexuals are disgusting abominations while lesbian porn is okay to fap over

#11 to #1 - theschmidt

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(04/14/2013) [-]

Just because people like doing it, doesn't make it right.

Just food for thought

#3 to #1 - drastronomy

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(04/14/2013) [-]

2 people did not understand irony
'
+1 for you

#6 to #3 - lieutenantshitface **User deleted account**

+7 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#15 to #3 - mayormilkman

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(04/14/2013) [-]

That's not irony, that's sarcasm.

#27 to #15 - drastronomy

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(04/15/2013) [-]

The definition is debatable

Sarcasm is "a sharp, bitter, or cutting expression or remark; a bitter gibe or taunt",[1] usually conveyed through irony or understatement.[2] Most authorities distinguish sarcasm from irony;[3] however, others argue that sarcasm may or often does involve irony[4] or employs ambivalence.[5]

Irony (from the Ancient Greek εἰρωνεία eirōneía, meaning dissimulation or feigned ignorance)[1], in its broadest sense, is a rhetorical device, literary technique, or event characterized by an incongruity, or contrast, between reality (what is) and appearance (what seems to be). It is further defined into three major categories: verbal, dramatic, and situational.
Verbal Irony[2] is an incongruity between what is said and what is meant.
Dramatic Irony is an incongruity between what a character in a work of fiction believes to be true and what the audience knows to be true.
Situational Irony is an "incongruity between the actual result of a sequence of events and the normal, [intended], or expected result."[3]
The discordance of verbal irony may be deliberately created as a means of communication (as in art or rhetoric). Dramatic irony communicated the importance of a particular truth by portraying a person who is strikingly unaware of it, emphasizing a percieved truth. Descriptions or depictions of situational irony, whether in fiction or in non-fiction, serve the communicative function of sharpening or highlighting certain discordant features of reality. Verbal, dramatic, and situational irony are often used for emphasis in the assertion of a truth. The ironic form of simile, used in sarcasm, and some forms of litotes emphasize one's meaning by the deliberate use of language which states the opposite of the truth — or drastically and obviously understates a factual connection.

#9 - anon id: e0581e9e

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(04/14/2013) [-]

That logic is so flawed, it made me puke.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not christian, and I couldn't care less about what homosexuals do ones with others as far as they don't mess with me. And I don't care for a fetus life (or a newborn, or any of you for that matter).
But while the "right" to marry is defended by one side and denied by the other, they both claim to support the "right" to life. That is the issue the OP was talking about, by considering a fetus is alredy a person, while others consider it's not. The rapport with marriage is none.
"I forgot to logic" - Daniel Velasquez
(Also, you yankees need to stop being bigots, and learn some respect and tolerance).

#18 to #9 - StormEagle

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(04/14/2013) [-]

your last line has been made invalid

#10 to #9 - hargleblarg

Reply +6 123456789123345869

(04/14/2013) [-]

Because clearly only Americans are intolerant...

#4 - beren

Reply +5 123456789123345869

(04/14/2013) [-]

Yeah, because all Republicans want to execute homosexuals.

#20 to #4 - zyketor

0 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#25 to #20 - beren

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(04/15/2013) [-]

Then I say the same thing for Rick Santorum alone. There's a difference between the right to life and the right to get married. Say what you want about how important the latter is, the truth is that the two will never compare.

#26 to #25 - zyketor

0 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#13 to #4 - notthistime

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(04/14/2013) [-]

hes not implying that for every republican, but you do realize that is rick santorum right?

#22 - redclover

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(04/14/2013) [-]

>respect

What has a fetus ever done that's worthy of respect?
Float around inside a womb and slowly form into a humanoid shape?
Big deal, literally every person on Earth has done that.

#5 - anon id: 7e1a6f07

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(04/14/2013) [-]

There's a difference between prejudice and killing babies. Just saying.

#19 to #5 - poiklman

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(04/14/2013) [-]

Semen isn't human life so neither is useless fetal mush.

#21 to #19 - theist

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(04/14/2013) [-]

I'm kinda neutral, neither pro choice or pro life, I'd just like to point out a fetus is more than just semen. A lot more, that's something you can't deny.

#12 - anon id: 95ff2587

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(04/14/2013) [-]

Every person gay or not has the equal right to marry someone of the opposite sex...

#16 to #12 - anon id: 1b868f26

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(04/14/2013) [-]

The point just flew over your head.

#24 to #12 - galkawhm

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(04/14/2013) [-]

Just like 60 years ago when blacks had the right to their own drinking fountain like whites.

#17 - ronyx

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(04/14/2013) [-]

Oh my, the anons are quite rowdy today.

#14 - bitchplzzz

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(04/14/2013) [-]

#8 - anon id: 6f2598b4

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(04/14/2013) [-]

His tweets only go back as far as April 5, 2012.

#2 - anon id: 837132fd

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(04/14/2013) [-]

This is nothing but ******* ignorant ******** "logic" that makes people sound rational when they're being goddamn ******* pretentious cock-sucking idiots.
Let's ******* break it down, cunts:
Santorum's claim is basically saying that being alive is sufficient criteria for basic dignity, respect, and protection to be deserved, and that an unborn child meets that criteria and so deserves life (a "basic dignity.")
Then this ******* comes along and says that if humans deserve life, the same logic proves that homosexuals deserve marriage (or any privilege that's exclusively denied to homosexuals.) That's ******** logic. It's like Santorum says "If A, then B" and this ******** says, "well if that's true, then if C, then D." Life's a natural right, marriage is a positive political right that's GIVEN to people, and there's no relationship between the two syllogisms.
This kind of ignorant *********** is perpetuating pseudo-logical ******** like this and making idiocy sound rational.

#7 to #2 - anon id: 28c995be

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(04/14/2013) [-]

Man, you shot so far off target you just got your gun license revoked. You're even better at reading things that were never said into a simple conversation, than my wife.

"Daniel"s response was snappy, cruel and funny and a shot at prejudice, not abortion (for or against.)

Did he mention marriage at all, you halfwit? No, that was your mind-friend making up things that never were even implied. 2/10 for making me smirk enough to answer you. But write "****" and "cunt" some more and people will surely give you the recognition you deserve.

here's the tags.