Login or register
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
User avatar #53 - slatersniper
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/14/2013) [-]
You aren't Persian. You're Iranian.
#65 to #53 - MikeyA
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/14/2013) [-]
No it's Persians. I'm Persian. I don't call myself an Iranian. Persians started calling themselves Iranians after the country started to become Islamic, I'm not Islamic and the Islamic state is a piece of ****. You can suck my hairy PERSIAN cock if you think you're right.
User avatar #84 to #65 - slatersniper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/16/2013) [-]
Yeah you're Iranian.
User avatar #78 to #65 - thatoneiranianguy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/14/2013) [-]

Actually the land of Iran has been titled as Persian by western nations forever until lately.

Around the late 30's is when the Iranian government started demanding that western nations call the land "Iran" which is "Land of Aryans" if they want to open negotiations. Most of the locals called it Iran.

Iran is made up of many peoples. From Persians to Arabs to Kurds. To Muslims to Christians to Jews. Hell even Zoroastrians. All from the Indo-Iranian branch of Aryans. There's a reason it's called Iran and the people that live under it are Iranians. Because Iran is not Persian, it's not Muslim, it's not Arabic, it's not Jewish. It's Aryan. We are a people united and that's why we're the most stable in the middle east.

Fellow Persian-Iranian standing bye. Although I do agree with you, the Islamic State's government sucks massive balls. However its the only reason the U.S. hasn't walked in there yet and taken it over. There's a reason the Islamic Republic was created, I suggest you research it.
#82 to #78 - MikeyA
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/15/2013) [-]
It's personal preference honestly. I like calling myself Persian, it's what Persians called themselves before they ****** up. It sounds better too.

But you're saying that if Iran wasn't an Islamic state the US would march on in there and take it over? Now that isn't true. It wouldn't matter if it was a Jewish state, Christian state, or whatever the US wouldn't take a country over lol it isn't the 1500's where everyone is trying to conquer each other. We have the UN to regulate us all who participate in it.

The Islamic state was created merely because the stupid people fell for Khomeni's lies. I don't know if you have Ahmadinejad face as you're profile picture to support him or what...but if that's the reason you're hurting your people supporting him. I'm sickend by their regime.
User avatar #83 to #82 - thatoneiranianguy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/15/2013) [-]
Apologies for very late reply.

But, it's not that I don't call myself Persian. I specify what "type" of Iranian I am. Because I strongly believe in the whole unity thing.

As for having Ahmadinejad as my profile pictures, that's just for ***** and giggles really. When it comes down to it just like with any leader I see good ideas and bad ideas. Mahmoud is by no means a good guy but he does have SOME good ideas.

As for the U.S. I strongly do believe that the that the current regime is a strong and good influence in the middle east. It's taking a forefront against the U.S.' meddling in the Middle East for proxy control. For instance look at Libya and Syria, the rebels are trained by the CIA (when was a common practice against the Soviets in the Soviet-Afghan War in the 70's) and the FSA in Syria are even carrying around NATO weaponry.

There was a political shift/coup in the US government since '63 and the new one has since then made plans to destabilize the Middle East in order to take control. Because it's no secret we've funded dictators in the past for a dollar-zone trade for natural resources.

The government needs to be changed in the U.S. before the Iranian government becomes lenient to start opening up more.

That's just my personal opinion, but more to the point is I dont like the regime any more than you do. However the Shah sucked aswell. Iran/Persia before the Shah was best Iran.