Logic?. here's the tags.. Rick Santorum l Rick% we rum An unborn child is a human life, and like every one of us, worthy of basic dignity, respect and protectio
Home Funny Pictures YouTube Funny Videos Funny GIFs Text/Links Channels Search


here's the tags.

Rick Santorum l Rick% we rum
An unborn child is a human life, and like every one of us, worthy of
basic dignity, respect and protection.
1: 33 PM- 27 Liar 12 via Details
in Reply " Retweet * Favorite
Daniel Velasquez c'.. id in A - Close
so are , but I shot see you respecting them or
their rights. Mu strayan
EEG At, via was . Details
Views: 15963
Favorited: 33
Submitted: 04/13/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to martbeast E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Anonymous commenting is allowed
User avatar #23 - lordhaha (04/14/2013) [-]
Hur dur believing in something that liberals do not means you have no logic hurp derp
User avatar #22 - redclover (04/14/2013) [-]

What has a fetus ever done that's worthy of respect?
Float around inside a womb and slowly form into a humanoid shape?
Big deal, literally every person on Earth has done that.
#17 - ronyx (04/14/2013) [-]
Oh my, the anons are quite rowdy today.
#12 - anonymous (04/14/2013) [-]
Every person gay or not has the equal right to marry someone of the opposite sex...
User avatar #24 to #12 - galkawhm (04/14/2013) [-]
Just like 60 years ago when blacks had the right to their own drinking fountain like whites.
#16 to #12 - anonymous (04/14/2013) [-]
The point just flew over your head.
#9 - anonymous (04/14/2013) [-]
That logic is so flawed, it made me puke.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not christian, and I couldn't care less about what homosexuals do ones with others as far as they don't mess with me. And I don't care for a fetus life (or a newborn, or any of you for that matter).
But while the "right" to marry is defended by one side and denied by the other, they both claim to support the "right" to life. That is the issue the OP was talking about, by considering a fetus is alredy a person, while others consider it's not. The rapport with marriage is none.
"I forgot to logic" - Daniel Velasquez
(Also, you yankees need to stop being bigots, and learn some respect and tolerance).
#18 to #9 - StormEagle (04/14/2013) [-]
your last line has been made invalid
#10 to #9 - hargleblarg ONLINE (04/14/2013) [-]
Because clearly only Americans are intolerant...
#8 - anonymous (04/14/2013) [-]
His tweets only go back as far as April 5, 2012.
#5 - anonymous (04/14/2013) [-]
There's a difference between prejudice and killing babies. Just saying.
User avatar #19 to #5 - poiklman (04/14/2013) [-]
Semen isn't human life so neither is useless fetal mush.
User avatar #21 to #19 - theist (04/14/2013) [-]
I'm kinda neutral, neither pro choice or pro life, I'd just like to point out a fetus is more than just semen. A lot more, that's something you can't deny.
User avatar #4 - beren (04/14/2013) [-]
Yeah, because all Republicans want to execute homosexuals.
#20 to #4 - zyketor has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #25 to #20 - beren (04/15/2013) [-]
Then I say the same thing for Rick Santorum alone. There's a difference between the right to life and the right to get married. Say what you want about how important the latter is, the truth is that the two will never compare.
#26 to #25 - zyketor has deleted their comment [-]
#13 to #4 - notthistime (04/14/2013) [-]
hes not implying that for every republican, but you do realize that is rick santorum right?
#2 - anonymous (04/14/2013) [-]
This is nothing but ******* ignorant ******** "logic" that makes people sound rational when they're being goddamn ******* pretentious cock-sucking idiots.
Let's ******* break it down, ***** :
Santorum's claim is basically saying that being alive is sufficient criteria for basic dignity, respect, and protection to be deserved, and that an unborn child meets that criteria and so deserves life (a "basic dignity.")
Then this ******* comes along and says that if humans deserve life, the same logic proves that homosexuals deserve marriage (or any privilege that's exclusively denied to homosexuals.) That's ******** logic. It's like Santorum says "If A, then B" and this ******** says, "well if that's true, then if C, then D." Life's a natural right, marriage is a positive political right that's GIVEN to people, and there's no relationship between the two syllogisms.
This kind of ignorant *********** is perpetuating pseudo-logical ******** like this and making idiocy sound rational.
#7 to #2 - anonymous (04/14/2013) [-]
Man, you shot so far off target you just got your gun license revoked. You're even better at reading things that were never said into a simple conversation, than my wife.

"Daniel"s response was snappy, cruel and funny and a shot at prejudice, not abortion (for or against.)

Did he mention marriage at all, you halfwit? No, that was your mind-friend making up things that never were even implied. 2/10 for making me smirk enough to answer you. But write " **** " and " **** " some more and people will surely give you the recognition you deserve.
User avatar #1 - splendiddust ONLINE (04/14/2013) [-]
well of course not homosexuals are disgusting abominations while ******* porn is okay to fap over
User avatar #11 to #1 - theschmidt (04/14/2013) [-]
Just because people like doing it, doesn't make it right.

Just food for thought
User avatar #3 to #1 - drastronomy ONLINE (04/14/2013) [-]
2 people did not understand irony
+1 for you
User avatar #15 to #3 - mayormilkman (04/14/2013) [-]
That's not irony, that's sarcasm.
User avatar #27 to #15 - drastronomy ONLINE (04/15/2013) [-]
The definition is debatable

Sarcasm is "a sharp, bitter, or cutting expression or remark; a bitter gibe or taunt",[1] usually conveyed through irony or understatement.[2] Most authorities distinguish sarcasm from irony;[3] however, others argue that sarcasm may or often does involve irony[4] or employs ambivalence.[5]

Irony (from the Ancient Greek εἰρωνεία eirōneía, meaning dissimulation or feigned ignorance)[1], in its broadest sense, is a rhetorical device, literary technique, or event characterized by an incongruity, or contrast, between reality (what is) and appearance (what seems to be). It is further defined into three major categories: verbal, dramatic, and situational.
Verbal Irony[2] is an incongruity between what is said and what is meant.
Dramatic Irony is an incongruity between what a character in a work of fiction believes to be true and what the audience knows to be true.
Situational Irony is an "incongruity between the actual result of a sequence of events and the normal, [intended], or expected result."[3]
The discordance of verbal irony may be deliberately created as a means of communication (as in art or rhetoric). Dramatic irony communicated the importance of a particular truth by portraying a person who is strikingly unaware of it, emphasizing a percieved truth. Descriptions or depictions of situational irony, whether in fiction or in non-fiction, serve the communicative function of sharpening or highlighting certain discordant features of reality. Verbal, dramatic, and situational irony are often used for emphasis in the assertion of a truth. The ironic form of simile, used in sarcasm, and some forms of litotes emphasize one's meaning by the deliberate use of language which states the opposite of the truth — or drastically and obviously understates a factual connection.
#6 to #3 - lieutenantshitface **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
 Friends (0)